| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
arah
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: # SEXUAL LIFE IN THE PARADISE ? # |
 |
|
Christ die for our sin?
So we can continue to go against Almighty God the Creator. Why worry
Jesus have die for our sin.
OOOp the bible tell. Jesus can't even get Almighty God the Creator to
save himself, so how can Jesus save all of us.?
And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli,
Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou
forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46).
Almighty God the Creator saved Moses, Abraham, Loth but not his only
begotten son Jesus?
Why???? So will you save others but not you own beloved son?
Something is not right somewhere
Cheers
On Oct 28, 5:48am, Randy <pulpitf...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:36:51 -0500,
in article <ge4cl5$qg...@registered.motzarella.org>,
"Ike" <xeickleberrybo...@msn.com> wrote:
[Trim to point]
Even so, you still haven't produced a single verse, even from
what you do consider Scripture, that comes right out and
states that it is specifically legalists who are the beasts of
the field.
Yes, I did: JOHN'S USE OF SYMBOLISM IN REVELATION, UPHELD BY THE REST OF THE
PROPHETS.
"And I saw a beast," meaning NATURAL, UNGODLY MAN;
"rise from the EARTH," meaning FROM AMONG THE SEMITES;
"having two horns," meaning having authority of TWO THINGS;
"of a lamb," meaning AS A SELF-DEFINED SAVIOR, which means the TWO THINGS
that the beast has authority over are the TWO RELIGIOUS NATIONS of the
SEMITES, ISRAEL AND ISLAM;
"but spoke as a DRAGON," meaning HE WAS LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH.
AND HOW DOES THIS "BEAST" COME BY THIS POWER?
ANSWER: BY ATTACHING HIMSELF TO ISRAEL AND ISLAM AT THE SAME TIME BY
RECOGNIZING ISLAM'S COMPETING CLAIM TO THE PROMISES OF ABRAHAM, EVEN THOUGH
THE ARABS ARE OF THE REJECTED SONS WHILE THE ISRAELITES ARE OF THE SELECTED
SONS. (But, in truth, NEITHER ONE OF THESE will be "Israelites," as God
still has His "Israel" hidden in the nations.)
THAT'S "LEGALISM," MORON.
That's not exegesis, that's your imagination.
--
Christ died for our sins, and God raised Him from the dead.
Rely on this work alone to escape hell and receive eternal
life (Jn. 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:1-3; Eph. 2:8-10; 2 Thess. 1:8-9).
We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself
up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every
thought to make it obedient to Christ. 2 Corinthians 10:5 |
|
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Budikka666
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:33 am Post subject: Can Chicken Andrew Prove His Accusation? |
|
|
On Nov 5, 2:34 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
| Quote: | "(M)-adman" wrote in messagenews:mrcQk.52113$IB6.21149@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Andrew wrote:
"Devils Advocaat" wrote:
How about you try and refute the evidence
rather than just ignoring it?
Resemblance does not prove they are transitional.
How foolish and desperate to make such a claim.
You have seen the only answer many of them have.
When confronted with the idea that they believe a lie,
they go to the text book answer
=
Yes, but the problem is that their text book is filled with
half truths, falsehoods, speculations and fantasies which
have been crafted by the venerated priests of materialism.
|
Prove it. Prove what you claimed here or have the decency to admit
you;re nothing but a fraud and a cheap LIAR.
You;re challenged. Either emet your reposnibility to abck up these
despicable accusaitons, |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Free Lunch
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:29 am Post subject: Re: Can Chicken Andrew Prove His Accusation? |
|
|
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:33:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
<budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
| Quote: | On Nov 5, 2:34 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
"(M)-adman" wrote in messagenews:mrcQk.52113$IB6.21149@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Andrew wrote:
"Devils Advocaat" wrote:
How about you try and refute the evidence
rather than just ignoring it?
Resemblance does not prove they are transitional.
How foolish and desperate to make such a claim.
You have seen the only answer many of them have.
When confronted with the idea that they believe a lie,
they go to the text book answer
=
Yes, but the problem is that their text book is filled with
half truths, falsehoods, speculations and fantasies which
have been crafted by the venerated priests of materialism.
Prove it. Prove what you claimed here or have the decency to admit
you;re nothing but a fraud and a cheap LIAR.
You;re challenged. Either emet your reposnibility to abck up these
despicable accusaitons,
|
We're talking about Andrew, he's a master of projection. Since he
believes a book filled with half-truths, falsehoods, speculations and
fantasies that were crafted by high priests, he cannot imagine that
there is any other way. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Christopher A. Lee
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: Re: Can Chicken Andrew Prove His Accusation? |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:33:21 -0600, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us>
wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:33:18 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
On Nov 5, 2:34 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
"(M)-adman" wrote in messagenews:mrcQk.52113$IB6.21149@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Andrew wrote:
"Devils Advocaat" wrote:
How about you try and refute the evidence
rather than just ignoring it?
Resemblance does not prove they are transitional.
How foolish and desperate to make such a claim.
You have seen the only answer many of them have.
When confronted with the idea that they believe a lie,
they go to the text book answer
=
Yes, but the problem is that their text book is filled with
half truths, falsehoods, speculations and fantasies which
have been crafted by the venerated priests of materialism.
|
This is a deliberate lie.
He knows there are no "venerated priests of materialism", and that any
materialism people exhibit is minor, incidental; and consequential.
The language used is a dishonest attempt to rile people so he can use
their frustration as an ad hominem excuse to ignore what should not
even have to be explained.
| Quote: | Prove it. Prove what you claimed here or have the decency to admit
you;re nothing but a fraud and a cheap LIAR.
You;re challenged. Either emet your reposnibility to abck up these
despicable accusaitons,
We're talking about Andrew, he's a master of projection. Since he
believes a book filled with half-truths, falsehoods, speculations and
fantasies that were crafted by high priests, he cannot imagine that
there is any other way.
|
I disagree. He knows that his whole world revolves round a lie, and
can't admit it.
So he keeps adding more lies, digging himself in deeper every time. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Cary Kittrell
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: Re: "Captain, the Atheist has committed bestiality!" - "Giv |
|
|
fasgnadh <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> writes:
| Quote: | Ouroboros_Rex wrote:
fasgnadh wrote:
Devils Advocaat slithered:
"Seest thou not that We have set the devils on the disbelievers
to confound them with confusion ?"
Sura [19:83]
B^D
On 5 Nov, 02:17, "\(M\)-adman" <g...@hotmail.ed> wrote:
Devils Advocaat wrote:
On 4 Nov, 21:05, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[]
that's funny.
Let's sit back and listen to the whining of all the atheist pussies.
An Atheist informed me of an Atheist preference for
worship of Bastet so why are you breaking the COMMANDMENT
against GIVING FALSE WITNESS.. ??? B^{
"it makes utterly no difference which goddesses or gods
you believe in, as long as you have some...
Me, I'd suggest Bastet." - Cary Kittrell
(has he misspelled 'Kitten'? ;-)
ROFL You really are mind-numbingly stupid.
You mean it is foolish to believe an Atheist Bastet, or take any of them
at their word, ever?
|
Absolutely. I mean, first he tells you he's an atheist, then he
tells you he worships a Goddess?
C'mon now.
As a High Atheist Bastest, who has devoted my life to not
believing in my most adored and puissant Bast, I tell
you now that everything I ever say is a lie, including
this sentence.
-- cary
| Quote: |
Possibly.
Thanks for the heads-up about lying Atheist Bastets.
Round 1 - Understanding and wisdom
The Shrewd: 1 The Skewed: 0 B^D
"Thus does Allah confound the unbelievers."
Sura [40.74]
Let's see I would reckon name calling comes under the rule laid down
in Exodus 22:21 and 23:9 and Leviticus 19:33 about not vexing or
oppressing the stranger.
If you Atheist hypocrites express a preference for A FELINE Goddess,
I have given NO offence by commenting on it! B^[
You seem to Barking , or meowing, MAD!!! B^[
Round 2 - Truth
The Shrewd: 2 The Skewed: 0 B^D
"they rejected the truth when it came to them,
so they are (now) in a state of confusion."
Sura [50.5]
Perhaps you should think twice about that sort of behaviour,
especially as in James 2:10-11 you are reminded that if you break
just
one part of the law you are guilty of breaking the whole of the law.
