www.evangelicalview.com

Leading Religious,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Paternal and maternal line divinations
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Druid Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David Dalton
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Paternal and maternal line divinations Reply with quote

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:46:45 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:37:17 GMT, "Morgan Azstarelle"
jaditelefae@ntlworld.com> wrote:


"David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote

I do most of my divinations by base chakra area muscle
click divination and some by self-compatibility sensitivity and
self-bridge-compatibility sensitivity. This is different from
lifelong held divination abilities held by other humans
and is I think unique to me among living humans

sound interesting..

and is
one sign that I am an Avatar, though perhaps only a few
elders in each path know that, and may not be on the
computers, and those on the computers may not have
been talking about me to their elders at all.

never a good idea to claim to be a God or GodHead Incarnate online...

I have said if some consider past figures such have me to have been
divine in life and not just after death they must consider me, a
global figure, to be also divine, but other do not have to, and I
would prefer not to be worshipped, I would prefer that past figures
similar to me be conbsired to have been not divine during life.
Also at various times I have used the term Avatar or

I typed "considered" not "conbsired", someone hacked it,
and I also did not put that many blank spaces after "Also".
Some are betraying their past figures, who fully support
me, by betraying me.

Quote:
all-purpose avar or Opener of the Way or global shaman
but really a standard term for those such as me must be
negotiated by the UN though historical initially local terms
such as Prophet and Budhha and avatar and Christ should
be retained for past figures similar to me. But until that standard
term is negiated I will use the term Avatar (to distinguish it
from my use of the terminoology such as Sinead O'Connor
is the current avatar (lowercase) of Brigid, which I have
explained before and by which I do not mean that Sinead
O'Connor is Brigid but has a special duality with Brigid,
as I have explained in my previous writing, and may merge
with her after death). On the other hand by Avatar, or
all purpose avatar, I do not mean that I am current
avatar of any someone but can invoke any someone
other than myself and duality align myself with any
someone other than myself and have certain higher
dimensional extensions that other humans do not have.
But some may confused by some Hindu use of the
term avatar to just mean someone like me, e.g. Krishna,
and who they have said that are avatars of Vishnu but
I have divined that in my terminology that Mother
Amma is the current avatar of Vishnu. Also I maintain
that past figures such as Adonis, Taliesin, Finn, Amergin,
Herne (in his originally living human form), the Havamal
139--141 writer, the Iowa Dakota Salmon Youth, Moses,
Solomon, Jacob, Noah and Mohammed were all Avatars by my definition
of the term (pending negotiation of a standard UN term
as I hope for), not just those such as Jesus, Buddha,
and Krishna. Until said standard term is negotiated and
applies to all such past initially local figures

certainly including Jesus, Krishna and Buddha (as initially
local)

Quote:
along
with the initially local terms) and to me, a global and
near space figure, I will stick to using the term Avatar.
That is final.

David





*hugs to Dave*

Morgan
who is also not the sanest cookie in the pencilcase...
Back to top
David Dalton
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:06 am    Post subject: Re: Paternal and maternal line divinations Reply with quote

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:46:45 -0230, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:37:17 GMT, "Morgan Azstarelle"
jaditelefae@ntlworld.com> wrote:


"David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote

I do most of my divinations by base chakra area muscle
click divination and some by self-compatibility sensitivity and
self-bridge-compatibility sensitivity. This is different from
lifelong held divination abilities held by other humans
and is I think unique to me among living humans

sound interesting..

and is
one sign that I am an Avatar, though perhaps only a few
elders in each path know that, and may not be on the
computers, and those on the computers may not have
been talking about me to their elders at all.

never a good idea to claim to be a God or GodHead Incarnate online...

I have said if some consider past figures such have me to have been
divine in life and not just after death they must consider me, a
global figure, to be also divine, but other do not have to, and I
would prefer not to be worshipped, I would prefer that past figures
similar to me be conbsired to have been not divine during life.
Also at various times I have used the term Avatar or
all-purpose avar or Opener of the Way or global shaman
but really a standard term for those such as me must be
negotiated by the UN though historical initially local terms
such as Prophet and Budhha and avatar and Christ should
be retained for past figures similar to me. But until that standard
term is negiated I will use the term Avatar (to distinguish it
from my use of the terminoology such as Sinead O'Connor
is the current avatar (lowercase) of Brigid, which I have
explained before and by which I do not mean that Sinead
O'Connor is Brigid but has a special duality with Brigid,
as I have explained in my previous writing, and may merge
with her after death). On the other hand by Avatar, or
all purpose avatar, I do not mean that I am current
avatar of any someone but can invoke any someone
other than myself and duality align myself with any
someone other than myself and have certain higher
dimensional extensions that other humans do not have.
But some may confused by some Hindu use of the
term avatar to just mean someone like me, e.g. Krishna,
and who they have said that are avatars of Vishnu but
I have divined that in my terminology that Mother
Amma is the current avatar of Vishnu. Also I maintain
that past figures such as Adonis, Taliesin, Finn, Amergin,
Herne (in his originally living human form), the Havamal
139--141 writer, the Iowa Dakota Salmon Youth, Moses,
Solomon, Jacob, Noah and Mohammed were all Avatars by my definition
of the term (pending negotiation of a standard UN term
as I hope for), not just those such as Jesus, Buddha,
and Krishna. Until said standard term is negotiated and
applies to all such past initially local figures (along
with the initially local terms) and to me, a global and
near space figure,]

directing my messages at all humans (including I, who
am human) currently in that region (even if they later
move outside) and their descendants and including
any transition with our without transformation through
evolution (i.e. even those who transform to new
species members or would be descended from humans
currently in that region through evolution).

I have no followers and do not want any.

All that should be clear from my Salmon on the Thorns
web page
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html
where it is clear that I am directing certain non-denominational
and non-religious (but affecting religion) messages at humans
including myself on the planet (including to the outer atmopsphere)
and near space but I am not pushing my individual working
theory personal belief system stuff on anyone else and
very much believe in religious tolerance and diversity.

David



Quote:
will stick to using the term Avatar.
That is final.

David





*hugs to Dave*

Morgan
who is also not the sanest cookie in the pencilcase...
Back to top
Aetyr
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 4:41 am    Post subject: Re: Paternal and maternal line divinations Reply with quote

Take it easy, David. Eventually she will fall under your charms.
Pip
"David Dalton" <dalton@nfld.com> wrote in message
news:qh07i017q82ldjeteade983260gv26idv6@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:33:09 +0200, "Gianna Stefani"
gianna.stefani@j-b.org> wrote:

"Aetyr" <aetyr@HAHAnc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:17AUc.175215$wH4.11393257@twister.southeast.rr.com...
David. Go lie down.
Pip

I was wondering about his posts - even had a brief look at his
website.

Is he mentally ill ?


Have you acadmically proven my website incorrect, by library
and research study work, with lots of references, and
certainly not confined to just one path? And which of
my messages are you against?

David
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton


Back to top
Gianna Stefani
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Paternal and maternal line divinations Reply with quote

"Aetyr" <aetyr@HAHAnc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:oUaVc.179390$wH4.11693246@twister.southeast.rr.com...
Quote:
Take it easy, David. Eventually she will fall under your charms.
Pip

Already have - its a done deal (:
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Druid Forum Goto page Previous  1, 2  
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum