| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jim
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: Re: My Gods |
 |
|
"Kevin" <laighleas@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1190889498.786310.137000@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | On 27 Sep, 07:40, root <matthew149...@gmail.com> wrote:
You think they'd be online these days, with a blog, myspace account,
LiveJournal and email address and so on.
They're there - you just have to look carefully! :-)
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=378144
I guess it's quite logical for God to be an atheist, since there are
no other gods above him in which to believe. 
|
Just as I am closer to Jesus than most folks as neither of us are or were
Christians. :-)
| Quote: |
I think I've seen Thor around somewhere. IT is of course Hermes'
field, and he's no doubt got a number of blogs and websites. However,
he has a nasty habit of disguising himself as a mortal in order to
test folks' hospitaility, and woe betide you if you failed. So if you
visit a website, blog, forum or whatever, are very nice and your house
promptly fills up with gold, you've just run into him. :-)
Kevin
|
|
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Jim
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
"aine" <aine_nicneven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1190854614.015338.283080@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | On Sep 26, 5:27 pm, DruidEire <DruidE...@cablenet.ie> wrote:
On Sep 27, 1:11 am, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Poked at me in fun? Hmmm...you think? Who would do such a thing? I
mean that would involve quite alot of messing with my life. Who would
have the time to do that and why would they?
Scripture reports that Jesus underwent a "lost 18 years" from when he
was 12 until he was 30, when he commenced his public ministry until he
was 33 when he was crucified.
He did. That is verified. No ones life is lost, peoples lives are
hushed.
I have always taken it that he was in studies and training at
Qumran,
but he could equally have been anywhere else in the world during this
time.
Time enough to study and become a Druid. Especially if he was a speed
Ogham reader. Pardone if Cornwall was one of those places Druids were
not in. The mass amount of posts and info here is more then I can
follow.
Somewhere in there he did do what the Church did not agree with.
The Gospels of the New Testament write of these "Lost Years" as indeed
the Catholic and other Protestant Churches also admit - they do not
know where he was in those years. Ask any priest or Minister and he/
she will confirm this to you.
Agreed. I had many talks with them.
I pushed buttons about that and the fact that the church says at
funerals and tells those grieving that their loved ones are in Heaven
with God. The Bible clearly states they are in sleep state until the
2nd coming of Christ.
I also asked why if the Ten Commandments state Thou Shall Not
Lie..they lie so easily. I was told each time that it was more
soothing for the loved ones. "Why" I asked if God is so great and the
religion so loving would that not be soothing already.
The whole church is based on lies on what makes it easier to digest.
It is not far fetched to believe they destroyed documentation of his
early life that was study of the mysteries. It is not a reach then to
believe Mary's scripture was destroyed or kept by her. The Church
wanted no part of anything that deviated into the pagan or Goddess.
There are these reports that he visited Cornwall with his Uncle Joseph
of Arimathea who imported tin from the Cornish mines, as was his
business, to Israel.
I know one Freemason site says it was Cornwall but I read several
others I would have to go back to to cite. One did say Mary was of
Celtic Royal blood as her father was an early Celtic King but, I am
not sure if that is correct according to all that has been said here.
If he was a King it would be royal enough blood to call Jesus and Mary
both of royal line heritage.
I often think, that as Cornwall is just a short sea trip away, he
could have visited Ireland too - and maybe even have met our ancient
Druids.
Do-able. Even then although, I seriously would want Dramamine.
It is speculation, of course.
Of Course..for you. Mine is a mission. I love missions. ;)
Michael.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
And missionaries?
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kevin
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:43 pm Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
On 27 Sep, 01:56, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Sep 26, 5:27 pm, DruidEire <DruidE...@cablenet.ie> wrote:
I have always taken it that he was in studies and training at
Qumran,
but he could equally have been anywhere else in the world during this
time.
|
However, it is probably better to go with what is more likely. He did
say that his message was not for the gentiles.
| Quote: | Time enough to study and become a Druid. Especially if he was a speed
Ogham reader. Pardone if Cornwall was one of those places Druids were
not in. The mass amount of posts and info here is more then I can
follow.
|
Oh, there were druids in Dumnonia. There are tales, and their names
appear in place names , such as Drewsteignton. You've even got a place
called Nymet Rowland - nymet, as in nemed.
As for the Ogham, you can learn that quickly. What you learn from it
would take you much longer though. But that's true of lots of things.
| Quote: | Somewhere in there he did do what the Church did not agree with.
|
Not necessarily. If someone is off learning, he or she is going to be
off the radar.
| Quote: | I pushed buttons about that and the fact that the church says at
funerals and tells those grieving that their loved ones are in Heaven
with God. The Bible clearly states they are in sleep state until the
2nd coming of Christ.
|
Hmm! Would have to dig around in the Bible for chapter and verse. Got
one? Though it sounds likely, given what I know of Church dogma.
| Quote: | I also asked why if the Ten Commandments state Thou Shall Not
Lie..they lie so easily. I was told each time that it was more
soothing for the loved ones. "Why" I asked if God is so great and the
religion so loving would that not be soothing already.
|
:-)
| Quote: | The whole church is based on lies on what makes it easier to digest.
|
I'm not sure anyone deliberately lied. They explained it to the
gentiles in a manner the gentiles could understand - Paul actually
says that was his approach - and in doing so, changed it drastically.
They could not have foreseen the consequences - most folks today
don't, which is one reason I'm not keen on eclecticism. Others 'spun'
the message - which they believed - for various audiences, because
they reckoned the message was so important, but in doing so, changed
the message as far as later generations were concerned. Later
generations then built on everything that had gone before, and did the
medieval thing of relying on authorities - particular earlier authors
who were taken as authoratitive. The plethora of gospels that were
wandering around were systematised partly by appeals to authorities to
just four canonical gospels, though one may have to wonder at the
process, given that one important character remarked that there could
only be four gospels, in the same way that there were only four
pillars to the world.And in such a manner a tottering edifice got
built, full of contradictions and flaws that generations a millennia
later could see - much like some settlements get built on the remains
of previous ones that have been infilled, knocked down or filled with
trash until the settlement forms a mound - but the generations doing
the building couldn't, because their mindset didn't allow them to see
such problems.
No one in the early days, I think, ever had a view of the overall
emerging structure. Add to the above beefs on interpretations and
doctrine in the early Church, the fact that Christianity had the
misfortune to become the state religion, and this take over from Sol
Invictus and the earlier imperial cult, and thus got involved in
internal power politics, the relationship of emperors to the Church
and of the elite to the emperor, and the introduction of military
muscle into the equation - well, that's how it all developed.
OK not a rigorous academic exercise in explanation, but I'm not
writing an academic essay! But basically no one at any point set
out to decieve - not until some medieval character came up with
theological justification for 'noble lies'. They just took what they'd
got and ran with it, without have full knowledge of what had gone
before, or the education and mental equipment to see the
contradictions, flaws and fault lines. Given the lack of general
education, the persepctive of culture then (pre-scientific) and a
thousand other factors, this wasn't going to start happening until the
Enlightenment.
I know - I'm being tolerant of Christianity. However, never having
been a Christian, I don't have any axes to grind. I don't feel let
down by its flaws, cos they don't matter to me. Were I in charge of it
- well, I can see a way to rewrite its ethos to make it work
coherently, but I don't think that they will be asking me any time
soom :-)
| Quote: | It is not far fetched to believe they destroyed documentation of his
early life that was study of the mysteries. It is not a reach then to
believe Mary's scripture was destroyed or kept by her. The Church
wanted no part of anything that deviated into the pagan or Goddess.
|
The Gospel according to Mary is till about. Controversial and non-
canonical, but 2nd century or earlier.
http://www.gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mary
Then you have the Gospel of Thomas, which is either about 50 AD (20
years or less after the crucifixion) or 2nd century, depending on who
is arguing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas
"The Gospel of Thomas is mystical and emphasizes a direct and
unmediated experience of the Divine through becoming a Christ. In
Thomas v.108, Jesus said, "Whoever drinks from my mouth will become as
I am; I myself shall become that person, and the hidden things will be
revealed to him." Furthermore, salvation is personal and found through
spiritual (psychological) introspection. In Thomas v.70, Jesus says,
"If you bring forth what is within you, what you have will save you.
If you do not bring it forth, what you do not have within you will
kill you." "
Which relates to a saying in the canonical gospels, "The Kingdom of
God is within you."
"In Thomas v.6, his disciples asked him, "Do you want us to fast? How
should we pray? Should we give to charity? What diet should we
observe?" Jesus dismisses the relevance of the questions with his
reply, "Don't lie, and don't do what you hate, because all things are
disclosed before heaven. After all, there is nothing hidden that will
not be revealed, and there is nothing covered up that will remain
concealed;" correlating a state of unconflicted awareness with the
external experience of the Real."
OK.
"No major Christian group accepts this gospel as canonical or
authoritative. Nonetheless, it is an important work for scholars
working on the Q Gospel, which itself is thought to be a collection of
sayings or teachings upon which later gospels are based. Although no
copy of Q has ever been discovered, the fact that Thomas is similarly
a 'sayings' Gospel is taken by some as indication that the early
Christians did write collections of the sayings of Jesus, and thus
they feel it renders the Q theory more credible"
Not far off the practice of modern disciples writing down the sayings
of some teacher.
"Modern critical scholars use three criteria to determine what the
historical Jesus may have taught: multiple attestations,
dissimilarity, and contextual credibility. Many modern scholars
believe that the Gospel of Thomas was written independently of the New
Testament, and therefore, is a useful guide to historical Jesus
research."
"By finding those sayings in the Gospel of Thomas that overlap with Q,
Mark, Matthew, Luke, John, and Paul, scholars feel such sayings
represent "multiple attestations" and therefore are more likely to
come from a historical Jesus than sayings that are only singly
attested, such as the vast majority of the material in John."
John is late. Personally I find it highly unlikely that the author
ever met Jesus.
I have more sympathy with the Gospel of Thomas than I do with
conventional Christianity, but that is as far as it goes.
It would be flawed reasoning to argue that this stuff depends upon
druidism or vice versa, despite superficial similarities in some
areas. You'd have to dig deeper and have a good understanding of both
systems to comment on that. Best you might say is that mystical
traditions are trying to understand the reality underlying reality by
differenct means and ways. They will have things in common, due to a
common goal; they will differ, due to different cultures and times.
Kevin |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Stacey
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:07 pm Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
You know, I think I misunderstood this whole thread. I was thinking it was
about why someone says, "My gods" as an exclamation, not as a possessive
thingie.
"Say good-night Gracie."
Stacey |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jim
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:39 pm Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
"Stacey" <Stacey_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:fdgo090133p@drn.newsguy.com...
| Quote: | You know, I think I misunderstood this whole thread. I was thinking it
was
about why someone says, "My gods" as an exclamation, not as a possessive
thingie.
"Say good-night Gracie."
Stacey
|
It has always bothered me when people speak of their gods as though they
possess them.
Of course they are speaking of the gods they personally give recognition to.
When I finally meet a god I can get into that game.
Faith in a suppositioin just does not work for this one. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
aine
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:03 am Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
On Sep 27, 5:47 am, "Jim" <stonelo...@softcom.net> wrote:
| Quote: | "aine" <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1190857964.584853.58460@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 26, 5:41 pm, "Jim" <stonelo...@softcom.net> wrote:
You are slow arn't you!!!- Hide quoted text -
You want to know what would be really funny "Jim"?
If I really was as good as I say and the joke was actually being
played around the jokester(s).
Ya see, I hate Trolls so bad and I hate people who mess with others
minds so bad, I actually would yes..include that in my missions in
life to magickally make their lives very miserable. ;)
Am I slow? Or am I one of those powerful enough to fool even the best
into thinking I am doing nothing?
Think about it "Jim"...;)
Your the person messing with peoples minds!
Think about it.
|
How? I am the most up front person I know. No games, no subject
tabboos.
The only thing I can think of that I mess with others minds about is
when I like them romantically and I am attracted to them.
Then I keep that to myself and pretend like I don't like them or I
tease and flirt if they do but in game mode. Like I throw a snowball
at them and then run. lol~ Isn't that weird? Seriously. I can handle
rejection and I am not shy at all once I know someone likes me. It is
that in between time.
Since that is not going on here Jim unless you are a sock for someone
I have the hots for and I do not know you are..... I am not messing
with your mind!!!!!!!! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
aine
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:52 am Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
On Sep 27, 3:36 am, odubh...@comcast.net wrote:
| Quote: | On Sep 26, 9:52 pm, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Am I slow? Or am I one of those powerful enough to fool even the best
into thinking I am doing nothing?
Think about it "Jim"...;)
Perhaps thinking is not his strong point?
Searles- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
I can take certain insults as just fun.
Some things like "are you slow".. "are you blind"... are red flags to
me for Troll and player activity. As if someone could not hold it in
any more about a private joke or they are privy to a game.
I am aware that Trolls do come in and mess with peoples heads, place
bets on who can do more damage and in the instance of religion..try to
see if they can get followers based on like the Scientology bet.
I hate being played or seeing others get played because that is really
messing with their heads, hearts and spiritual well being.
Now if they came in and proposed some off the wall religion, that
would be one thing. To set people up around religious icons and known
Gods, would be just sick and twisted.
If the Troll activity is just to get people aware of a real religion.
Raise awareness of issues or lies about it or introduce theories of
say The Church among Druidry. Fine. As long as what is posted is for a
real purpose not made up for the drunk frat boys to get a good laugh
over.
Let's get real..alot of what DruidE and Mairtin write is fun at best
and easy to say..yeah its a Troll thing in a way. Stories, laughs,
goofs...I mean come on..garters and corsets, angry supposed Doctors..I
mean DUH.
Yet they do present real thinking information, so, one just has fun
with the other.
What the goal is, I have no clue. Possibly it is to see if they can
sway groups minds to a different thinking. As long as the info
presented is indeed a possibility. I would not find much harm in that.
I think the joke would be on them.
My honest concern is magickals who are Trolls out for their own fun.
Yes, there are groups who do put intent into their words. I think a
person needs to be concerned that this is their true thoughts about
their path and spirituality verses..being tagged by another's game.
That is why I timeline my visions and research out for hours what I am
receiving in. Is it true for me or anothers intent.
Telepathy game is one thing, but only honorable if all parties are
aware what is going on and agree to it.
Like I said..are you slow" and such phrases are flags to that.
Jim has been here a long time. It would be odd that he part of a game,
but, still. A person normally does not drop an insult without
explanation of why they are saying it and he does alot.
Why the heck not just spit it out why you are saying something like
Are you slow? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:41 am Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
On Sep 27, 3:52 pm, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Sep 27, 3:36 am, odubh...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 26, 9:52 pm, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Am I slow? Or am I one of those powerful enough to fool even the best
into thinking I am doing nothing?
Think about it "Jim"...;)
Perhaps thinking is not his strong point?
Searles- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can take certain insults as just fun.
Some things like "are you slow".. "are you blind"... are red flags to
me for Troll and player activity. As if someone could not hold it in
any more about a private joke or they are privy to a game.
I am aware that Trolls do come in and mess with peoples heads, place
bets on who can do more damage and in the instance of religion..try to
see if they can get followers based on like the Scientology bet.
I hate being played or seeing others get played because that is really
messing with their heads, hearts and spiritual well being.
Now if they came in and proposed some off the wall religion, that
would be one thing. To set people up around religious icons and known
Gods, would be just sick and twisted.
If the Troll activity is just to get people aware of a real religion.
Raise awareness of issues or lies about it or introduce theories of
say The Church among Druidry. Fine. As long as what is posted is for a
real purpose not made up for the drunk frat boys to get a good laugh
over.
Let's get real..alot of what DruidE and Mairtin write is fun at best
and easy to say..yeah its a Troll thing in a way. Stories, laughs,
goofs...I mean come on..garters and corsets, angry supposed Doctors..I
mean DUH.
Yet they do present real thinking information, so, one just has fun
with the other.
What the goal is, I have no clue. Possibly it is to see if they can
sway groups minds to a different thinking. As long as the info
presented is indeed a possibility. I would not find much harm in that.
I think the joke would be on them.
My honest concern is magickals who are Trolls out for their own fun.
Yes, there are groups who do put intent into their words. I think a
person needs to be concerned that this is their true thoughts about
their path and spirituality verses..being tagged by another's game.
That is why I timeline my visions and research out for hours what I am
receiving in. Is it true for me or anothers intent.
Telepathy game is one thing, but only honorable if all parties are
aware what is going on and agree to it.
Like I said..are you slow" and such phrases are flags to that.
Jim has been here a long time. It would be odd that he part of a game,
but, still. A person normally does not drop an insult without
explanation of why they are saying it and he does alot.
Why the heck not just spit it out why you are saying something like
Are you slow?
|
I don't think you are slow at all. I *DO* think Jim overates his own
cleverness.
That should spit it out plainly enough for Jim even. :-)
Searles |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lilith
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:06 am Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
Kevin wrote:
| Quote: | On 27 Sep, 01:56, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 26, 5:27 pm, DruidEire <DruidE...@cablenet.ie> wrote:
I have always taken it that he was in studies and training at
Qumran,
but he could equally have been anywhere else in the world during this
time.
However, it is probably better to go with what is more likely. He did
say that his message was not for the gentiles.
|
That bit always irked me, the number of times and ways those books (old
& new testament) said "this is only for *my* people" and was (at best)
disregarded.
| Quote: | Time enough to study and become a Druid. Especially if he was a speed
Ogham reader. Pardone if Cornwall was one of those places Druids were
not in. The mass amount of posts and info here is more then I can
follow.
Oh, there were druids in Dumnonia. There are tales, and their names
appear in place names , such as Drewsteignton. You've even got a place
called Nymet Rowland - nymet, as in nemed.
As for the Ogham, you can learn that quickly. What you learn from it
would take you much longer though. But that's true of lots of things.
|
.... ok... a thought... if he'd studied with Druids and learned Ogham,
wouldn't there be Ogham inscriptions somewhere in the Middle East, or
have mention of "sacred script" or some such?
| Quote: | Somewhere in there he did do what the Church did not agree with.
Not necessarily. If someone is off learning, he or she is going to be
off the radar.
I pushed buttons about that and the fact that the church says at
funerals and tells those grieving that their loved ones are in Heaven
with God. The Bible clearly states they are in sleep state until the
2nd coming of Christ.
Hmm! Would have to dig around in the Bible for chapter and verse. Got
one? Though it sounds likely, given what I know of Church dogma.
I also asked why if the Ten Commandments state Thou Shall Not
Lie..they lie so easily. I was told each time that it was more
soothing for the loved ones. "Why" I asked if God is so great and the
religion so loving would that not be soothing already.
:-)
The whole church is based on lies on what makes it easier to digest.
I'm not sure anyone deliberately lied. They explained it to the
gentiles in a manner the gentiles could understand - Paul actually
says that was his approach - and in doing so, changed it drastically.
They could not have foreseen the consequences - most folks today
don't, which is one reason I'm not keen on eclecticism. Others 'spun'
the message - which they believed - for various audiences, because
they reckoned the message was so important, but in doing so, changed
the message as far as later generations were concerned. Later
generations then built on everything that had gone before, and did the
medieval thing of relying on authorities - particular earlier authors
who were taken as authoratitive. The plethora of gospels that were
wandering around were systematised partly by appeals to authorities to
just four canonical gospels, though one may have to wonder at the
process, given that one important character remarked that there could
only be four gospels, in the same way that there were only four
pillars to the world.And in such a manner a tottering edifice got
built, full of contradictions and flaws that generations a millennia
later could see - much like some settlements get built on the remains
of previous ones that have been infilled, knocked down or filled with
trash until the settlement forms a mound - but the generations doing
the building couldn't, because their mindset didn't allow them to see
such problems.
No one in the early days, I think, ever had a view of the overall
emerging structure. Add to the above beefs on interpretations and
doctrine in the early Church, the fact that Christianity had the
misfortune to become the state religion, and this take over from Sol
Invictus and the earlier imperial cult, and thus got involved in
internal power politics, the relationship of emperors to the Church
and of the elite to the emperor, and the introduction of military
muscle into the equation - well, that's how it all developed.
OK not a rigorous academic exercise in explanation, but I'm not
writing an academic essay! But basically no one at any point set
out to decieve - not until some medieval character came up with
theological justification for 'noble lies'. They just took what they'd
got and ran with it, without have full knowledge of what had gone
before, or the education and mental equipment to see the
contradictions, flaws and fault lines. Given the lack of general
education, the persepctive of culture then (pre-scientific) and a
thousand other factors, this wasn't going to start happening until the
Enlightenment.
|
Oh, gosh.
Do read The Pagan Christ if you've got the chance.
Tom Harpur.
Much early Church history in there.
| Quote: | I know - I'm being tolerant of Christianity. However, never having
been a Christian, I don't have any axes to grind. I don't feel let
down by its flaws, cos they don't matter to me. Were I in charge of it
- well, I can see a way to rewrite its ethos to make it work
coherently, but I don't think that they will be asking me any time
soom :-)
It is not far fetched to believe they destroyed documentation of his
early life that was study of the mysteries. It is not a reach then to
believe Mary's scripture was destroyed or kept by her. The Church
wanted no part of anything that deviated into the pagan or Goddess.
The Gospel according to Mary is till about. Controversial and non-
canonical, but 2nd century or earlier.
http://www.gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mary
Then you have the Gospel of Thomas, which is either about 50 AD (20
years or less after the crucifixion) or 2nd century, depending on who
is arguing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas
|
<snippage of interesting stuff>
| Quote: | It would be flawed reasoning to argue that this stuff depends upon
druidism or vice versa, despite superficial similarities in some
areas. You'd have to dig deeper and have a good understanding of both
systems to comment on that. Best you might say is that mystical
traditions are trying to understand the reality underlying reality by
differenct means and ways. They will have things in common, due to a
common goal; they will differ, due to different cultures and times.
Kevin
|
Nicely put, this last paragraph.
Ta.
L.
--
Lilith Dragonswife, Yin Bitch
~ "Better to be an enemy than a slave." ~ |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jim
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 3:11 am Post subject: Re: My Gods |
|
|
<odubhain@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1190929312.367476.255570@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | On Sep 27, 3:52 pm, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 27, 3:36 am, odubh...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 26, 9:52 pm, aine <aine_nicne...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Am I slow? Or am I one of those powerful enough to fool even the best
into thinking I am doing nothing?
Think about it "Jim"...;)
Perhaps thinking is not his strong point?
Searles- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can take certain insults as just fun.
Some things like "are you slow".. "are you blind"... are red flags to
me for Troll and player activity. As if someone could not hold it in
any more about a private joke or they are privy to a game.
I am aware that Trolls do come in and mess with peoples heads, place
bets on who can do more damage and in the instance of religion..try to
see if they can get followers based on like the Scientology bet.
I hate being played or seeing others get played because that is really
messing with their heads, hearts and spiritual well being.
Now if they came in and proposed some off the wall religion, that
would be one thing. To set people up around religious icons and known
Gods, would be just sick and twisted.
If the Troll activity is just to get people aware of a real religion.
Raise awareness of issues or lies about it or introduce theories of
say The Church among Druidry. Fine. As long as what is posted is for a
real purpose not made up for the drunk frat boys to get a good laugh
over.
Let's get real..alot of what DruidE and Mairtin write is fun at best
and easy to say..yeah its a Troll thing in a way. Stories, laughs,
goofs...I mean come on..garters and corsets, angry supposed Doctors..I
mean DUH.
Yet they do present real thinking information, so, one just has fun
with the other.
What the goal is, I have no clue. Possibly it is to see if they can
sway groups minds to a different thinking. As long as the info
presented is indeed a possibility. I would not find much harm in that.
I think the joke would be on them.
My honest concern is magickals who are Trolls out for their own fun.
Yes, there are groups who do put intent into their words. I think a
person needs to be concerned that this is their true thoughts about
their path and spirituality verses..being tagged by another's game.
That is why I timeline my visions and research out for hours what I am
receiving in. Is it true for me or anothers intent.
Telepathy game is one thing, but only honorable if all parties are
aware what is going on and agree to it.
Like I said..are you slow" and such phrases are flags to that.
Jim has been here a long time. It would be odd that he part of a game,
but, still. A person normally does not drop an insult without
explanation of why they are saying it and he does alot.
Why the heck not just spit it out why you are saying something like
Are you slow?
I don't think you are slow at all. I *DO* think Jim overates his own
cleverness.
That should spit it out plainly enough for Jim even. :-)
Searles
|
Geeze cult one, maybe I should spit it out more clearly for the new age
twit. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