Round 3 Hypocrisy
The Shrewd: 2 The Skewed: -1 B^D
Jesus clearly said that we are to as doves, but as sharp as a snake
when we
have to be.
I am not a Christian, I will not turn the other cheek,
I will turn the BLOWTORCH OF REALITY upon their SAMSARA!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA!
And teach them their Latin; B^]
"nemo me impune lacessit!"
quote
Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be wise as
serpents and innocent as doves.
/quote
So.
SO... let's sit back and listen to the whining of all the atheist
pussies
that attempt to use God's word when they do not know how.
WHAT THE ATHEISTS WORSHIP, I USE TO CATCH RATS! B^D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bastet_Istanbul_museum.JPG
Bast: (for all the ignorant Atheist pussies! B^)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastet
"Bast /[called] Bastet, a repetitive and diminutive form after her role
in the pantheon became diminished as Sekhmet, a similar
lioness war deity, became more dominant"
WHAT THE ATHEISTS WORSHIP, I USE TO CATCH RATS! B^D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bastet_Istanbul_museum.JPG
Atheist: a repetitive and diminutive form after it's role
in the death of Millions, diminished as TV, an equally
vacuous time-waste, became more dominant"
Bask: in the glory of victory B^D
Basket: a Case - containing body parts of eviscerated Bastets!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAA!
Hope THAT helps.
Heaps, thanks... B^]
Could you just bend over one more time, i have another
pair of shoes that need to be shined on some non-sentient
beings arse.. (wouldn't want to cause suffering to a sentient
being ;-)
I love it when we see the Atheists trying to use the Scriptures
they don't believe in to try and hang the Innocent in their
webs of deceit, and reveal their lack of understanding as they
Hoist themselves on their own Petard of Petty Perdition:
Matthew 10:16 is the verse I believe you are referring to, but in the
20 English translations that I have access to not one of them uses the
word sharp, in fact the majority of translations use either wise
or shrewd.
And by no stretch of the imagination can it be suggested that Jesus
was telling the Apostles that you can call people names if you don't
like them or if they don't listen to what you have to say.
El Diablo, you serpent, you REPEAT the lie of the False Witness! B^D
YOU will suffer the FIRE WITH THEM! 8^o
The BURNING OF CHEEKS, UTTERLY HUMILIATED
IN FRONT OF THEIR PEERS AND ENEMIES!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH
Ask Hysteria for a MATCH! B^D
# "Hysteria claims that:
#
# " Fire is essentially a discovery of modern, educated,
# scientifically aware grown-ups."
#
# Because she cooked her own Goose on a blazing funeral pyre:
#
# BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAAA
(Isaiah)
45:16 They shall be ashamed, and also confounded, all of them:
they shall go to confusion together..
Consider what Jesus says in Matthew 5:17; 5:19 and 5:22 and you will
see that he is not in favour of those who break the commandments that
are found in the Torah.
So, what is YOUR punishment for False Witness, Iblis?
I am pure as driven snow, I came into you NG and for the
crime of asking rational probing questions, was set upon
by mad dogs.. or was it pussies? who hunt in packs
and are Red of Tooth and Paw B^D
I WAS the stranger, and you did not love me like a neighbour,
you tried to crucify me. 8^o
Abu'Baker Bash'er even Called Upon a Higher Power (was that you?)
to SILENCE me..
Clearly your power is seized, and you are cast down. B^D
After the jackal pack attack of Massed Atheist pussies...
I returned you a Catskin purse. It looks good on you.
Having defeated your Goliaths, single-handedly,
you now send me your PHARISEES!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAAA!
.. to LAWYER ME TO DEATH!??????
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!
I hope that helps you to understand.
Sure, like anyone would come to YOU for understanding... B^D
can't stand about jaw-boning all day..
"Cats to Kill,
Contracts to fill......"
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
fasgnadh
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: Athiest Bastets -"The Union of Beligerent Atheists", USSR 19 |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
| Quote: | fasgnadh <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> writes:
Ouroboros_Rex wrote:
fasgnadh wrote:
Devils Advocaat slithered:
"Seest thou not that We have set the devils on the disbelievers
to confound them with confusion ?"
Sura [19:83]
B^D
On 5 Nov, 02:17, "\(M\)-adman" <g...@hotmail.ed> wrote:
Devils Advocaat wrote:
On 4 Nov, 21:05, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[]
that's funny.
Let's sit back and listen to the whining of all the atheist pussies.
An Atheist informed me of an Atheist preference for
worship of Bastet so why are you breaking the COMMANDMENT
against GIVING FALSE WITNESS.. ??? B^{
"it makes utterly no difference which goddesses or gods
you believe in, as long as you have some...
Me, I'd suggest Bastet." - Cary Kittrell
(has he misspelled 'Kitten'? ;-)
ROFL You really are mind-numbingly stupid.
You mean it is foolish to believe an Atheist Bastet, or take any of them
at their word, ever?
Possibly.
Thanks for the heads-up about lying Atheist Bastets.
Absolutely. I mean, first he tells you he's an atheist, then he
tells you he worships a Goddess?
|
Atheists are irrational, it seems.
"Storming the Heavens: The Soviet League of the Militant Godless"
Daniel Peris Cornell University Press 1998 ISBN 9780801434853
"The Soviet Union was an atheist state, in which religion was largely
discouraged and heavily persecuted."
"Soviet policy toward religion was based on the ideology of
Marxism-Leninism, which made atheism the official doctrine of the
Communist Party"
"Society of the Godless (Общество безбожников in Russian); other names
include Союз воинствующих безбожников (The Union of Belligerent Atheists
or The League of the Militant Godless[1]) and Союз безбожников (The
Union of the Godless), was a mass volunteer antireligious organization
of Soviet workers and others in 1925-1947. It "consisted of Party
members, members of the Komsomol youth movement, workers and army
veterans"[2]
"Religion is the opium of the people"
After just 70 years of this madness the Russians wished they
had some opium to dull the pain of life in the Underworld of
Savage Slaughter and Repression(USSR)
Soviet Union, Stalin's regime (1924-53): 20 000 000 dead
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm
| Quote: | As a High Atheist Bastest, who has devoted my life to not
believing in my most adored and puissant Bast, I tell
you now that everything I ever say is a lie,
|
We know.
| Quote: | including this sentence.
|
Plagiarising the Cretin's paradox (sic), eh? B^)
| Quote: | -- cary
Round 1 - Understanding and wisdom
The Shrewd: 1 The Skewed: 0 B^D
"Thus does Allah confound the unbelievers."
Sura [40.74]
Let's see I would reckon name calling comes under the rule laid down
in Exodus 22:21 and 23:9 and Leviticus 19:33 about not vexing or
oppressing the stranger.
If you Atheist hypocrites express a preference for A FELINE Goddess,
I have given NO offence by commenting on it! B^[
You seem to Barking , or meowing, MAD!!! B^[
Round 2 - Truth
The Shrewd: 2 The Skewed: 0 B^D
"they rejected the truth when it came to them,
so they are (now) in a state of confusion."
Sura [50.5]
Perhaps you should think twice about that sort of behaviour,
especially as in James 2:10-11 you are reminded that if you break
just
one part of the law you are guilty of breaking the whole of the law.
Round 3 Hypocrisy
The Shrewd: 2 The Skewed: -1 B^D
Jesus clearly said that we are to as doves, but as sharp as a snake
when we
have to be.
I am not a Christian, I will not turn the other cheek,
I will turn the BLOWTORCH OF REALITY upon their SAMSARA!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA!
And teach them their Latin; B^]
"nemo me impune lacessit!"
quote
Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be wise as
serpents and innocent as doves.
/quote
So.
SO... let's sit back and listen to the whining of all the atheist
pussies
that attempt to use God's word when they do not know how.
WHAT THE ATHEISTS WORSHIP, I USE TO CATCH RATS! B^D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bastet_Istanbul_museum.JPG
Bast: (for all the ignorant Atheist pussies! B^)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastet
"Bast /[called] Bastet, a repetitive and diminutive form after her role
in the pantheon became diminished as Sekhmet, a similar
lioness war deity, became more dominant"
WHAT THE ATHEISTS WORSHIP, I USE TO CATCH RATS! B^D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bastet_Istanbul_museum.JPG
Atheist: a repetitive and diminutive form after it's role
in the death of Millions, diminished as TV, an equally
vacuous time-waste, became more dominant"
Bask: in the glory of victory B^D
Basket: a Case - containing body parts of eviscerated Bastets!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAA!
Hope THAT helps.
Heaps, thanks... B^]
Could you just bend over one more time, i have another
pair of shoes that need to be shined on some non-sentient
beings arse.. (wouldn't want to cause suffering to a sentient
being ;-)
I love it when we see the Atheists trying to use the Scriptures
they don't believe in to try and hang the Innocent in their
webs of deceit, and reveal their lack of understanding as they
Hoist themselves on their own Petard of Petty Perdition:
Matthew 10:16 is the verse I believe you are referring to, but in the
20 English translations that I have access to not one of them uses the
word “sharp”, in fact the majority of translations use either “wise”
or “shrewd”.
And by no stretch of the imagination can it be suggested that Jesus
was telling the Apostles that you can call people names if you don't
like them or if they don't listen to what you have to say.
El Diablo, you serpent, you REPEAT the lie of the False Witness! B^D
YOU will suffer the FIRE WITH THEM! 8^o
The BURNING OF CHEEKS, UTTERLY HUMILIATED
IN FRONT OF THEIR PEERS AND ENEMIES!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH
Ask Hysteria for a MATCH! B^D
# "Hysteria claims that:
#
# " Fire is essentially a discovery of modern, educated,
# scientifically aware grown-ups."
#
# Because she cooked her own Goose on a blazing funeral pyre:
#
# BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAAA
(Isaiah)
45:16 They shall be ashamed, and also confounded, all of them:
they shall go to confusion together..
Consider what Jesus says in Matthew 5:17; 5:19 and 5:22 and you will
see that he is not in favour of those who break the commandments that
are found in the Torah.
So, what is YOUR punishment for False Witness, Iblis?
I am pure as driven snow, I came into you NG and for the
crime of asking rational probing questions, was set upon
by mad dogs.. or was it pussies? who hunt in packs
and are Red of Tooth and Paw B^D
I WAS the stranger, and you did not love me like a neighbour,
you tried to crucify me. 8^o
Abu'Baker Bash'er even Called Upon a Higher Power (was that you?)
to SILENCE me..
Clearly your power is seized, and you are cast down. B^D
After the jackal pack attack of Massed Atheist pussies...
I returned you a Catskin purse. It looks good on you.
Having defeated your Goliaths, single-handedly,
you now send me your PHARISEES!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAAA!
.. to LAWYER ME TO DEATH!??????
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!
I hope that helps you to understand.
Sure, like anyone would come to YOU for understanding... B^D
can't stand about jaw-boning all day..
"Cats to Kill,
Contracts to fill......"
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Aratzio
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:30 am Post subject: Re: Athiest Bastets -"The Union of Beligerent Atheists", USS |
|
|
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:09:43 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks, rand mair
fheal <mmf@tania-che.com> bloviated:
| Quote: | In article <49144314$0$4448$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
fasgnadh <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote:
Atheists are irrational, it seems.
everyones irrational
that makes life more fun
Yer crazy if you think I am. |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
rand mair fheal
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:56 am Post subject: Re: Athiest Bastets -"The Union of Beligerent Atheists", USS |
|
|
In article <3rc9h49hl68i9vnvk15qasrkbk19uunnt7@4ax.com>,
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:09:43 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks, rand mair
fheal <mmf@tania-che.com> bloviated:
In article <49144314$0$4448$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
fasgnadh <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote:
Atheists are irrational, it seems.
everyones irrational
that makes life more fun
Yer crazy if you think I am.
|
fun?
arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Budikka666
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:04 pm Post subject: Proof of Palindrome's Cluelessness |
|
|
On Nov 15, 9:41 am, palindrome <palindrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | The black widow spider of north america.
One of the most poisonous spiders in north america.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/MEDLINEPLUS/ency/images/ency/fullsize/19582.jpg
Notice the red hourglass?
It is a sign from GOD.
If you are bit by this mofo, your time is up ...
|
First of all, the spider isn't poisonous, it's venomous. Go look up
the difference, Moron.
Then go read wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_widow_spider
Where you'll see it says, "Deaths in healthy adults from Latrodectus
bites are relatively rare in terms of the number of bites per thousand
people."
In short, please actually do what real scientists do, and be sire of
your evidence before you open your idiot mouth.
Got that?
Oh, and one more thing: when you're going to make a claim that
something is evidence of a god, then actually provide the evidence
that establishes the link you're claiming. As it is with what you've
said here, you're missing a link or two or three. I suspect the
missing links are between your neurons.
An be prepared for the rebuttal, which is: If your intelligent
designer is a loving god, why would he create something which can harm
humans, supposedly the pinnacle of his creation?
And why does the NT LIE about people's ability to handle venomous
snakes?
Budikka |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kate
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject: Re: Proof of Palindrome's Cluelessness |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:04:49 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
<budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
| Quote: | On Nov 15, 9:41 am, palindrome <palindrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
The black widow spider of north america.
One of the most poisonous spiders in north america.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/MEDLINEPLUS/ency/images/ency/fullsize/19582.jpg
Notice the red hourglass?
It is a sign from GOD.
If you are bit by this mofo, your time is up ...
First of all, the spider isn't poisonous, it's venomous. Go look up
the difference, Moron.
Then go read wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_widow_spider
Where you'll see it says, "Deaths in healthy adults from Latrodectus
bites are relatively rare in terms of the number of bites per thousand
people."
In short, please actually do what real scientists do, and be sire of
your evidence before you open your idiot mouth.
Got that?
Oh, and one more thing: when you're going to make a claim that
something is evidence of a god, then actually provide the evidence
that establishes the link you're claiming. As it is with what you've
said here, you're missing a link or two or three. I suspect the
missing links are between your neurons.
An be prepared for the rebuttal, which is: If your intelligent
designer is a loving god, why would he create something which can harm
humans, supposedly the pinnacle of his creation?
And why does the NT LIE about people's ability to handle venomous
snakes?
Budikka
|
Is there a point to even responding to this moron? He's just a troll. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:25 am Post subject: Re: Proof of Palindrome's Cluelessness |
|
|
Kate wrote:
| Quote: | On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:04:49 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
Is there a point to even responding to this moron? He's just a troll.
|
Yeah, others like him might read it and believe it. This *might* teach them
to think.
I know a guy who, with his family, owned four McDonald's.
He told me one day that KFC had changed it's name becasue what they sold was
no longer "real" chicken but some genetically modified substance.
I don't know if he accepted such things without question before being born
again. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Budikka666
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:47 am Post subject: Re: Proof of Palindrome's Cluelessness |
|
|
On Nov 16, 9:02 am, cob...@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote:
| Quote: | On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:04:49 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
On Nov 15, 9:41 am, palindrome <palindrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
The black widow spider of north america.
One of the most poisonous spiders in north america.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/MEDLINEPLUS/ency/images/ency/fullsize/19582.jpg
Notice the red hourglass?
It is a sign from GOD.
If you are bit by this mofo, your time is up ...
First of all, the spider isn't poisonous, it's venomous. Go look up
the difference, Moron.
Then go read wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_widow_spider
Where you'll see it says, "Deaths in healthy adults from Latrodectus
bites are relatively rare in terms of the number of bites per thousand
people."
In short, please actually do what real scientists do, and be sire of
your evidence before you open your idiot mouth.
Got that?
Oh, and one more thing: when you're going to make a claim that
something is evidence of a god, then actually provide the evidence
that establishes the link you're claiming. As it is with what you've
said here, you're missing a link or two or three. I suspect the
missing links are between your neurons.
An be prepared for the rebuttal, which is: If your intelligent
designer is a loving god, why would he create something which can harm
humans, supposedly the pinnacle of his creation?
And why does the NT LIE about people's ability to handle venomous
snakes?
Budikka
Is there a point to even responding to this moron? He's just a troll.
|
It depends on what the purpose of your response is. If it's to get an
intelligent discussion going or to seek scientific support for the
claims made, then I agree, it's a complete waste of time.
Neither of those reasons are why I respond to these people.
Budikka |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Cary Kittrell
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:48 am Post subject: Re: Proving Creation - The Second Law of Thermodynamics |
|
|
Tim_Miller <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid>
| Quote: |
Andrew wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" wrote in message news:gfvogt$rm8$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Riddle me this: how does the chaos of molecules in a glass of
water at 32 degrees F "randomly organize" into an extremely
ordered, lower-entropy array of molecules in a glass of ice
at 32 degrees F?
-- cary
The water molecules will crystallize at 32 degrees F and will hook
up into a shape that is predictable and stable. It has nothing to do
with the extreme complexity found in any living organism.
Inorganic molecules cannot randomly organize into the complexity
of life forms apart from an intelligently directed process (IDP); for
to do so would violate the 2nd law.
Andrew
In exactly what way Andrew? Why can't these molecules self organize?
Second Law.
The Second Law says that if you integrate the quotient
of the heat energy divided by the temperature, integrate
it over the entire system, the result can only increase
with time. This is the Second Law.
Now, this prohibits self-organizing systems ... how, exactly?
Entropy will prevent it --> ''the tendency for all matter and energy
in the universe to evolve toward a state of inert uniformity.''
You really DON'T understand thermo, do you?
|
No. He doesn't.
-- cary |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Tim_Miller
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:01 am Post subject: Re: Proving Creation - The Second Law of Thermodynamics |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
| Quote: | Tim_Miller <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid
Andrew wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" wrote in message news:gfvogt$rm8$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Riddle me this: how does the chaos of molecules in a glass of
water at 32 degrees F "randomly organize" into an extremely
ordered, lower-entropy array of molecules in a glass of ice
at 32 degrees F?
-- cary
The water molecules will crystallize at 32 degrees F and will hook
up into a shape that is predictable and stable. It has nothing to do
with the extreme complexity found in any living organism.
Inorganic molecules cannot randomly organize into the complexity
of life forms apart from an intelligently directed process (IDP); for
to do so would violate the 2nd law.
Andrew
In exactly what way Andrew? Why can't these molecules self organize?
Second Law.
The Second Law says that if you integrate the quotient
of the heat energy divided by the temperature, integrate
it over the entire system, the result can only increase
with time. This is the Second Law.
Now, this prohibits self-organizing systems ... how, exactly?
Entropy will prevent it --> ''the tendency for all matter and energy
in the universe to evolve toward a state of inert uniformity.''
You really DON'T understand thermo, do you?
No. He doesn't.
|
Then why does he keep trying to "explain" it to those of
us who make our LIVING at it?? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Cary Kittrell
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:35 pm Post subject: Re: Proving Creation - The Second Law of Thermodynamics |
|
|
In article <gfvs0v$tcf$1@news.motzarella.org> Tim_Miller <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid> writes:
| Quote: | Cary Kittrell wrote:
Tim_Miller <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid
Andrew wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" wrote in message news:gfvogt$rm8$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Riddle me this: how does the chaos of molecules in a glass of
water at 32 degrees F "randomly organize" into an extremely
ordered, lower-entropy array of molecules in a glass of ice
at 32 degrees F?
-- cary
The water molecules will crystallize at 32 degrees F and will hook
up into a shape that is predictable and stable. It has nothing to do
with the extreme complexity found in any living organism.
Inorganic molecules cannot randomly organize into the complexity
of life forms apart from an intelligently directed process (IDP); for
to do so would violate the 2nd law.
Andrew
In exactly what way Andrew? Why can't these molecules self organize?
Second Law.
The Second Law says that if you integrate the quotient
of the heat energy divided by the temperature, integrate
it over the entire system, the result can only increase
with time. This is the Second Law.
Now, this prohibits self-organizing systems ... how, exactly?
Entropy will prevent it --> ''the tendency for all matter and energy
in the universe to evolve toward a state of inert uniformity.''
You really DON'T understand thermo, do you?
No. He doesn't.
Then why does he keep trying to "explain" it to those of
us who make our LIVING at it??
|
Well, invincible ignorance cannot be vinced unless the
vincee wishes it to be.
-- cary |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
