| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Scout Lady
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:49 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
 |
|
<larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:nb9ob4lpc1qfc8butmoa2boe0145t8s5io@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:jp7mb4t26l8l54ns0sc38msie1ovl61un8@4ax.com...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:51:17 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:d4ceb4tfu0bvbbik57tor1aqeo9o17e9j4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:10:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:trqbb4958ka0kjhmp5o41hvnr69ikrjasb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have.
Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting
no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and fighting.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for
tooth'.
But I tell you Do not resist and evil person. If someone strikes you
on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5: 38-40 NIV
Back in Jesus' day they didn't have bidet's and toilet tissue Larry.
They
did what they had to do and used their left hand to clean themselves.
(they
still do this in some parts of the Middle East today). The left hand
was
considered unclean. Anyway when someone wanted to strike another they
would
never use their right hand because the person they wanted to strike
was
considered inferior and unclean to them and they would make themselves
unclean if they touched such a person with their right hand. The right
cheek
was struck with the left hand. Offering the other cheek was a ploy to
get
them to use their right hand thereby contaminating themselves by
touching
an
unclean person. This of course made a big fool out of the
aggressor........
Now, you were saying?
I will have to take you at your word for this.
No you don't have to take my word for this, look it up.
But still does not
condone Elaine's attitude in my opinion. Or are you saying it is okay
and eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Even Paul said do not
return evil with evil.
You are obsessed with everything Elaine says but somewhat blinded to
what
is
said to her. Most of Elaine's posts concerning John are in response to
his
disgusting behavior. You chose to walk on eggshells around John, she
does
not. Paul said in 1 Timothy 5:20 "Those who sin are to be rebuked
publicly,
so that the others may take warning." Verse 21 says "I charge you, in
the
sight of God and Christ Jesus and the elect angels, to keep these
instructions without partiality, and to do nothing out of favoritism."
When are you going to be impartial Larry? What would you have said if
Elaine
called Jesus a bastard and claimed his mother was a whore Larry? I would
have written the same exact thing in response, how about you Larry,
would
you have tried to sweep it under the rug if Elaine was the one who had
written such blasphemy?
Yes I guess I am in a way. She is supposed to be the one that doesn't
have a mental problem.
Exactly what is John's mental problem which causes him to behave as he
does
Larry?
What he has admitted to and that is all I am going to say on the
subject.
And John knows how I feel about certain things,
Yup and he doesn't give a crap whether he offends you or anyone else.
I do not need to beat him over the head with it as some seem to do.
Not everyone is a pacifist Larry.
If Elaine had said that, I would have said the same thing to her that
I did John.
Rebuke yes, but does it say to nag, gossip, ridicule also?
He reaps what he sows Larry just like everyone else.
So are you saying if he sows evil, you are suppose to return evil back
to him? I didn't mean just you.
|
I'm saying if he wants to dish it out then he better expect to have it
dished right back at him. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:49:29 -0400, "Scout Lady"
<scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:nb9ob4lpc1qfc8butmoa2boe0145t8s5io@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:jp7mb4t26l8l54ns0sc38msie1ovl61un8@4ax.com...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:51:17 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:d4ceb4tfu0bvbbik57tor1aqeo9o17e9j4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:10:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:trqbb4958ka0kjhmp5o41hvnr69ikrjasb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have.
Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting
no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and fighting.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for
tooth'.
But I tell you Do not resist and evil person. If someone strikes you
on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5: 38-40 NIV
Back in Jesus' day they didn't have bidet's and toilet tissue Larry.
They
did what they had to do and used their left hand to clean themselves.
(they
still do this in some parts of the Middle East today). The left hand
was
considered unclean. Anyway when someone wanted to strike another they
would
never use their right hand because the person they wanted to strike
was
considered inferior and unclean to them and they would make themselves
unclean if they touched such a person with their right hand. The right
cheek
was struck with the left hand. Offering the other cheek was a ploy to
get
them to use their right hand thereby contaminating themselves by
touching
an
unclean person. This of course made a big fool out of the
aggressor........
Now, you were saying?
I will have to take you at your word for this.
No you don't have to take my word for this, look it up.
But still does not
condone Elaine's attitude in my opinion. Or are you saying it is okay
and eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Even Paul said do not
return evil with evil.
You are obsessed with everything Elaine says but somewhat blinded to
what
is
said to her. Most of Elaine's posts concerning John are in response to
his
disgusting behavior. You chose to walk on eggshells around John, she
does
not. Paul said in 1 Timothy 5:20 "Those who sin are to be rebuked
publicly,
so that the others may take warning." Verse 21 says "I charge you, in
the
sight of God and Christ Jesus and the elect angels, to keep these
instructions without partiality, and to do nothing out of favoritism."
