| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jani
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:05 am Post subject: Re: Hey, johnniekins weatherless.... read if you DARE. |
 |
|
<no> wrote in message news:4i1cb415dbfoifcrmpft03p8b3jrpcu5el@4ax.com...
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:23:29 +0100, "Jani" <jani@jani.adsl24.co.uk
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
no> wrote in message news:vrgbb45p0gqngfqf07jta7t140dsjn8u9h@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:06:29 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:47:05 -0700, john<no>@nospam.com wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:11:19 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:mj70b4trck0e9e3n7t7b3jaj9domf6hk6l@4ax.com...
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:53:12 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:55:31 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Let's all remember that johnnie does not like to be called johnnie.
Why not? Johnnie is johnnie's name! I wonder if johnnie would care
to
confirm that? !! :+D
As for being his name, yes and no. If it was put on the birth
certificate as John, then his name is John, and Johnnie would be a
nick name.(and some people do not like to be called by their
nickname)
But if it was put on as Johnnie then Johnnie would be his name, and
John the nickname. Just thought I would point that out.
Still think it is the Christian thing to do to call someone by the
given name, unless the person doesn't mind being called by his or
her
nickname.
Hi Larry, I would just like to point out that "the "c" word" is not on
my
birth certificate.
If you can call me "narcissist" any time you please, then I'll
feel free to call you whatever I please.
[..]
You may also rest assured I HAVE REPORTED YOU to the proper personnel
at Yahoo. So -- if your account get slashed (as it SHOULD) don't
bother trying to blam everyone else, johnnie.
I must admit, for once in my life, I am shaking in my shoes.
In fact, I just looked, and there's this huge wet spot on the front
of my pants, and there's a puddle of yellow liquid on the floor.
(I think you scared the piss out of me!)
I frankly don't know if Ill survive the next minute.
Joking apart,
No! I want to keep joking. You're all a bunch of clowns and
punksters. I join you in your clowning and punking sometimes.
given the posts you've made here and on Yahoo
Yahoo? Perhaps you have me confused with someone else.
|
Nope, definitely not.
| Quote: |
There could actually be a number of people who are very much like
me!
I mean, if you hadn't noticed, "Kelly" is an almost identical clone
of Elaine.
and the
supervised access in your divorce case based on abuse allegations,
snicker. "Here we go again."
If you weren't aware, "Miss Concerned Citizen", "abuse allegations"
are about the easiest FALSE CHARGES there are.
A PD (public defender) many years ago explained it this way:
With abuse, if you're accused, "You're Guilty."
I wasn't guilty; I'm not guilty; I'll never be guilty.
Someone mentioned recently, "John, you were tried by a jury of 12,
you were convicted, you were sentenced."
NOPE. There was no trial. My "guilt" was PRONOUNCED by a "judge"
at a HEARING (where you normally are told what the charges are before
you go to court).
She pronounced my "guilt" and sentenced me, all in a span of like 5
minutes. That's what they call "justice for all" these days.
|
Despite all your blathering, you were restricted to supervised access
because of child abuse concerns, and that is a matter of record.
| Quote: |
you might
do well to watch your step, John.
snicker.
Thanks. I've been watching my step my whole life. What good has it
done?
You -- among a dozen other-- will always believe THE WORST about me.
|
Oh, that's right, you want us to believe that you're telling the truth if it
happens to go in your favour, but be assured that you're telling lies (oh,
excuse me, being 'mistaken' because of 'mental issues) when it doesn't. Very
convenient.
| Quote: |
And so you lie, you embellish, you finger point, you GOSSIP.
If there's an incident in your area, and
the police are reasonably sensible about their profiling, it could be
rather
awkward for you.
snicker. ^ ^ ^ ^ You don't know a thing about me, REALLY. But
you're sure I fit a "criminal profile."
|
It's cumulative, John. You're on record for DV, your access to your child
was severely restricted because of abuse allegations, you've posted numerous
inappropriate online messages to young teenagers relating to sexual
behaviour, you write, watch and ask for links to incest porn, and whenever
you're challenged about aberrant or dishonest behaviour, you use 'mental
illness' as an excuse. Do you really think, if there's a relevant crime
committed in your area, that law enforcement agencies will ignore all of
that?
Jani |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
| Quote: | On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:29:46 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
No Elaine, I have not. And I have no intention to do so. I do not
need to go searching the vast space of the internet, trying to find
something on someone to rub in his face. If he is doing what you
claim, then I trust God to handle the problem.
So here comes the train and the little boy on the track is not paying |
attention.
Do you stand by and wait for your god to do something? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:09 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:07:47 +0100, "Jani" <jani@jani.adsl24.co.uk>
wrote:
| Quote: |
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:trqbb4958ka0kjhmp5o41hvnr69ikrjasb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have. Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and fighting.
