| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
john w
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... |
 |
|
x-no-archive: yes
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Aug 14, 10:13 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Kelly! I see you CONTINUE to be quite the little BITCH.
Where's the Christianity, Kelly?
I very deliberately do not archive.
You have AGAIN STOLEN my intellectual property!
You BITCH!
See you in court!
I bet your dad would be VERY proud of this one!
Shall I contact him and ask?
:-)
john w
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
John, I did not intentionally archive your post. I was going to
respond and then changed my mind. Rather than hitting "discard" I hit
"send". It was merely a mistake. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Aug 14, 11:14 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
|
That's all that was necessary. Truthfully, with the names you called
me, you were lucky to get that.
| Quote: | And... damage done!
|
What "damage"?
| Quote: | And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
|
Maybe because when I do intentionally archive your posts I always
write "ARCHIVED". Did I do that this time, John?
| Quote: | And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize.
|
I have nothing to apologize for.
| Quote: | People have traffic ACCIDENTS daily. It wasn't intentional, but if
they're class folks, they get out of their cars and you get something
like this:
"I didn't mean to hit your car!"
"I didn't mean to run the light!"
I'm SO SORRY!"
|
Except I'm not sorry - I have nothing to be sorry for, John. It was a
mistake, nothing more and no harm was done. Even so, your posts may
not be archived by Google, but they *are* archived by other
newsreaders. It's possible to do a search for your posts with a basic
search engine if need be. You do know that because of this fact, your
"no archive" is essentially worthless, don't you? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:13 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
|
Kelly! I see you CONTINUE to be quite the little BITCH.
Where's the Christianity, Kelly?
I very deliberately do not archive.
You have AGAIN STOLEN my intellectual property!
You BITCH!
See you in court!
I bet your dad would be VERY proud of this one!
Shall I contact him and ask?
:-)
john w
| Quote: |
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:14 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:45:57 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 14, 10:13 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Kelly! I see you CONTINUE to be quite the little BITCH.
Where's the Christianity, Kelly?
I very deliberately do not archive.
You have AGAIN STOLEN my intellectual property!
You BITCH!
See you in court!
I bet your dad would be VERY proud of this one!
Shall I contact him and ask?
:-)
john w
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
John, I did not intentionally archive your post. I was going to
respond and then changed my mind. Rather than hitting "discard" I hit
"send". It was merely a mistake.
|
um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
And... damage done!
And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize.
People have traffic ACCIDENTS daily. It wasn't intentional, but if
they're class folks, they get out of their cars and you get something
like this:
"I didn't mean to hit your car!"
"I didn't mean to run the light!"
I'm SO SORRY!" |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:14 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:31:43 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 14, 11:14 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
That's all that was necessary. Truthfully, with the names you called
me, you were lucky to get that.
|
"That was "" all that was necessary"" "in whose opinion?
As for "name-calling", you just changed the subject AGAIN, from YOU
(the guilty party), back to me.
You admitted your "mistake." That's to your credit. But, I see, you
still find it IMPOSSIBLE to apologize.
Impossible. There's no pride in YOU!
And, as for name-calling, you've done a bit of that yourself
(narcissist, liar, etc)
And I haven't called you a single thing you haven't deserved.
You also made NO comment about my apologies over the remarks about
your father.
You DEMAND apologies, but you never give any!
It's as if you think you'd literally curl up and DIE, turn to dust,
and cease to exist if you
apologized.
My, aren't you full of yourself!
| Quote: |
And... damage done!
What "damage"?
|
smirk. I wouldn't expect you to get it. You have all the
sensitivity-- all the honesty-- of a bull in a china shop.
| Quote: |
And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
Maybe because when I do intentionally archive your posts I always
write "ARCHIVED". Did I do that this time, John?
|
smirk.
Where's the apology?
| Quote: |
And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize.
I have nothing to apologize for.
|
Um.... yes, you do. You did something that harmed me.
And, I notice, for all the rhetoric, you didn't apologize.
I think if you live to be 1,000 years old, you will never apologize.
You are black as coal inside.
| Quote: |
People have traffic ACCIDENTS daily. It wasn't intentional, but if
they're class folks, they get out of their cars and you get something
like this:
"I didn't mean to hit your car!"
"I didn't mean to run the light!"
I'm SO SORRY!"
Except I'm not sorry
|
That part is obvious.
SNIP
I've achieved my purpose. In your own words, you're a shallow,
arrogant, prideful, EXTREMELY ANGRY, little self-centered bitch.
Your daddy would be so proud!
john w |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robibnikoff
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:53 pm Post subject: Re: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity... |
|
|
"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:gqv9a4dbnmtlo6du1v5dbtmmkac52jjpov@4ax.com...
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
|
You actually don't need to do that.
| Quote: |
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
|
Really? Um, okay. Whatever you say. I mean it's not bad, but I certainly
wouldn't consider it an award winner.
Thanks for proving that you're not totally full of shit, johnnie. Way to
go! 
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
If you can't be a good example....
