www.evangelicalview.com

Leading Religious,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31 ... 56, 57, 58  Next
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Christian Baptist Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:07 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 6:34 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
  Actually, you can't, because I did take them.

   As I've said, stupid person, all you need to do is contact Ted; ask
him. Or are you afraid you'd find out I DID take them?

I'm not afraid of anything of the kind, John.  You didn't take them.

  I have no clue why you're doing this, Kelly. This is a new low even
for you.
  But as I said, contact Ted. He'll likely happily tell you the photo
is mine. It was his official Hair publicity photo for several years.
  I gave it to him as an 8 1/2 X 11. I went to the show one evening
(backstage), and he came RUNNING to me, very excitedly.
  He was carrying a 3 foot x 4 foot blowup of the photo.
  I was aghast. He said, "I like it THIS much, Weatherly!" (he called
me "Weatherly" and he called me "Little Weatherly") That was Ted's
version of "being affectionate." I think that was the night the little
runt (said affectionately) picked me up in a bear hug and lifted me
like a foot off the ground. He's little (like 5 5 or less), but he was
STRONG.

Sure, John. Whatever you say.

Quote:
  Contact Randy/ Adam. Ask him.  Or are you afraid you'd find out, I
did take them?

Ibid.

  So you have no plans on checking, but you're happy to falsely accuse
me!

 That's not Christian!

  Libel suit, here we come!

Only in your dreams, John.

Quote:
  The three photos of some of the Hair cast

members couldn't have been taken by you for a couple of reasons:

   Your "reasons" don't matter. I took them.

Liar.

  ^ ^ ^ ^ Libel.

Nope.

Quote:
1) They already exist on another website and are identified as photos
from the show's playbill

   You are NOT correct.  

Yep, I am.

You are confused.  

Nope, I'm not.

Unless a NEW playbill was
published, those three were taken WELL AFTER the playbill was
published.

Why would they publish a "new playbill" for a show that played back in
the 60's?

???  If those three photos are in a playbill, it's a newer one than
the one they had at the Aquarius Theatre in the late 60s.

Nope. See the links below.

Quote:
 Do you understand that there have been Hair shows all over the world?

Of course I do. I know people who have been in them, John.

Quote:
 Each new show uses photos from previous shows. If you saw my photos
in a playbill, it's a more recent one than the LA show.

Nope. See the links below.

Quote:
 I haven't seen any intact playbills since the one from the LA show,
which is the one my brother was INITIALLY in.

 The playbill I saw online was from the LA show in 69,

Hmm-hmm. The one you stole the photos from and gave yourself credit
for, John.

Quote:
John.  In fact, your caption on the photos said "LA Cast...69" as well
as (incorrectly) "LA Cast...68".

 So post the link, and I'll check it. I'd LOVE to know my three photos
(I took more than the three)
  ended up in a Hair Playbill.
 Talk about a "credit."
  Thanks!  Smile
  The evil you intended ended up for good.

Riiiight...they put them in there and didn't tell you. How stupid do
you think they are going to be setting themselves up for a copyright
infringement lawsuit, John?

Quote:
  You weren't in the states then, John

- you were in the Air Force in England.  I mean, that's what you've
been telling us for the last couple of months.  So...which is it?  You
took the photos when you were supposed to be in the Air Force or you
were in the Air Force stationed in Europe - which one do you choose?
Hmmm?

  I continue to be clueless why this is so EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to you.

 Put it this way. I got home in November, 1968. (east coast)
  Almost immediately, I flew out to Los Angeles. I was in Los Angeles
right after Christmas.
 So if I said "68" on the photo, I should have said "69." Is that a
crime? Or is that a mistake of memory?

Nope. It's just you tripping up again on your many, many lies. See
the links below.

Quote:
  And, if you found the photo of the 3, it has my name on  it as
"byline."

Nope.  Wasn't there.  Besides, "by-lines" are for written articles,
not photographs, doofus.

   You AGAIN, don't know what you're talking about, dufus.

Uh-huh. Whatever you say, John. See the links below.

Quote:
 As for them existing on "another web site", what's the link?

 I'll add it to my portfolio.  (contrary to yoru low opinion, I CAN
prove they're all mine)

Sure you can, John.  Oh, and while you're at it, try and prove that
Willie Weatherly, the very obviously African American stage actor is
your brother,

?????  Where did you see a photo of Willie Weatherly who is a African
American, In the Hair photos?

See the links below.

Quote:
  Your sleuthing is slipping.

See the links below.

Quote:
 as you claim him to be, okay?



2) They were from 1968  - you were supposed to be in the Air Farce in
Alconbury then, remember...?  ;-)

   Nope. Your dates are off. And I wasn't at Alconbury the whole time
I was overseas, stupid.

Ah, I see.  But you *were* overseas (you just said it yourself) at
that time.  How could you have been taking pictures of the cast of
Hair in 1969 for their playbill that was probably printed months
before the show opened in LA in 1969.

  You truly don't need to have this discussion anymore.

Getting a little too hot for you, John? Your lies becoming a little
too apparent, even for you? See the links below.