John's even nasty about his own gods, though. Didn't you notice that he
called Mary a whore and a fuckslut?
Jani
|
Yes I seen that. Do I approve of it, no. But I am not going to crucify
him for it, like others seem to want to do. For all have sinned and
fall short of the glory of God. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:13 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:10:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
<scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:trqbb4958ka0kjhmp5o41hvnr69ikrjasb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have. Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and fighting.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth'.
But I tell you Do not resist and evil person. If someone strikes you
on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5: 38-40 NIV
Back in Jesus' day they didn't have bidet's and toilet tissue Larry. They
did what they had to do and used their left hand to clean themselves. (they
still do this in some parts of the Middle East today). The left hand was
considered unclean. Anyway when someone wanted to strike another they would
never use their right hand because the person they wanted to strike was
considered inferior and unclean to them and they would make themselves
unclean if they touched such a person with their right hand. The right cheek
was struck with the left hand. Offering the other cheek was a ploy to get
them to use their right hand thereby contaminating themselves by touching an
unclean person. This of course made a big fool out of the aggressor........
Now, you were saying?
|
I will have to take you at your word for this. But still does not
condone Elaine's attitude in my opinion. Or are you saying it is okay
and eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Even Paul said do not
return evil with evil. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:15 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:09:10 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:12:44 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have. Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and fighting.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth'.
But I tell you Do not resist and evil person. If someone strikes you
on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5: 38-40 NIV
You might as well back off and ride into the sunset for another few
months, Larry.
I WILL NOT enable liar johnnie.
I WILL NOT pass by his sexual filth, gutter mouth, false witness,
false prophesying, lies, and threats.
That's because I AM A CHRISTIAN, and not a coward or pacifier.
|
Well then understand I will challenge you when I feel moved by God to
do so. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:20 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:59:30 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:18:33 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:02:39 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
So, Larry- are you saying that we should simply IGNORE all his lies
and believ 'he is a Christian'?
Yep, ignore his lies, if you think he is lying. whether you believe he
is a Christian, is you choice. But remember, he has admitted he has
problems, and you are (in my opinion) judging him as if he has none.
(as I have done in the past also)
I don't THINK he is lying. I KNOW HE IS.
He's been proven a liar too many times, and is an habitual liar.
THIS Christian won't.
Liars should be exposed, not molly-coddled.
Is this what Christ commanded us to do? I don't think so. Just because
I don't jump all over him because he says something I disagree with
all the time, does not mean I am molly coddling him.
Yes you are, Larry; admit it.
|
Why, so you can brag you were right, which you aren't.
I noticed you did not answer the question why?
| Quote: | You're afraid of getting on johnnie's 'bad books', so you pacify him
I won't.
i'm tired of his excuses, tired of his lies, tired of his false
accusations, his sexual inappropriateness, his gutter mouth, and his
idle threats.
I've said it all along, AND I STILL SAY IT:
Johnnie knows when to turn on the 'normal act' and when to behave like
a fool.
His problem is, he doesn't fool me.
I've dealt with enough patients of his kind in my professional career,
and his tactics denote paranoid schizophrenia, coupled with
narcissism.
|
Dealt with them is one thing, being a practicing doctor in that field
is another. Do you have a license to back up those claims?
| Quote: |
DID you go to look at some of those disgusting posts on
YahooAnswers.com?
If so, what do you think of his feigned intelligence and 'normalcy'?
If not, WHY NOT?
|
Why should I, so I can be un Christian like the some of you and jump
all over him.
| Quote: |
If you were all the time, you would KNOW what a professional liar he
is.
He even denied being John1212.......... yet the post idents PROVE
beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is lying.
The bible speaks loudly and clearly against lying.
H has called people in here ALL SORTS of filthy names, yet he gripes
when called 'johnnie'.. He is behaving like a spoiled brat, and AFAIC,
as long as he does, he will be TREATED as such.
That is you choice, do not agree with it, but still your choice.
Fine. We must, therefore, agree to disagree, Larry. I will NOT abide
his lies and disgusting behavior, nor will I stand siltenly by because
of it. |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:11:22 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 27, 5:25 pm, larry4...@adelphia.com wrote:
If he is actually doing this, then report him to the proper people,
and I don't think they are in here. By bringing it up in here what he
is or is not doing, in my opinion is nothing but gossip.
Bury your head in the sand all you want, Larry - but don't try to take
us down into the hole with you. It's not gossip, it's the truth - you
just don't want to see it for what it is.
Sorry Kelly, I am not saying you are okay John, it the others.
Yes, you have.
I have
said he is just as much as fault as we are.
No, you haven't.
But you still have not
answered the question, how is yelling at him, calling him names,
When have I "yelled at him", Larry? I've called him names, huh? What
names are those - do you even know?
etc,
etc, helping him?
I have come to the conclusion that while you spout Scripture and say
"is that what Jesus would do?" a lot, you are really just another
troll. An overly annoying one at that.
You refuse to get it about John, Larry - and that is certainly your
choice, but frankly, it's hard for me to stomach. I've had enough of
your clueless, enabling, self-righteous pablum. Welcome to my kill-
file (a place few have been before).
PLONK!
|
Thank you |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:02:17 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:25:27 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:45:11 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 26, 6:23 pm, larry4...@adelphia.com wrote:
Whether or not he has done all you all have claimed about John1212,
doesn't matter to me. John is still one of God's creations, and we
should treat him no different than we should treat any of God's
creations.
He's communicating EXTREMELY inappropriately with teenage girls,
Larry. He's talking to them about how they can know if their hymen is
still intact and how to insert tampons and drooling over teenage girls
and basically coming on to them, Larry. He's talking about starting a
nude dinner club, Larry. He's writing sexually explicit material and
asking what people think about it. He's doing all of this and at the
same time claiming to be a former pastor and a current evangelist,
Larry. You say none of this matters to you? Why *doesn't it* matter
to you, Larry? Huh?
If he is actually doing this, then report him to the proper people,
and I don't think they are in here. By bringing it up in here what he
is or is not doing, in my opinion is nothing but gossip.
It is not gossip when it is THE TRUTH.
He HAS posted supposedly 'being a former Pastoer' and 'a lifelong
evangelist'.
I will even post it if you disbelieve Kelly or myself.
|
No need to I have seen him. And I suggest you get a dictionary and
look up the word gossip. You may be surprised at the definition.
| Quote: |
John does have problems, but no one has yet to give me a
good answer by how treating him the way he is treated, (fighting with
him, calling him names, etc.) is doing him any good, and showing him
the love that we as Christians should have for him. Remember God loves
him too.
(again, I am not condoning John's actions, but by us bringing them up
over and over and over, is that the Christian thing to do, and it is
really helping him?)
Here's some of the things you obviously don't get about John, Larry:
He does not respond appropriately to kindness - he takes advantage.
He does not respond appropriately to reasonable thinking - he takes
advantage. He does not respond to anything done in a good spirit
except to take advantage over and over again. He takes advantage
because he is a taker, not a giver - he is a user, not a fair player.
Everytime you come in here and do what you are doing right now, you
give him ammunition and enable him to behave worse because you tell
him how awful we all are. All John needs to continue in his bad
behavior, you hand to him on a silver platter.
John doesn't get better because people like you give him more reason
to say "see, it's not me, it's them!" And everytime you do that, you
enable him. And everytime you enable John to continue in his bad
behavior, you give him more reason to behave inappropriately. Don't
you get it, Larry? You're not helping John, you are hurting him. You
keep expecting John to miraculously act like a rational, reasonable,
healthy adult - but as long as you and others keep enabling him and
giving him a reason to continue on in his behavior it will never -
EVER - happen.
You're worse for him than any of us could ever be, because everytime
you chastise us, John sees you saying: "you're okay John, it's the
others who are wrong, not you."
Sorry Kelly, I am not saying you are okay John, it the others. I have
said he is just as much as fault as we are. But you still have not
answered the question, how is yelling at him, calling him names, etc,
etc, helping him?
How is your defending his lies helping?
I agree with Kelly. ALL you're doing is giving him more excuses and
enabling him.
|
I do not really defend his lies. and I have told him I disapprove of
certain things, even though Kelly says I haven't, and you agreed with
her. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:31 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:24 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:29:46 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
No Elaine, I have not. And I have no intention to do so. I do not need
to go searching the vast space of the internet, trying to find
something on someone to rub in his face. If he is doing what you
claim, then I trust God to handle the problem.
What " I CLAIM"?
He IS doing just what several of us have SAID.
Because you 'have no intention' of checking into yourself, don't go
about telling anyone else 'they are not helping'. He IS a proven liar,
an instigator, and as long as he continues to be so, I WILL expose
him.
I strongly suggest you kill file me if my posts upset you every few
months or so that you decide to appear.
|
And you all have proven this is John beyond a shadow of a doubt how? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:32 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:43:29 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:29:46 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
No Elaine, I have not. And I have no intention to do so. I do not
need to go searching the vast space of the internet, trying to find
something on someone to rub in his face. If he is doing what you
claim, then I trust God to handle the problem.
So here comes the train and the little boy on the track is not paying
attention.
Do you stand by and wait for your god to do something?
|
Sorry Mike, I do not see this as the same thing. And it is possible
that God put me there at that time to save the little boy. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:34 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:56:16 -0400, "Scout Lady"
<scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:7jqbb4dd93p371lu5v6p3076ck9lpi54uh@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:53:38 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:0j99b4hq261oivkj6e3m1uq2kvbfptcja8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:52:39 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:csn6b4lq1igd3tchf1p8ut4r03m59ttb9a@4ax.com...
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:11:19 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:mj70b4trck0e9e3n7t7b3jaj9domf6hk6l@4ax.com...
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:53:12 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:55:31 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Let's all remember that johnnie does not like to be called johnnie.
Why not? Johnnie is johnnie's name! I wonder if johnnie would care
to
confirm that? !! :+D
As for being his name, yes and no. If it was put on the birth
certificate as John, then his name is John, and Johnnie would be a
nick name.(and some people do not like to be called by their
nickname)
But if it was put on as Johnnie then Johnnie would be his name, and
John the nickname. Just thought I would point that out.
Still think it is the Christian thing to do to call someone by the
given name, unless the person doesn't mind being called by his or
her
nickname.
Hi Larry, I would just like to point out that "the "c" word" is not on
my
birth certificate.
Yes I know it is not. (if I am the "c" word is what I think you are
talking about) But like I just mentioned to Elaine, are we honoring
God or are we honoring Satan?
I am not saying John is right by his name calling and I think he knows
this. But if we do the same, does that make us anymore right?
Just think and pray about it, and ask God to guide you in this matter.
Larry
Sorry Larry but I don't think there is anything wrong with calling John
Johnnie. John has reaped what he has sown and nothing more.
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion it
offends him, then there is.
There is no end to the things that "offend" John Larry. In reality he
really
doesn't care, all that is important is how much attention he can generate
for himself. I don't understand how you can witness him in action all
these
years and still be clueless as to what makes him tick.
Yes I know many things offend John Scout, just as there are probably
many things that offend all of us. Whether I understand what makes
John tick or not, doesn't matter does it? It should be how as
Christians do we treat him. Do we pass him by (call him names, argue
with him, etc.) or do we act like the good Samaritan and show him
love?
Enabling him is not showing him love Larry.
Let me give you an example. One of my bosses at work, his name is
John. And we are on a first name basis there. I called him Johnny
once, and he told me his name is John, not Johnny. I said I was sorry,
and will try my best to remember that.
Well you ought to respect your bosses choice of name and I trust he calls
you by the name that you prefer, you know, having mutual respect for one
another. You may not be so inclined to respect his choice of name if he
refered to you as widdle warry warthead.
Yes he calls me by my name. Oh we pick on each other once in a while,
but we do respect each other.
Even though you say John has reaped what he has sown, shouldn't we as
Christians try out best to do our best to show the love of Christ by
our actions?
Jesus had no problem calling the vipers Vipers Larry.
This is true, but I feel Jesus did it with and out of love Scout, do
we?
Jesus did not love the vipers Larry.
|
And you know this how? Did Jesus tell you he didn't love them? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
vernono
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:34 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity..., An entire
thread made up of asses. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
| Quote: | On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:24 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:29:46 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
No Elaine, I have not. And I have no intention to do so. I do not need
to go searching the vast space of the internet, trying to find
something on someone to rub in his face. If he is doing what you
claim, then I trust God to handle the problem.
What " I CLAIM"?
He IS doing just what several of us have SAID.
Because you 'have no intention' of checking into yourself, don't go
about telling anyone else 'they are not helping'. He IS a proven liar,
an instigator, and as long as he continues to be so, I WILL expose
him.
I strongly suggest you kill file me if my posts upset you every few
months or so that you decide to appear.
And you all have proven this is John beyond a shadow of a doubt how?
|
would it matter?
--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this archived post...
Best answer by Sarah:
all i can say is, dont plan on getting this published....
hahahahaha |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:52 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
| Quote: | On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:43:29 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:29:46 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
No Elaine, I have not. And I have no intention to do so. I do not
need to go searching the vast space of the internet, trying to find
something on someone to rub in his face. If he is doing what you
claim, then I trust God to handle the problem.
So here comes the train and the little boy on the track is not paying
attention.
Do you stand by and wait for your god to do something?
Sorry Mike, I do not see this as the same thing. And it is possible
that God put me there at that time to save the little boy.
|
but He wouldn't set you as a warning lighthouse, i see how that works!
--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this archived post...
Best answer by Sarah:
all i can say is, dont plan on getting this published....
hahahahaha |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:57 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
vernono wrote:
| Quote: | OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity..., An entire
thread made up of asses.
|
and you are in it!
hahaha lol
--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this archived post...
Best answer by Sarah:
all i can say is, dont plan on getting this published....
hahahahaha |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