When are you going to be impartial Larry? What would you have said if
Elaine
called Jesus a bastard and claimed his mother was a whore Larry? I would
have written the same exact thing in response, how about you Larry,
would
you have tried to sweep it under the rug if Elaine was the one who had
written such blasphemy?
Yes I guess I am in a way. She is supposed to be the one that doesn't
have a mental problem.
Exactly what is John's mental problem which causes him to behave as he
does
Larry?
What he has admitted to and that is all I am going to say on the
subject.
And John knows how I feel about certain things,
Yup and he doesn't give a crap whether he offends you or anyone else.
I do not need to beat him over the head with it as some seem to do.
Not everyone is a pacifist Larry.
If Elaine had said that, I would have said the same thing to her that
I did John.
Rebuke yes, but does it say to nag, gossip, ridicule also?
He reaps what he sows Larry just like everyone else.
So are you saying if he sows evil, you are suppose to return evil back
to him? I didn't mean just you.
I'm saying if he wants to dish it out then he better expect to have it
dished right back at him.
|
That much I understood. But what I am asking you is if he sows evil,
are Christians suppose to return evil back to him? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Scout Lady
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:13 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
<larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:fnirb45jq4gupfg95kp0f6mcd31tk789mf@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:49:29 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:nb9ob4lpc1qfc8butmoa2boe0145t8s5io@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:jp7mb4t26l8l54ns0sc38msie1ovl61un8@4ax.com...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:51:17 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:d4ceb4tfu0bvbbik57tor1aqeo9o17e9j4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:10:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:trqbb4958ka0kjhmp5o41hvnr69ikrjasb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion
it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have.
Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting
no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and
fighting.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for
tooth'.
But I tell you Do not resist and evil person. If someone strikes
you
on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5: 38-40 NIV
Back in Jesus' day they didn't have bidet's and toilet tissue Larry.
They
did what they had to do and used their left hand to clean
themselves.
(they
still do this in some parts of the Middle East today). The left hand
was
considered unclean. Anyway when someone wanted to strike another
they
would
never use their right hand because the person they wanted to strike
was
considered inferior and unclean to them and they would make
themselves
unclean if they touched such a person with their right hand. The
right
cheek
was struck with the left hand. Offering the other cheek was a ploy
to
get
them to use their right hand thereby contaminating themselves by
touching
an
unclean person. This of course made a big fool out of the
aggressor........
Now, you were saying?
I will have to take you at your word for this.
No you don't have to take my word for this, look it up.
But still does not
condone Elaine's attitude in my opinion. Or are you saying it is
okay
and eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Even Paul said do not
return evil with evil.
You are obsessed with everything Elaine says but somewhat blinded to
what
is
said to her. Most of Elaine's posts concerning John are in response to
his
disgusting behavior. You chose to walk on eggshells around John, she
does
not. Paul said in 1 Timothy 5:20 "Those who sin are to be rebuked
publicly,
so that the others may take warning." Verse 21 says "I charge you, in
the
sight of God and Christ Jesus and the elect angels, to keep these
instructions without partiality, and to do nothing out of favoritism."
When are you going to be impartial Larry? What would you have said if
Elaine
called Jesus a bastard and claimed his mother was a whore Larry? I
would
have written the same exact thing in response, how about you Larry,
would
you have tried to sweep it under the rug if Elaine was the one who had
written such blasphemy?
Yes I guess I am in a way. She is supposed to be the one that doesn't
have a mental problem.
Exactly what is John's mental problem which causes him to behave as he
does
Larry?
What he has admitted to and that is all I am going to say on the
subject.
And John knows how I feel about certain things,
Yup and he doesn't give a crap whether he offends you or anyone else.
I do not need to beat him over the head with it as some seem to do.
Not everyone is a pacifist Larry.
If Elaine had said that, I would have said the same thing to her that
I did John.
Rebuke yes, but does it say to nag, gossip, ridicule also?
He reaps what he sows Larry just like everyone else.
So are you saying if he sows evil, you are suppose to return evil back
to him? I didn't mean just you.
I'm saying if he wants to dish it out then he better expect to have it
dished right back at him.
That much I understood. But what I am asking you is if he sows evil,
|
Should a Christian be sowing evil?
| Quote: | are Christians suppose to return evil back to him?
|
Jesus said to offer them the other cheek. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:44 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
| Quote: | On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:49:29 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
snip
I'm saying if he wants to dish it out then he better expect to have
it dished right back at him.
That much I understood. But what I am asking you is if he sows evil,
are Christians suppose to return evil back to him?
|
In general they don't. They demand evidence for his claims and usually are
met with insults for asking.
They never offer violence and usually the insults they give are minimal
compared to what he says.
Johns lies, evasions and half truths are well documented here. So are his
contstant threats against anybody who disagrees with him.
He has admittd he has a mental illness and that he can't follow things to
well.
He seems to know right from wrong.
He should not be here.
But I'd rather see him here than to se what he does in the Yahoo group.
Swift would be proud.
Maybe your god calls on them to do this. That seems to be the reason why you
claim to do most things. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:02 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:13:55 -0400, "Scout Lady"
<scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:fnirb45jq4gupfg95kp0f6mcd31tk789mf@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 21:49:29 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:nb9ob4lpc1qfc8butmoa2boe0145t8s5io@4ax.com...
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:00:12 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:jp7mb4t26l8l54ns0sc38msie1ovl61un8@4ax.com...
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:51:17 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:d4ceb4tfu0bvbbik57tor1aqeo9o17e9j4@4ax.com...
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:10:53 -0400, "Scout Lady"
scoutlady@nospam4me.net> wrote:
larry4355@adelphia.com> wrote in message
news:trqbb4958ka0kjhmp5o41hvnr69ikrjasb@4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:43:01 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:08 -0400, larry4355@adelphia.com wrote:
In a way there is nothing wrong with that. Unless in my opinion
it
offends him, then there is.
In OUR OPINION, what disgusting sexually filthy name johnnie has
called US is offensive, yet he still continues to do so.
If we offend him, TOO BAD.
Well in my opinion, not a good Christian attitude to have.
Especially
if a non Christian is lurking in here, just reading. We are acting
no
different than a non Christian does with name calling and
fighting.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for
tooth'.
But I tell you Do not resist and evil person. If someone strikes
you
on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5: 38-40 NIV
Back in Jesus' day they didn't have bidet's and toilet tissue Larry.
They
did what they had to do and used their left hand to clean
themselves.
(they
still do this in some parts of the Middle East today). The left hand
was
considered unclean. Anyway when someone wanted to strike another
they
would
never use their right hand because the person they wanted to strike
was
considered inferior and unclean to them and they would make
themselves
unclean if they touched such a person with their right hand. The
right
cheek
was struck with the left hand. Offering the other cheek was a ploy
to
get
them to use their right hand thereby contaminating themselves by
touching
an
unclean person. This of course made a big fool out of the
aggressor........
Now, you were saying?
I will have to take you at your word for this.
No you don't have to take my word for this, look it up.
But still does not
condone Elaine's attitude in my opinion. Or are you saying it is
okay
and eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Even Paul said do not
return evil with evil.
You are obsessed with everything Elaine says but somewhat blinded to
what
is
said to her. Most of Elaine's posts concerning John are in response to
his
disgusting behavior. You chose to walk on eggshells around John, she
does
not. Paul said in 1 Timothy 5:20 "Those who sin are to be rebuked
publicly,
so that the others may take warning." Verse 21 says "I charge you, in
the
sight of God and Christ Jesus and the elect angels, to keep these
instructions without partiality, and to do nothing out of favoritism."
When are you going to be impartial Larry? What would you have said if
Elaine
called Jesus a bastard and claimed his mother was a whore Larry? I
would
have written the same exact thing in response, how about you Larry,
would
you have tried to sweep it under the rug if Elaine was the one who had
written such blasphemy?
Yes I guess I am in a way. She is supposed to be the one that doesn't
have a mental problem.
Exactly what is John's mental problem which causes him to behave as he
does
Larry?
What he has admitted to and that is all I am going to say on the
subject.
And John knows how I feel about certain things,
Yup and he doesn't give a crap whether he offends you or anyone else.
I do not need to beat him over the head with it as some seem to do.
Not everyone is a pacifist Larry.
If Elaine had said that, I would have said the same thing to her that
I did John.
Rebuke yes, but does it say to nag, gossip, ridicule also?
He reaps what he sows Larry just like everyone else.
So are you saying if he sows evil, you are suppose to return evil back
to him? I didn't mean just you.
I'm saying if he wants to dish it out then he better expect to have it
dished right back at him.
That much I understood. But what I am asking you is if he sows evil,
Should a Christian be sowing evil?
|
No they should not
| Quote: |
are Christians suppose to return evil back to him?
Jesus said to offer them the other cheek.
Agreed |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
