www.evangelicalview.com

Leading Religious,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

John and arcb
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Christian Baptist Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:30 am    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:10:07 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 19, 5:28 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Aug 19, 2:07 pm, Matt . <trdell1...@nospamgmail.com > wrote:

I'm from Florida or lived there many many years. 90' is not that hot
to me. I'm wearing a sweatshirt today and it is around 70' My
neighbors were out wearing shorts and a t-shirt.

chuckle.

I'm from where (Washington, DC) it's not unusual for it to hit 110.
20 below zero is not unusual for the winter.

You're so full of baloney. Here's what the truth is about Washington
DC's weather:

"The highest recorded temperature was 106 °F on July 20, 1930 and
August 6, 1918. Summers tend to be hot and humid, with daily high
temperatures in July and August averaging in the high 80s °F. The
lowest recorded temperature was -15 °F (-26.1 °C) on February 11,
1899, during the Great Blizzard of 1899. Average winter lows tend to
be around 30 °F from mid-December to mid-February. The city averages
36.7 days hotter than 90 °F, and only 64.4 nights below freezing."

Wanna try again? Or do you wanna be the guy who when told something
will always come up with another something that beats what the other
guy said? You're a chronic liar and one-upper, John.

You just never quit, do you?

First, I "lied" about Metropolitan Baptist, then I "lied" about my
time in England, then I "Lied" about the photographs!

I just don't get that you spend all this time checking on me!

Or you pretend you do.

What I did is called "commenting."

If you don't like it, don't read my posts.


Quote:

So for me, while 90 (Seattle) isn't comfortable, I've been WAY
hotter.

Riiiiight...you've been there and done it all and no one will ever be
able to top you, will they John?

If you say so.

By the way, Ms Kelly, smartest darn person in this here Universe,
the links you posted didn't go to the photos I took. I'm disappointed,
because if those photos are really in the "playbill" that you LIED and
said were in it, I would get credit.

And, [ guffaw ], the person you're calling the black "Willie
Weatherly" is Dobie Gray.

chuckle.

You are that STUPID that you don't know Dobie Gray when you see him?

Roll on the ground, laughing my ass off.

AGAIN, if you PRETENDED to be a Christian occasionally, you wouldn't
be wasting so much time trying (in vain) to prove I lied about
something.

You're a liar, Kelly. Google proves that FACT. You're a liar, and
you're psychotic.


john w
Back to top
Matt .
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:55 am    Post subject: Re: John and arcb Reply with quote

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:28:52 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:46:46 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:

On Aug 19, 2:07 pm, Matt . <trdell1...@nospamgmail.com > wrote:

Drove about 100 miles to a town called Marysville last
sunday.  It was a smaller Baptist Church very nice.

Why would anyone want to drive "100 miles" in the kind of heat we've
been having through some of the worst traffic in the state to get to,
of all places, Marysville?

I'm from Florida or lived there many many years. 90' is not that hot
to me. I'm wearing a sweatshirt today and it is around 70' My
neighbors were out wearing shorts and a t-shirt.

I live north of Marysville so not that bad traffic wise.

chuckle.

I'm from where (Washington, DC) it's not unusual for it to hit 110.
20 below zero is not unusual for the winter.

So for me, while 90 (Seattle) isn't comfortable, I've been WAY
hotter.

(note those who wish to superimpose their views / and life experience
on you; and don't let them)

john w

Hi John

I live near Bellingham, Washington. Much more eastern in the
mountains.

I would never let others " superimpose their views / and life
experience" on me. I learn by hearing other opinions though.

That is why Vera and I do not agree.

I lived in Florida so long that 90' is not hot to me.

God Bless You

Matt
Quote:

So I'm a little crazy.


God Bless

Matt


"My brothers, if one of you should wander from
the truth and someone should bring him back,
remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the
error of his way will save him from death and
cover over a multitude of sins."
Back to top
Matt .
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Re: John and arcb Reply with quote

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:26:58 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:07:05 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:04:38 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:46:13 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:36:02 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

JW "explained" to me part of the reason why he was here when I accepted his
invitation to join this group.

Something quite obvious just now hit me.
Probably 80% or more of the non arcb posts addressed to him are in direct
relation to his claims. He says something like "In the 90's the book of
Mormon changed a word in their book." and everybody researches based on his
claim and shows he is wrong, or right in one incidence.
Usually his insults are ignored or laughed at.

Here he is far more likely to be attacked personally for his behavior and
people respond far more often to his insults.

Yet he claimed he feels safer here.

Interesting.

Nothing wrong with being a masochist.

On the other hand maybe he does not want people to see how his brand of
Christianity works. A wise move.




Well lately JW has joined with Chuck and Vera on ACC.

That is not true. I am in arcb.

If posts from acc wander into arcb when someone cross-posts, I'll
respond if I wish to, and not be concerned with where the post
originated. If it's cross-posted, it's cross-posted. I didn't
originate the cross-posting; I'm merely responding to it.

So, Matt, you of good heart and kind soul, right out of the start
gate, you falsely accuse me.

If so I apologize.

It is so, and I accept your apology. The ONLY "team" I am on, is --
hopefully-- God's team.

Where Vera and I agree/ and where Chuck and I agree, on doctrine, on
theology, and on dogma, then... fine! "We're on the same team."

When you see me being silent (and you falsely assume I'm in 100 %
agreement with one or the other), it's MANY times that I do NOT agree,
but

1 I have many other things to deal with at the moment (most of the
time), like my writing, my photography, looking for "supplemental"
income
2 I prefer to not get into the "gory and gritty" any more than I can
help.

For some reason, it seems like the best way to KILL a conversation is
for me to get into it.
Seems no matter what the topic, if there are 20 people discussing it,
I can jump in, say my 10 words, and SUDDENLY, "KA - BOOOOOOOOM!" the
conversation suddenly turns to / ON ME!

That is NOT my intent, so I stay OUT of more discussions than I join.
Very purposefully

3. I do not wish to attack people in PUBLIC even if I disagree.
So I don't comment MUCH. Much less than I would normally (say, in the
hallway of my building, or on the public street)

I am VERY aware that any time I add my 2 cents to a discussion, it's
VERY likely that the discussion will end "on a dime" right there, and
EVERYONE will be climbing my back.

I know the feeling his whole disagreement with Vera Six was because I
said Hi to Mark. She hates Mark so I am not allowed to be polite to
him.
Quote:




That means
agree with everything they say or you are going to Hell.

Also not true.

I have had several RECENT disagreement with Chuck (notably when he
suggested that he attends an "AoG" church, which I understand is
"pentecostal." I could not agree any less with pentecostal teaching,
and I told him that.

There are times I agree with Chuck. If I don't then I'm stupid or a
moron.

Ok. More on that. "Excellent observation." I tend to be VERY blunt.
That has been discussed to exhaustion. If yo don't know, I am bi-polar
("the secret is out") < being sarcastic.
If I comment at all, (if I disagree) it's very likely to come across
like I'm swinging a baseball bat.
Sorry, but that's me.
I do not mean to suggest that you are ALWAYS, no matter the topic,
no matter the time of day, ALWAYS a drooling idiot.

I mean to say, "On this topic, today, at this moment, """ Good
GRIEF!, MATT!!!!!"
Kindly take it as a Local, Specific reference to the topic at hand,
and not a universal declaration.

If you missed it, Chuck and I had words TODAY and they were not
nice words.

Vera and I have RECENTLY had words.

I don't play favorites.

Be careful of Vera. She has written my ISP in the past. Think she
forgets all post are archived. Google is not the only one.
Quote:

And as I told someone yesterday (the day before?), someone I had just
told off a day or two earlier, and then was nice to the next day.
They said something like, "John, make up your mind! Yesterday, I was
a drooling idiot; today, I'm "ok." Which is it, John?"

Well yes. I do understand. With me it is moods and also I read 4
different NSc. Sometimes by the time I read a post the others have
influenced me. Vera and I have a history. She even attacks me if I
ask for peoples favorite scriptures.
Quote:

I said, "Yesterday, I had a point to make; I made it (their comment
proved that)
Then it was bedtime (literally). I got up, it was a NEW DAY.
They did / said something I liked THAT day (we'll say yesterday).
For the comments they made that I AGREED with, I said so.

Don't get confused that my behavior on Wednesday is going to reflect
my behavior on Tuesday.
I try to "sweep the floor clean" each evening, and start the next day
fresh, with a clean floor.
If you choose to throw 5 pounds of dirt on my floor that day, then
we have a new ball game.

Does that make sense?

Yes it does. I apologized to Vera and she said it was a "hollow
apology" Then She applied conditions. Erase all my post against Vera
for the past 5 years off the internet.


Quote:
Jesus called it "forgiveness." And He said we
are to constantly be about "forgiveness."
He was asked, "Oh, Lord! Do I forgive 7 times?" Jesus said, "EEEEE!
You are to forgive 70 X 7."
So why is it, every time I forgive XXX < person on Monday after they
were a jerk on Tuesday, I'm called "two-faced?" I "can't make up my
mind?"
I'm struggling (yes, it's a struggle) to be obedient-- as I
understand it.



I don't actually know much about AoG or pentecostals. I was a
Southern Baptist most my life.

As was I
Quote:

^ ^ ^ ???? I was Southern Baptist the first half of my life!
Mom was a preacher's kid! Granddad was a Southern Baptist ordained
pastor!

"Small world." And you have given me fresh reason to like you!

I hope so just don't tell Vera.
Quote:


I no longer belong to any one Church
but go to many and try to see what they are about normally with
friends. Drove about 100 miles to a town called Marysville last
sunday. It was a smaller Baptist Church very nice.

I should make a point of visiting one sometime.

Nor do I always agree with Vera.

Who does.

^ ^ ^ Roll on the ground, laughing my ass off.

Don't hurt yourself
Quote:


So you need to find another way to attack me, Matt.

Try some honesty (it'll do you some good, I promise)

I will try to take a step back. Find it helps at times. Received 2
hints in one day.

Reading over this post, something I frequently do NOT do with you
(for reasons we've discussed)
I think -- like MANY-- you fall into this pit: You read A and you
read F, and you "fill in with B, C, D, and E."
Don't "fill in." Don't make assumptions.
You make a LOT of assumptions (as do many, as do I)
Do what Paul taught in 1 Cor 13.
Assume the BEST, not the WORST.
Believe the BEST, not the worst.

If someone is calling Bob Wilson (invented person) a little piece of
what we scrape off our shoe (or worse, they say "shit") don't jump in
with your 2 centavos, unless-- at that very moment-- you know
PERSONALLY that what's been said is "arrow straight" and "plumb bob
true."

You haev numerous times commented with me, "John, I think what
everyone in arcb says about you is true. You're ____________."

Bear in mind, what 99.999999999 % of these losers think or say is not
even in my vocabulary.

Think for yourself; don't let the wrong crowd "suck you in."

There's a story about Abe Lincoln (one of my few real heroes).
He held a cabinet meeting. Some 20 to 30 of the most powerful, most
influential man and women in the world were sitting at his desk.
But he was President, and they were advisers.

He let them talk and talk and talk. Each had his say.

When it was all discussed, he called for a vote.
However many men were there-- let's say 25-- every single one voted
in one block. "No!"

Lincoln listened, then voted. "I vote Yes." Then he said, "The Yes
vote" (his) carries."

For all the rhetoric (is this making sense?), the only vote that
mattered, was his.

Don't be afraid to stand against the mob. RARELY is the mob "right."

Well I'm not afraid to stand against the Mob or any cult.

My employees are taught. If attacked do the maximums damage for the
minimal of time. It has worked.