Quote:
 You can post the link to the photos if you like. I just went where I
found my photo of Jerry, Carol, and Randy. It's not there anymore. So
the webmaster has obviously done some re-arranging.

Oh, baloney. You are such an unbelievable liar. See the links below.

Quote:
 He also evidently has put up the two other photos I sent him. (He had
the one of the three. I sent him the one of my brother, and the one of
Ted. If you've seen all three, he put them up.

 I need to thank him, and ask him for a credit.

Uh-huh. Whatever you say, John.

Quote:
 You LIVE in denial

I do, huh?  So you don't think that claiming Willie Weatherly, an
African American stage actor, to be your brother is living in denial?

  I notice you didn't put up the link.

Yeah, I did. You conveniently missed it. See below, doofus.

Quote:
  All you have to do is put up the link, (except that you're lying
about it), and I'd go and contact the webmaster and ask for credit.

  I am amused, however (shades of Metropolitan Baptist church) that
you think that just because there may be a black Willie Weatherly
stage actor (I've never heard of him or seen him) that there could not
POSSIBLY be a WHITE Willie Weatherly.

Oh, for heaven's sake, John. Did you forget the post you responded to
earlier today where we already went over this? Here, let me post it
all for you again:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Um-hm. Except that the real "Willie Weatherly" who was in the LA Cast
of Hair is black, John. Just because you took a picture from a
website and *said* it was Willie Weatherly, doesn't make it so. Wanna
see a real picture of the real Willie Weatherly who is really African
American? Go to the following link John, and take a look at your
"brother":

http://www.vegasartscorner.com/images/willie-weatherly.jpg

Then go to the following link, to the bottom of the page, and you
will
read the caption under the *same* picture that says "Willie Weatherly"
highlighted in yellow and blue:

Um-hm. Except that the real "Willie Weatherly" who was in the LA
Cast
of Hair is black, John. Just because you took a picture from a
website and *said* it was Willie Weatherly, doesn't make it so.
Wanna
see a real picture of the real Willie Weatherly who is really African
American? Go to the following link John, and take a look at your
"brother":

http://www.vegasartscorner.com/images/willie-weatherly.jpg

Then go to the following link, to the bottom of the page, and you
will
read the caption under the *same* picture that says "Willie Weatherly"
highlighted in yellow and blue:

http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:QTyipnJ4740J:www.vegasartscorner.com/JessicaMarciel.html+willie+weatherly+la+cast+hair&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, are you still going to try and tell us that your brother is
Willie Weatherly the stage actor who performed in Hair in LA in 1969,
John?

Quote:
  You just do not learn from past mistakes!

 You are also trying WAY too hard to prove me a liar.

 You are one hysterical woman!

  And in a blind RAGE.

Actually, I'm sitting quite calmly in my recliner with HBO on along
with my dog and my cat responding to you. Just got out of the hot-
tub, had a relaxation massage earlier today...nope - I'm quite
relaxed, John.

Why are you in a "blind rage"? Maybe because your lies are starting
to bite you in the tuchus?
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:51 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 9:19 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

<snipped a bunch of repetitive garbage to get to the point>

Quote:
You're calling Dobie Gray "Willie Weatherly"

No, I know who Dobie Gray is, John. Your "brother" is the other guy
with the afro.

Quote:
chuckle.

And -- again-- you're being an absolute waste of time.

And yet you keep responding.

Here you go - look at this page, John and tell me again how Willie
Weatherly is your brother and he isn't black. Okey-dokey?

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair3.html
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:08 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 9:19 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
  The only shot I saw was one of an unidentified female (likely Carol)
next to the white male who's squatting (my brother playing Claude),

Oh, BTW - something I forgot in the previous post - Willie Weatherly
didn't have the role of "Claude" - that was Ted Neeley's role, John.

Now, you were saying...?
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:46 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 10:41 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:51:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:

 © 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Aug 19, 9:19 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

snipped a bunch of repetitive garbage to get to the point

  You're calling Dobie Gray "Willie Weatherly"

No, I know who Dobie Gray is, John.  Your "brother" is the other guy
with the afro.

  "The other guy" is Willie Weatherly. The other guy, Willie
Weatherly, is WHITE.



 chuckle.

  And -- again-- you're being an absolute waste of time.

And yet you keep responding.

   I keep trying to correct your LIES and exaggerations and
fabrications.

 You just ADMITTED that the photo you referred me to is of Dobie Gray.

 Thanks!

  I never --- I NEVER -- said I took a picture of Dobie Gray.

  So you have now stated emphatically that the photo of the two guys
(that mysterious white guy) and the black guy (Dobie Gray) is not one
of the pictures I put on my page, and it's not one I claimed.



Here you go - look at this page, John and tell me again how Willie
Weatherly is your brother and he isn't black.  Okey-dokey?

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair3.html

  You need to get your eyes checked.  AND, the photo of my brother on
that page is not a photo I took.

  You said you had found all 3 pictures I took on the Hair page, as
part of the playbill.

  The photos of the playbill are on that page, but I didn't take any
of those, and the photo of my brother that's on that page is not one I
took, and I didn't ever say it was.

  Try again, Kelly. I thought you were a world-famous photographer.

 You don't even know a white man with an afro when you see one?

 smirk

You don't know a black man with an afro when you see one? Nice try,
John-boy, but Willie Weatherly of Hair is NOT your brother.

You are a world-class liar, John. I guess everybody has to excel in
something...goodness knows you've failed at everything else.
Back to top
CB
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:47 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:24:29 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:51:57 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:12:38 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

And you continue to forget, I don't answer to you.

Sure you do.
You dance for free.


It would need to be, CB-------- no one in their right mind would PAY
for him to dance! :+D

Exactly Smile
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:58 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 10:43 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:08:51 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:

2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Aug 19, 9:19 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

The only shot I saw was one of an unidentified female (likely Carol)
next to the white male who's squatting (my brother playing Claude),

Oh, BTW - something I forgot in the previous post - Willie Weatherly
didn't have the role of "Claude" - that was Ted Neeley's role, John.

Now, you were saying...?

You obviously have never seen the play.

Of course I have. But that doesn't make any difference about anything
you've said.

Quote:
If you remember the photo of my brother (sitting on the stage), NEXT
to Dobie Gray (the names are reversed), the costume my brother is
wearing is one of Claude's costumes.

Not. Ted Neeley played Claude - Claude wore an indian-style headband
and feather. Another lie to cover up a lie, John.

Quote:
You never watched the LA show, so you don't recognize the costumes.

Nice try, but really lame, John.

Quote:
You're wrong again! (as usual)

Keep telling yourself that.

Quote:
I still can't figure out why you're playing all these mind games, but
it's going to stop, one way or the other.

"Mind games"? You're the one who's lying his tuchus off, John.
There's nothing about that to be considered a "mind game".

Quote:
If you BOTHERED to look at the Cast List for the LA show, Dobie and
my brother are both on the list.

No, Dobie Gray and an African American stage actor named Willie
Weatherly are on the cast list. Furthermore, you said that Willie
Weatherly played "Claude". Wrong. You are caught lying once again.
Ted Neeley played Claude in the LA production of Hair, John.

And with that, I am officially done with this subject, satisfied that
I have successfully proven you a liar once more.
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:45:54 -0400, "Scout Lady"
<scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:3t6ma4pqmvqk8qml6d3isa0e82desps5ke@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:


2) They were from 1968 - you were supposed to be in the Air Farce in
Alconbury then, remember...? ;-)

Nope. Your dates are off. And I wasn't at Alconbury the whole time
I was overseas, stupid.

I landed at Alconbury April 17, 1967 and was there until Nov 24, 1967. Had a
brief stay. But it was enjoyable. As a Brit by ancestry, it was good to
return to the homeland. I hope to get back one day. I'd LOVE to retire in
England. Anyone seeing this who was at Alconbury or Lakenheath between Apr
67 and Nov 68 when I left England is invited to get in touch.
----John Weatherly

I'm sorry, Cathy; did I somehow miss your point?

>
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:23 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 10:43 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:08:51 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:

 © 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Aug 19, 9:19 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  The only shot I saw was one of an unidentified female (likely Carol)
next to the white male who's squatting (my brother playing Claude),

Oh, BTW - something I forgot in the previous post - Willie Weatherly
didn't have the role of "Claude" - that was Ted Neeley's role, John.

Now, you were saying...?

   You obviously have never seen the play.

  If you remember the photo of my brother (sitting on the stage), NEXT
to Dobie Gray (the names are reversed), the costume my brother is
wearing is one of Claude's costumes.

  You never watched the LA show, so you don't recognize the costumes.

  You're wrong again!   (as usual)

 I still can't figure out why you're playing all these mind games, but
it's going to stop, one way or the other.

 If you BOTHERED to look at the Cast List for the LA show, Dobie and
my brother are both on the list.

And my POV comes from having two brothers who are/were professional
musicians for many years. The one who remains is a studio musician who
has worked with the likes of Smokey Robinson (a Christian), Andy
Williams, and many other "names." I do not mean to drop names; I am
merely saying that my brother has been to the "pinnacle" of his
profession. **HE NEVER HAD THE INTEREST TO PERFORM LIVE**, in case you are
wondering why you never heard of a "Weatherly" who is a famous
singer ---John Weatherly 2004
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:34 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:51:44 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 19, 12:35 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  Actually, you can't, because I did take them.

   As I've said, stupid person, all you need to do is contact Ted; ask
him. Or are you afraid you'd find out I DID take them?

I'm not afraid of anything of the kind, John. You didn't take them.

I have no clue why you're doing this, Kelly. This is a new low even
for you.
But as I said, contact Ted. He'll likely happily tell you the photo
is mine. It was his official Hair publicity photo for several years.
I gave it to him as an 8 1/2 X 11. I went to the show one evening
(backstage), and he came RUNNING to me, very excitedly.
He was carrying a 3 foot x 4 foot blowup of the photo.
I was aghast. He said, "I like it THIS much, Weatherly!" (he called
me "Weatherly" and he called me "Little Weatherly") That was Ted's
version of "being affectionate." I think that was the night the little
runt (said affectionately) picked me up in a bear hug and lifted me
like a foot off the ground. He's little (like 5 5 or less), but he was
STRONG.
Quote:

  Contact Randy/ Adam. Ask him.  Or are you afraid you'd find out, I
did take them?

Ibid.

So you have no plans on checking, but you're happy to falsely accuse
me!

That's not Christian!

Libel suit, here we come!



Quote:

  The three photos of some of the Hair cast

members couldn't have been taken by you for a couple of reasons:

   Your "reasons" don't matter. I took them.

Liar.

^ ^ ^ ^ Libel.

Quote:

1) They already exist on another website and are identified as photos
from the show's playbill

   You are NOT correct.  

Yep, I am.

You are confused.  

Nope, I'm not.

Unless a NEW playbill was
published, those three were taken WELL AFTER the playbill was
published.

Why would they publish a "new playbill" for a show that played back in
the 60's?

??? If those three photos are in a playbill, it's a newer one than
the one they had at the Aquarius Theatre in the late 60s.

Do you understand that there have been Hair shows all over the world?

Each new show uses photos from previous shows. If you saw my photos
in a playbill, it's a more recent one than the LA show.

I haven't seen any intact playbills since the one from the LA show,
which is the one my brother was INITIALLY in.

The playbill I saw online was from the LA show in 69,
Quote:
John. In fact, your caption on the photos said "LA Cast...69" as well
as (incorrectly) "LA Cast...68".

So post the link, and I'll check it. I'd LOVE to know my three photos
(I took more than the three)
ended up in a Hair Playbill.
Talk about a "credit."
Thanks! Smile
The evil you intended ended up for good.


You weren't in the states then, John
Quote:
- you were in the Air Force in England. I mean, that's what you've
been telling us for the last couple of months. So...which is it? You
took the photos when you were supposed to be in the Air Force or you
were in the Air Force stationed in Europe - which one do you choose?
Hmmm?

I continue to be clueless why this is so EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to you.

Put it this way. I got home in November, 1968. (east coast)
Almost immediately, I flew out to Los Angeles. I was in Los Angeles
right after Christmas.
So if I said "68" on the photo, I should have said "69." Is that a
crime? Or is that a mistake of memory?

Quote:

  And, if you found the photo of the 3, it has my name on  it as
"byline."

Nope. Wasn't there. Besides, "by-lines" are for written articles,
not photographs, doofus.

You AGAIN, don't know what you're talking about, dufus.

Quote:

 As for them existing on "another web site", what's the link?

I'll add it to my portfolio.  (contrary to yoru low opinion, I CAN
prove they're all mine)

Sure you can, John. Oh, and while you're at it, try and prove that
Willie Weatherly, the very obviously African American stage actor is
your brother,

????? Where did you see a photo of Willie Weatherly who is a African
American, In the Hair photos?

Your sleuthing is slipping.


as you claim him to be, okay?
Quote:

2) They were from 1968  - you were supposed to be in the Air Farce in
Alconbury then, remember...?  ;-)

   Nope. Your dates are off. And I wasn't at Alconbury the whole time
I was overseas, stupid.

Ah, I see. But you *were* overseas (you just said it yourself) at
that time. How could you have been taking pictures of the cast of
Hair in 1969 for their playbill that was probably printed months
before the show opened in LA in 1969.

You truly don't need to have this discussion anymore.

You can post the link to the photos if you like. I just went where I
found my photo of Jerry, Carol, and Randy. It's not there anymore. So
the webmaster has obviously done some re-arranging.

He also evidently has put up the two other photos I sent him. (He had
the one of the three. I sent him the one of my brother, and the one of
Ted. If you've seen all three, he put them up.

I need to thank him, and ask him for a credit.


Quote:

 You're fishing, and you're being nasty. And I'm can't figure out why
you're doing either.

Because you're a known, documented liar, John.

 If you have a link those three photos are on, post it.

  However, they're mine.

Sure they are, John.

snipped more rantings from a raving madman

You LIVE in denial

I do, huh? So you don't think that claiming Willie Weatherly, an
African American stage actor, to be your brother is living in denial?

I notice you didn't put up the link.

All you have to do is put up the link, (except that you're lying
about it), and I'd go and contact the webmaster and ask for credit.


I am amused, however (shades of Metropolitan Baptist church) that
you think that just because there may be a black Willie Weatherly
stage actor (I've never heard of him or seen him) that there could not
POSSIBLY be a WHITE Willie Weatherly.

You just do not learn from past mistakes!

You are also trying WAY too hard to prove me a liar.

You are one hysterical woman!

And in a blind RAGE.

Quote:

hahahahahahahahaha!

You crack me up, John.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:34 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

On Aug 19, 11:29 pm, "Mike Painter" <mddotpain...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
Quote:
Kelly> wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:19 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

snipped a bunch of repetitive garbage to get to the point

  You're calling Dobie Gray "Willie Weatherly"

No, I know who Dobie Gray is, John.  Your "brother" is the other guy
with the afro.

 chuckle.

  And -- again-- you're being an absolute waste of time.

And yet you keep responding.

Here you go - look at this page, John and tell me again how Willie
Weatherly is your brother and he isn't black.  Okey-dokey?

http://www.orlok.com/hair/holding/photographs/hair/LAHair3.html

http://www.vegasartscorner.com/images/willie-weatherly.jpg- Hide quoted text -

We've already been there, Mike. Weatherly still insists he's his
brother "Willie".
Back to top
Scout Lady
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:18 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:vrrma4tep2hughs4lh4evp16ameb87bkop@4ax.com...
Quote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:45:54 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:3t6ma4pqmvqk8qml6d3isa0e82desps5ke@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:


2) They were from 1968 - you were supposed to be in the Air Farce in
Alconbury then, remember...? ;-)

Nope. Your dates are off. And I wasn't at Alconbury the whole time
I was overseas, stupid.

I landed at Alconbury April 17, 1967 and was there until Nov 24, 1967. Had
a
brief stay. But it was enjoyable. As a Brit by ancestry, it was good to
return to the homeland. I hope to get back one day. I'd LOVE to retire in
England. Anyone seeing this who was at Alconbury or Lakenheath between Apr
67 and Nov 68 when I left England is invited to get in touch.
----John Weatherly

I'm sorry, Cathy; did I somehow miss your point?

Just reminding you of your previous statement of where you were from April

1967 to November 1968.
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:07:06 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 19, 6:34 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  Actually, you can't, because I did take them.

   As I've said, stupid person, all you need to do is contact Ted; ask
him. Or are you afraid you'd find out I DID take them?

I'm not afraid of anything of the kind, John.  You didn't take them.

  I have no clue why you're doing this, Kelly. This is a new low even
for you.
  But as I said, contact Ted. He'll likely happily tell you the photo
is mine. It was his official Hair publicity photo for several years.
  I gave it to him as an 8 1/2 X 11. I went to the show one evening
(backstage), and he came RUNNING to me, very excitedly.
  He was carrying a 3 foot x 4 foot blowup of the photo.
  I was aghast. He said, "I like it THIS much, Weatherly!" (he called
me "Weatherly" and he called me "Little Weatherly") That was Ted's
version of "being affectionate." I think that was the night the little
runt (said affectionately) picked me up in a bear hug and lifted me
like a foot off the ground. He's little (like 5 5 or less), but he was
STRONG.

Sure, John. Whatever you say.

I notice you're still too damn STUPID and too damn stubborn
(blockheaded) to simply go check with Ted and Randy.

I somehow THOUGHT you'd said that you had found the photos I posted
on my portfolio page. NONE of the photos you referred me to is one I
claim. Not a one.

Quote:

  Contact Randy/ Adam. Ask him.  Or are you afraid you'd find out, I
did take them?

Ibid.

"Ibid" yourself. Stupid person.

Quote:

  So you have no plans on checking, but you're happy to falsely accuse
me!

 That's not Christian!

  Libel suit, here we come!

Only in your dreams, John.

  The three photos of some of the Hair cast

members couldn't have been taken by you for a couple of reasons:

Well, sweety, the person you're calling "Willie Weatherly" (who
actually isn't Willie Weatherly), is not in any of the photos I claim
as mine.

The only two black males in the photo I took are Randy and Jerry. I
guess that little detail escaped your razor sharp sleuthing.

snicker.

Quote:

   Your "reasons" don't matter. I took them.

Liar.

  ^ ^ ^ ^ Libel.

Nope.

^ ^ ^ ^ Libel compounded by pathological denial.

Quote:

1) They already exist on another website and are identified as photos
from the show's playbill

Where's the link?
Quote:

   You are NOT correct.  

Yep, I am.

You are confused.  

Nope, I'm not.

Unless a NEW playbill was
published, those three were taken WELL AFTER the playbill was
published.

Why would they publish a "new playbill" for a show that played back in
the 60's?

???  If those three photos are in a playbill, it's a newer one than
the one they had at the Aquarius Theatre in the late 60s.

Nope. See the links below.

The links below do not show any of the three photos in question.

The only shot I saw was one of an unidentified female (likely Carol)
next to the white male who's squatting (my brother playing Claude),
Willie Weatherly, and the black male you're identifying as "Willie
Weatherly", is in fact Dobie Gray.

http://www.dobiegray.com/home.html

You're such a bozo!

You actually have lived how many years, and you don't know Dobie
Gray, and what he looks like?

"Give me the beat, boys, and free my soul, I want to get lost in your
rock and roll, and drift away!"

^ ^ ^ Dobie Gray, who is standing next to my brother (who is
squatting). On the one photo where the names are on the photo,
someone simply reversed the names.

Anyone who knows Dobie Gray (I've met him), knows that the black male
you're calling "Willie Weatherly" is Dobie Gray.

Quote:

 Do you understand that there have been Hair shows all over the world?

Of course I do. I know people who have been in them, John.

^ ^ ^ ^ smirk.

Um, so do I.
Prove that you know anybody who's been in Hair. At this point, I'd
have to call that one of your usual lies.

Quote:

 Each new show uses photos from previous shows. If you saw my photos
in a playbill, it's a more recent one than the LA show.

Nope. See the links below.

Your links below don't include any copies of the photos I took.

You want to try that again?

Quote:

 I haven't seen any intact playbills since the one from the LA show,
which is the one my brother was INITIALLY in.

 The playbill I saw online was from the LA show in 69,

Hmm-hmm. The one you stole the photos from and gave yourself credit
for, John.

^ ^ ^ ^ Libel.

And it's something you can't PROVE. So you're being damned foolish.

Quote:

John.  In fact, your caption on the photos said "LA Cast...69" as well
as (incorrectly) "LA Cast...68".

Yes, I've already admitted that the "68" was not correct.

Quote:

 So post the link, and I'll check it. I'd LOVE to know my three photos
(I took more than the three)
  ended up in a Hair Playbill.
 Talk about a "credit."
  Thanks!  Smile
  The evil you intended ended up for good.

Riiiight...they put them in there and didn't tell you. How stupid do
you think they are going to be setting themselves up for a copyright
infringement lawsuit, John?

Did it ever occur to you, in a billion years, Kelly, darling, that
they couldn't locate me?

I doubt seriously if anyone from Hair knows where my brother is, and
he was a "principal."

Quote:

  You weren't in the states then, John

- you were in the Air Force in England.  I mean, that's what you've
been telling us for the last couple of months.  So...which is it?  You
took the photos when you were supposed to be in the Air Force or you
were in the Air Force stationed in Europe - which one do you choose?
Hmmm?

  I continue to be clueless why this is so EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to you.

 Put it this way. I got home in November, 1968. (east coast)
  Almost immediately, I flew out to Los Angeles. I was in Los Angeles
right after Christmas.
 So if I said "68" on the photo, I should have said "69." Is that a
crime? Or is that a mistake of memory?

Nope. It's just you tripping up again on your many, many lies. See
the links below.

zzzzzz. You're shooting blanks again. For some reason, you seem to
THRIVE on my attention. ???

The three photos in question are not in any of the links you have
posted.

Quote:

  And, if you found the photo of the 3, it has my name on  it as
"byline."

Nope.  Wasn't there.  Besides, "by-lines" are for written articles,
not photographs, doofus.

   You AGAIN, don't know what you're talking about, dufus.

Uh-huh. Whatever you say, John. See the links below.

I've checked all your links, Kelly. The three photos are not in any
of those places!

You are imagining things. (You're seeing photos that plain aren't
there.

Quote:

 As for them existing on "another web site", what's the link?

 I'll add it to my portfolio.  (contrary to yoru low opinion, I CAN
prove they're all mine)

Sure you can, John.  Oh, and while you're at it, try and prove that
Willie Weatherly, the very obviously African American stage actor is
your brother,

?? ^ ^ ^ You're a total, opinionated, ignorant crack up and a jerk.

The person you're calling "Willie Weatherly" is Dobie Gray.

http://www.dobiegray.com/home.html


http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:QTyipnJ4740J:www.vegasartscorner.com/JessicaMarciel.html+willie+weatherly+la+cast+hair&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us

^ ^ ^ ^ The photo is mis-labeled. My brother's name should appear
first. And chuckle.. you don't know who Dobie Gray is!

So where did you find MY photos? None of the links you provided
contains ANY of them.

Did you actually NOT visit my page?


Quote:

?????  Where did you see a photo of Willie Weatherly who is a African
American, In the Hair photos?

See the links below.

You're calling Dobie Gray "Willie Weatherly"

chuckle.

And -- again-- you're being an absolute waste of time.

john w

>
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:07:06 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 19, 6:34 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

  Actually, you can't, because I did take them.

   As I've said, stupid person, all you need to do is contact Ted; ask
him. Or are you afraid you'd find out I DID take them?

I'm not afraid of anything of the kind, John.  You didn't take them.

So, Kelly, when are you going to post links to the 3 photos I took?

You said you did; you lied.

Quote:

  I have no clue why you're doing this, Kelly. This is a new low even
for you.
  But as I said, contact Ted. He'll likely happily tell you the photo
is mine. It was his official Hair publicity photo for several years.
  I gave it to him as an 8 1/2 X 11. I went to the show one evening
(backstage), and he came RUNNING to me, very excitedly.
  He was carrying a 3 foot x 4 foot blowup of the photo.
  I was aghast. He said, "I like it THIS much, Weatherly!" (he called
me "Weatherly" and he called me "Little Weatherly") That was Ted's
version of "being affectionate." I think that was the night the little
runt (said affectionately) picked me up in a bear hug and lifted me
like a foot off the ground. He's little (like 5 5 or less), but he was
STRONG.

Sure, John. Whatever you say.

  Contact Randy/ Adam. Ask him.  Or are you afraid you'd find out, I
did take them?

Ibid.

  So you have no plans on checking, but you're happy to falsely accuse
me!

 That's not Christian!

  Libel suit, here we come!

Only in your dreams, John.

  The three photos of some of the Hair cast

members couldn't have been taken by you for a couple of reasons:

   Your "reasons" don't matter. I took them.

Liar.

  ^ ^ ^ ^ Libel.

Nope.

1) They already exist on another website and are identified as photos
from the show's playbill

   You are NOT correct.  

Yep, I am.

You are confused.  

Nope, I'm not.

Unless a NEW playbill was
published, those three were taken WELL AFTER the playbill was
published.

Why would they publish a "new playbill" for a show that played back in
the 60's?

???  If those three photos are in a playbill, it's a newer one than
the one they had at the Aquarius Theatre in the late 60s.

Nope. See the links below.

 Do you understand that there have been Hair shows all over the world?

Of course I do. I know people who have been in them, John.

 Each new show uses photos from previous shows. If you saw my photos
in a playbill, it's a more recent one than the LA show.

Nope. See the links below.

 I haven't seen any intact playbills since the one from the LA show,
which is the one my brother was INITIALLY in.

 The playbill I saw online was from the LA show in 69,

Hmm-hmm. The one you stole the photos from and gave yourself credit
for, John.

John.  In fact, your caption on the photos said "LA Cast...69" as well
as (incorrectly) "LA Cast...68".

 So post the link, and I'll check it. I'd LOVE to know my three photos
(I took more than the three)
  ended up in a Hair Playbill.
 Talk about a "credit."
  Thanks!  Smile
  The evil you intended ended up for good.

Riiiight...they put them in there and didn't tell you. How stupid do
you think they are going to be setting themselves up for a copyright
infringement lawsuit, John?

  You weren't in the states then, John

- you were in the Air Force in England.  I mean, that's what you've
been telling us for the last couple of months.  So...which is it?  You
took the photos when you were supposed to be in the Air Force or you
were in the Air Force stationed in Europe - which one do you choose?
Hmmm?

  I continue to be clueless why this is so EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to you.

 Put it this way. I got home in November, 1968. (east coast)
  Almost immediately, I flew out to Los Angeles. I was in Los Angeles
right after Christmas.
 So if I said "68" on the photo, I should have said "69." Is that a
crime? Or is that a mistake of memory?

Nope. It's just you tripping up again on your many, many lies. See
the links below.

  And, if you found the photo of the 3, it has my name on  it as
"byline."

Nope.  Wasn't there.  Besides, "by-lines" are for written articles,
not photographs, doofus.

   You AGAIN, don't know what you're talking about, dufus.

Uh-huh. Whatever you say, John. See the links below.

 As for them existing on "another web site", what's the link?

 I'll add it to my portfolio.  (contrary to yoru low opinion, I CAN
prove they're all mine)

Sure you can, John.  Oh, and while you're at it, try and prove that
Willie Weatherly, the very obviously African American stage actor is
your brother,

?????  Where did you see a photo of Willie Weatherly who is a African
American, In the Hair photos?

See the links below.

  Your sleuthing is slipping.

See the links below.

 as you claim him to be, okay?



2) They were from 1968  - you were supposed to be in the Air Farce in
Alconbury then, remember...?  ;-)

   Nope. Your dates are off. And I wasn't at Alconbury the whole time
I was overseas, stupid.

Ah, I see.  But you *were* overseas (you just said it yourself) at
that time.  How could you have been taking pictures of the cast of
Hair in 1969 for their playbill that was probably printed months
before the show opened in LA in 1969.

  You truly don't need to have this discussion anymore.

Getting a little too hot for you, John? Your lies becoming a little
too apparent, even for you? See the links below.

 You can post the link to the photos if you like. I just went where I
found my photo of Jerry, Carol, and Randy. It's not there anymore. So
the webmaster has obviously done some re-arranging.

Oh, baloney. You are such an unbelievable liar. See the links below.

 He also evidently has put up the two other photos I sent him. (He had
the one of the three. I sent him the one of my brother, and the one of
Ted. If you've seen all three, he put them up.

 I need to thank him, and ask him for a credit.

Uh-huh. Whatever you say, John.

 You LIVE in denial

I do, huh?  So you don't think that claiming Willie Weatherly, an
African American stage actor, to be your brother is living in denial?

  I notice you didn't put up the link.

Yeah, I did. You conveniently missed it. See below, doofus.

  All you have to do is put up the link, (except that you're lying
about it), and I'd go and contact the webmaster and ask for credit.

  I am amused, however (shades of Metropolitan Baptist church) that
you think that just because there may be a black Willie Weatherly
stage actor (I've never heard of him or seen him) that there could not
POSSIBLY be a WHITE Willie Weatherly.

Oh, for heaven's sake, John. Did you forget the post you responded to
earlier today where we already went over this? Here, let me post it
all for you again:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Um-hm. Except that the real "Willie Weatherly" who was in the LA Cast
of Hair is black, John. Just because you took a picture from a
website and *said* it was Willie Weatherly, doesn't make it so. Wanna
see a real picture of the real Willie Weatherly who is really African
American? Go to the following link John, and take a look at your
"brother":

http://www.vegasartscorner.com/images/willie-weatherly.jpg

Then go to the following link, to the bottom of the page, and you
will
read the caption under the *same* picture that says "Willie Weatherly"
highlighted in yellow and blue:

Um-hm. Except that the real "Willie Weatherly" who was in the LA
Cast
of Hair is black, John. Just because you took a picture from a
website and *said* it was Willie Weatherly, doesn't make it so.
Wanna
see a real picture of the real Willie Weatherly who is really African
American? Go to the following link John, and take a look at your
"brother":

http://www.vegasartscorner.com/images/willie-weatherly.jpg

Then go to the following link, to the bottom of the page, and you
will
read the caption under the *same* picture that says "Willie Weatherly"
highlighted in yellow and blue:

http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:QTyipnJ4740J:www.vegasartscorner.com/JessicaMarciel.html+willie+weatherly+la+cast+hair&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, are you still going to try and tell us that your brother is
Willie Weatherly the stage actor who performed in Hair in LA in 1969,
John?

  You just do not learn from past mistakes!

 You are also trying WAY too hard to prove me a liar.

 You are one hysterical woman!

  And in a blind RAGE.

Actually, I'm sitting quite calmly in my recliner with HBO on along
with my dog and my cat responding to you. Just got out of the hot-
tub, had a relaxation massage earlier today...nope - I'm quite
relaxed, John.

Why are you in a "blind rage"? Maybe because your lies are starting
to bite you in the tuchus?
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:24 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:14:09 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:
On Aug 18, 5:04 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yesOn Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:12:37 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:

 © 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:54:44 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

 And I didn't "bold" anything. Perhaps you mean to say "capitalized."

More lies. YES YOU DID embolden

  Perhaps-- stupid person-- the page's software bolded it.  I don't
even recall capitalizing.

You didn't even remember where you put the pictures, John

No, that's not what I said.

And I must wonder why all the attacks? What do you gain?

Nothing.
You gain absolutely NOTHING. What you lose is your reputation,
your credibility.


- why would
Quote:
you remember what you but in bold lettering in your profile there?
Believe me, it was in bold because you put it that way.

"What ever you say." You're ALWAYS right. About EVERYTHING.

There has never been a single case in your entire life when you've
ever been wrong about ANYTHING.

Except about the church in DC, and about where I was stationed, and
my unit.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Nor do you have the class to admit it!

I highly
Quote:
doubt that flickr.com would have put "I'm Male and Open" in bold for
you. lol!

When I looked it wasn't in bold. Makes me think you're
hallucinating, too. Seen any pink elephants lately?

Quote:

Oh, and BTW, I meant to post part 2 of your profile yesterday, so I'll
just have to do it now:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hometown: Seattle
Occupation: Retired writer
Interests: Writing, photography, the Bible, the arts, cooking, eating,
sex, good movies, good live theatre, chidren, pets, traveling.

Favorite Books & Authors: "Favorites?" No favorites. There are a
handful I like. Clancy, Sanford

Favorite Movies, Stars & Directors: Too many. I'll get back to you.De
NiroPacinoNicole KidmanBridgett FondaMeryl StreepBarbara Hershey (I've
met her)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments from anyone are welcome, of course. Wink

^ ^ ^ ^ ^It's so nice that you post the details of other people's
lives when you skulk them out, but never your own.

I shall have to dig up some goodies on YOU!

Smile
Back to top
john w
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:27 am    Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... Reply with quote

x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:09:36 -0400, "Scout Lady"
<scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Quote:

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:uq3ka415q5mluqigf0q6dakbii0bls9gvm@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:17:05 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:060ia4lq0kgsabnt6pfdi0ptahp9oruqv4@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:38:44 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:9btha4dj1i86b7vh7j20akm06mg6to0i7a@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:44:59 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:7gmha41splje330c3nv0m82d5hhsbfupsr@4ax.com...

By the way, *I'm* VERY disturbed that you'd have found my portfolio
(that I had thought I HID from these monsters), and evidently, YOU
"let the word out",
but you didn't bother to tell ME.
There just might have been some VERY GOOD reasons I didn't want
people from in here (including YOU) in my portfolio.

AGAIN, you (and others) pretend I have ZERO rights. You can do as
you damn well please.

You didn't even pay me the f*ing courtesy of telling me
"Hey! John! Perhaps you should hide it AGAIN! I found your
portfolio!"

Classy! NOT!

Every time I try to be nice to you, it bites me in the ass.

Hey moron, the next time you want to hide something don't be so stupid
and
put your name on it.

I didn't put MY name on it, stupid.

But you did!

There are any number of Weatherlys in America and elsewhere, and
there are several other professional photographers by the name,
Weatherly, as well.

None of those snapshots were taken by a professional photographer!

^ ^ ^ ^^ ?????? I thought for SURE you said "even if I knew
where they were, I wouldn't look."

Liar.

You thought? That is a lie in itself.

Congratulations, short bus!

You can ALWAYS come up with "a lower blow."

That's why you're known as such a good Catholic!

Not a good Christian, mind you! A "good Catholic!"
(there IS a difference/ you're living proof, that you can be a VERY
good Catholic without being ANYTHING remotely resembling a Christian.)

:-)

You really got me this time short bus.

Well, I'm just telling the truth. Like you claim you do!

I could probably gather 500 Christians (real ones) to look over these
posts, and they'd likely all agree, "this Cathy may be a Roman
Catholic, but she's certainly not a Christian. And she is also
evidently suffering from some sort of mental/ emotional malady.

I just call it "being a bitch."

>
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Christian Baptist Forum Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 29, 30, 31 ... 56, 57, 58  Next  
Page 30 of 58
All times are GMT

 
Jump to: