| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
 |
|
In a July 2, 2008 speech, Barack Obama announced that as president he
plans on calling America to national service. In that speech, Obama
proposed “a civilian national security force that's just as powerful,
just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military. Why would we
need such a thing when we already have the armed services, the coast
guard, and the National Guard?
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallels
such a "national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Hmmm...? |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a "national security force" in fairly recent world history?
|
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Roque
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 12:50 pm, janet_reno...@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: | On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a "national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
|
Obama's Waffen Schutzstaffel will be a manifestation of his paranoia
resulting from his guilt of stealing the election with illegal
voters. He already has children singing and goosestepping for his
benefit. His Black Corps will be used to supplement his Secret
Service protection; but mostly to elliminate those who would dare to
speak against him. The initial recruits for Obama's Black Corps will
be provided by Farrakhan who refers to his Furher as the Messiah.:)
RR |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Roque
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 1:24 pm, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
| Quote: | janet_reno...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35815cb1-eaec-4dfa-b5ca-dde1ebb11e1c@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a
"national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
I'm cool with that; I already belong to the NRA, have a police-type car,
and a buttload of guns.
Seriously, this jackass (President Jackass?) is apparently unaware of
the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. So there is no need for
his program. He probably just wants to arm the NAACP and the UNCF. And 90%
of the people on parole in the US..........
|
Tom,
His "New Deal" will be presidential pardons for service in the Black
Corps. He will empty the prisons to fill the ranks of his national
police force. It is a bad economic move because it will cost us more
to pay his militia than it would cost to keep them locked up. On a
positive note, his Black Corp might be a means of achieving racial
harmony between whites, hispanics, and blacks. It seems to me that
giving guns to sworn enemies might result in the groups killing each
other; but maybe that is part of Obama's plan - cutting costs by
eliminating those who cost us money.
But, we don't know the full extent of his plan yet. The Emporer might
want to use them as gladiators to entertain the populace while he
rapes the economy and does other naughty things while the people are
watching the fights.
RR |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 10:24 am, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
| Quote: | janet_reno...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35815cb1-eaec-4dfa-b5ca-dde1ebb11e1c@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a
"national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
I'm cool with that; I already belong to the NRA, have a police-type car,
and a buttload of guns.
|
Which, in and of itself, is quite firghtening since you have revealed
the following about yourself in this group: "...dope fiend...an acid
chemist.... (LSD)...growing marijuana....peyote....San Pedro cactus...
Carrying two guns at all times, =illegally=...Stealing...Trying to
kill two boys I went to school with....Sleeping with a 14yo
girl...running red lights at 145mph/232kph while
drunk...Communism...Assault with a Deadly Weapon...Illegally Carrying
a Concealed Deadly Weapon...attempted murder..."
I have to wonder if the above is true how it is you are able to
"belong to the NRA, have a police-type car, and a buttload of guns".
It's also easy to see why Vera's attracted to you.
| Quote: | Seriously, this jackass (President Jackass?) is apparently unaware of
the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. So there is no need for
his program. He probably just wants to arm the NAACP and the UNCF. And 90%
of the people on parole in the US..........
|
You apparently don't get it, do you? (no surprise there - guess the
Peyote, LSD, and marijuana did a number on what few brain cells you
had to start with). |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 1:44 pm, "Scout Lady" <scoutl...@nospam4me.net> wrote:
| Quote: | My guess is that he is planning on expanding the Public Allies program
AmeriCorps.
|
"Expanding"? Is that a euphemism? Are you downplaying what you
really think? Can you expand on "expanding"? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Roque
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 4:42 pm, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Nov 2, 10:24 am, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
janet_reno...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35815cb1-eaec-4dfa-b5ca-dde1ebb11e1c@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com....
On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a
"national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
I'm cool with that; I already belong to the NRA, have a police-type car,
and a buttload of guns.
Which, in and of itself, is quite firghtening since you have revealed
the following about yourself in this group: "...dope fiend...an acid
chemist.... (LSD)...growing marijuana....peyote....San Pedro cactus...
Carrying two guns at all times, =illegally=...Stealing...Trying to
kill two boys I went to school with....Sleeping with a 14yo
girl...running red lights at 145mph/232kph while
drunk...Communism...Assault with a Deadly Weapon...Illegally Carrying
a Concealed Deadly Weapon...attempted murder..."
I have to wonder if the above is true how it is you are able to
"belong to the NRA, have a police-type car, and a buttload of guns".
It's also easy to see why Vera's attracted to you.
Seriously, this jackass (President Jackass?) is apparently unaware of
the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. So there is no need for
his program. He probably just wants to arm the NAACP and the UNCF. And 90%
of the people on parole in the US..........
You apparently don't get it, do you? (no surprise there - guess the
Peyote, LSD, and marijuana did a number on what few brain cells you
had to start with).- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Kelly,
If McCain is elected, he needs to put you in charge of the FBI.
In the criminal system the people are represnted by two separate and
equally important groups; the police who investigate crime and the
District Attorney who prosecutes the the offenders.
Your investigative skills would save a lot of money and manpower and
ensure that offenders are prosecuted with very little cost to the
taxpayer.
If Obama is elected, he needs to stay the hell out of Oregon and off
the internet.
RR |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:13 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 2:05 pm, Roque <royalro...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | If McCain is elected, he needs to put you in charge of the FBI.
In the criminal system the people are represnted by two separate and
equally important groups; the police who investigate crime and the
District Attorney who prosecutes the the offenders.
Your investigative skills would save a lot of money and manpower and
ensure that offenders are prosecuted with very little cost to the
taxpayer.
|
What in the world are you blathering about?
| Quote: | If Obama is elected, he needs to stay the hell out of Oregon and off
the internet.
|
I don't live in Oregon. How did you get out of my killfile? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 3:07 pm, "Scout Lady" <scoutl...@nospam4me.net> wrote:
| Quote: | I am just guessing like anyone else since he failed to explain what the heck
he is talking about.
|
I see. Well, he did give some clues here: "We cannot continue to
rely on our military in order to achieve the national security
objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national
security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-
funded."
Well, I personally I find it frightening that Obama is planning on de-
funding the military we already have, but wants to have a ciivilian
"security force" that would be (so it seems) as well funded as our
military currently is. I just find it incredible that he plans on
having a civilian force that is as powerful and strong as the Marines,
for instance. Does that mean civilians with jets carrying heat-
seeking missles? Civilians with SAMS? Civilians with tanks?
Civilians with satellite techonology for spying?
And what, exactly would be the purpose of such a "force" when we
already have the National Guard? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:58 pm Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
On Nov 2, 4:43 pm, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
| Quote: | Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
I'm cool with that; I already belong to the NRA, have a police-type car,
and a buttload of guns.
Which, in and of itself, is quite firghtening
Well, the NRA doesn't ask questions and you just have to be in favor of
patriotism and safe gun handling practices.
I can buy any kind of car I want, and a big white Ford was what I
wanted.
And I haven't done anything that makes me ineligible to purchase guns;
every gun is purchased after a background check by the FBI. Including my new
AK47 pistol.
|
Good. Advertise that here. Someone who needs to know should read
this.
| Quote: | since you have revealed
the following about yourself in this group: "...dope fiend...an acid
chemist.... (LSD)...growing marijuana....peyote....San Pedro cactus...
Carrying two guns at all times, =illegally=...Stealing...Trying to
kill two boys I went to school with....Sleeping with a 14yo
girl...running red lights at 145mph/232kph while
drunk...Communism...Assault with a Deadly Weapon...Illegally Carrying
a Concealed Deadly Weapon...attempted murder..."
In what decade????
|
Doesn't matter. From the above, it appears that you are one of the
many who should never be allowed to own guns. I'm curious - do you
use that "police-type car" to pull over young girls late at night in
order to assault them? Is that part of your new pedo schtick?
| Quote: | Are you really that thick, you stupid dyke??
|
Well, that comment's got the love of Christ written all over it,
doesn't it?
| Quote: | It's because out of all
those things, I've only been arrested once,
|
Which means you were caught only once. Doesn't mean you committed
crimes only once.
| Quote: | and never convicted of ANY of
these things.
|
I see. You're kinda like Bill Ayers, eh?
"Free as a bird and guilty as h[eck]"?
| Quote: | Duh. You're not very imaginative,
|
Who needs to be imaginative - ain't my fault you listed all of your
crimes in a public online forum when you were drunk one night.
| Quote: | except late at night when
you imagine you're the man in the relationship....
|
No, I enjoy being a girl, thanks.
| Quote: | It's also easy to see why Vera's attracted to you.
That is because decent Christian people will always enjoy fellowship,
|
Yes, Vera does enjoy "fellowship" with married *and* unmarried men in
Usenet.
| Quote: | no
matter what language they speak....and that pretty much leaves unrepentant
homos out. Sorry.
