| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bertie the Bunyip
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: Why nitrogen? - 1 attachment |
 |
|
"Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:zcTAk.20433$PK.7004@newsfe04.iad:
| Quote: | Be more careful Buttlipps, you forgot to cross post two of them this
time.
|
Forged?
You're a moron
Bertie |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Bertie the Bunyip
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: What value the [PL 2008] list? - 1 attachment (1/2) |
|
|
A complete moron, ye are.
Arrrr.
Bertie |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bertie the Bunyip
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:12 pm Post subject: Re: A new record! |
|
|
"Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tbTAk.20411$PK.13186@newsfe04.iad:
| Quote: |
"Bertie the Bunyip" <BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa> wrote in message
news:gb0u26$q5b$26@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:zLSAk.19963$PK.11419
@newsfe04.iad:
|
|
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <T@ld.you> wrote in message
| > news:Xns9B1ECAB9487FApissupropeeh@208.90.168.18...
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:YbRAk.10732$Il.9424
@newsfe09.iad:
| >|
| >|
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
| >| > news:gavjti$bsc$11@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in
| >| >| news:8GDAk.13280$rV4.2332@newsfe03.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
| >| >| > news:gausi9$1cd$24@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| This upsets me.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >|
| >| >| > take Pepto
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| nah, I have other means of relieving stress.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| see?
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
|
|
|
|
| Just want to let you know you're doing a fantastic job there, Maxie.
|
|
|
| Bertie
|
Fantastic
Bertie |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bertie the Bunyip
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:15 pm Post subject: Re: Bertie, aka a@aa.aa |
|
|
"Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:JaTAk.20393$PK.14904@newsfe04.iad:
| Quote: |
"Bertie the Bunyip" <BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa> wrote in message
news:gb0uep$q5b$34@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:JQSAk.20051$PK.847@newsfe04.iad:
|
|
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa> wrote in message
| > news:gb0tdd$q5b$19@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:RGSAk.19878$PK.2257
@newsfe04.iad:
| >|
| >|
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa> wrote in message
| >| > news:gb0s03$q5b$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:PeRAk.10737$Il.7147
| @newsfe09.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| > "a" <pappson@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >| >| > news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.c
| >| >| > om. ..
| >| >| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa
as
| >| >| >| the return email address. If you look at information on
google
| >| >| >| groups you'll find that address has been banned for
"violating
| >| >| >| terms of agreement" earlier this month so it would appear
| Bertie
| >| >| >| has changed email/signon information.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the
| worst
| >| >| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| >| >| >| business of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for
| us.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity
does
| >| >| >| not.
| >| >|
| >| >| > We can only hope.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Whooosh!
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things, Okie?
| >| >|
| >| >| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for quite
| some
| >| >| > time now.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >|
| >| > Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Prove it.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >|
| >|
| >|
|
|
|
|
| Can't.
|
|
| Can you?
|
|
| Bertie
|
Thought so.
Bertie |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bertie the Bunyip
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:05 pm Post subject: Re: What value the [PL 2008] list? |
|
|
"Morgans" <jsmorgan@charterJUNK.net> wrote in news:gb13fo$290$1@aioe.org:
| Quote: |
"Ari" < wrote
Did I tell ya' I bought a fucking Velocity XL?*
This Milbank creep is buttsucking our old buddy, Barry Seals' Company
pilot, "William "Bear" Bottoms of Mena AK infame. Imagine that.!
Look, everyone! A new poster; full of class and integrity!
Not.
|
Oh brother.
you are one dumb fuck.
Fortunately, not too dumb for k00kdom
Bertie |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bubba
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: Re: Salvia divinorum |
|
|
"Sanforized" <sanforized@naol.con> wrote in message
news:80176$48d228b3$cdd085ce$25241@DIALUPUSA.NET...
| Quote: | wismel@yahoo.com wrote:
snip <slobbering rant
Very interesting.
ted
After a while it gets to a point that they all
sound alike. I take it you've never experienced
a big city soapbox preacher?
|
Or a TV preacher |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Blondie
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:27 am Post subject: Re: 162 Skycatcher crashes |
|
|
"Bertie the Bunyip" <BtB@BB.not.aaaaaaa> wrote in message
news:gb0sr2$q5b$17@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| Quote: | "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:iaRAk.11471$PS3.8076@newsfe06.iad:
"Bertie the Bunyip" <T@ld.you> wrote in message
news:Xns9B1EF4096214pissupropeeh@208.90.168.18...
|C J Campbell <christophercampbell@hotmail.com> wrote in
| news:2008091815380337709-christophercampbell@hotmailcom:
|
| > On 2008-09-18 15:36:17 -0700, Kingfish <kingfish@hotmail.com> said:
|
| >> Here's the link to the story. The 162 was Cessna's first entry into
| >> the "sport and training market"... Yeeeesh...
|
| >> http://www.kake.com/home/headlines/28606459.html
|
| > To be fair, the article did not say it was Cessna's "first" entry.
|
|
| Which would have been innacurate in any case.
|
|
|
| Bertie
Good point there Okie boi.
|
How do you gather that this person is from Oklahoma, arrogant dickhead?
hehee |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Biljo White
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:20 pm Post subject: Re: I AM DOMME HEAR ME ROAR.25 year old Woman BellaPura |
|
|
sudiemisti@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | 25 year old Woman BellaPura in Saint Louis, Looking For: Men, Women,
Couples for erotic email exchange, phone fantasies, performing only,
watching only or active participation http://ragdai.info/BellaPura.htm
|
tedw, goz, and sharkz - your prayers are answered! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
jimbo
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:40 pm Post subject: Re: I AM DOMME HEAR ME ROAR.25 year old Woman BellaPura |
|
|
On Sep 26, 9:04 am, sudiemi...@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | 25 year old Woman BellaPura in Saint Louis,
|
Hi Atlanta!
Jimbo |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rich Ahrens
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:01 am Post subject: Re: A new record! |
|
|
on 9/19/2008 1:55 PM Bertie the Bunyip said the following:
| Quote: | "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:sbRAk.10731$Il.1675@newsfe09.iad:
"Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
news:gavjsb$bsc$10@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tFDAk.13279$rV4.3026
@newsfe03.iad:
|
|
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
| > news:gausgv$1cd$23@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| >|
| >| You don;t know the meaning of the words, "cross post"
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >|
| >|
|
| > It's not a word dumb ass, it's two.
|
|
| Yes, fjukkktard, I know.
|
| that's why I used the plural.
|
| I tried to find a page that explains all that, but they were all in
| english, not okie.
|
|
|
|
| Bertie
Anyone know of an English Okie dictionary online?
|
Ask and ye shall receive...
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/minnesota/491/dictionary.html |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bertie the Bunyip
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: Re: A new record! |
|
|
Rich Ahrens <rma@iphouse.com> wrote in news:48dd73a5$0$90344$804603d3
@auth.newsreader.iphouse.com:
| Quote: | on 9/19/2008 1:55 PM Bertie the Bunyip said the following:
"Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:sbRAk.10731$Il.1675@newsfe09.iad:
"Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
news:gavjsb$bsc$10@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tFDAk.13279$rV4.3026
@newsfe03.iad:
|
|
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" <AA@AA.AA> wrote in message
| > news:gausgv$1cd$23@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
| >|
| >| You don;t know the meaning of the words, "cross post"
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >|
| >|
|
| > It's not a word dumb ass, it's two.
|
|
| Yes, fjukkktard, I know.
|
| that's why I used the plural.
|
| I tried to find a page that explains all that, but they were all
in
| english, not okie.
|
|
|
|
| Bertie
Anyone know of an English Okie dictionary online?
Ask and ye shall receive...
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/minnesota/491/dictionary.html
|
When will i learn to look first?
Bertie |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Crowlie
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:51 am Post subject: Re: Gods and Goddesses |
|
|
Jack Slutmuffin wrote:
| Quote: | On Oct 30, 2:51 pm, Néo <n...@adresski.ru> wrote:
Néo a écrit :
Crowlie a écrit :
Hi all,
Reading through some of the links I've been very kindly given. I must
say I'm impressed with the Saxon/Norse pantheon. What is it with all
these cross-dressing gods???? Just quietly it's a bit of a turn on LOL
Maybe not the best reason to convert....
Lis
Hi,
I'm also interested in the IE pantheons, something
which I gradually felt the need to do after having
started a neo-shamanic path and having had a few
glimpses of the World Above. Up to now, I mostly
studied the Ancient Greek one, and more recently,
I have been paying more and more attention to the
Norse one - as time permits.
It's not the first time I'm hearing something about
cross-dressing, but I failed to identify that to some
specific Norse deities. Could you be more specific?
Thanks in advance!
I guess you probably meant Loki... I'll let seasoned
Asatruars answer it in more detail, but he's got a
very bad (deserved) reputation and it's unlikely that
he was ever worshipped. The trickster side looks to
me as being more important than the cross-dressing
aspect. Also, shape-shifting is not specific to some
Deities.
--
Néo- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
i take offense to that! on guard!
www.godchecker.com
|
What's offensive? That Loki's reputation might seem all bad? That
certainly isn't my reading of him.
Lis |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Néo
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:04 pm Post subject: Re: Gods and Goddesses |
|
|
Crowlie a écrit :
| Quote: | Jack Slutmuffin wrote:
On Oct 30, 2:51 pm, Néo <n...@adresski.ru> wrote:
Néo a écrit :
Crowlie a écrit :
Hi all,
Reading through some of the links I've been very kindly given. I must
say I'm impressed with the Saxon/Norse pantheon. What is it with all
these cross-dressing gods???? Just quietly it's a bit of a turn on LOL
Maybe not the best reason to convert....
Lis
Hi,
I'm also interested in the IE pantheons, something
which I gradually felt the need to do after having
started a neo-shamanic path and having had a few
glimpses of the World Above. Up to now, I mostly
studied the Ancient Greek one, and more recently,
I have been paying more and more attention to the
Norse one - as time permits.
It's not the first time I'm hearing something about
cross-dressing, but I failed to identify that to some
specific Norse deities. Could you be more specific?
Thanks in advance!
I guess you probably meant Loki... I'll let seasoned
Asatruars answer it in more detail, but he's got a
very bad (deserved) reputation and it's unlikely that
he was ever worshipped. The trickster side looks to
me as being more important than the cross-dressing
aspect. Also, shape-shifting is not specific to some
Deities.
--
Néo- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
i take offense to that! on guard!
www.godchecker.com
What's offensive?
|
I can't tell, but it looks like it was said with some
sense of humor and a pinch of salt anyway.
| Quote: | That Loki's reputation might seem all bad? That
certainly isn't my reading of him.
Lis
|
Well, he's a cold-blood murderer...
--
Néo |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: Re: Gods and Goddesses |
|
|
Néo wrote:
| Quote: | Crowlie a écrit :
Jack Slutmuffin wrote:
On Oct 30, 2:51 pm, Néo <n...@adresski.ru> wrote:
Néo a écrit :
Crowlie a écrit :
Hi all,
Reading through some of the links I've been very kindly given. I must
say I'm impressed with the Saxon/Norse pantheon. What is it with all
these cross-dressing gods???? Just quietly it's a bit of a turn on
LOL
Maybe not the best reason to convert....
Lis
Hi,
I'm also interested in the IE pantheons, something
which I gradually felt the need to do after having
started a neo-shamanic path and having had a few
glimpses of the World Above. Up to now, I mostly
studied the Ancient Greek one, and more recently,
I have been paying more and more attention to the
Norse one - as time permits.
It's not the first time I'm hearing something about
cross-dressing, but I failed to identify that to some
specific Norse deities. Could you be more specific?
Thanks in advance!
I guess you probably meant Loki... I'll let seasoned
Asatruars answer it in more detail, but he's got a
very bad (deserved) reputation and it's unlikely that
he was ever worshipped. The trickster side looks to
me as being more important than the cross-dressing
aspect. Also, shape-shifting is not specific to some
Deities.
--
Néo- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
i take offense to that! on guard!
www.godchecker.com
What's offensive?
I can't tell, but it looks like it was said with some
sense of humor and a pinch of salt anyway.
That Loki's reputation might seem all bad? That certainly isn't my
reading of him.
Lis
Well, he's a cold-blood murderer...
|
Thor doesn't look too good kicking that dwarf into the funeral pyre of
Baldr fire because he was annoyed.
As for Odin...
Of course, that would be a literalist interpretation.
FFF
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Crowlie
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:18 am Post subject: Re: Gods and Goddesses |
|
|
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
| Quote: | Néo wrote:
Crowlie a écrit :
Jack Slutmuffin wrote:
On Oct 30, 2:51 pm, Néo <n...@adresski.ru> wrote:
Néo a écrit :
|
[...]
| Quote: | i take offense to that! on guard!
www.godchecker.com
What's offensive?
I can't tell, but it looks like it was said with some
sense of humor and a pinch of salt anyway.
That Loki's reputation might seem all bad? That certainly isn't my
reading of him.
Lis
Well, he's a cold-blood murderer...
Thor doesn't look too good kicking that dwarf into the funeral pyre of
Baldr fire because he was annoyed.
As for Odin...
Of course, that would be a literalist interpretation.
FFF
Dirk
|
There seem to be some issues interpreting Loki... A lot of people seem
to think it's because of the influence of the ideas of Satan and evil in
christendom... the polar blackness. In the stories of Loki, however, he
brings trouble but it somehow always turns out for the benefit of gods
or people.
Elaine Pagels did some studies on the original view of Satan as the
adversary. A spirit who could stop you in your tracks with a situation
or question that would provoke some discovery or new wisdom in your
life. Troubling perhaps, but better than remaining ignorant and undeveloped.
I see Loki's hand in my life in a number of situations. My journey has
been particularly horrible in some places, but jeez I've learnt a lot! I
may now be condemned to sit on the fringes and think unorthodox
thoughts, but it's worth the trouble of having hung on the world tree so
to speak.
http://www.uppsalaonline.com/uppsala/loki.htm
Wassail, Lis
crowlie.wordpress.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