Quote:



Vera says
she is the "Right hand of God"

I've never heard or read her saying that. If she has said that,
that's a comment I STRONGLY disagree with.

Well she has said so.

You might want to stop and consider the SOURCE, Matt. Vera may be a
born again Christian (I don't know if you are even NOW). But she has
mental and emotional issues; in that regard, so do you.

I am a Christian As for having mental and emotional issues, don't
think so but it is hard to judge yourself.

^ ^ ^ ^You've said something important.

As for your declaration, I'm going to assume you are "born again."
If you say it's so, I have no choice but believe you, until you
act/say otherwise.

The important thing you said was "It's hard to judge yourself' (your
own mental health). How true. That's what "psych evals" are for. I've
had many. Had one very recently.

I have had one many times as do all my employees.
Quote:

When you find you are wobbling, and you need the support of 1 or 2
or 5 or 20 or 50 others so you "don't feel so conspicuous", you are
suffering ego weakness. You find yourself "insufficient." Adults
should feel "complete", "self-contained" (you don't need anyone's
approval), self-confident. The only "strong arm" we should need to
shout for is God's.

Wisdom: When you don't know, "find out." In the meantime (until you
KNOW), it's wise to withhold judgment or comment.

When YOU get angry, you grab the nearest chunk of rhetoric that you
think will "make a dent." "Since everyone ELSE in the group
thinks....."
Don't do that. Think for yourself.

Well what I should do is think what would Christ do. I not good at
that.
Quote:



also has the Gift of Discernment and
Chuck is the Spin master.

How kind of you to call Chuck "The Spin Master."

Facts are Facts

Well, since I said that, I've done more reading RE: Chuck. We're
(you and I) are getting closer on that one.


What you're doing right now is called "spinning." You're weaving
your version of fact and fiction together to get the result YOU
desire.


They both use deception if not all and all
lies.

My suggestion is to killfile all 3.

Well, I am certainly at this point considering kill filing you.

That would work.

For that last comment, I apologize. I've now seen a new side of you.

Be you a jerk or a gremlin or a schlepp, if you call Christ your Lord
and Savior, I have to try to be nice to you.


I call for a "fresh start."

All in favor,

"I second."

It's been moved and carried. Matt and John W get a fresh start.

Well that sound good to me.
Quote:


I continue to have hope that Chuck and Vera will find their way.

We can pray for them.

I certainly hope you mean that; also please pray for me.

You have just showed me Christianity. "Pray for and bless your
enemies."

You've also just hit ME upside the head with a much - deserved brick.

I am bleeding, and I thank you for it. (sincerely)

God bless.

No Blood please. As I have been told in so many E-mails this week I
need to take a step back.

Maybe I need to make a new website and Blog although it isn't really a
Blog. More a opinion site.

God Bless

Matt
Quote:


God Bless

Matt



Matt

"My brothers, if one of you should wander from
the truth and someone should bring him back,
remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the
error of his way will save him from death and
cover over a multitude of sins."

"My brothers, if one of you should wander from
the truth and someone should bring him back,
remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the
error of his way will save him from death and
cover over a multitude of sins."
Back to top
Robibnikoff
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> whined:
Quote:

What I did is called "commenting."

i.e., yet another opportunity to lie.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight
#1557
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

On Aug 20, 5:36 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
  My brother, labeled on the photo, "Willie Weatherly" (the white guy)
playing Claude;  an unknown (loser with NO talent) "Red Shepard"
playing Burger.

v v v

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair4.html

  I'm betting you won't look because "you already know."

  Meaning, you're quite willing to IGNORE the FACTS and continue to
argue like a drooling idiot.

No, no drooling here. You must have me confused with your neighbor in
your very institutional-looking living situation.

Anyhoo...yes, I see that it states Willie Weatherly is Claude, so I do
apologize for that error.

However, Willie Weatherly still looks African American - the guy in
the picture you included on your Flickr page, however, was NOT the
same Willie Weatherly in the program pages, John. Now...are you going
to continue saying that Willie Weatherly the African American stage
actor is your brother (just like you claim Shawn Weatherly is related
to you and Jim Weatherly is related to and Michael Weatherly is
related to you) ?

Quote:
 As I have said many times, my brother played BOTH Burger AND Claude.

  He was the only cast member I am aware of who got cast in BOTH
leads.

BOTH leads, huh? He's still black, John.

Quote:
  And you TRULY should actually DO some research, and not just start
opening that cavernous mouth of yours when you find ONE picture.

  If you actually had the correct playbill, in fact, you'd see my
brother listed in both roles.

I see. Well, it's not unusual to double-cast. But, do you see that
Willie Weatherly is still black, John?
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:18 pm    Post subject: Re: John and arcb Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:22:09 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
Quote:
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post

may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:26:58 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:07:05 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:04:38 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:46:13 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:36:02 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

JW "explained" to me part of the reason why he was here when I accepted his
invitation to join this group.

Something quite obvious just now hit me.
Probably 80% or more of the non arcb posts addressed to him are in direct
relation to his claims. He says something like "In the 90's the book of
Mormon changed a word in their book." and everybody researches based on his
claim and shows he is wrong, or right in one incidence.
Usually his insults are ignored or laughed at.

Here he is far more likely to be attacked personally for his behavior and
people respond far more often to his insults.

Yet he claimed he feels safer here.

Interesting.

Nothing wrong with being a masochist.

On the other hand maybe he does not want people to see how his brand of
Christianity works. A wise move.




Well lately JW has joined with Chuck and Vera on ACC.

That is not true. I am in arcb.

If posts from acc wander into arcb when someone cross-posts, I'll
respond if I wish to, and not be concerned with where the post
originated. If it's cross-posted, it's cross-posted. I didn't
originate the cross-posting; I'm merely responding to it.

So, Matt, you of good heart and kind soul, right out of the start
gate, you falsely accuse me.

If so I apologize.

It is so, and I accept your apology. The ONLY "team" I am on, is --
hopefully-- God's team.

Where Vera and I agree/ and where Chuck and I agree, on doctrine, on
theology, and on dogma, then... fine! "We're on the same team."

When you see me being silent (and you falsely assume I'm in 100 %
agreement with one or the other), it's MANY times that I do NOT agree,
but

1 I have many other things to deal with at the moment (most of the
time), like my writing, my photography, looking for "supplemental"
income
2 I prefer to not get into the "gory and gritty" any more than I can
help.

For some reason, it seems like the best way to KILL a conversation is
for me to get into it.
Seems no matter what the topic, if there are 20 people discussing it,
I can jump in, say my 10 words, and SUDDENLY, "KA - BOOOOOOOOM!" the
conversation suddenly turns to / ON ME!

That is NOT my intent, so I stay OUT of more discussions than I join.
Very purposefully

3. I do not wish to attack people in PUBLIC even if I disagree.
So I don't comment MUCH. Much less than I would normally (say, in the
hallway of my building, or on the public street)

I am VERY aware that any time I add my 2 cents to a discussion, it's
VERY likely that the discussion will end "on a dime" right there, and
EVERYONE will be climbing my back.

I know the feeling his whole disagreement with Vera Six was because I
said Hi to Mark. She hates Mark so I am not allowed to be polite to
him.




That means
agree with everything they say or you are going to Hell.

Also not true.

I have had several RECENT disagreement with Chuck (notably when he
suggested that he attends an "AoG" church, which I understand is
"pentecostal." I could not agree any less with pentecostal teaching,
and I told him that.

There are times I agree with Chuck. If I don't then I'm stupid or a
moron.

Ok. More on that. "Excellent observation." I tend to be VERY blunt.
That has been discussed to exhaustion. If yo don't know, I am bi-polar
("the secret is out") < being sarcastic.
If I comment at all, (if I disagree) it's very likely to come across
like I'm swinging a baseball bat.
Sorry, but that's me.
I do not mean to suggest that you are ALWAYS, no matter the topic,
no matter the time of day, ALWAYS a drooling idiot.

I mean to say, "On this topic, today, at this moment, """ Good
GRIEF!, MATT!!!!!"
Kindly take it as a Local, Specific reference to the topic at hand,
and not a universal declaration.

If you missed it, Chuck and I had words TODAY and they were not
nice words.

Vera and I have RECENTLY had words.

I don't play favorites.

Be careful of Vera. She has written my ISP in the past. Think she
forgets all post are archived. Google is not the only one.

And as I told someone yesterday (the day before?), someone I had just
told off a day or two earlier, and then was nice to the next day.
They said something like, "John, make up your mind! Yesterday, I was
a drooling idiot; today, I'm "ok." Which is it, John?"

Well yes. I do understand. With me it is moods and also I read 4
different NSc. Sometimes by the time I read a post the others have
influenced me. Vera and I have a history. She even attacks me if I
ask for peoples favorite scriptures.

I said, "Yesterday, I had a point to make; I made it (their comment
proved that)
Then it was bedtime (literally). I got up, it was a NEW DAY.
They did / said something I liked THAT day (we'll say yesterday).
For the comments they made that I AGREED with, I said so.

Don't get confused that my behavior on Wednesday is going to reflect
my behavior on Tuesday.
I try to "sweep the floor clean" each evening, and start the next day
fresh, with a clean floor.
If you choose to throw 5 pounds of dirt on my floor that day, then
we have a new ball game.

Does that make sense?

Yes it does. I apologized to Vera and she said it was a "hollow
apology" Then She applied conditions. Erase all my post against Vera
for the past 5 years off the internet.


Jesus called it "forgiveness." And He said we
are to constantly be about "forgiveness."
He was asked, "Oh, Lord! Do I forgive 7 times?" Jesus said, "EEEEE!
You are to forgive 70 X 7."
So why is it, every time I forgive XXX < person on Monday after they
were a jerk on Tuesday, I'm called "two-faced?" I "can't make up my
mind?"
I'm struggling (yes, it's a struggle) to be obedient-- as I
understand it.



I don't actually know much about AoG or pentecostals. I was a
Southern Baptist most my life.

As was I

^ ^ ^ ???? I was Southern Baptist the first half of my life!
Mom was a preacher's kid! Granddad was a Southern Baptist ordained
pastor!

"Small world." And you have given me fresh reason to like you!

I hope so just don't tell Vera.


I no longer belong to any one Church
but go to many and try to see what they are about normally with
friends. Drove about 100 miles to a town called Marysville last
sunday. It was a smaller Baptist Church very nice.

I should make a point of visiting one sometime.

Nor do I always agree with Vera.

Who does.

^ ^ ^ Roll on the ground, laughing my ass off.

Don't hurt yourself


So you need to find another way to attack me, Matt.

Try some honesty (it'll do you some good, I promise)

I will try to take a step back. Find it helps at times. Received 2
hints in one day.

Reading over this post, something I frequently do NOT do with you
(for reasons we've discussed)
I think -- like MANY-- you fall into this pit: You read A and you
read F, and you "fill in with B, C, D, and E."
Don't "fill in." Don't make assumptions.
You make a LOT of assumptions (as do many, as do I)
Do what Paul taught in 1 Cor 13.
Assume the BEST, not the WORST.
Believe the BEST, not the worst.

If someone is calling Bob Wilson (invented person) a little piece of
what we scrape off our shoe (or worse, they say "shit") don't jump in
with your 2 centavos, unless-- at that very moment-- you know
PERSONALLY that what's been said is "arrow straight" and "plumb bob
true."

You haev numerous times commented with me, "John, I think what
everyone in arcb says about you is true. You're ____________."

Bear in mind, what 99.999999999 % of these losers think or say is not
even in my vocabulary.

Think for yourself; don't let the wrong crowd "suck you in."

There's a story about Abe Lincoln (one of my few real heroes).
He held a cabinet meeting. Some 20 to 30 of the most powerful, most
influential man and women in the world were sitting at his desk.
But he was President, and they were advisers.