And the events I described all happened decades ago, in the Ford and
Carter administrations.
|
I don't care if it all happened in the Roosevelt administration.
Pedophilia is like luggage - you carry it around with you forever.
Aren't you on a sex offenders list somewhere?
| Quote: | Look in the mirror, genius. You're a GIRL, that means that if you have a
girlfriend, you're a PERVERT! Look it up in the dictionary, ya old bat.
She is already a Female Body Inspector. She's as Gay as a Day in May.
And a phony baloney "Christian".
|
Hilarious. You're an admitted pedophile and you call *me* a pervert?
Oh, and BTW - gladly crossposting this to alt.law-enforcement |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Tom
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
<janet_reno_jr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35815cb1-eaec-4dfa-b5ca-dde1ebb11e1c@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a
"national security force" in fairly recent world history?
|
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
I'm cool with that; I already belong to the NRA, have a police-type car,
and a buttload of guns.
Seriously, this jackass (President Jackass?) is apparently unaware of
the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. So there is no need for
his program. He probably just wants to arm the NAACP and the UNCF. And 90%
of the people on parole in the US.......... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
<kelly>
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:41 am Post subject: Re: ****Weekly Repost for Newcomers -- How to deal with Sin* |
|
|
On Nov 2, 4:16 pm, " ::: babe in Christ :::" <veral...@lycos.com>
wrote:
| Quote: | ****Weekly Repost for Newcomers -- How to deal with Sin****
More than two years ago in the summer of 2006 I fell in love with a
newsgroup poster who had contacted me by private e-mail. I didn't know
that he only wanted to manipulate my faith when he was very nice to me
and pretended to be my friend. After he had made some sexual approaches
towards me, I made that big mistake to respond to him on the same level.
In retrospective I really have no idea how this could happen to me, but
it happened, which was a shame. It was as if something had been switched
off in my brain. For a couple of weeks I had a really big problem,
because I knew he was married. My feelings however, were honest. I do
not want to justify what I did at all. It was as bad as bad can be, and
really wrong, and it will not happen to me again.
This man whom I am talking about kept the flames burning, but in
September 2006 I confessed my wrongdoing to another Christian at my
church, because I knew it was wrong and had to stop. I regretted
everything I had done and decided to stop this walk into a false
direction. So I wrote an e-mail to this man, and I softly tried to tell
him that our relationship couldn't go on like that. I would have
understood if he hadn't written to me at all anymore, but he continued.
But from this day on I refrained from responding to his sexual
approaches and communicated with him on the basis of a friendship
between a brother and a sister. This worked until November/December
2007.
I hadn't wanted to do several things he wanted me to do, e.g. give him
some real names and addresses of people as well as raising some funds
for some expensive personal luxury articles for him online in the
newsgroups. When he saw he couldn't manipulate me as he had wished, he
befriended those people who had been my enemies for years and wanted to
force me into things I didn't want to do at that time. So our friendship
was completely broken up by this. He also made some allusions to our
former relationship online, a warning for me to do as he pleased. Since
I knew him well enough, I thought about it, prayed and talked with the
brother about it, too, and took the decision to inform the people of ACC
about the events and not give him the chance to shut me up by his
blackmail.
My life really has never been very easy (if you are interested and have
enough time, please read my story onhttp://www.acc-growing-deeper.de/vera%27s_story.html), and still is not
at all (indeed it has never been worse than in the past months), but
there was one thing I had sworn years after I had left my husband with
an almost two year old child, when I had recovered from all the terror I
had experienced. I swore rather to die than to be intimidated,
blackmailed or threatened by a man in my life again. I thought that some
of the atheists would jump on me for my confession, but weird enough, my
confession has given several so-called Christians food for 10 months
now. They have accepted the unrepentant man as their friend and brother,
but they have brought this old sin of mine here again and again,
whenever they want to make use of it to influence people against me.
Before that they loved to bring up my old sins (being a witch, having
been married twice etc.) from times before I had become a Christian -
and they very often still do, or invent some new things that had never
been true at all - like the lie that I would drink and more.
I am just glad that God is not like this, but full of mercy for the most
evil sinner if the sinner is repentant and confesses his sins. There is
a chance for everybody! For you, and you, and you, and you... whatever
your sin is. Just please do not cover it! Confess it! And you will get
eternal life. If you think you are good enough, you might end up in hell
fire, so please think about it. If you do not how to confess and repent,
you can just say a short prayer like that:
--> "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner."
When I had confessed my sins at my church and prayed over that I was
forgiven. The guilt was taken away from me as if it had never been
there. The best is that it was taken away years before this all happened
to me when I stumbled with this man... I surrendered my life in March
2000. I told God that I would not want to be without Him anymore in my
life, and He should take over. And He did. He allowed me my free will,
though, and I stumbled and fell very badly in the summer of 2006. Yet I
was forgiven by my wonderful God - not after my evildoing but long
before - not in March 2000 but at the beginning of everything. The Lord
knew it all in advance! He is Almighty and omniscient. From my view and
experience, however, I stood blameless before the Lord the moment I
surrendered. Some people also speak of being "born again" in the Spirit.
My walk with the Lord is even stronger than before now. It is His
strength that carries me through my life, and I would not know what to
do without Him.
When I feel bad again for my sin with this man and speak about it to the
Lord in prayer, He lets me know He has no idea what they are talking
about...
Anyway, I could learn much of it... I know myself better, and also what
things can make me stumble, and that I am not out of the danger of sin
yet. But it is for me like for a child who has touched a hot oven plate
and will never touch it again. I have learned something, and the Lord
allowed me to learn that. I do not know why He was so merciful to me...
Probably because He knows I will never make that same mistake again, or
He wanted me to learn to be more merciful with others, and come down
from my pride believing such things could never happen to me. I have
learned they *can* happen to anyone - that was what I have learned. I
have also learned that sin is *never* worthwhile for anything, and that
the Lord will bless people who reject their sinful way. I have also
learned that as long as I live on this earth here I will *never* be
without sin, and that the Lord does not make a difference between a big
sin or a small sin - sin simply does not go together with belonging to
God, no matter what sin (I am not talking of the unforgivable sin now,
though). That is why Jesus told us to pray like this:
...And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not
into temptation, but deliver us from evil... (Matthew 6:12-13 KJV)
So we still have debts to be forgiven, sins we commit, and we should
also pray to be protected of the temptation to sin... we are not free
from sin yet, but our way...
This, however should not lead us to the FALSE conclusion that we might
sin continually, becasue we will be forgiven anyway. This concept of
cheap grace might not lead to salvation, either.
I am going to post this here weekly as long as there is the need for it
and people cannot refrain from accusing me or others of long repented
sins and bringing them here again and again to make some cheap shots at
me. I do not need them to deal with my sins, because I have people at my
church where I confess my sins - regularly.
The Apostle John said:
"If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us
our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we
have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us." (1 John
1:8-10 KJV)
I will confess my long repented sin 1000 times or more, so people dare
speaking of their sins at their churches or elsewhere again, so that
they can get God's forgiveness and stop the devil come into their
houses, because this is what sin does - it opens doors for the evil. The
only chance we have is by confessing our sins. People who still accuse
people who have confessed and repented of their sins might not know that
they are a helper of the devil - so let me warn you... Usenet is not
really the place to confess sins, because you can never know whom to
trust. Some people will usually abuse your confessions here. But please,
do confess your sins to people whom you trust at your church, or to
Christians you know. The Lord will bless you like He blessed me for it!
What He cannot stand at all is sin which people try to cover up or
justify. Be honest, also to yourself! Admit it when you made a mistake.
Who is still there to hold my old sin against me or his neighbors which
the Lord forgave long ago? Who thinks he surrendered to the Lord
blamelessly? Is there anyone? Which of the Christians believes he is
without sin? Anyone? Who believes Christians have to be perfect already?
Anyone?
Forgive me my harshness. People who speak a foreign language (I am a
German) always come over as harsh, because they cannot discern the
niances in a language. So lacking the nuances, my words are what YOU
want to make of them. They will sound harsh to my enemies, and lovely to
my friends, brothers and sisters. They at least know I mean well and
care for your souls.
|
Sorry, Vera - but when you call people names intentionally and gossip
about them intentionally that behavior has absolutely nothing to do
with any imagined language barrier. After all, isn't it you who tells
us on a regular basis how wonderfully knowledgeable you are in English
and so many other languages? If that's the case, why are you blaming
your "harsh words" on the fact that English isn't your first
language? Hmmm...?
And, I'm curious - if you really repented of this behavior with Baba
(it *was* Baba, wasn't it?), why didn't you just cut off communication
with him entirely? Why would you put yourself in a situation where
the same could occur? Or maybe, just maybe, you liked the feeling of
danger in still communicating with him online? Does his wife know you
were still communicating with him? Does his wife know of the "online
affair" at all? Did you ever ask *her* for forgiveness? If not - why
not?
Plainly put - your behavior and the life you live here does not show
someone who loves others and cares about their souls and wants to live
a clean life before the Lord, Vera. Humilty says alot about a
person's heart, Vera - and your posts just don't demonstrate that at
all - not that I've ever seen. All I see here is someone who got
caught doing something they shouldn't and continued doing it (just a
little more clandestine and undercover) and is now making excuses for
it.
Maybe if we saw less of "Hypocrite Vera" and "Judgemental Vera" and
"Liar Vera" and "Vindictive Vera" and "Hateful Vera" and "Gossip Vera"
your confession might carry more weight. Right now, where it stands,
it doesn't mean much. Not to me, anyway.
Try being "Christian-non-
hypocriticaljudgementalvindictiveliarhatefulgossipping-Vera" for more
than a day, and I know that I, for one, would be more apt to believe
you. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Tom
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:46 am Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
"Roque" <royalroque@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ce9a070-d832-4e3b-8af5-0ebf0b60c288@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 2, 1:24 pm, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
| Quote: | janet_reno...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35815cb1-eaec-4dfa-b5ca-dde1ebb11e1c@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 2, 11:17 am, "<Kelly>" <316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallelssuch a
"national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Ok the second amendment talks about "A well regulated Militia being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Could this be Obama-speak for saying gun loving patriots will be
pressed into service as this militia to be the "national security
force" ?
Quick - somebody call the NRA.
I'm cool with that; I already belong to the NRA, have a police-type car,
and a buttload of guns.
Seriously, this jackass (President Jackass?) is apparently unaware of
the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security. So there is no need for
his program. He probably just wants to arm the NAACP and the UNCF. And 90%
of the people on parole in the US..........
|
Tom,
His "New Deal" will be presidential pardons for service in the Black
Corps. He will empty the prisons to fill the ranks of his national
police force.
And make room for all the evil, rotten, mean and nasty people who didn't
support him? It's Ok, I have some pretty serious firepower...
It is a bad economic move because it will cost us more
to pay his militia than it would cost to keep them locked up. On a
positive note, his Black Corp might be a means of achieving racial
harmony between whites, hispanics, and blacks. It seems to me that
giving guns to sworn enemies might result in the groups killing each
other; but maybe that is part of Obama's plan - cutting costs by
eliminating those who cost us money.
I dunno; I think they should all be put on an island somewhere, fully
armed. It has nothing to do with money, and everything to do with quality of
life. I hate having to go to WalMart with a .45.....
But, we don't know the full extent of his plan yet. The Emporer might
want to use them as gladiators to entertain the populace while he
rapes the economy and does other naughty things while the people are
watching the fights.
LOL!!!! Bread and circuses!!!!
Tom
RR |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Fred A Stover
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:15 am Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
<Kelly> wrote:
| Quote: | In a July 2, 2008 speech, Barack Obama announced that as president he
plans on calling America to national service. In that speech, Obama
proposed a civilian national security force that's just as powerful,
just as strong, just as well-funded as our military. Why would we
need such a thing when we already have the armed services, the coast
guard, and the National Guard?
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallels
such a "national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Hmmm...?
|
The universal draft.
Same devil, different man.
--
His,
More @ www.selah-tx.net
ho echon ota akoueto Preparing the way of the
Lord
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verily I say unto you, Whosoever
shall not receive the kingdom of God
as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
(Mark 10:15)
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<)))))))>< |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Tom
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:34 am Post subject: Re: Obama and a "civilian national security force" |
|
|
"Fred A Stover" <fredstover7@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:l1nPk.3716$hc1.1549@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com...
| Quote: | Kelly> wrote:
In a July 2, 2008 speech, Barack Obama announced that as president he
plans on calling America to national service. In that speech, Obama
proposed a civilian national security force that's just as powerful,
just as strong, just as well-funded as our military. Why would we
need such a thing when we already have the armed services, the coast
guard, and the National Guard?
Comments? Thoughts? Comparisons to anything else in that parallels
such a "national security force" in fairly recent world history?
Hmmm...?
The universal draft.
Same devil, different man.
|
Same devil man.......
| Quote: |
--
His,
More @ www.selah-tx.net
ho echon ota akoueto Preparing the way of the
Lord
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verily I say unto you, Whosoever
shall not receive the kingdom of God
as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
(Mark 10:15)
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
)))))))
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
