| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Corax Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 7:58 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
"Kevin Filan" <mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com> wrote in message
news:BB5BCEFB.2DBE5%mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com...
| Quote: | On 8/10/03 3:28 AM, in article
3f35f5b9$0$97234$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk, "- wolf -"
wolf@nospam-blazingangles.com> wrote:
Satanic Ritual Abuse doesn't need criminal Satanists, because it can
easily
make up better stories without them. A few criminal Satanists enable the
SRA
people to say, "See! They exist!," but so does any fictional story made
up
by any Michelle.
The interesting thing about the SRA hysteria, and the thing which most of
the "anti-SRA Satanists" miss, is that the vast majority of people accused
of SRA were *Christians* accused by *other Christians.* Other than
Aquino,
not one self-professed "Satanist" found himself targeted by these
investigations.
|
I do not think it has anything to do with how Satanists act vs. how
Christians act. Only few people got accused, Satanists are a very small
minority and most Americans a Christians. Those who got accused usually
where daycare workers or they got accused by there own children who suddenly
"remembered abuse" after too many hours of bogus therapy sessions or
fundamentalist Christian preaching. I do not know of any Satanists who
worked with daycare in the US (maybe some did, but I guess they did not make
a big deal out of it in public) or any Satanists who had grown up kids who
joined fundamentalist Christian groups in the 80'ties and 90'ties. But I do
remember Nagy complaining about questions in connection with the sudden
infant death of his child and other Satanists has also had different sorts
of bad experiences even if non of the cases made it to criminal court.
- Amina |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Kevin Filan Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 10:37 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
On 8/10/03 12:01 PM, in article
3f366c47$0$97180$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk, "- wolf -"
<wolf@nospam-blazingangles.com> wrote:
| Quote: | "Kevin Filan" <mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com> wrote in message
news:BB5BCEFB.2DBE5%mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com...
For Tani, Usenet is
her real world. I'm sure she thinks if she screams loudly enough on here
someone will pay attention to her
Somehow she reminds me of the stereotypical German tourist who believes that
anything he says must be right, and if others are incapable of understanding
his language or intentions, the situation can be remedied by SHOUTING VERY
LOUDLY, AND REPEATEDLY. If they still don't understand, then it's because
those Dummköpfe want to not understand.
|
So there's some commonality between German and American tourists, then? :)
Peace
Kevin Filan |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Kori Houghton Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
"- wolf -" <wolf@nospam-blazingangles.com> wrote in message news:<3f364264$1$97242$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>...
| Quote: | "People's Commissar" <satanicreds@www.com> wrote in message
news:kjpZa.6338$BC2.65@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
You either have no idea what SRA really is about, or you're deliberately
trying to twist its meaning. See Amina's reply elsewhere.
- wolf -
|
Whether or not Tani knows what so-called SRA is, it seems like she is
trying to establish an example of it. Was she the one who started
cross-posting on a few other threads to a bunch of Christian
newsgroups?
Tani has boasted on several occasions about how many members SR has,
and surely she doesn't know them all. Last summer a regular poster
here joined SR and then faked her death a la Egan. I have the email
Tani sent me about it. Before this happened, Tani claimed that she
didn't know if this woman was an SR because there were 3 SRs with that
first name! Point being, if I were the leader of an org as large and
diverse as Tani claims SR to be, I would hesitate to single out
another group as being the embodiment of a nasty legend like SRA. The
universe is full of surprises. Revenge can often be sweetly savored
in private. Tani's continued hysterical screeching about this here
makes me wonder if she has something to hide?
Kori H. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
ThirdRockFan74 Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 10:54 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
SRA is just a 60/80s revisionisiom of anti Jewish protocols directed at
Satanists |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
- wolf - Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
"Kevin Filan" <mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com> wrote in message
news:BB5BFB69.2DC2A%mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com...
| Quote: | So there's some commonality between German and American tourists, then?
 |
Far from it. the Germans have a real reputation for that behavior. As you
may have heard, the Italian president created an international scandal for
saying that openly some weeks ago, but he really has a point.
American tourists are rather known for superficiality in the sense that they
quickly visit some cultural sights, take a lot of photographs, and then
quickly move on to cover as much culture in as short time as possible. Their
sense of culture resembles certain Texas residents' food taste: there has to
be plenty of it, and it should be mashed.
Danish tourists tend to be oblivious of foreign cultures and often behave
rather rudely. After dinner, they can usually be found at the local bars
singing the wistful songs of their homeland. Poorly. And loudly.
- wolf - |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
- wolf - Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 11:29 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
"Kori Houghton" <korihoughton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6db9a636.0308100949.277fafec@posting.google.com...
| Quote: | Point being, if I were the leader of an org as large and
diverse as Tani claims SR to be, I would hesitate to single out
another group as being the embodiment of a nasty legend like SRA.
|
Yes. I'm sure the alt.satanism residents will remember everything Tani said
when eventually one of the people in her group suddenly finds himself or
herself in a similarly awkward situation, in which case Google will be a
pretty nasty nemesis.
| Quote: | Tani's continued hysterical screeching about this here
makes me wonder if she has something to hide?
|
Don't know. But IF she were to succeed in triggering a new hysteria wave, I
doubt it anyone in the SRA hysteria would bother to distinguish between her
group and the Church of Satan.
- wolf - |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
People's Commissar Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:42 am Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
Sure I can tell the difference. But you can't figure out when it's
best to shut your face hole - and we all know that the "trolls" are
you and your pals, Filan. Please. Don't even try to deny it.
I can scream SRA at you as loudly as you tried to out the names,
addresses and phone numbers of people you THOUGHT were my neighbors.
I can scream SRA as loudly as you TRIED to incite violence against me,
you and your pals - and my witnesses in this little game you played
are the COPS in TWO counties who witnessed you doing this, Filan. You
didn't even hide your email address.
You can't see the utter, complete hypocricy of Nadramia and Ygraine
(the Best Girlfriends) leading the crusade against "Egan having any
connection to Satanism" and even pleading with me or going hysterical
on me, because I chose to NOT FLAME Egan over what I thought was
nothing. Or you calling Aquino and his wife child fuckers on usenet,
repeatedly, consistently, for MONTHS on usenet, which is not a closed
mailing list, but a place the world can look at. Or LaVey heading the
crusade against the Aquinos to try to seriously get them locked up in
jail for life by cowardly lying to the CID of all things. Do you
think perhaps that despite the lack of appearance on here and flames,
that maybe people in the TOS have a SERIOUS BONE to pick with you and
your gang due to this shit? How about Egan and his gang - SERIOUS
BONES to pick for three years of persecution over how "dangerous Egan
is to the world of satanism?"
Now you are heh - you are a hypocrite. Your COS is hypocricy times
ten. You represent hypocricy to the max. I've never even SEEN such
hypocricy except on the part of the Roman Catholic Pope. Maybe not
even the Pope.
Your organization WANTED crusades against innocent people in rival
organizations. Now you no longer want a crusade when pedophilia is
going on in your own organization, and while definite wife abuse is
going on, not just one case. Let's not forget GOAD. Why not, Filan?
If you were enemies of the CoS, you'd be on here talking about hot
cocks going into underage moist vaginas. We all know it, we've seen
you in action.
After all, it was Ygraine that had to get a lawyer to make you STOP
with he flames you dished out in the past. All you did was kinda call
her a whore and she got herself a lawyer. Interesting.
You are such an incredible hypocrite. Your whole org represents
hypocricy and lies. No truth at all. No self truth. Not even
courage. Not even the decency to LET other organizations practice
satanism and either be NON-LaVeyan or use LaVeyan stuff. You guys
made a MISTAKE. You WANT everyone that you formerly picked on and
persecuted on here to REALIZE that all people make mistakes. Oh
really. Yeah, did Egan perhaps make a MISTAKE and did he really think
nambla was just about lowering the age of consent to a reasonable age
where teens are already having sex? Did he really believe that? He
sounded 100% true when he said that is what that org was about. You
never even gave Egan the benefit of the DOUBT. I did. You guys
didn't just make a mistake, Filan - that's really soft padding it.
Your organization REPRESENTS hypocricy (you call that duping the
rubes, even though it's definitely NOT that; and when others DUPE YOU
it's not duping the rubes).
Your MAGUS has no intuitions when he hangs out with these people and
they are his best buddies.
We all know what SRA is. I know what SRA is - I EXTENSIVELY looked
into it heh - BEFORE I ever contacted Peter in 1989. EXTENSIVELY. In
the 1980's I was receiving newsletters from seriously political CLOUT
organizations in the USA that were planning to implicate the Aquinos.
I even MAILED it, a copy of the worst stuff, to "A. LaVey and M.
Aquino, 6114 California St. Sfran CA 94121" thinking that they were
both there and would BOTH get the warning. I mailed it and said
"watch your backs, these people are out to seriously get you." Now,
on hindsight, I KNOW LaVey never sent a copy to Aquino. In 1989 I
learned that Aquino was no longer with LaVey. I know exactly what SRA
is about. But here you are, whining about what - FLAMES? Lmao.
Hypocrite.
You are too stupid to recognize that I'm just finally DOing what
Nadramia and Ygraine bugged me 100 times over to do. I'm finally
DOing something about a thing you and your pals gave me GRIEF over.
I'm POINTING OUT how dangerous it is to have PEDOPHILES connected to
satanism. Like, does anyone need to have that pointed out? Nope.
What in FACT I'm really doing is showing what total hypocrites you all
are. And you coming on here, heh, no matter what you say, Filan, it
just makes it worse. You know what Egan did when you attacked him en
masse like that? He put up a Nambla ad on his SATANIC website for the
world to see.
LaVey himself was too fucking stupid to realize that lying to get
innocent people, the Aquinos, locked in jail for life is a real deal -
and has nothing to do with a STUPID fucking dispute over satan garbage
that happened in 1975.
Why Filan, I'm being totally LAVEYAN here. LMAO, though I'm still not
being one percent as hypocritical as you guys always were.
You spew out lies against Audey and the store. You spew out lies
against Ron Mershon, the same old TIRED lies. You guys just never
stop. But you want everyone ELSE to stop when there is not lies, but
TRUTH to be spewed here?
HYPOCRITE. The word of the Aeon of LaVey may well have been indulge
and mock the Christians. The word of the CoS now is NYAAAAAAA.
Kevin Filan <mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com> wrote in message news:<BB5BCEFB.2DBE5%mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com>...
| Quote: | On 8/10/03 3:28 AM, in article
3f35f5b9$0$97234$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk, "- wolf -"
wolf@nospam-blazingangles.com> wrote:
Satanic Ritual Abuse doesn't need criminal Satanists, because it can easily
make up better stories without them. A few criminal Satanists enable the SRA
people to say, "See! They exist!," but so does any fictional story made up
by any Michelle.
The interesting thing about the SRA hysteria, and the thing which most of
the "anti-SRA Satanists" miss, is that the vast majority of people accused
of SRA were *Christians* accused by *other Christians.* Other than Aquino,
not one self-professed "Satanist" found himself targeted by these
investigations. (And Aquino's problems had more to do with his utter lack
of social skills than any "FUNDAMENTALIST PEDOPHILES ON THE SRA MONEY
TRAIN", IMO).
Russell Smith was convicted of sexual crimes against minors; Will Gidney has
been charged with same. In Smith's case there appears to have been some
ritualistic component: I have not seen the specifics of the accusations
against Gidney and cannot comment thereon. In Smith's case at least it
looks like the system worked ... a criminal was captured, charged and
convicted. There's no "hysteria" about it... and to date no authorities
have used this as "evidence" that the FCoS, CoS, ToS, etc. advocate child
molestation, or that they are part of some shadowy conspiracy.
Of course, it's not surprising that Tani can't tell the difference between
the real world and trolls making accusations on Usenet. For Tani, Usenet is
her real world. I'm sure she thinks if she screams loudly enough on here
someone will pay attention to her and all those evil CoS people who threw
her out on her Depends-wearing ass will be arrested for crimes against
children. It isn't going to happen, of course... but I'm sure it makes her
feel a lot better about her sad existence.
Peace
Kevin Filan |
|
|
| |
|
Back to top |
- wolf - Guest
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 7:17 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
"People's Commissar" <satanicreds@www.com> wrote in message
news:f4c223d9.0308101259.b935afe@posting.google.com...
| Quote: | Don't know. But IF she were to succeed in triggering a new hysteria
wave, I
doubt it anyone in the SRA hysteria would bother to distinguish between
her
group and the Church of Satan.
DITTO for the COS who were the ONLY organization that seriously tried
to start up a new hysteria wave - against EGAN and AQUINO.
|
They're not the only group. Your group is other one.
| Quote: | God damn
you people are selectively amnesiac. Hypocrites!
|
Ahem... YOU are trying to fire up an SRA hysteria. I'm not: search Google
and you might find what I've said to Filan about his hosting of Curio's
accusations against Aquino). That makes you the hypocrite.
- wolf - |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
People's Commissar Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:34 am Post subject: Re: Jesse Helms Again (was Re: Not only Gidney) |
|
|
OO, you are slipping up. Kaiden Fox posted that entire thing to OUR
archives. He's not using my machine. I posted that using copy/paste from
the archive Kaiden Fox MADE of your filth, y our filthy mewling attempts to
FUCK OVER Aquino. How does the FIRE feel, Filan? You PEDOPHILE defender.
"Kevin Filan" <mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com> wrote in message
news:BB5CFFA9.2DEB0%mrharwer@excite.SPAMBGONE.com...
| Quote: | On 8/11/03 5:59 AM, in article
f4c223d9.0308110159.2f057656@posting.google.com, "People's Commissar"
satanicreds@www.com> wrote:
|
DROOOOOL woof woof woof, yelp yelp yelp yelp yelp yelp yelp yelp yelp yelp. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Lisa Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 11:12 am Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
<<Just FYI. I'm surprised you are trying to defend them. They are what they
are, Ole. Would-be bullies, freaks, twisted klippoths. You thought you knew
that. Guess you didn't REALLY know it.>>
Omigod, he does not KNOW and he never really KNEW! Well, snap my garter.... who
would have guessed? |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
People's Commissar Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:54 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
This is a question for Nadramia that me and quite a few others want to
ask (yeah, too chicken shit to come on here and ask themselves?
Perhaps). I have the background tid bits which makes all the more
hilarious.
Recall that you, Nadramia, emailed about 10 pleading emails lecturing
me on and on, with Gilmore's help, about the Supreme Danger of Lord
Egan having anything to do with Satanism because of his decades old,
long gone (formerly unknown and obscure) membership in, and reading of
material from - Nambla.
I countered repeatedly that he never committed a crime.
You countered with (what I seriously thought were impossibly absurd
and even illegal activity) details about Nambla.
I countered that perhaps Egan had no idea it represented all that -
and that he quit it ages ago. He did quit it ages ago. It was you
guys that dredged that up to begin with.
You, Nadramia, kept on with your incessant bringing up of SRA SRA SRA
and more SRA. You said "S R A."
I ignored it.
Jacueline Davis went on and on about the SRA SRA SRA dangers of having
a person like Lord Egan involved with Satanism in any way. She came
to realize that I just didn't believe it or believe the info about
Nambla. It was too impossible to believe. As for your cult praising
his deranged act as if it was some sort of honorable ritual sacrifice,
I need not say much at all. IDIOT.
Gabielle Gidney, your bosom buddy the Lady Ygraine went on and on
about SRA. And I mean all three of them (Y, J and JD) used the
specific term SRA multiple times, as did YOU, Nadramia. She went on
hysterically about 4 year old children and grown men and got all over
my case because I poopooed the DANGER that she thought Lord Egan posed
to satanism for some short term, long past membership in that org.
Nadramia - what do you have to say NOW about a woman, your best buddie
there, that endured over ELEVEN YEARS of (ritualized?) abuse from your
own elevated high Satanic Priest and Grotto Master William Gidney?
What do you have to say now about the real pedophile and abuse charges
against this man that appeared in a national TV show with YOU in it
Gilmore in it, who with his wife (the repeatedly abused woman -
consider that they also DID rituals, heh) spoke for the Church of
Satan and arrogantly "all of satanism." What do you have to say now
that these people appeared in that national TV show DOING rituals with
you and the HP, representing Satanism, when it has come out that this
abuse and other garbage was going on AT THE TIME of this show? For 11
years it went on.
In lieu of Russel Smith (he claims he LEFT the CoS and since there was
no rancor on his part, he is believable), in lieu of your praising a
deranged act as honorable and some ritual, in lieu of so much of this
and THIS HERE to top off the cake:
Nadramia: IS THIS NOT A THREAT TO ALL OF SATANISM due to SRA SRA SRA?
Lemme hear ya squirm out of that one.
I have nothing MORE to say unless your storm troopers keep up their
typical, libelous, stupid, off-key shit, such as inventing stories
about me or my friends and then wasting their time talking about it as
if their own invented fantasied are true, or messing with more
innocent people that aren't even satanists. I have to wonder what you
have to say to Aquino for the SHIT LaVey tried to pull on him AND his
wife. Serious shit. I have to wonder what you have to say to Lord
Egan, who never molested a kid at all, now that you and your storm
troopers ruined HIS chances to get on TV and represent Satanism.
You lit the fire. You put up the stake. You tried to put quite a few
people on that stake. Now YOU are on it and the fire is under you and
yours.
IS YOUR ORG, OR IS NOT YOUR OWN HIGH PRIESTHOOD ITSELF A THREAT TO ALL
OF SATANISM BECAUSE IT WILL LINK IT TO SRA SRA SRA? Yes, according
to your own criteria - IT IS.
If you gave a flying hell about your satanism, you'd hand it over to
Satan Shop and let someone decent, normal, mature and FRIENDLY to
LaVeyanism like Audy take over the Church of Satan. YOU ARE A DANGER
TO ALL OF SATANISM as are all of your friends.
Tani Jantsang |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Balphagor Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 11:32 pm Post subject: Thanks but no thanks :) |
|
|
"If you gave a flying hell about your satanism, you'd hand it over to
Satan Shop and let someone decent, normal, mature and FRIENDLY to
LaVeyanism like Audy take over the Church of Satan. YOU ARE A DANGER
TO ALL OF SATANISM as are all of your friends."
Thank you Tani for your vote of confidence - I'm touched.
However, we are way too busy with our businesses to do justice to the cause.
Insofar as our camp being friendly to LaVeyanism, you must be correct as we
are continuously accused of being an Anton LaVey fan club. Like that would
be an insult! I'll keep doing what I do best.
- Balphagor
Audy Morgan |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
- wolf - Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 9:22 pm Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
"People's Commissar" <satanicreds@www.com> wrote in message
news:kP2_a.9520$BC2.2581@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
| Quote: | This is a question for Nadramia
|
Then why the Hell are you asking it as a reply to me?
- wolf - |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Tarapia Tapioco Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2003 1:42 am Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
--------------------------------------------------------
Kori Houghton wrote:
| Quote: |
"- wolf -" <wolf@nospam-blazingangles.com> wrote in message
news:<3f3a6809$1$97263$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>...
"People's Commissar" <satanicreds@www.com> wrote in message
news:kP2_a.9520$BC2.2581@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
This is a question for Nadramia
Then why the Hell are you asking it as a reply to me?
- wolf -
Perhaps Mrs. Lysenko/Marsh/Jantsang/Rose/Radu is too cowardly to
simply send a personal email to Peggy Nadramia, and then post a cc on
alt.s? Or, she wants to have your name attached to it in case someone
in the CoS takes her rant disguised as a question seriously enough to
respond?
She did the same thing with me, sort of, when she upchucked a long
spew of edited posts from the archives concerning Aquino and SRA as if
it was a response to a conversation with "Xori". Like, in her
imagination.
She seems to be quiet for the mo'. Perhaps her supply of crank ran
out?
|
Tani does crank? Well imagine that! |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
People's Commissar Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:11 am Post subject: Re: Not only Gidney |
|
|
Clue: we all know Nadramia doesn't read usenet. These were her criteria.
Why aren't you asking the question? You care about as much about the "image
of satanism" as I do. Not at all.
This is a question for Nadramia that I, and quite a few others, want to
ask and which every single satanist org out there should be asking. (edited
from "quite a few people want ME to ask) - fixed.
Recall that you, Nadramia, emailed about 10 pleading emails lecturing
me on and on, with Gilmore's help, about the Supreme Danger of Lord
Egan having anything to do with Satanism because of his decades old,
long gone (formerly unknown and obscure) membership in, and reading of
material from - Nambla.
I countered repeatedly that he never committed a crime.
You countered with (what I seriously thought were impossibly absurd
and even illegal activity) details about Nambla.
I countered that perhaps Egan had no idea it represented all that -
and that he quit it ages ago. He did quit it ages ago. It was you
guys that dredged that up to begin with.
You, Nadramia, kept on with your incessant bringing up of SRA SRA SRA
and more SRA. You said "S R A."
I ignored it.
Jacueline Davis went on and on about the SRA SRA SRA dangers of having
a person like Lord Egan involved with Satanism in any way. She came
to realize that I just didn't believe it or believe the info about
Nambla. It was too impossible to believe. As for your cult praising
his deranged act as if it was some sort of honorable ritual sacrifice,
I need not say much at all. IDIOT.
Gabielle Gidney, your bosom buddy the Lady Ygraine went on and on
about SRA. And I mean all three of them (Y, J and JD) used the
specific term SRA multiple times, as did YOU, Nadramia. She went on
hysterically about 4 year old children and grown men and got all over
my case because I poopooed the DANGER that she thought Lord Egan posed
to satanism for some short term, long past membership in that org.
Nadramia - what do you have to say NOW about a woman, your best buddie
there, that endured over ELEVEN YEARS of (ritualized?) abuse from your
own elevated high Satanic Priest and Grotto Master William Gidney?
What do you have to say now about the real pedophile and abuse charges
against this man that appeared in a national TV show with YOU in it
Gilmore in it, who with his wife (the repeatedly abused woman -
consider that they also DID rituals, heh) spoke for the Church of
Satan and arrogantly "all of satanism." What do you have to say now
that these people appeared in that national TV show DOING rituals with
you and the HP, representing Satanism, when it has come out that this
abuse and other garbage was going on AT THE TIME of this show? For 11
years it went on.
In lieu of Russel Smith (he claims he LEFT the CoS and since there was
no rancor on his part, he is believable), in lieu of your praising a
deranged act as honorable and some ritual, in lieu of so much of this
and THIS HERE to top off the cake:
Nadramia: IS THIS NOT A THREAT TO ALL OF SATANISM due to SRA SRA SRA?
Lemme hear ya squirm out of that one.
I have nothing MORE to say unless your storm troopers keep up their
typical, libelous, stupid, off-key shit, such as inventing stories
about me or my friends and then wasting their time talking about it as
if their own invented fantasied are true, or messing with more
innocent people that aren't even satanists. I have to wonder what you
have to say to Aquino for the SHIT LaVey tried to pull on him AND his
wife. Serious shit. I have to wonder what you have to say to Lord
Egan, who never molested a kid at all, now that you and your storm
troopers ruined HIS chances to get on TV and represent Satanism.
You lit the fire. You put up the stake. You tried to put quite a few
people on that stake. Now YOU are on it and the fire is under you and
yours.
IS YOUR ORG, OR IS NOT YOUR OWN HIGH PRIESTHOOD ITSELF A THREAT TO ALL
OF SATANISM BECAUSE IT WILL LINK IT TO SRA SRA SRA? Yes, according
to your own criteria - IT IS.
If you gave a flying hell about your satanism, you'd hand it over to
Satan Shop and let someone decent, normal, mature and FRIENDLY to
LaVeyanism like Audy take over the Church of Satan. YOU ARE A DANGER
TO ALL OF SATANISM as are all of your friends.
Or maybe they can hand it over to Ole Wolf and Amina since they seem to
perhaps want that, too.
Tani Jantsang
| Quote: |
"Kori Houghton" <korihoughton@hotmail.com> wrote in message |
news:6db9a636.0308131550.66562c22@posting.google.com...
| Quote: | "- wolf -" <wolf@nospam-blazingangles.com> wrote in message
news:<3f3a6809$1$97263$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>...
"People's Commissar" <satanicreds@www.com> wrote in message
news:kP2_a.9520$BC2.2581@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
This is a question for Nadramia
Then why the Hell are you asking it as a reply to me?
- wolf -
Perhaps Mrs. Lysenko/Marsh/Jantsang/Rose/Radu is too cowardly to
simply send a personal email to Peggy Nadramia, and then post a cc on
alt.s? Or, she wants to have your name attached to it in case someone
in the CoS takes her rant disguised as a question seriously enough to
respond?
She did the same thing with me, sort of, when she upchucked a long
spew of edited posts from the archives concerning Aquino and SRA as if
it was a response to a conversation with "Xori". Like, in her
imagination.
She seems to be quiet for the mo'. Perhaps her supply of crank ran
out?
Kori H. |
|
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|