You'll just have to be a horrible warning. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robibnikoff
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:54 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wrote in message
news:h14aa4tn94c2ufd4gujh960ulq1iltj70r@4ax.com...
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Kelly! I see you CONTINUE to be quite the little BITCH.
|
Guess you lied when you said you were going to ignore "ugly comments".
| Quote: |
Where's the Christianity, Kelly?
|
Oh, the irony.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
If you can't be a good example....
You'll just have to be a horrible warning. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Aug 15, 12:14 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:31:43 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 11:14 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
That's all that was necessary. Truthfully, with the names you called
me, you were lucky to get that.
"That was "" all that was necessary"" "in whose opinion?
As for "name-calling", you just changed the subject AGAIN, from YOU
(the guilty party), back to me.
You admitted your "mistake." That's to your credit. But, I see, you
still find it IMPOSSIBLE to apologize.
Impossible. There's no pride in YOU!
And, as for name-calling, you've done a bit of that yourself
(narcissist, liar, etc)
And I haven't called you a single thing you haven't deserved.
You also made NO comment about my apologies over the remarks about
your father.
You DEMAND apologies, but you never give any!
It's as if you think you'd literally curl up and DIE, turn to dust,
and cease to exist if you
apologized.
My, aren't you full of yourself!
And... damage done!
What "damage"?
smirk. I wouldn't expect you to get it. You have all the
sensitivity-- all the honesty-- of a bull in a china shop.
And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
Maybe because when I do intentionally archive your posts I always
write "ARCHIVED". Did I do that this time, John?
smirk.
Where's the apology?
And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize.
I have nothing to apologize for.
Um.... yes, you do. You did something that harmed me.
And, I notice, for all the rhetoric, you didn't apologize.
I think if you live to be 1,000 years old, you will never apologize.
|
Here ya go, John: "I'm sorry".
Feel better now? Are ya happy? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:21 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Aug 15, 9:07 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | One thing I learned from the great Ansel Adams was to do the HARD
work behind the camera, NOT in the dark room.
As for using an adjustable bellows camera, I never cared for
"manipulating" images that way.
|
Hmmm...I guess you didn't learn *that* from "the great Ansel Adams"...
Adams used a 4x5 bellows view camera, John. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:53 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
On Aug 15, 9:12 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:59:05 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 15, 12:14 am, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:31:43 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 11:14 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
That's all that was necessary. Truthfully, with the names you called
me, you were lucky to get that.
"That was "" all that was necessary"" "in whose opinion?
As for "name-calling", you just changed the subject AGAIN, from YOU
(the guilty party), back to me.
You admitted your "mistake." That's to your credit. But, I see, you
still find it IMPOSSIBLE to apologize.
Impossible. There's no pride in YOU!
And, as for name-calling, you've done a bit of that yourself
(narcissist, liar, etc)
And I haven't called you a single thing you haven't deserved.
You also made NO comment about my apologies over the remarks about
your father.
You DEMAND apologies, but you never give any!
It's as if you think you'd literally curl up and DIE, turn to dust,
and cease to exist if you
apologized.
My, aren't you full of yourself!
And... damage done!
What "damage"?
smirk. I wouldn't expect you to get it. You have all the
sensitivity-- all the honesty-- of a bull in a china shop.
And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts.. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
Maybe because when I do intentionally archive your posts I always
write "ARCHIVED". Did I do that this time, John?
smirk.
Where's the apology?
And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize..
I have nothing to apologize for.
Um.... yes, you do. You did something that harmed me.
And, I notice, for all the rhetoric, you didn't apologize.
I think if you live to be 1,000 years old, you will never apologize.
Here ya go, John: "I'm sorry".
Feel better now? Are ya happy?
WOW! Thank you! "It's ok."
Was that so difficult?
Even a gifted surgeon, working with all his tools and all his
skills, loses a patient occasionally.
Through no fault of his own, but merely because "it wasn't meant to
be."
He's done nothing wrong. He and his team of 10 professionals devoted
some 20 hours to the best surgery humans can perform, but the patient
died under the knife.
He'll still greet the family, probably hug the wife, probably hug
the mother.. and say, "we did our best. It simply wasn't enough!
I'm sorry!"
No "FAULT." No blame. But "I wish that hadn't happened! I'm TRULY
sorry."
And your "I'm sorry" would have really meant something, if you'd
just MEANT it.
But thanks for typing the words.
Perhaps, in time, that'll come more naturally.
You get a B+ for effort.
Question is: Do YOU feel better?
I also note you made NO comment on the photo.
|
The photo is okay. The lines of the building are interesting, but
personally, I found no real interest there. If there had been more of
a contrast of the plants and the pot beside the dull colors of the
building the picture might have been more engaging. As it is, it's
kind of unengaging.
But you had a good concept with it - I could see what you intended, it
just wasn't completely realized (I studied photography under Josef
Scaylea in the 80's). |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:20 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
john w <j wrote:
I like the way you didn't correct for the parallaxes allowing everything
to seem unnatural. Most would have used an adjustable bellows cameras
and lost that Freddy Kruger mystique. Well done John.
ujb
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:40 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
john w <j wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:45:57 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 10:13 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"<316k...@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 9:12 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Kelly! I see you CONTINUE to be quite the little BITCH.
Where's the Christianity, Kelly?
I very deliberately do not archive.
You have AGAIN STOLEN my intellectual property!
You BITCH!
See you in court!
I bet your dad would be VERY proud of this one!
Shall I contact him and ask?
:-)
john w
OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity...
about my photography, that it occurs to me, there are some photos
"out there", one of which I can think of off the top of my head, which
you can see without it "tracing back to me." That is, the page it is
on isn't identified as my page, as in "www.johndweatherly.com"
I have located one photo, a contest winner, that is on a page you
can look at. I don't have 100 photos out there on public pages, but I
have a few.
I am not putting a lot of stuff out there until I can figure out a
way to turn the photos that are online into $$$.
But, if some of you are curious about my photography (which I've
discussed in here MANY times),
you can now look at one of my better photos from a few years back.
Go to:
http://www.photolaureates.org
There will be a tab called "Search Photographers"
click on it.
You will be taken to a page where you will fill out a "search
request" form. No doubt, most / all of you have filled out "search
criteria".
Fill in my name, "John Weatherly"
Fill in my zip code (so you know that the John Weatherly listed is me
in Seattle.)
98104
If you're wondering, I used the zip code of an old address, the
building in the photo.
You'll likely land on a blank page, with just my first name on the
far left of the page, "John."
Click on "John", and the photo will appear.
It DID win an award, and it does represent some of my best work.
If I don't see hundreds of altered, butchered copies of the photo all
over the web in the next month, I may consider showing you more of my
work.
However, I have no desire to post photos that I haven't sold and have
some of you "mass-circulate" them and have them end up not marketable.
Behave, and you MAY get to see some more.
However, I am showing this photo because I've had a lot of very
positive feedback from people who've seen it. Residents of that
building have been VERY appreciative.
I hope some of you will enjoy it.
I REALLY am "me" with a camera in my hands.
For many years (decades), I wondered what I'd end up doing with my
life. Everything I touched-- aside from writing-- felt "odd."
Writing was difficult because-- in the pre-"PC" years-- writing was
difficult.
I'm not the first writer to say that writing with a typewriter was a
"royal pain in the butt."
When I picked up my first PROFESSIONAL 35mm, it was a true "bonding"
experience. I got my first roll of film back, and all I wanted was to
shoot more pictures.
By the time I started college, I already had a substantial
portfolio, and my teachers told me I had a gift.
I figured out that art was my world, not "science", not "math".
Art. Creating out of nothing.
I hope you enjoy.
Ugly comments will be ignored.
john w- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
John, I did not intentionally archive your post. I was going to
respond and then changed my mind. Rather than hitting "discard" I hit
"send". It was merely a mistake.
um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
And... damage done!
And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize.
People have traffic ACCIDENTS daily. It wasn't intentional, but if
they're class folks, they get out of their cars and you get something
like this:
"I didn't mean to hit your car!"
"I didn't mean to run the light!"
I'm SO SORRY!"
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ok. Enough of you have expressed interest /curiosity |
|
|
john w <j wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:31:43 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 14, 11:14 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
um hm.
So where's the apology. You merely "explained."
That's all that was necessary. Truthfully, with the names you called
me, you were lucky to get that.
"That was "" all that was necessary"" "in whose opinion?
As for "name-calling", you just changed the subject AGAIN, from YOU
(the guilty party), back to me.
You admitted your "mistake." That's to your credit. But, I see, you
still find it IMPOSSIBLE to apologize.
Impossible. There's no pride in YOU!
And, as for name-calling, you've done a bit of that yourself
(narcissist, liar, etc)
And I haven't called you a single thing you haven't deserved.
You also made NO comment about my apologies over the remarks about
your father.
You DEMAND apologies, but you never give any!
It's as if you think you'd literally curl up and DIE, turn to dust,
and cease to exist if you
apologized.
My, aren't you full of yourself!
And... damage done!
What "damage"?
smirk. I wouldn't expect you to get it. You have all the
sensitivity-- all the honesty-- of a bull in a china shop.
And-- you HAVE very deliberately archived any number of my posts. Why
would I believe you did something "different" this time?
Maybe because when I do intentionally archive your posts I always
write "ARCHIVED". Did I do that this time, John?
smirk.
Where's the apology?
And, then, there's the point that you actually didn't apologize.
I have nothing to apologize for.
Um.... yes, you do. You did something that harmed me.
And, I notice, for all the rhetoric, you didn't apologize.
I think if you live to be 1,000 years old, you will never apologize.
You are black as coal inside.
People have traffic ACCIDENTS daily. It wasn't intentional, but if
they're class folks, they get out of their cars and you get something
like this:
"I didn't mean to hit your car!"
"I didn't mean to run the light!"
I'm SO SORRY!"
Except I'm not sorry
That part is obvious.
SNIP
I've achieved my purpose. In your own words, you're a shallow,
arrogant, prideful, EXTREMELY ANGRY, little self-centered bitch.
Your daddy would be so proud!
john w
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