He let them talk and talk and talk. Each had his say.

When it was all discussed, he called for a vote.
However many men were there-- let's say 25-- every single one voted
in one block. "No!"

Lincoln listened, then voted. "I vote Yes." Then he said, "The Yes
vote" (his) carries."

For all the rhetoric (is this making sense?), the only vote that
mattered, was his.

Don't be afraid to stand against the mob. RARELY is the mob "right."

Well I'm not afraid to stand against the Mob or any cult.

My employees are taught. If attacked do the maximums damage for the
minimal of time. It has worked.





Vera says
she is the "Right hand of God"

I've never heard or read her saying that. If she has said that,
that's a comment I STRONGLY disagree with.

Well she has said so.

You might want to stop and consider the SOURCE, Matt. Vera may be a
born again Christian (I don't know if you are even NOW). But she has
mental and emotional issues; in that regard, so do you.

I am a Christian As for having mental and emotional issues, don't
think so but it is hard to judge yourself.

^ ^ ^ ^You've said something important.

As for your declaration, I'm going to assume you are "born again."
If you say it's so, I have no choice but believe you, until you
act/say otherwise.

The important thing you said was "It's hard to judge yourself' (your
own mental health). How true. That's what "psych evals" are for. I've
had many. Had one very recently.

I have had one many times as do all my employees.

When you find you are wobbling, and you need the support of 1 or 2
or 5 or 20 or 50 others so you "don't feel so conspicuous", you are
suffering ego weakness. You find yourself "insufficient." Adults
should feel "complete", "self-contained" (you don't need anyone's
approval), self-confident. The only "strong arm" we should need to
shout for is God's.

Wisdom: When you don't know, "find out." In the meantime (until you
KNOW), it's wise to withhold judgment or comment.

When YOU get angry, you grab the nearest chunk of rhetoric that you
think will "make a dent." "Since everyone ELSE in the group
thinks....."
Don't do that. Think for yourself.

Well what I should do is think what would Christ do. I not good at
that.



also has the Gift of Discernment and
Chuck is the Spin master.

How kind of you to call Chuck "The Spin Master."

Facts are Facts

Well, since I said that, I've done more reading RE: Chuck. We're
(you and I) are getting closer on that one.


What you're doing right now is called "spinning." You're weaving
your version of fact and fiction together to get the result YOU
desire.


They both use deception if not all and all
lies.

My suggestion is to killfile all 3.

Well, I am certainly at this point considering kill filing you.

That would work.

For that last comment, I apologize. I've now seen a new side of you.

Be you a jerk or a gremlin or a schlepp, if you call Christ your Lord
and Savior, I have to try to be nice to you.


I call for a "fresh start."

All in favor,

"I second."

It's been moved and carried. Matt and John W get a fresh start.

Well that sound good to me.


I continue to have hope that Chuck and Vera will find their way.

We can pray for them.

I certainly hope you mean that; also please pray for me.

You have just showed me Christianity. "Pray for and bless your
enemies."

You've also just hit ME upside the head with a much - deserved brick.

I am bleeding, and I thank you for it. (sincerely)

God bless.

No Blood please. As I have been told in so many E-mails this week I
need to take a step back.

Maybe I need to make a new website and Blog although it isn't really a
Blog. More a opinion site.

God Bless

For once, I can say, "You have blessed me this day."

God bless you, too!

And-- yes--- we can all "take a step back" on a regular basis.

I personally find something happening in here that distresses me.

You're likely to see it in a day or two. I'm going to be VERY crude;
I hope you "catch my drift."

I can just see 10 people in the next couple of days (we could
probably both list them ahead of time) who will see that we've shaken
hands and hugged (I call it "cheek to cheek"/sincere, warm, close hug)
and listened to and forgiven one another (one sign that you are one
of His is that you can FORGIVE sincerely)

They're gonna say (this is the vulgar part/please put it in context)
"OH! I see John and Matt are French kissing!" ( < ugh !! )

^ ^ ^ This trash talk in a Christian group? If the "wrong people"
are nice to each other, "it must be bedtime for those two."
That's been said to me / of me, countless times.

Those who call themselves "Christians" aren't necessarily.

That's why I said, "I'll know who you serve by how you act and what
you say." I don't mean actions; I don't mean words;
I mean attitude.
You can get angry, you can say disgusting things. (I do all the
time, to make points here and there)
But are you DELIBERATELY revolting as "revenge?"
That is not allowed.

And I am going to try to spend less time in here, and get back to my
house cleaning!

God DID Bless me. A neighbor called me last night. "John! Come help!
Please! I broke my computer!"
She had said "Yes" to a download she should have refused!

One of those big flags that SAYS "Windows" that isn't. She
downloaded a nasty virus.

Fortunately, it was confined to one program folder that was easy to
remove.

The endless flags stopped instantly.

"I'm such a hero!" It also means a FAT paycheck next week!

:-)

I've told her many times, " a hug is payment enough." She works;
she knows I don't (well, I work for HER). She said, "if I took it to a
shop, I'd have to pay them TWICE what I pay you."

So she insists on paying me for any help I give her.

Then I stayed to show her how to use canned air and blow her
computer out.

Yep, a nice, FAT paycheck next week!! :-)

You have a GREAT Wednesday!

(Oh! I almost forgot!) You AGAIN have given me evidence of your
faith, and who your "Daddy " is.

I was telling you "stand alone!" Don't join the mob!

You said you try to calculate what Jesus would do. We don't always
KNOW; I believe we're given credit for having the thought and
attempting to do what we believe He would do.

I prefer to say, "Try to do what you believe would please the
Master."

Bear in mind: Jesus got into lots of arguments. We see half-a-dozen
in scripture. HE also likely yelled in frustration. He called names.
(we wouldn't use the "names" / "labels" He used, so many don't relate
to that)
He got VIOLENT. (He cleansed the temple TWICE) There are those who
say (I agree) that He cursed people out a time or two.
Bear in mind ALSO that He had WAY more enemies than friends. (the
MOB killed Him)
So when you hear, "Well, if you were a Christian, everybody would
love you! Jesus was loved universally!"
^ ^ ^ No, Jesus was not loved universally. He was DESPISED by those
who mattered, and when they couldn't "whip Him into shape", they
murdered Him.

You DO understand, I hope, that He didn't just "sacrifice" Himself?
In fact, He pissed off the influential people, and they murdered Him
in cold blood.

So, if you want to be like Jesus, be prepared to be martyred!


God bless.

john w


Quote:

Matt


God Bless

Matt



Matt

"My brothers, if one of you should wander from
the truth and someone should bring him back,
remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the
error of his way will save him from death and
cover over a multitude of sins."

"My brothers, if one of you should wander from
the truth and someone should bring him back,
remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the
error of his way will save him from death and
cover over a multitude of sins."
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:23 pm    Post subject: Re: John and arcb Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:55:45 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
Quote:
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post

may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:28:52 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:46:46 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:

On Aug 19, 2:07 pm, Matt . <trdell1...@nospamgmail.com > wrote:

Drove about 100 miles to a town called Marysville last
sunday.  It was a smaller Baptist Church very nice.

Why would anyone want to drive "100 miles" in the kind of heat we've
been having through some of the worst traffic in the state to get to,
of all places, Marysville?

I'm from Florida or lived there many many years. 90' is not that hot
to me. I'm wearing a sweatshirt today and it is around 70' My
neighbors were out wearing shorts and a t-shirt.

I live north of Marysville so not that bad traffic wise.

chuckle.

I'm from where (Washington, DC) it's not unusual for it to hit 110.
20 below zero is not unusual for the winter.

So for me, while 90 (Seattle) isn't comfortable, I've been WAY
hotter.

(note those who wish to superimpose their views / and life experience
on you; and don't let them)

john w

Hi John

I live near Bellingham, Washington. Much more eastern in the
mountains.

Oh, My Gosh! I live in Seattle now. I used to live in Bellingham.
To give you the time frame, I worked on the team that produced the
Nissan Infiniti car. So roughly 6 months before the first Infiniti
came out (the I-45 ?), I was in Bellingham, documenting the computer
they used in the sales showrooms!

"Small world." I LOVED Bellingham, and we had MONEY to spend. My son
was an infant of about 6 months when I was there!

"Good memories."

Quote:

I would never let others " superimpose their views / and life
experience" on me.

Yes. Don't be afraid to agree, and don't be afraid to say "I
agree." But don't feel compelled to agree if you don't.

I learn by hearing other opinions though.
Absolutely! You can hear / read someone's opinion, and come to the
conclusion, "They're dead wrong!"
And all you have to do is realize that. You truly don't have to
ANNOUNCE it.
"That YOU know is sufficient."
Quote:

That is why Vera and I do not agree.

I lived in Florida so long that 90' is not hot to me.

God Bless You

Matt

So I'm a little crazy.


God Bless

Matt


"My brothers, if one of you should wander from
the truth and someone should bring him back,
remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the
error of his way will save him from death and
cover over a multitude of sins."
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:39:47 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 19, 10:30 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:10:07 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:

 © 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.





On Aug 19, 5:28 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Aug 19, 2:07 pm, Matt . <trdell1...@nospamgmail.com > wrote:

I'm from Florida or lived there many many years.  90' is not that hot
to me.  I'm wearing a sweatshirt today and it is around 70'  My
neighbors were out wearing shorts and a t-shirt.  

  chuckle.

  I'm from where (Washington, DC) it's not unusual for it to hit 110.
20 below zero is not unusual for the winter.

You're so full of baloney.  Here's what the truth is about Washington
DC's weather:

"The highest recorded temperature was 106 °F on July 20, 1930 and
August 6, 1918.  Summers tend to be hot and humid, with daily high
temperatures in July and August averaging in the high 80s °F.  The
lowest recorded temperature was -15 °F (-26.1 °C) on February 11,
1899, during the Great Blizzard of 1899.   Average winter lows tend to
be around 30 °F from mid-December to mid-February.  The city averages
36.7 days hotter than 90 °F, and only 64.4 nights below freezing."

Wanna try again?  Or do you wanna be the guy who when told something
will always come up with another something that beats what the other
guy said?  You're a chronic liar and one-upper, John.

  You just never quit, do you?

  First, I "lied" about Metropolitan Baptist, then I "lied" about my
time in England, then I "Lied" about the photographs!

Yep. You lie alot.

^ ^ ^^ That's a lie. You provoke a lot. You lie a lot. You libel
a lot.


Quote:

  I just don't get that you spend all this time checking on me!

  Or you pretend you do.

 What I did is called "commenting."

What you did is called lying

Not so.



so that you could have a bigger story to
Quote:
tell than someone else. It's called "one-upmanship" and you are the
crowned prince of it.

 If you don't like it, don't read my posts.

Oh, I'll likely keep reading them just to check to see how many more
lies you tell.

I predict the future. I see a lawsuit coming. All these attacks
are just plain not necessary.


Are you giving up so darn easily about the weather in
Quote:
Washington, DC, John? I mean, really - no challenges to the weather
facts I posted. No claims of "making a joke"?

I'm saving it for court. And for my autobio.

You are obviously a person who LOVES an argument. You start so
many; arguments that truly don't need to happen.

But all that contentiousness proves who your master is, and you make
no pretense of serving God.


john w
Quote:

I'm surprised at you, John. :-(

  So for me, while 90 (Seattle) isn't comfortable, I've been WAY
hotter.

Riiiiight...you've been there and done it all and no one will ever be
able to top you, will they John?

  If you say so.

  By the way, Ms Kelly, smartest darn person in this here Universe,
the links you posted didn't go to the photos I took. I'm disappointed,
because if those photos are really in the "playbill" that you LIED and
said were in it, I would get credit.

 And, [ guffaw ], the person you're calling the black "Willie
Weatherly" is Dobie Gray.

 chuckle.

  You are that STUPID that you don't know Dobie Gray when you see him?

 Roll on the ground, laughing my ass off.

Sorry, John - but you are wrong yet again. The other guy in the afro
is Willie Weatherly. Nice try, but still no cigar.

You are very obviously attempting to provoke me.


Quote:

 AGAIN, if you PRETENDED to be a Christian occasionally, you wouldn't
be wasting so much time trying (in vain) to prove I lied about
something.

  You're a liar, Kelly.  Google proves that FACT. You're a liar, and
you're psychotic.

Oh, John. Just take a look at the responses I made to you in the
other thread where you continue to claim that Willie Weatherly, whom
you claim played "Claude" (even though it was Ted Neeley who had the
role of Claude) in Hair is your brother. Well...he *is* a "brother",
just not yours, dear.

My brother, labeled on the photo, "Willie Weatherly" (the white guy)
playing Claude; an unknown (loser with NO talent) "Red Shepard"
playing Burger.

v v v

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair4.html


I'm betting you won't look because "you already know."

Meaning, you're quite willing to IGNORE the FACTS and continue to
argue like a drooling idiot.


As I have said many times, my brother played BOTH Burger AND Claude.

He was the only cast member I am aware of who got cast in BOTH
leads.

And you TRULY should actually DO some research, and not just start
opening that cavernous mouth of yours when you find ONE picture.

If you actually had the correct playbill, in fact, you'd see my
brother listed in both roles.



Quote:

Have a nice evening. Wink
Back to top
Mike Painter
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:31 pm    Post subject: Re: John and arcb Reply with quote

Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:22:09 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:26:58 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

sni
For once, I can say, "You have blessed me this day."

God bless you, too!

And-- yes--- we can all "take a step back" on a regular basis.

I personally find something happening in here that distresses me.

You're likely to see it in a day or two. I'm going to be VERY crude;
I hope you "catch my drift."

I can just see 10 people in the next couple of days (we could
probably both list them ahead of time) who will see that we've shaken
hands and hugged (I call it "cheek to cheek"/sincere, warm, close hug)
and listened to and forgiven one another (one sign that you are one
of His is that you can FORGIVE sincerely)

They're gonna say (this is the vulgar part/please put it in context)
"OH! I see John and Matt are French kissing!" ( < ugh !! )

^ ^ ^ This trash talk in a Christian group? If the "wrong people"
are nice to each other, "it must be bedtime for those two."
That's been said to me / of me, countless times.

Those who call themselves "Christians" aren't necessarily.

That's why I said, "I'll know who you serve by how you act and what
you say." I don't mean actions; I don't mean words;
I mean attitude.
You can get angry, you can say disgusting things. (I do all the
time, to make points here and there)
But are you DELIBERATELY revolting as "revenge?"
That is not allowed.

John says otehres will say the things he says and talks of revenge not being

allowed.
This is the man who has threatened people with law suits for years and talks
of physical violence against them on a regular basis.

Quote:
And I am going to try to spend less time in here, and get back to my
house cleaning!

God DID Bless me. A neighbor called me last night. "John! Come help!
Please! I broke my computer!"
She had said "Yes" to a download she should have refused!

One of those big flags that SAYS "Windows" that isn't. She
downloaded a nasty virus.

Fortunately, it was confined to one program folder that was easy to
remove.

The endless flags stopped instantly.

"I'm such a hero!" It also means a FAT paycheck next week!

:-)

I've told her many times, " a hug is payment enough." She works;
she knows I don't (well, I work for HER). She said, "if I took it to a
shop, I'd have to pay them TWICE what I pay you."

So she insists on paying me for any help I give her.

Then I stayed to show her how to use canned air and blow her
computer out.

Yep, a nice, FAT paycheck next week!! Smile

Half of what a reputable shop would charge is a fat pay check.
And you brag about showing her how to use a can of air but fail to mention
telling her about virus checkers that should have caught the virus in the
download.

You are like a small child who brags about his ability to tie his shoes. A
great accomplishment for him but a bemused smile from an adult.
Back to top
ujb
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:47 pm    Post subject: Re: John and arcb Reply with quote

Mike Painter wrote:
Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:22:09 -0800, Matt . <trdell1234@nospamgmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:26:58 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

sni
For once, I can say, "You have blessed me this day."

God bless you, too!

And-- yes--- we can all "take a step back" on a regular basis.

I personally find something happening in here that distresses me.

You're likely to see it in a day or two. I'm going to be VERY crude;
I hope you "catch my drift."

I can just see 10 people in the next couple of days (we could
probably both list them ahead of time) who will see that we've shaken
hands and hugged (I call it "cheek to cheek"/sincere, warm, close hug)
and listened to and forgiven one another (one sign that you are one
of His is that you can FORGIVE sincerely)

They're gonna say (this is the vulgar part/please put it in context)
"OH! I see John and Matt are French kissing!" ( < ugh !! )

^ ^ ^ This trash talk in a Christian group? If the "wrong people"
are nice to each other, "it must be bedtime for those two."
That's been said to me / of me, countless times.

Those who call themselves "Christians" aren't necessarily.

That's why I said, "I'll know who you serve by how you act and what
you say." I don't mean actions; I don't mean words;
I mean attitude.
You can get angry, you can say disgusting things. (I do all the
time, to make points here and there)
But are you DELIBERATELY revolting as "revenge?"
That is not allowed.

John says otehres will say the things he says and talks of revenge not being
allowed.
This is the man who has threatened people with law suits for years and talks
of physical violence against them on a regular basis.

And I am going to try to spend less time in here, and get back to my
house cleaning!

God DID Bless me. A neighbor called me last night. "John! Come help!
Please! I broke my computer!"
She had said "Yes" to a download she should have refused!

One of those big flags that SAYS "Windows" that isn't. She
downloaded a nasty virus.

Fortunately, it was confined to one program folder that was easy to
remove.

The endless flags stopped instantly.

"I'm such a hero!" It also means a FAT paycheck next week!

:-)

I've told her many times, " a hug is payment enough." She works;
she knows I don't (well, I work for HER). She said, "if I took it to a
shop, I'd have to pay them TWICE what I pay you."

So she insists on paying me for any help I give her.

Then I stayed to show her how to use canned air and blow her
computer out.

Yep, a nice, FAT paycheck next week!! :-)

Half of what a reputable shop would charge is a fat pay check.
And you brag about showing her how to use a can of air but fail to mention
telling her about virus checkers that should have caught the virus in the
download.

You are like a small child who brags about his ability to tie his shoes. A
great accomplishment for him but a bemused smile from an adult.

poor poor stupid's mind is so frail!
--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this archived post...
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:46 am    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 20, 5:36 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  My brother, labeled on the photo, "Willie Weatherly" (the white guy)
playing Claude;  an unknown (loser with NO talent) "Red Shepard"
playing Burger.

v v v

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair4.html

  I'm betting you won't look because "you already know."

  Meaning, you're quite willing to IGNORE the FACTS and continue to
argue like a drooling idiot.

No, no drooling here. You must have me confused with your neighbor in
your very institutional-looking living situation.


Your trash talk doesn't interest me. But I'm betting the
authorities will be interested in this very deliberate, very visible
harassment.

SNIP


john w
>
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:47 am    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 20, 5:36 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  My brother, labeled on the photo, "Willie Weatherly" (the white guy)
playing Claude;  an unknown (loser with NO talent) "Red Shepard"
playing Burger.

v v v

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair4.html

  I'm betting you won't look because "you already know."

  Meaning, you're quite willing to IGNORE the FACTS and continue to
argue like a drooling idiot.

No, no drooling here. You must have me confused with your neighbor in
your very institutional-looking living situation.

Anyhoo...yes, I see that it states Willie Weatherly is Claude, so I do
apologize for that error.

However, Willie Weatherly still looks African American - the guy in
the picture you included on your Flickr page, however, was NOT the
same Willie Weatherly in the program pages, John. Now...are you going
to continue saying that Willie Weatherly the African American stage
actor is your brother (just like you claim Shawn Weatherly is related
to you and Jim Weatherly is related to and Michael Weatherly is
related to you) ?

 As I have said many times, my brother played BOTH Burger AND Claude.

  He was the only cast member I am aware of who got cast in BOTH
leads.

BOTH leads, huh? He's still black, John.

  And you TRULY should actually DO some research, and not just start
opening that cavernous mouth of yours when you find ONE picture.

  If you actually had the correct playbill, in fact, you'd see my
brother listed in both roles.

I see. Well, it's not unusual to double-cast. But, do you see that
Willie Weatherly is still black, John?


------------------ ARCHIVED -----------------------
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:49 am    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 20, 5:36 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  My brother, labeled on the photo, "Willie Weatherly" (the white guy)
playing Claude;  an unknown (loser with NO talent) "Red Shepard"
playing Burger.

v v v

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair4.html

  I'm betting you won't look because "you already know."

  Meaning, you're quite willing to IGNORE the FACTS and continue to
argue like a drooling idiot.

No, no drooling here. You must have me confused with your neighbor in
your very institutional-looking living situation.

Anyhoo...yes, I see that it states Willie Weatherly is Claude, so I do
apologize for that error.

However, Willie Weatherly still looks African American - the guy in
the picture you included on your Flickr page, however, was NOT the
same Willie Weatherly in the program pages, John. Now...are you going
to continue saying that Willie Weatherly the African American stage
actor is your brother (just like you claim Shawn Weatherly is related
to you and Jim Weatherly is related to and Michael Weatherly is
related to you) ?

 As I have said many times, my brother played BOTH Burger AND Claude.

  He was the only cast member I am aware of who got cast in BOTH
leads.

BOTH leads, huh? He's still black, John.

  And you TRULY should actually DO some research, and not just start
opening that cavernous mouth of yours when you find ONE picture.

  If you actually had the correct playbill, in fact, you'd see my
brother listed in both roles.

I see. Well, it's not unusual to double-cast. But, do you see that
Willie Weatherly is still black, John?


^ ^ ^ ^^ This is EXACTLY the sort of trash talk for which I didn't
want you and a dozen other cretins IN HERE seeing my portfolio.

You have now proved my point.

IT was put up for professional purposes, and you've been childishly
ragging me about it since you found it.

Explain how these RIDICULOUS, mind-numbing comments are "critiquing"
my work.

You're not critiquing my work. You're being a petty, vindictive
little "c" word.

john w
Back to top
ujb
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:11 am    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

john w <j wrote:
Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 20, 5:36 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

My brother, labeled on the photo, "Willie Weatherly" (the white guy)
playing Claude; an unknown (loser with NO talent) "Red Shepard"
playing Burger.

v v v

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair4.html

I'm betting you won't look because "you already know."

Meaning, you're quite willing to IGNORE the FACTS and continue to
argue like a drooling idiot.
No, no drooling here. You must have me confused with your neighbor in
your very institutional-looking living situation.


Your trash talk doesn't interest me. But I'm betting the
authorities will be interested in this very deliberate, very visible
harassment.

hahaha lol

same as archive papa porn...

--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this archived post...
Back to top
Robibnikoff
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:48 am    Post subject: Re: Once again, John W's been there, done it all, seen it al Reply with quote

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> lied:

Quote:
Your trash talk doesn't interest me.

Obviously it does, as you read and reply to every one of her posts.

But I'm betting the
Quote:
authorities will be interested in this very deliberate, very visible
harassment.

So? Get off your lazy ass and do something about it already.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight
#1557
Back to top
Display posts from previous: