| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David Dalton
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:10 am Post subject: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
 |
|
Has anyone on here been yet to the half size scale model
of Stonehenge that was constructed in either Nova Scotia
or New Brunswick?
Actually I am sure I read about such quite a few years ago
but can't easily find info on it with a google search so
perhaps those on ns.general and/or nb.general can
comment as to its location.
There is another neohenge called Keppel Henge
next to Georgian Bay in Ontario, and described on
http://www.steveirvine.com/henge.html
One side of the real Stonehenge needs charging but
I am unable to do it remotely it seems, but can only
do it when I visit.
There are other Stonehenge clones described at
http://www.luckymojo.com/stonehenge.html
and in the upper picture of Stonehenge on that page
it is the left 1/3 of Stonehenge that needs charging,
and it is unusual that I cannot do it remotely even
though I tried fairly hard.
OK I tried again, I tried upfifting the trapped
souls of possibly sacrificial victims (humans and non-humans)
and blessing those that were not trapped but had not
been so blessed before. That worked some but the
extreme left, the pillar (or two, one dark, one a bit lighter
to the right of it) alone and the two to the right
of it with a flat stone on top, still had a dark unhealthy vibe.
I tried a few things that did not work and finally I figured
it was dedicated to a criminal someone and removed
that link and that seemed to work (actually then it seemed
there were more such links which I then removed as well).
Then the very extreme left dark stone still wasn't right
and I linked it to/within Cosma and that seemed to work,
it still has a dark vibe but not an unhealthy one. I
also linked the stone to a stone special to me in Newfoundland
which has other linkings, including one to BC, and
maybe Alan MacLeod's crystal is in there somewhere.
So beyond that I may be able to improve on site,
perhaps with musical backing, or I might not be
able to. But for now Stonehenge should be
somewhat more charged and healthy than it
was a half hour ago.
Of course most of that will be of interest just to those
on alt.religion.druid and alt.traditional.witchcraft but
I would still like some comment from those on ns.general
and nb.general on the first two paragraphs, but I am
setting followups to alt.religion.druid , and override that
when following up if you are following up from another
group and want to add your own group. Oh I will now
add uk.religion.pagan as well but again note that
followups are set to alt.religion.druid .
David |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:26 am Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
Sorry, I forgot to set followup-to , so I suggest if you do followup
that you direct it manually to alt.religion.druid only, unless if
you are following up from another group you think it will be
of interest to that group as well and can add it.
I just touched up the charging a bit more but it is hard
to do with a small two-dimensional picture. If Stonehenge
affects the surrounding area then said cleansing/charging
should help in that.
David |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:32 am Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
Now some may say why would I cleanse and charge
Stonehenge without consulting those with closer ties to
it. Well, really I wasn't planning to but in my google
search for the NS or NB stone circle I stumbled across
that picture of Stonehenge and seeing that beautifully
still charged right 2/3 and the problems with the left
1/3 I was obligated to try and help but will try to fine
tune it up close in consultation with local people if
that is desired, later.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:52:06 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | OK I tried again, I tried upfifting the trapped
souls of possibly sacrificial victims (humans and non-humans)
and blessing those that were not trapped but had not
been so blessed before.
|
This I just tried in wide defocusing to extend to all past
sacrificial sites worldwide, and from feedback it supposedly
worked but that does not included say improvised charging
for each site in consultation perhaps with locals. OK,
just now I also added delinking of sites and also objects
and people from evil someones, but again that does not
include relinking to better someone(s) yet.
Anyway, belated (since it is now after midnight)
Happy Bonfire Night, from Newfoundland.
David |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:34 am Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:14:16 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | This I just tried in wide defocusing to extend to all past
|
and any still in use, even though blood sacrifice has
supposedly been rendered ineffective magically but
some may not know that yet
>sacrificial sites worldwide, |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:27 am Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:14:16 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | This I just tried in wide defocusing to extend to all past
sacrificial sites worldwide, and from feedback it supposedly
worked but that does not included say improvised charging
for each site in consultation perhaps with locals.
|
of any religion, and not just of sacrificial sites (but anyway
some sites may not be known today as sacrficial sites
but may have been thousands of years ago). I can
invoke any deity of anyone without it necessarily being
my deity, though I might not choose to invoke some,
and of course the invocation is not necessarily granted.
Good night,
David |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:40 am Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:14:16 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | for each site in consultation perhaps with locals. OK,
just now I also added delinking of sites and also objects
and people from evil someones, but again that does not
include relinking to better someone(s) yet.
|
One last (I hope) afterthought before I go to bed. I altered
the above, since strongly compatible (even more so if
they are also minimally complete) marriage bonds reduce
criminality, any marriage bonds broken by said delinking
were returned by me if the ones bonded are not evil
towards one another at least one way (I mean if
say two were bonded and one is abusive towards
the other, or both towards each other, then the
marriage bond was not returned). However all that
may have had no effect but I figured I would report
what I attempted and sensed supposedly worked.
Good night from The Rock (this island is known as that in Canada),
David |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Trin
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 4:23 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
"David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote
(x-posts minimised)
| Quote: | One side of the real Stonehenge needs charging but
I am unable to do it remotely it seems, but can only
do it when I visit.
|
I've gotta ask, why does one side of Stonehenge need charging?
--
trin
I don't need a life, I've got ADSL.
www.lokeandimensions.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
lffing
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 4:56 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 01:08:43 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> wrote:
{Sorry, I forgot to set followup-to , so I suggest if you do followup
{that you direct it manually to alt.religion.druid only, unless if
{you are following up from another group you think it will be
{of interest to that group as well and can add it.
{
{I just touched up the charging a bit more but it is hard
{to do with a small two-dimensional picture. If Stonehenge
{affects the surrounding area then said cleansing/charging
{should help in that.
{
{David
Hmm.... I have a 12 volt battery that ran flat yesterday.... I like that remote
charging idea... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:58 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:56:28 -0300, lffing <none@home.not> wrote:
| Quote: | Hmm.... I have a 12 volt battery that ran flat yesterday.... I like that remote
charging idea...
|
Yeah, I know, as a physicist I should come up with a word
other than charging perhaps, but charging can have many
meanings already. Perhaps sanctifying or blessing may be
a better word.
Thanks,
David |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:13 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:23:48 +0100, "Trin"
<urp@lokeandimensions.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: | "David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote
(x-posts minimised)
One side of the real Stonehenge needs charging but
I am unable to do it remotely it seems, but can only
do it when I visit.
I've gotta ask, why does one side of Stonehenge need charging?
|
It did, one side was bright/glorious, and the left one third (in the
perspective of the picture I mentioned) was partly dull
and lifeless and partly filled with dark evil energy, and
I had to fix that, as described. As for why that was the
case perhaps those if any more knowledgeable in the very long
term history of Stonehenge than I am can comment.
Now last night I talked about dispelling connections to
evil someones. Last night that was done purely intuitively
on my sense of what was evil. In retrospect I wondered
what definition of goodness was used. Now I if being
very specific might say goodness of A towards B as
defined by C. But if I just say good loosely without
specifying, there may be two obvious definitions of
that. The first is goodness as defined by me towards me.
The second is goodness as defined by ALL towards ALL.
Though I lean (based on the above "my sense") towards
the first, my intuition/divination today is that the second
was used last night and indeed when I thought, in case
that the first was used, that I would try to correct to the
second no correction occurred, the second was already
in use. Now that could mean than a connection to a
someone that was good to a local tribe but overall very
bad may have been lost in some cases, for example.
Earlier I posted a note on the song "Sarah" to rec.music.celtic
and other groups, even though it is a week before full moon still
Yesterday or earlier I posted a note on "Great Rite" stuff to
alt.mythology and other groups and also separately to
soc.sexuality.general .
However Sarah McLachlan does not have to grab me
unless she wants me again or still but perhaps some
(ideally women) could advise her on this great rite stuff
in case she thinks it is all bullshit.
Have you seen Dido's new video in the woods? But
there is no mud in that one, unlike Sarah's Into
the Fire video.
David |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Dalton
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:14 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:22:14 GMT, "'Thenie" <MTN-GIRL@prodigy.net>
wrote:
| Quote: | "Trin" <urp@lokeandimensions.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2k2ga1F16ni7uU1@uni-berlin.de...
"David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote
(x-posts minimised)
One side of the real Stonehenge needs charging but
I am unable to do it remotely it seems, but can only
do it when I visit.
I've gotta ask, why does one side of Stonehenge need charging?
Because there's a big target painted on and a long path running up to it?
|
But no red cloak?
:-) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Thenie
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:22 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
"Trin" <urp@lokeandimensions.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2k2ga1F16ni7uU1@uni-berlin.de...
| Quote: | "David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote
(x-posts minimised)
One side of the real Stonehenge needs charging but
I am unable to do it remotely it seems, but can only
do it when I visit.
I've gotta ask, why does one side of Stonehenge need charging?
|
Because there's a big target painted on and a long path running up to it?
Sorry. It just struck me funny.
I'll be going now...
-'Thenie
grabs coat |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
janet
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:25 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
David Dalton wrote:
Much about charging Stonehenge.
I'm bemused, though... there are some questions which occur.
Is "bad, unhealthy" energy not possibly *supposed* to be there? If it's in
half the circle...?
What defines good energy?
Surely the people who put the sacrifices there knew what they were doing?
If that (those) sacrifice(s) were there for a purpose, is getting rid of
their energy the best thing to be doing?
I don't mean to be argumentative, but these did occur as questions... isn't
this imposing a modern (or rather, one sort of modern) view on an ancient
monumnet?
--
janet
texestentialist
http://www.karlsforums.com/forums/index.php |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Thenie
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:36 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
"janet" <janet@karlsforums.com> wrote
| Quote: | David Dalton wrote:
Much about charging Stonehenge.
I'm bemused, though... there are some questions which occur.
Is "bad, unhealthy" energy not possibly *supposed* to be there? If it's
in
half the circle...?
What defines good energy?
Surely the people who put the sacrifices there knew what they were doing?
If that (those) sacrifice(s) were there for a purpose, is getting rid of
their energy the best thing to be doing?
I don't mean to be argumentative, but these did occur as questions...
isn't
this imposing a modern (or rather, one sort of modern) view on an ancient
monumnet?
|
Hmm... A 'National Trust' of Psychic Fields? I find the concept of
preserving historical energy an interesting one...
-'Thenie
<waves> Hi, janet! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
janet
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: NS/NB stone circle/Stonehenge charging |
|
|
'Thenie wrote:
, but these did occur as
| Quote: | questions... isn't this imposing a modern (or rather, one sort of
modern) view on an ancient monumnet?
Hmm... A 'National Trust' of Psychic Fields? I find the concept of
preserving historical energy an interesting one...
|
It's both more and less than that.
And both sides come down to the same question... and that's one of
authority, I think.
janet
texestentialist
http://www.karlsforums.com/forums/index.php |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
