www.evangelicalview.com

Leading Religious,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Is My Reasoning Correct?
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Gnostic Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest







PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 6:47 am    Post subject: Is My Reasoning Correct? Reply with quote

INTRODUCTION:

I was skeptical about the existence of God, but no more now.







SECULAR EVIDENCE:

That proto-DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA, which emerged about 4 billion years
ago, as fossil records indicate, has to meet the following 4
conditions, (1) ALL OF THEM (2) SIMULTANEOUSLY, or the proto-DNA/RNA/
PNA/TNA/GNA is dead (ref: en.wikipedia.com):

-different organic compounds joined in exact helical order, WITHIN ONE
GENERATION.
-have a complete reproductive system, WITHIN ONE GENERATION.
-have a complete DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA-repair system, WITHIN ONE
GENERATION.
-have a complete metabolic system, WITHIN ONE GENERATION.

Chimps are 98.8% human, not because humans evolved out of proto-chimp,
but because humans share biological functions with Chimps more than
any other living thing.

Evolution is "theory", not a proved "law".

Famous Scientist Crick proposed that the proto-DNA/RNA couldn't have
developed on Earth, but must have come from the space; but this
doesn't solve the problem, about the origin of the proto-DNA/RNA.








RELIGIOUS EVIDENCE:

All Major Religions teach:

-Oneness of God, (yes, hindus believe in ONE GOD, but many forms of
that god) and
-Messengership i.e. God communicated with humanity through messengers,
and that
-Books/oral-words were revealed to his messengers.

Muhammad is the last of the Messengership chain; Jews call him their
"warrior messenger", Christians call him "that prophet", Hindus call
him "Kalki Avatar".

Example Hindu Messengership: "Just an illiterate man with the epithet
Teacher, Muhammad by name, came along with his companions. Raja (Bhoja
in a vision) to that Great Diva, that denizen of Arabia, purifying
with the Ganges water and with the five things of cow offered sandal
wood and pay worship to him. O denizen of Arabia and Lord of the
holies, to thee is my adoration. O thou who hast found many ways and
means to destroy the devils of the world. O pure one from among the
illiterates, O sinless one, the spirit of the truth and absolute
master, to thee is my adoration. Accept me at thy feet", Bhavishya
Purna Parv 3, Khand 3, Adhya 3, Shalok 5-8.

Bible is consistent, i.e. the last messenger will only come from
Arabia, not elsewhere; if Bible was a word of man, then Bible would
have all spectrum of prophesies.

Carbon dating proves that current bible existed before Muhammad, i.e.
muslims have not entered the Muhammadan messengership into bible.

For a complete list of Parsi/Hindu/Biblical Messengerships: www.awais-nazir.biz







CONCLUSION:

-God communicated with humanity through Messengership. Current/last
Messengership is Muhammadan.
-God send new Messengerships, until previous Messengership corrupts
beyond recognition.
-Three Majors of the previous Messengership include: Hindu/Jewish/
Christian.
-Sincerity without Messengership knowledge is OK. But if one knowingly
rejects the messengership, then will God punish.







RELEASING THE HIJACKED MUHAMMADAN/LAST MESSENGERSHIP:

I know how original Islam is hijacked by the arab culture. In the
remainig book of mine, (www.awais-nazir.biz), I will show how Islam is
the simplest of all, including:

-Attaining higher of the two paradises.
-The story of humanity, from Adam till now; including Humanity Eras,
Science Periods, Messengership Eras.
-The Story of Grave Life, Day of Resurrection, and Paradise/Hell
admission.
-Celebrating Birthdays/etc is Optional.
-Prefering either of right/left hand, is Optional.
-Fate is God's simulation, i.e. as mother can predict the behavior of
her child.
-Moral issues, i.e. miserliness/extravagency/lying/etc are Optional;
they should not be handled by religion, but by secular measures,
because whenever religion involves in something then it can't be
solved.
-Smoking is Optional.
-Doing 'Salam' To Non-muslims, Is Optional.
-Music/dogs/etc are Optional, to hear/keep.
-Salat is not 5, but 2 times a day, i.e. sunrise/sunset.
-There is no usury/interest, if the exchange is in different
commodities.
-Women Leading Salat/Country, Is Optional.
-Keeping Beard, Is Optional.
-Clothes are secular, not religious, matter.
-Stealing, killing, suicide, etc, are Major Sins; but Minor Sins are
no sin.
-Calamities Fall Equally On Believers/Nonbelievers.

For a complete list: www.awais-nazir.biz






I HOPE THE ABOVE INFO PROBABLY IS NERVE-WRECKING. IF ONE IS STILL NOT
CONVINCED, I HOPE THAT SOMEWHERE IN HIS FUTURE LIFE, HE WILL.

RATIONALITY AND SINCERITY MATTERS; NONE ELSE, INCLUDING BIAS.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:05 am    Post subject: Re: Is My Reasoning Correct? Reply with quote

On May 27, 4:47 pm, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:

Compare Muhammed and Jesus
http://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/compare.htm

Muhammed used the Biblical scriptures, choosing what suited him,
mainly from the Old Testament and a little from the New Testament.

Gladys Swager
Back to top
Dan
Guest






PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Is My Reasoning Correct? Reply with quote

On May 28, 10:05 pm, gswa...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On May 27, 4:47 pm, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:

Compare Muhammed and Jesushttp://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/compare.htm

Muhammed used the Biblical scriptures, choosing what suited him,
mainly from the Old Testament and a little from the New Testament.

Gladys Swager

This is only if you give Mohammed credit for concocting the Quran,
which also contains extensive borrowings from:

-- pagan myths and fables
-- animistic beliefs and practices
-- Imrau'l Qais and other Arabian poets
-- Samaritan literature
-- Sabean literature
-- the "Pirke Rabbi Eliezer"
-- the Mishnah
-- the Midrash
-- Galen
-- the apocryphal gospels
etc., etc., etc.

The end result of all of this is an ugly confused jumble expressed in
beautiful language.

Cheers,

Dan
Back to top
I AM
Guest






PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Is My Reasoning Correct? Reply with quote

On May 29, 8:23 am, Dan <dannyk1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 28, 10:05 pm, gswa...@gmail.com wrote:

On May 27, 4:47 pm, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:

Compare Muhammed and Jesushttp://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/compare.htm

Muhammed used the Biblical scriptures, choosing what suited him,
mainly from the Old Testament and a little from the New Testament.

Gladys Swager

This is only if you give Mohammed credit for concocting the Quran,
which also contains extensive borrowings from:

-- pagan myths and fables
-- animistic beliefs and practices
-- Imrau'l Qais and other Arabian poets
-- Samaritan literature
-- Sabean literature
-- the "Pirke Rabbi Eliezer"
-- the Mishnah
-- the Midrash
-- Galen
-- the apocryphal gospels
etc., etc., etc.

The end result of all of this is an ugly confused jumble expressed in
beautiful language.

Cheers,

Dan

What is wrong with an angel dictating?

Christianity itself borrowed from surrounding ressurection cults
as it were.

What remains and what can we believe?

One did rise from the dead.

I AM.
Don't believe and die.
It is simple really ...
Today.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Gnostic Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum