| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
server
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:51 pm Post subject: *** Adam and Eve: Who Sinned First? - Chuck Runs From Proof |
 |
|
| message unavailable |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
JohnH
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject: Re: Introducing....Doctor Dahesh: The Miracle-Working Prophe |
|
|
On Jul 17, 3:07 pm, Darrick <darrick_even...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | http://daheshist.angelfire.com/
|
All you've done is traded one cult for another. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
JohnH
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: Re: A Daheshist View of SEX............... |
|
|
On Jul 13, 8:58 pm, Darrick <darrick_even...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | http://daheshist.angelfire.com/SEX.html
|
All you've done is traded one cult for another. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Thirsty Thetan
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: Re: A Daheshist View of SEX............... |
|
|
On Jul 18, 9:39 am, JohnH <johnhenne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Jul 13, 8:58 pm, Darrick <darrick_even...@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://daheshist.angelfire.com/SEX.html
All you've done is traded one cult for another.
|
Be careful. Darrick might have to stop communicating with you.
Hey, Darrick, I'm still butthurt since you told me you could no longer
talk to me about your retarded religious leanings.
Hail Xenu, Seth, Joseph Smith and Dahesh!
TT |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: Re: Big Bad U.S.A. |
|
|
On Jul 18, 2:13 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | You are repeating hearsay.
You personally have no knowledge of that.
|
Yeah, I "personally" do.
| Quote: | Use your head for a change. You truly need to get past this notion
that anything you're not personally aware of isn't happening or isn't
true.
|
Projecting. You musta heard that from your therapist recently.
| Quote: | For example, I asked you SEVERAL questions about my rebate check.
You didn't have the answers.
|
How could I? Moreover, I didn't say that I did. *You* did, however,
as a snide aside.
| Quote: | Likely, you don't have all the answers about our military's access
to civilian medical care.
|
Of course I don't. Neither do you. That wasn't the point, however -
the point is whether or not military personnel can receive civilian
medical care if they choose to. If they do, however, unless they have
Tricare or Champus, it will be a totally out-of-pocket expense not
covered by the U.S. Government. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Pastor Dave
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: Re: God finds homosexual *activity* an abomination |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:43:48 +0100, "A Watcher"
<awatcher@word.com> spake thusly:
| Quote: | No, Leviticus is speaking of anal sex in the context
of demeaning a male to become like a female.
Maybe in a corrupted mind, but not to the level-headed.
|
It's true, since that is what anal sex does in this case.
I understand that there are heterosexual couples who
perform this act, which is why I said "in this case".
In the case of heterosexual couples, there is already
no question that one of them is female. :)
--
http://www.creationists.org/ervin.html
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Zadok
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: Re: *** ADAM & EVE: THE PASSAGE THAT CHUCK DELETES! *** |
|
|
"colp" <> wrote in message ...
| Quote: | Rather than address the specifics of Pastor Dave's argument with
Chuck, I'd like to comment on the context.
Original sin is a Pauline Doctrine.
Some posters, myself included, claim that Paul was a false apostle.
According to Ebionite tradition Paul was the rejected suitor of the
daughter of a High Priest.
Paul reccomended celibacy, and taught that women should be submissive.
The issue of "Who sinned first" looks to me like a gender battle.
Symbolically, the equal armed cross represents the intersection of
male and female energies.
|
There are more and more of us all the time, that reject Saulus (Paul)
the apostate.
The most interesting thing about the bible, is it does not mention Saulus,
except in Paul's own writings and those of his follower Luke.
Of course that is rejecting the FAKE 2 Peter.
Jesus warned us about Paul, when he said imposters would come in his name
and decieve many.
Smile. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bert Hyman
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: Re: NRA & VIRGINIA: USA's Gun Central! |
|
|
crimenewscenter@gmail.com (Bo Raxo) wrote in
news:apSdndFyQo-KIOLVnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@comcast.com:
| Quote: | "NapalmHeart" <olsonfamNOSPAM@iserv.net> wrote in message
news:XuWdnaRYAZiqFOPVnZ2dnUVZ_vninZ2d@posted.eaglecomputertechnology.
It seems that free speech is not respected at Emanuel College. I
have to wonder how many other rights they don't care for on that
campus.
Apparently you think "free speech" means you can say anything you
want at work and your employer can't fire you for it. How insane.
|
However, members of the chattering classes have 'til now always
supported their idea of "academic freedom", which allows professors
and instructors to say or do anything in their classes, regardless of
how outrageous they might be, without fear of repercussion.
Why the change of heart for this single incident?
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rod
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: Re: Big Bad U.S.A. |
|
|
john w <j wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:56:27 -0500, Rod <nospam@noway.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <j wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:18:13 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@noospam.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:g7ln74d8smsvka9pehcuuragqq62a21098@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:31:28 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@noospam.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
It was Craig R. Smith who wrote it not Jay Leno. Good stuff.
Interesting! So you are saying that vernon got the source wrong,
but all he gets is a "It was Craig R Smith... not Jay Leno. Good
stuff!"
If I had named the source wrong, there would be a LONG line of people
telling me what an idiot I am!
But not vern!
If you had of named the
If you had of...?
Where did you learn English?
You don't need the "of".
" If you had named the "
wrong source and it was pointed out to you your
response would be that I am trying to castrate you,
Stupid person. Listen up. It's not the correcting that's
objectionable. There are people in here who correct me and who don't
insult me while they're doing it.
For instance:
John, you gave the wrong source.
"You're wrong, as usual!"
that I am a bitch and to
tell me to stfu.
You are a bitch.
Why do you have to use that term to describe her ?
Why not? It's a derogatory term that suits her.
If she can call me "short bus", I can call her "bitch."
|
Given, she's a woman with an insulting mouth, that I"ll never
question, but a bitch she isn't. I'm simply glad that she likes you
well enough to insult you, besides...you don't need to be upset about
the "short bus" thing, it's only an insult and a cheap shot. Surely
you're a bigger man than to stoop down to her level ? And why would
you care so much about such a little thing as an insult ?
She cannot speak without insulting you, John ! It's been about the
abuse, not about you personally ! Some of the people are every bit as
sick as what they say you and I are, the only difference being we know
and admit it and they won't !
I would just encourage you to turn a deaf ear to their insults and
ignore them. I can promise you that your life will be the better for
doing it, mine has been. Sure, they will trash you when your back is
turned, but look what that says about them to the world ! What a
reputation they get from doing that.
What goes around will eventually find it's way back to them, you just
have to be patient. When you stop responding to their garbage they will
find someone else to trash for their fun. A pro in the field of
psychology recently explained to me that abuse is like a drug, once they
get into doing it they can't stop, they become addicted to giving it and
getting it.
Besides John, the truth is that you're only a "short bus" if you
believe all the cheap shots are true !
You're not retarded John, you're very intelligent, but I seeing you
bending under the weight of the harm they are causing you. Turn them off
and get your life back ! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
John Henry
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:34 pm Post subject: Re: Big Bad U.S.A. |
|
|
Stormin Mormon wrote:
| Quote: | You really should sending useless internet legends, and wasting our time.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/hitnail.asp
You, a Mormon in ARCB, and it's "our time?" In no wise. |
2Co 11:3 But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his
craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is
in Christ.
Gal 1:8 But even if we, or an angel from Heaven, preach any other gospel
to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Al Smith
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: Re: *** Adam and Eve: Who Sinned First? - Chuck Runs From Pr |
|
|
| Quote: | On Jul 18, 12:27 pm, Al Smith <inva...@address.com> wrote:
Where do you read IN THAT STORY that the serpent was "a superior being"?
"Now the serpent was the shrewdest of all the wild beasts" (Gen. 3:1 JPS
TANAKH). There is NOTHING aabout any "Satan" in the entire story!
Satan means adversary. The serpent acted in an adversarial manner
towards Eve.
The serpent helped Eve by showing her the way to gnosis.
That depends on how you define gnosis, which is a term which is
notoriously difficulty to pin down.
IMO the central problem with gnosis is that limited knowledge may
convey meaning that is different to the meaning that is conveyed when
the full context is known.
What this means in the context of the story of the garden is that it
would have been better for Eve to understand the wider context first
by first understanding the fullness of life. Thus the tree of life was
not forbidden, but the ideal of free will meant that it was not
recommended.
|
So what you're saying is that it would have been better for Eve to
have had knowledge before she took the step to acquire knowledge. A
bit of a conundrum for her, don't you think? In order to acquire
knowledge, she must first have knowledge? God's other name must have
been Heller.
-Al- |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:52 pm Post subject: Re: I Just Saw Nick Cage's "The Weatherman" I'm Wondering If |
|
|
On Jul 18, 10:54 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | I asked you a question. How does your behavior show your love.
INSTEAD, you -- AGAIN-- point your finger at SOMEONE ELSE.
"Forget that I just committed murder!" Look at THAT guy over
THERE!"
You refuse to be responsible. You "step down" to the level you
criticize.
I can't recall the last time (1980? 1970?) you explained
yourself!
And with that last comment, you are doing exactly what you have
accused Cathy of doing. You said: "INSTEAD, you -- AGAIN-- point
your finger at SOMEONE ELSE" and then you end your post with you
pointing your finger at Cathy and saying: "I can't recall the last
time (1980? 1970?) you explained yourself!"
Do you see the irony, double-standard and hypocrisy here, John?
Do you see the irony of you leaping into a discussion I'm having
with someone ELSE?
|
I guess then, that your answer is "no, I don't see the irony, double-
standard and hypocrisy here".
In addition to not seeing the irony, double-standard and hypocrisy,
you will now again accuse in the same manner after complaining about
being accused:
| Quote: | AND, you point at me for "not answering."
Yet, Kelly, I can't recall the last time YOU answered a question!
You have asked me probably 50 qusetions in the last few months; you
haven't ANSWERED EVEN ONE question.
|
See? Complete with "finger pointing", you have now, again, done
exactly that which you can't stand being done to you.
And you still don't see the irony, double-standard, and hypocrisy in
that? Hmmm...
No. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
NOSPAM
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: Big Bad U.S.A. |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:22:56 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: permission DENIED
|
| Quote: | On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:31:57 -0400, NOSPAM <nospam@nospam> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:09:55 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
When you stop acting like a crazy person, people will stop calling
you Insane Elaine.
You are the only idiot who does, liar-johnnie.
Doesn't matter if one person calls you that, or if 50 call you that.
There may be only one person YOU KNOW OF, who does,
but you are called "Insane Elaine."
And I just laugh at it
every time.
Sure you do. "You just laugh!"
Sure you do!
Insane Elaine!
^ ^ ^^ It fits!
Sure, sure, liar-johnnie - insane liar-johnnie, the queen liar of |
Usenet........... go take your meds. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
NOSPAM
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:32 pm Post subject: Re: Big Bad U.S.A. |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:48:27 -0400, ujb <ujb@bigfoot.com> wrote:
| Quote: | john w <j wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:31:57 -0400, NOSPAM <nospam@nospam> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:09:55 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
When you stop acting like a crazy person, people will stop calling
you Insane Elaine.
You are the only idiot who does, liar-johnnie.
Doesn't matter if one person calls you that, or if 50 call you that.
There may be only one person YOU KNOW OF, who does,
but you are called "Insane Elaine."
but now you are a celebrity like Madonna, or Liberace or even Oprah and
Cher, we say one name, shortbus and everyone knows you! I've made you
famous papa porn!
luv,
sweet sweet
|
Yes-- you're simply too nice to short bus, Sweet-Sweet! :O) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
NOSPAM
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: Re: Big Bad U.S.A. |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:40:33 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> whined:
Doesn't matter if one person calls you that, or if 50 call you that.
There may be only one person YOU KNOW OF, who does,
but you are called "Insane Elaine."
Only by you and you're a loon suffering from mental illness and/or brain
damage. How much do you think such an opinion is worth?
|
Poor old liar-johnnie! He makes a bigger fool of himself every day! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
