| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:15 pm Post subject: Re: ARD |
 |
|
On Aug 15, 11:48 pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
I'll donate my half point to SLYG, the society for the liberation of yard
gnomes or alternatively the GLF, the gnome liberation front.
We're not impressed with the performance of YGLN, the yard gnome's
liberation network and GOWU/gnomes of the world united is an all out
scam anyway, so beware.
|
0- 10
Mum |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Kent
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:17 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 15, 3:48 pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
I'll donate my half point to SLYG, the society for the liberation of yard
gnomes or alternatively the GLF, the gnome liberation front.
We're not impressed with the performance of YGLN, the yard gnome's
liberation network and GOWU/gnomes of the world united is an all out
scam anyway, so beware.
|
A gnome is a terrible thing to waste... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kent
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
|
Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
four way tie!
Not that it means a pile of dung either way... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
1X2Willows
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:09 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
"Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
|
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
1X2Willows
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:09 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
"stonehengeio" <stonehengers@googlemail.com> wrote
| Quote: | Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
|
I'll donate my half point to SLYG, the society for the liberation of yard
gnomes or alternatively the GLF, the gnome liberation front.
We're not impressed with the performance of YGLN, the yard gnome's
liberation network and GOWU/gnomes of the world united is an all out
scam anyway, so beware. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kent
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:39 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 15, 5:50 pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone?
|
Just need the chips, there's plenty of "dips" here already... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 16, 1:50 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone?
|
Don't be so zilly Then again...As You have claimed in the past to
have, "just" realized the"zillyness" of what "you" have said.
My advice would be to think before you waffle.
Many well known and respected authors from the past, and some that
are alive now, have appalling spelling skills.
Thats why they use proof readers on the documents before printing.
oh bye the way for your own future reference its spelt "silliness".
I realise you are concerned re my spelling of names, and overjoyed
because you think that i am bothered by
your observation. Well i am not, you plainly understood my post and
that's good enough for me.
Mum.
0 out of 10
PS we call them nicknames, but as I love the way you switched it
around, i think i will be using the term "namenicks" in future as i
find it very amusing, thanks. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Archdruid Michael McGrath
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:38 pm Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 16, 12:53 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 1:50 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
"Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone?
Don't be so zilly Then again...As You have claimed in the past to
have, "just" realized the"zillyness" of what "you" have said.
My advice would be to think before you waffle.
Many well known and respected authors from the past, and some that
are alive now, have appalling spelling skills.
Thats why they use proof readers on the documents before printing.
oh bye the way for your own future reference its spelt "silliness".
I realise you are concerned re my spelling of names, and overjoyed
because you think that i am bothered by
your observation. Well i am not, you plainly understood my post and
that's good enough for me.
Mum.
0 out of 10
PS we call them nicknames, but as I love the way you switched it
around, i think i will be using the term "namenicks" in future as i
find it very amusing, thanks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Not to worry, Einstein's spelling wasn't all that great either ! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Archdruid Michael McGrath
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:10 pm Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 16, 1:38 pm, Archdruid Michael McGrath of Ireland
<PhotographerOfKilke...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 12:53 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 1:50 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
"Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone?
Don't be so zilly Then again...As You have claimed in the past to
have, "just" realized the"zillyness" of what "you" have said.
My advice would be to think before you waffle.
Many well known and respected authors from the past, and some that
are alive now, have appalling spelling skills.
Thats why they use proof readers on the documents before printing.
oh bye the way for your own future reference its spelt "silliness".
I realise you are concerned re my spelling of names, and overjoyed
because you think that i am bothered by
your observation. Well i am not, you plainly understood my post and
that's good enough for me.
Mum.
0 out of 10
PS we call them nicknames, but as I love the way you switched it
around, i think i will be using the term "namenicks" in future as i
find it very amusing, thanks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not to worry, Einstein's spelling wasn't all that great either
|
And Yeats' handwriting is virtually indechipherable, I know, I held
his papers concerning The Celtic Order of Mysteries, never published,
so I had and have first access to his mystic writings, the only Druid
who has. !- Hide quoted text -
| Quote: |
- Show quoted text - |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Searles O'Dubhain
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:44 pm Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
"Archdruid Michael McGrath of Ireland" <PhotographerOfKilkenny@gmail.com>
wrote in message
news:4188e536-86e1-4bda-b778-621c057363e4@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 16, 1:38 pm, Archdruid Michael McGrath of Ireland
<PhotographerOfKilke...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 12:53 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 1:50 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
"Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine
names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone?
Don't be so zilly Then again...As You have claimed in the past to
have, "just" realized the"zillyness" of what "you" have said.
My advice would be to think before you waffle.
Many well known and respected authors from the past, and some that
are alive now, have appalling spelling skills.
Thats why they use proof readers on the documents before printing.
oh bye the way for your own future reference its spelt "silliness".
I realise you are concerned re my spelling of names, and overjoyed
because you think that i am bothered by
your observation. Well i am not, you plainly understood my post and
that's good enough for me.
Mum.
0 out of 10
PS we call them nicknames, but as I love the way you switched it
around, i think i will be using the term "namenicks" in future as i
find it very amusing, thanks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not to worry, Einstein's spelling wasn't all that great either
|
And Yeats' handwriting is virtually indechipherable, I know, I held
his papers concerning The Celtic Order of Mysteries, never published,
so I had and have first access to his mystic writings, the only Druid
who has. !- Hide quoted text -
| Quote: |
- Show quoted text -
|
I'd be interested in hearing excerpts from this unpublished work by Yeats.
Searles O'Dubhain |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 16, 2:10 pm, Archdruid Michael McGrath of Ireland
<PhotographerOfKilke...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 1:38 pm, Archdruid Michael McGrath of Ireland
PhotographerOfKilke...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 12:53 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 1:50 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
"Kent" wrote
On Aug 15, 2:58 pm, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Ok,
here are the scores for the- is ard
deceased thread.
Niodin 0 out of 10
kent 0 "
Stacy 0 "
Willow x 1/2 "
Elain 2 "
Jim 2 "
Root 3 "
Michael 6 "
Searls 10 "
Mum
: Now that Dan donated his point to the gneedy gnomes home, we have a
: four way tie!
:
: Not that it means a pile of dung either way...
Considering that the idiot can't even spell six out of nine names/nicks
right... Whaddya' expect! :-D
We got us a real champion here. Chips and dip anyone?
Don't be so zilly Then again...As You have claimed in the past to
have, "just" realized the"zillyness" of what "you" have said.
My advice would be to think before you waffle.
Many well known and respected authors from the past, and some that
are alive now, have appalling spelling skills.
Thats why they use proof readers on the documents before printing.
oh bye the way for your own future reference its spelt "silliness"..
I realise you are concerned re my spelling of names, and overjoyed
because you think that i am bothered by
your observation. Well i am not, you plainly understood my post and
that's good enough for me.
Mum.
0 out of 10
PS we call them nicknames, but as I love the way you switched it
around, i think i will be using the term "namenicks" in future as i
find it very amusing, thanks.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not to worry, Einstein's spelling wasn't all that great either
And Yeats' handwriting is virtually indechipherable, I know, I held
his papers concerning The Celtic Order of Mysteries, never published,
so I had and have first access to his mystic writings, the only Druid
who has. !- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
You should have run off with them, they would have been well on topic.
Mum |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:39 pm Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 16, 9:44 pm, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
oh bye the way for your own future reference its spelt "silliness".
Zou probably mean by the way not bye the way and the spelling
"zilliness" has been established as a tongue in cheek years ago.
PS we call them nicknames, but as I love the way you switched it
around, i think i will be using the term "namenicks" in future as i
find it very amusing, thanks.
Names and nicks / names n'nicks / names & nicks / names/nicks
Take your pick, Micky ;-)
http://groups.google.ch/groups/profile?hl=de&enc_user=lhaAF0AAAAC0ZCE....
|
Mum says,
No, I meant Bye. (bye way) (byway (bye the way) (by the way).
"Half half, kif kif, same same".
It was deliberate and correct.
As for Zillie being established as a tongue in cheek years ago.
Fine.
However its NOT how you spell "silliness".
its incorrect.
As you plainly want to be a spell checker, consider your self hired,
although i will sack you if you want to elevate yourself into a debate
"about" peoples spelling.
I find it amusing that you googled me.
Try the profile on this group, its bigger and not in German like your
link.
Plainly i am a male called micky.
I note that you scored my enquiry to Google general as poor.
According to that score i should have got no reply, I got 7.
All understood my query and were able to help me.
Not one of them was a spell checker, how refreshing.
bye the way(GRIN) "Mum" is not my namenick,
its my title.
I am also known as "Mummick"
Mum. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 17, 12:54 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
[....]
I note that you scored my enquiry to Google general as poor.
No I did not. Someone else enlightened must have taken care of that one.
The rest of your comments is undeserving of a response, so... Ciao Stronzo.
|
I believe you, Honest.(LOL)
Mum. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:47 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 17, 1:17 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: | "stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
On Aug 17, 12:54 am, "1X2Willows" wrote:
"stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
[....]
I note that you scored my enquiry to Google general as poor.
No I did not. Someone else enlightened must have taken care of that one..
The rest of your comments is undeserving of a response, so... Ciao
Stronzo.
: I believe you, Honest.(LOL)
: Mum.
Glad we got that settled, Micky. Now why don't you go on and provide
Searles with the answer he was asking for, about that Yeats thing.
|
I am Not Mr Michael Mc Grath.
My name is Michael James.
As for you turning Searles stated desire into a question.
Perhaps you should look up the word "Held" paying particular attention
to the tense.
Its "Past".
Mum. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stonehengeio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:52 am Post subject: Re: ARD |
|
|
On Aug 17, 1:47 am, stonehengeio <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 17, 1:17 am, "1X2Willows" <nos...@least.invalid> wrote:
"stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
On Aug 17, 12:54 am, "1X2Willows" wrote:
"stonehengeio" <stoneheng...@googlemail.com> wrote
[....]
I note that you scored my enquiry to Google general as poor.
No I did not. Someone else enlightened must have taken care of that one.
The rest of your comments is undeserving of a response, so... Ciao
Stronzo.
: I believe you, Honest.(LOL)
: Mum.
Glad we got that settled, Micky. Now why don't you go on and provide
Searles with the answer he was asking for, about that Yeats thing.
I am Not Mr Michael Mc Grath.
My name is Michael James.
As for you turning Searles stated desire into a question.
Perhaps you should look up the word "Held" paying particular attention
to the tense.
Its "Past".
Mum.
|
PS As i am not Irish so i have no idea what "Ciao Stronzo" means?. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
