| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Qahir Al-Ashrar
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:04 am Post subject: Democracy = Terrorism? |
 |
|
Democracy = Terrorism?
One would immediately assume that to equate democracy with terrorism
would be a contradiction in terms. Terrorism is described as the
unnecessary use of violence in order to achieve an aim, whereas
democracy is about peaceful and collective participation in the law-
making process and is therefore a diplomatic and non-violent means to
achieve an aim, or so we would assume.
Democracy is a concept that has become a standard for the world today
according to which, everyone is expected to lead their lives. People
are led to believe that democracy is the modern, progressive and
‘civilised' way to look after the affairs of society. They are made to
believe that democracy will bring about progression and advancement,
having seen the success western nations have achieved. It is seen as
the only possible way of life that people are to live by and is
promoted as being widely accepted by the masses. Failure to comply to
it would render you an outcast, someone who is backward, regressive
and in need of reform.
Democracy is the way of life of the Kuffaar (disbelievers) in which
they believe, live their life by and are willing to die for. The US
and UK are hailed as being the champions of democracy and are the most
powerful and advanced nations in the world. Thus, the natural
consequence of this is that they will do whatever they can to ensure
that their way of life becomes dominant over all else, and that it is
accepted by the world as being the norm. Hence, these nations deem it
necessary to convey their democratic way of life to the rest of the
world so that they are able to further sustain their dominance and
ensure that any threat to their civilisation is made impotent.
Recent events in Iraq show us the way in which the Kuffaar are
determined to make their way of life become dominant and how they aim
to make others conform to their standards and principles to the extent
where they use violence to ensure that this happens. They kill,
murder, bomb, destroy, rape and pillage to achieve their aims and to
subjugate the people into becoming subservient to their demands.
The handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis was gloated as being a
symbol of self-determination for the Iraqi people by allowing them to
determine their own affairs, when in fact the truth of it is that they
are still very much dependent and subservient to the US.
If we were to look at the way in which this so-called democratic Iraq
came about, we can see that the policy of the western regimes is to
use terrorism as a means to further their own way of life and to
impose it upon others. The Iraqi people had no choice in their
leadership or in the fate of their government; rather the US took it
upon herself to determine the government of Iraq and its political
reality. The same can be said of Afghanistan, where the US stormed the
country using all its military might in order to enforce their way of
life (democracy) upon the people, against the will of its
inhabitants.
In fact, if one were to look at Afghanistan and Iraq after their
‘liberation', it becomes clearly evident that the people of these
countries have had no choice in the determination of their
governments. Rather, what we find is that both countries were
instilled with puppet regimes, whose rulers worked in American
petroleum companies and at some point, with American intelligence
agencies and remain fully subservient to the US. The claims of
liberating these countries and establishing democratic regimes made by
the US are now clearly understood. Their version of democracy in these
countries is one that is subservient to the US with a ‘made in the
USA' label firmly attached to it.
It seems that the western world is determined to make their system of
governance dominant over the world by forcing others to live their
lives according to it. For those who reject, they are subject to
facing the military might of these regimes forcing them to succumb to
their demands whilst those who are subjugated to adhere to it are left
to suffer in slavery under them. This is the choice they offer to the
people of the world enforcing their corrupt and evil way of life upon
the masses either way.
The reality is such that terrorism is not exclusive to the Muslims,
rather terrorism is the foreign policy of the western (non-Islamic)
regimes and a means that they adopt in order to further their way of
life and bully the world into submission. They employ state terrorism
under the guise of liberation and fighting evil (Islamic) despotic
regimes to fool the people into siding with them.
The Muslims who follow and practice the belief of Ahl ul-Sunnah wal-
Jamaa'ah (the Messenger Muhammad [PBUH] and his companions) are not
willing to accept such a reality where the Kuffaar are allowed to have
the upper hand over us. The Muslim Ummah (nation) was raised to be the
best nation among mankind given the highest status of ruling and
looking after the affairs of the people. Hence, we hereby reject the
deception and trickery of these nations and their filthy, rotten,
democratic way of life for we have Islam which is the only divine
unique and supreme way of life where the sovereignty is to Allah (SWT)
alone and all obedience is to Him and all that He has legislated. It
is only Islam that will elevate and dignify the Muslims bringing
advancement and prosperity in this life and the Hereafter.
Source: Thesavedsect
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2007/01/02/7050.shtml |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Qahir Al-Ashrar
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:21 am Post subject: Democracy = Terrorism? |
|
|
Democracy = Terrorism?
One would immediately assume that to equate democracy with terrorism
would be a contradiction in terms. Terrorism is described as the
unnecessary use of violence in order to achieve an aim, whereas
democracy is about peaceful and collective participation in the law-
making process and is therefore a diplomatic and non-violent means to
achieve an aim, or so we would assume.
Democracy is a concept that has become a standard for the world today
according to which, everyone is expected to lead their lives. People
are led to believe that democracy is the modern, progressive and
‘civilised' way to look after the affairs of society. They are made to
believe that democracy will bring about progression and advancement,
having seen the success western nations have achieved. It is seen as
the only possible way of life that people are to live by and is
promoted as being widely accepted by the masses. Failure to comply to
it would render you an outcast, someone who is backward, regressive
and in need of reform.
Democracy is the way of life of the Kuffaar (disbelievers) in which
they believe, live their life by and are willing to die for. The US
and UK are hailed as being the champions of democracy and are the most
powerful and advanced nations in the world. Thus, the natural
consequence of this is that they will do whatever they can to ensure
that their way of life becomes dominant over all else, and that it is
accepted by the world as being the norm. Hence, these nations deem it
necessary to convey their democratic way of life to the rest of the
world so that they are able to further sustain their dominance and
ensure that any threat to their civilisation is made impotent.
Recent events in Iraq show us the way in which the Kuffaar are
determined to make their way of life become dominant and how they aim
to make others conform to their standards and principles to the extent
where they use violence to ensure that this happens. They kill,
murder, bomb, destroy, rape and pillage to achieve their aims and to
subjugate the people into becoming subservient to their demands.
The handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis was gloated as being a
symbol of self-determination for the Iraqi people by allowing them to
determine their own affairs, when in fact the truth of it is that they
are still very much dependent and subservient to the US.
If we were to look at the way in which this so-called democratic Iraq
came about, we can see that the policy of the western regimes is to
use terrorism as a means to further their own way of life and to
impose it upon others. The Iraqi people had no choice in their
leadership or in the fate of their government; rather the US took it
upon herself to determine the government of Iraq and its political
reality. The same can be said of Afghanistan, where the US stormed the
country using all its military might in order to enforce their way of
life (democracy) upon the people, against the will of its
inhabitants.
In fact, if one were to look at Afghanistan and Iraq after their
‘liberation', it becomes clearly evident that the people of these
countries have had no choice in the determination of their
governments. Rather, what we find is that both countries were
instilled with puppet regimes, whose rulers worked in American
petroleum companies and at some point, with American intelligence
agencies and remain fully subservient to the US. The claims of
liberating these countries and establishing democratic regimes made by
the US are now clearly understood. Their version of democracy in these
countries is one that is subservient to the US with a ‘made in the
USA' label firmly attached to it.
It seems that the western world is determined to make their system of
governance dominant over the world by forcing others to live their
lives according to it. For those who reject, they are subject to
facing the military might of these regimes forcing them to succumb to
their demands whilst those who are subjugated to adhere to it are left
to suffer in slavery under them. This is the choice they offer to the
people of the world enforcing their corrupt and evil way of life upon
the masses either way.
The reality is such that terrorism is not exclusive to the Muslims,
rather terrorism is the foreign policy of the western (non-Islamic)
regimes and a means that they adopt in order to further their way of
life and bully the world into submission. They employ state terrorism
under the guise of liberation and fighting evil (Islamic) despotic
regimes to fool the people into siding with them.
The Muslims who follow and practice the belief of Ahl ul-Sunnah wal-
Jamaa'ah (the Messenger Muhammad [PBUH] and his companions) are not
willing to accept such a reality where the Kuffaar are allowed to have
the upper hand over us. The Muslim Ummah (nation) was raised to be the
best nation among mankind given the highest status of ruling and
looking after the affairs of the people. Hence, we hereby reject the
deception and trickery of these nations and their filthy, rotten,
democratic way of life for we have Islam which is the only divine
unique and supreme way of life where the sovereignty is to Allah (SWT)
alone and all obedience is to Him and all that He has legislated. It
is only Islam that will elevate and dignify the Muslims bringing
advancement and prosperity in this life and the Hereafter.
Source: Thesavedsect
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2007/01/02/7050.shtml |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Raptor
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Muslims, |
|
|
Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who
sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider
both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad
baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.,,If
you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as
a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically.
Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam
is a true religion. I will also pay ,,$50,000 U.S. dollars ,,to anyone
who can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made
against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:,a narcissist a
misogynist a rapist,a pedophile a lecher a torturer -
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Raptor
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: Re: Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Musl |
|
|
Raptor wrote:
Raptor wrote:
| Quote: | Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who
sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider
both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad
baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.,,If
you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as
a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically.
Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is
a true religion. I will also pay ,,$50,000 U.S. dollars ,,to anyone who
can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made
against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:,a narcissist a
misogynist a rapist,a pedophile a lecher a torturer -
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who
sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider
both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad
baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.,,If
you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as
a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically.
Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is
a true religion. I will also pay ,,$50,000 U.S. dollars ,,to anyone who
can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made
against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:,a narcissist a
misogynist a rapist,a pedophile a lecher a torturer -
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Raptor
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:09 am Post subject: Re: Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Musl |
|
|
Raptor wrote:
| Quote: | Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who
sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider
both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad
baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.,,If
you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as
a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically.
Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is
a true religion. I will also pay ,,$50,000 U.S. dollars ,,to anyone who
can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made
against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:,a narcissist a
misogynist a rapist,a pedophile a lecher a torturer -
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
HOW TO BECOME A SHITSKIN MOSLEM - this is how: fuck goats, fuck your |
mother (nikomak), molest children, wear a beekeepers outfit all the
time, never shower or bath, beat your wives, learn terrorist activities
at a maddrassa, wipe your ass with stones, sell the donkey you fucked to
a nearby village, marry a nine year-old , send your child off to an
indoctrination camp, practice thighing with little kids, ............
Practice all those and you too could become a prophet !!
Elif air ab tizak mohammad !!!!
info@muslimmatch.com or apache@muslimmatch.com or
politicsIranian@googlegroups.com
jamiat@islamsa.org.za
dsirc@mweb.co.za
jamiatmp@lantic.co.za
sanha-kzn@sanha.org.za
sanha-gp@sanha.org.za
sanha-cpt@sanha.org.za
helpline@sanha.org.za
islamwayoflife@googlegroups.com
furtivo4000@gmail.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** moslem cartoon character
mohammad and his bumchum allaah were child molesting goat fuckers and
nikomaks
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' /' ')
\ /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
Up your ass mohammad - Elif air ab tizak!!!
info@muslimmatch.com or apache@muslimmatch.com or
politicsIranian@googlegroups.com
jamiat@islamsa.org.za
dsirc@mweb.co.za
jamiatmp@lantic.co.za
sanha-kzn@sanha.org.za
sanha-gp@sanha.org.za
sanha-cpt@sanha.org.za
helpline@sanha.org.za
islamwayoflife@googlegroups.com
furtivo4000@gmail.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Qahir Al-Ashrar
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:04 am Post subject: Democracy = Terrorism? |
|
|
Democracy = Terrorism?
One would immediately assume that to equate democracy with terrorism
would be a contradiction in terms. Terrorism is described as the
unnecessary use of violence in order to achieve an aim, whereas
democracy is about peaceful and collective participation in the law-
making process and is therefore a diplomatic and non-violent means to
achieve an aim, or so we would assume.
Democracy is a concept that has become a standard for the world today
according to which, everyone is expected to lead their lives. People
are led to believe that democracy is the modern, progressive and
‘civilised' way to look after the affairs of society. They are made to
believe that democracy will bring about progression and advancement,
having seen the success western nations have achieved. It is seen as
the only possible way of life that people are to live by and is
promoted as being widely accepted by the masses. Failure to comply to
it would render you an outcast, someone who is backward, regressive
and in need of reform.
Democracy is the way of life of the Kuffaar (disbelievers) in which
they believe, live their life by and are willing to die for. The US
and UK are hailed as being the champions of democracy and are the most
powerful and advanced nations in the world. Thus, the natural
consequence of this is that they will do whatever they can to ensure
that their way of life becomes dominant over all else, and that it is
accepted by the world as being the norm. Hence, these nations deem it
necessary to convey their democratic way of life to the rest of the
world so that they are able to further sustain their dominance and
ensure that any threat to their civilisation is made impotent.
Recent events in Iraq show us the way in which the Kuffaar are
determined to make their way of life become dominant and how they aim
to make others conform to their standards and principles to the extent
where they use violence to ensure that this happens. They kill,
murder, bomb, destroy, rape and pillage to achieve their aims and to
subjugate the people into becoming subservient to their demands.
The handover of sovereignty to the Iraqis was gloated as being a
symbol of self-determination for the Iraqi people by allowing them to
determine their own affairs, when in fact the truth of it is that they
are still very much dependent and subservient to the US.
If we were to look at the way in which this so-called democratic Iraq
came about, we can see that the policy of the western regimes is to
use terrorism as a means to further their own way of life and to
impose it upon others. The Iraqi people had no choice in their
leadership or in the fate of their government; rather the US took it
upon herself to determine the government of Iraq and its political
reality. The same can be said of Afghanistan, where the US stormed the
country using all its military might in order to enforce their way of
life (democracy) upon the people, against the will of its
inhabitants.
In fact, if one were to look at Afghanistan and Iraq after their
‘liberation', it becomes clearly evident that the people of these
countries have had no choice in the determination of their
governments. Rather, what we find is that both countries were
instilled with puppet regimes, whose rulers worked in American
petroleum companies and at some point, with American intelligence
agencies and remain fully subservient to the US. The claims of
liberating these countries and establishing democratic regimes made by
the US are now clearly understood. Their version of democracy in these
countries is one that is subservient to the US with a ‘made in the
USA' label firmly attached to it.
It seems that the western world is determined to make their system of
governance dominant over the world by forcing others to live their
lives according to it. For those who reject, they are subject to
facing the military might of these regimes forcing them to succumb to
their demands whilst those who are subjugated to adhere to it are left
to suffer in slavery under them. This is the choice they offer to the
people of the world enforcing their corrupt and evil way of life upon
the masses either way.
The reality is such that terrorism is not exclusive to the Muslims,
rather terrorism is the foreign policy of the western (non-Islamic)
regimes and a means that they adopt in order to further their way of
life and bully the world into submission. They employ state terrorism
under the guise of liberation and fighting evil (Islamic) despotic
regimes to fool the people into siding with them.
The Muslims who follow and practice the belief of Ahl ul-Sunnah wal-
Jamaa'ah (the Messenger Muhammad [PBUH] and his companions) are not
willing to accept such a reality where the Kuffaar are allowed to have
the upper hand over us. The Muslim Ummah (nation) was raised to be the
best nation among mankind given the highest status of ruling and
looking after the affairs of the people. Hence, we hereby reject the
deception and trickery of these nations and their filthy, rotten,
democratic way of life for we have Islam which is the only divine
unique and supreme way of life where the sovereignty is to Allah (SWT)
alone and all obedience is to Him and all that He has legislated. It
is only Islam that will elevate and dignify the Muslims bringing
advancement and prosperity in this life and the Hereafter.
Source: Thesavedsect
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2007/01/02/7050.shtml |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Raptor
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:20 am Post subject: Re: Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Musl |
|
|
Raptor wrote:
| Quote: | Sina's Challenge - I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who
sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider
both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad
baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.,,If
you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as
a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically.
Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is
a true religion. I will also pay ,,$50,000 U.S. dollars ,,to anyone who
can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made
against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:,a narcissist a
misogynist a rapist,a pedophile a lecher a torturer -
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
