| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rrock
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:48 am Post subject: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
 |
|
--Shiva-- wrote:
| Quote: | On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:47:14 GMT, you wrote:
Would it then be, in your opinion, possible that a man could read the
Bible, profess no known organized religion, and yet still find hidden
truths or spiritual understanding within its pages?
as lo ng as he could explain it so EVERYONE ELSE, also saw the
same..
otherwise-its just like the 500 different Baptist sects.. they
pick and choose the passage THEY think is THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH, and
cram it down everyone elses throat.
--Shiva--
|
Wouldn't explaining such things to everyone else be considered
"preaching"?? Wouldn't some people find that sort of thing
objectionable, like "teaching" without being asked? What would
it matter if the set of "all people" were able to "see the same"?
Sounds like you are flipping the coin in mid-statement here.
When was the last time you attended a Baptist service?
Why would you make that opinion without other Baptists around
to represent their own side of that story? Are the Baptists
not allowed to believe in Angels? Are they not allowed to discuss
their viewpoints in this news group? Would they, too, be submitted
to religious persecution if they referenced the Bible when speaking
about Angels?
Perhaps we should invite some Baptists here to explain their
viewpoints on the topic. Because limiting the subject matter
to that of people who speak with demons and ghosts is rather
limiting, don't you think?
AOA rrock
/
o=====< toot
\ |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Opie
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:30 pm Post subject: Re: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:48:53 GMT, rrock
<ron@rrockwell.com> wrote:
<> --Shiva-- wrote:
<>
<> > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:47:14 GMT, you wrote:
<> >
<> >
<> >>Would it then be, in your opinion, possible
that a man could read the
<> >>Bible, profess no known organized religion,
and yet still find hidden
<> >>truths or spiritual understanding within its
pages?
<> >
<> > as lo ng as he could explain it so EVERYONE
ELSE, also saw the
<> > same..
<> > otherwise-its just like the 500 different
Baptist sects.. they
<> > pick and choose the passage THEY think is THE
ABSOLUTE TRUTH, and
<> > cram it down everyone elses throat.
<> > --Shiva--
<> >
<> >
<>
<> Wouldn't explaining such things to everyone
else be considered
<> "preaching"?? Wouldn't some people find that
sort of thing
<> objectionable, like "teaching" without being
asked? What would
<> it matter if the set of "all people" were able
to "see the same"?
<> Sounds like you are flipping the coin in
mid-statement here.
<>
<> When was the last time you attended a Baptist
service?
<> Why would you make that opinion without other
Baptists around
<> to represent their own side of that story? Are
the Baptists
<> not allowed to believe in Angels? Are they not
allowed to discuss
<> their viewpoints in this news group? Would
they, too, be submitted
<> to religious persecution if they referenced the
Bible when speaking
<> about Angels?
<>
<> Perhaps we should invite some Baptists here to
explain their
<> viewpoints on the topic. Because limiting the
subject matter
<> to that of people who speak with demons and
ghosts is rather
<> limiting, don't you think?
<>
<>
A good reason to read the Harry Potter series.
Lots of ghosts, demons, and other things that go
bump in the night. Careful -- don't say anything
negative about the Potter believers unless you
have several around to defend their point of view.
Keep the subject matter flowing by opening your
mind to all sorts of meaningful literature!
<> AOA rrock
<>
<> /
<> o=====< toot
<> \ |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC WATSON
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:26 pm Post subject: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:48:53 GMT, rrock <ron@rrockwell.com> said the
following funny stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
| Quote: |
Perhaps we should invite some Baptists here to explain their
viewpoints on the topic. Because limiting the subject matter
to that of people who speak with demons and ghosts is rather
limiting, don't you think?
|
Greetings, Ron.
I am a Baptist, and whether or not people might claim I'm 'allowed' to
speak on this matter, here goes, despite some comments I will no doubt
receive by certain individuals about my being a Christian, but
believing in ghosts!!
I HAVE had personal experience with ghostly activity.
I've not only seen some, but felt and heard some.
If you would like to email me, I'll be happy to elaborate, as I don't
want to bother doing so in here .
My email is romath@romath.com.
Looking forward to hearing from you!  )
--
Confucious say: "Don't judge people by their relatives!"
Sign in feudin' homestead: "Friends Welcome. Relatives by Appointment.!" |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Opie
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:45 pm Post subject: Re: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:26:43 -0400, DOC WATSON
<docwatson@yup> wrote:
<> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:48:53 GMT, rrock
<ron@rrockwell.com> said the
<> following funny stuff in this here little old
new 'froup:
<>
<> >
<> >Perhaps we should invite some Baptists here to
explain their
<> >viewpoints on the topic. Because limiting the
subject matter
<> >to that of people who speak with demons and
ghosts is rather
<> >limiting, don't you think?
<>
<> Greetings, Ron.
<> I am a Baptist, and whether or not people might
claim I'm 'allowed' to
<> speak on this matter, here goes, despite some
comments I will no doubt
<> receive by certain individuals about my being a
Christian, but
<> believing in ghosts!!
<> I HAVE had personal experience with ghostly
activity.
<> I've not only seen some, but felt and heard
some.
<> If you would like to email me, I'll be happy to
elaborate, as I don't
<> want to bother doing so in here .
<> My email is romath@romath.com.
<>
<> Looking forward to hearing from you! )
Actually, I think this would be a very fascinating
subject to elaborate on here. I'm sure you'd take
a few punches from a few jerks but I really
believe you'd fine a sympathetic audience if those
ghosts weren't baptist ghosts with a message.
Give it a try! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
decoder2
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:49 pm Post subject: Re: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
|
|
MY GOD! cross posting on a large scale!
"Opie" <O_Taylor@MayberryRFD.com> wrote in message
news:j167m19d06m09sr3fd1fe2u8pt5obkatvq@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:26:43 -0400, DOC WATSON
docwatson@yup> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:48:53 GMT, rrock
ron@rrockwell.com> said the
following funny stuff in this here little old
new 'froup:
Perhaps we should invite some Baptists here to
explain their
viewpoints on the topic. Because limiting the
subject matter
to that of people who speak with demons and
ghosts is rather
limiting, don't you think?
Greetings, Ron.
I am a Baptist, and whether or not people might
claim I'm 'allowed' to
speak on this matter, here goes, despite some
comments I will no doubt
receive by certain individuals about my being a
Christian, but
believing in ghosts!!
I HAVE had personal experience with ghostly
activity.
I've not only seen some, but felt and heard
some.
If you would like to email me, I'll be happy to
elaborate, as I don't
want to bother doing so in here .
My email is romath@romath.com.
Looking forward to hearing from you! )
Actually, I think this would be a very fascinating
subject to elaborate on here. I'm sure you'd take
a few punches from a few jerks but I really
believe you'd fine a sympathetic audience if those
ghosts weren't baptist ghosts with a message.
Give it a try! |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Willy
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:58 pm Post subject: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
|
|
Doc:
I was a Baptist for may years. Yet, I too have experienced ghosts and other
unexplained spirits.
And likewise, I would be willing to share my life experience with anyone
that care to drop me a line.
Willy
willyk@prodigy.net
"DOC WATSON" <docwatson@yup> wrote in message
news:c557m1ti2705rb79h1vr6lmurv1ulgl5vo@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:48:53 GMT, rrock <ron@rrockwell.com> said the
following funny stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
Perhaps we should invite some Baptists here to explain their
viewpoints on the topic. Because limiting the subject matter
to that of people who speak with demons and ghosts is rather
limiting, don't you think?
Greetings, Ron.
I am a Baptist, and whether or not people might claim I'm 'allowed' to
speak on this matter, here goes, despite some comments I will no doubt
receive by certain individuals about my being a Christian, but
believing in ghosts!!
I HAVE had personal experience with ghostly activity.
I've not only seen some, but felt and heard some.
If you would like to email me, I'll be happy to elaborate, as I don't
want to bother doing so in here .
My email is romath@romath.com.
Looking forward to hearing from you! )
--
Confucious say: "Don't judge people by their relatives!"
Sign in feudin' homestead: "Friends Welcome. Relatives by Appointment.!"
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC WATSON
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:34 am Post subject: Re: Ghosts vs Angels: |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 06:58:16 GMT, "Willy" <willyk@prodigy.net> said
the following funny stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
| Quote: | Doc:
I was a Baptist for may years. Yet, I too have experienced ghosts and other
unexplained spirits.
And likewise, I would be willing to share my life experience with anyone
that care to drop me a line.
Willy
willyk@prodigy.net
|
sounds good Willy - thank you, and I will be pleased to email you.
God bless.
--
Confucious say: "Don't judge people by their relatives!"
Sign in feudin' homestead: "Friends Welcome. Relatives by Appointment.!" |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ya'betz
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:44 am Post subject: Re: Is There Sex After Death?? |
|
|
"Stan Jensen" <stan@IsThereSexAfterDeath.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.07.22.35.19.390494@IsThereSexAfterDeath.com...
| Quote: | Is There Sex After Death
Stan
What a stupid question. If you live to be 70, 80 or 90, you won't ask that |
question, you will know.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Stormin Mormon
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:16 pm Post subject: Door-to-door Atheists Harrass Mormans |
|
|
| http://www.break.com/index/door_to_door_atheists_bother_mormons.html |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
bob young
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 5:52 pm Post subject: Re: Do not cause anyone to stumble |
|
|
On 3/5/08 3:05 PM, in article 0Drzj.4441$R_4.3026@newsb.telia.net, "Allan
Svensson" <allan-sv@algonet.se> wrote:
| Quote: |
Do not cause anyone to stumble
"Giving no offence in any thing, that the ministry be not blamed:
But in all things approving ourselves as the ministers of God, in
much patience, in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses, In
stripes, in imprisonments, in tumults, in labours, in watchings,
in fastings." 2 Cor. 6:3-5.
The apostles preached God's word,
|
God has never said a single word - all we hear are words from other humans
not to give offence but for
| Quote: | the purpose that people would receive God's word and be saved.
But whom did beat the servants of God and put them in prison?
It was those who took offence at the preaching.
Though many people take offence and do not believe God's word,
we must yet keep to the truths of the Bible.
|
Here are just a few 'truth's from The Bible
Genesis 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created.
Genesis 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created.
Genesis 1:20-21, 26-27 Birds were created before man was created.
Genesis 2:7, 19 Man was created before birds were created.
Genesis 1:24-27 Animals were created before man was created.
Genesis 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created.
Genesis 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time.
Genesis 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later.
Genesis 1:31 God was pleased with his creation.
Genesis 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation.
Acts 9:7
Those present at Paul's conversion heard the voice but saw no one.
Acts 22:9
They saw a light but did not hear a voice.
God is satisfied with his works
[Gen 1:31]
God is dissatisfied with his works.
[Gen 6:6]
God dwells in chosen temples
[2 Chron 7:12,16]
God dwells not in temples
[Acts 7:48]
First Account (Genesis 1:1-2:3) Second Account (Genesis 2:4-25)
Gen.1:25-27
(Humans were created after the other animals.)
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their
kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God
saw that it was good. And God said, Let us make man in our image.... So God
created man in his own image.
Gen.2:18-19
(Humans were created before the other animals.)
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will
make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed
every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto
Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living
creature, that was the name thereof.
Gen.1:27 (The first man and woman were created simultaneously.)
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them.
Gen.2:18-22
(The man was created first, then the animals, then the woman from the man's
rib.)
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will
make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed
every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto
Adam to see what he would call them.... And the LORD God caused a deep sleep
to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up
the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from
man, made
he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
Genesis, 32:30
"And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God
face to face, and my life is preserved."
Gospel of John, 1:18
"No man hath seen God at any time."
We are not allowed to
| Quote: | set God's word aside for the doctrines of men.
|
ROFL It is ALL men's doctrines, 100%
We become no
| Quote: | stumbling-block for anyone through preaching God's word. When
anyone preaches gospel and people take offence, then it is not the
preacher that is the stumbling-block, but Jesus Christ. "As it is
written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence:
and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed." Rom. 9:33.
Isaiah 8:14-15.
There are many who take offence at my articles, but it is not my
purpose. It is better people receive God's word than they reject it.
My purpose is to wake those who are in spiritual meaning sleeping.
The sleeper is unknowing of that he is sleeping, but when he wakes
up he knows that he has slept. A sign of spiritual sleeping people
is that they want to have calm and peace in their churches and won't
be disturbed of any revival message from the Lord. They are not
longing for any revival or that the Body of Christ may be ready to
meet Jesus when he comes. They get on well with the spiritual
darkness in the churches and won't be disturbed. But how to wake
anyone without disturbing him?
Allan Svensson
If you have any questions after reading of this article
Please, visit my Web Site
http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/INDEX.HTM
God is the Love, but God's love does not hinder us to study God's word
http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/LOVE.HTM
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Fred A Stover
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:07 am Post subject: Re: For a good work we stone Thee not; but for blasphemy." J |
|
|
"The Coyote" <information@tx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Q_nTj.2877$0L.2804@trnddc07...
| Quote: | For a good work we stone Thee not; but for blasphemy." John 10:33.
|
<snip to address one topic>
When the Jews read the Old Covenant, the Lord promised that He would reveal
all He would do to the prophets (Amos 3:7), and, since the prophets said
that the Lord, Himself, would come only once (Zech 12), Jesus' claim to be
God was deemed blasphemy.
It was the blindness of Israel (Rom 11:25), for the Lord had revealed both
his first comiing and his second coming to the prophets. The scribes missed
the first coming.
LORD Jesus @ www.selah-tx.net/
--
His,
More @ www.selah-tx.net
ho echon ota akoueto Preparing the way of the
Lord
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verily I say unto you, Whosoever
shall not receive the kingdom of God
as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
(Mark 10:15)
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<)))))))>< |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
