Janine Starscream
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:11 am Post subject: Re: Belief's Role in Perception/Learning (was Re: Tabula Ras |
 |
|
On Jun 12, 1:16 pm, dh@. wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:18:14 -0700 (PDT), "J.P. \"Julian Sebastian\" Bacchae" <juurgenizixexo...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 9, 7:48 pm, dh@. wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:58:06 -0700 (PDT), Janine Starscream <zevillkaa....@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 11:59 am, dh@. wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), "J.P. \"Julian Sebastian\" Bacchae" <Tipsyswe...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 7:14 am, dh@. wrote:
He believes what he wants when he wants, and changes
his beliefs to suite whatever he wants to believe at the time,
or at least he tries to give that impression. There was a time
when he claimed to believe individuals could have multiple
lives, but the last time we discussed it he denied it. There's
no telling what he would say about it by now. There were
times when he insisted nothing with any intelligence had
anything to do with the development of the universe, or
life itself, and then later acted as if he thought there could
have been or something like that. He doesn't really know
what to think, so...
I've been experimenting with that method of (dis(cordian))organized
thinking, just to get a feel for each and every kind of fanaticism
available on the planet right now, with the exception of debased Islam
for personal reasons, as a means to gain a wider perspective on the
whole suprapsychology of religious and non-religious thinking
patterns. Everybody has the option of doing that, but without
interplay, or ugh, synergy, between the altered veiw points it's just
being wishy washy.
He appears to have a very hard time making connections
and tying things together in general even though he is trying
to blame religion for encouraging child abuse somehow.
People get religious at times, even about non-religious subjects. If
Rev. Suzy the Floozy was correct about this, the word religion
essentially means to bind, or was it to be bound again? Now
occassionally getting bound up can be fun: getting bound up in a
fruitful activity, getting bound up in sexual pleasure (many meanings
for that one, hehe), getting bound up in an adventure, but it can also
mean being bound up in servitude, bound up in a parasitic idea, being
bound up in disgusting degeneracy which is, regardless if you view
them as emotional patterns or shiny hell creatures, rather daimonic.
Many sexual-negative faiths, the overly dogmatized ones, do indeed
encourage members towards perversion
What kind?
if they restrict healthy
consensual conscious activities to procreation only policies (what a
waste of time that is, and overpopulating!) or create matrices of
guilt and penance on essentially naturale animal activities that
release tension in evolution/design (one can see it either/or/both
ways) foundation approved fashions (but not cultural taboos, usually).
I consider majikal progress partially a collage of the many forces/
intelligences (i figure now it depends on the scope of definitions any
observer has as the limiting factors on how THAT comes out)
Like what might make it actually work, if it does?
Could you specify by what you mean by "it", please? :)
The supposedly majikal progresss.
I don't want to
go on a tangent if it's based on a misunderstanding of the subject. By
Gods Inc. that happens way too much anyway, oy.
to equivalent exchange,
Of what? you ask... everything... all interactions at all times
forever and ever amen... ala The Art of Shen Ku (which imho is very
effective)
But religious hocus pocus aside, it comes down to what form of justice
doesn't penalize personal quirks, opens up the world to creativity,
quashes fundamentalism, and in general takes the darkness by the neck
and screams the terrorgrammtron in it's face so loud it either dies
forever or transmutes into something that isn't going to parasitize
existence forever.
It also has quite a bit to do with ecology, and the earth's conscious
punishment of man for it's inequity to everything, including man. I
don't want to sound too militant about it, because without an easy
relaxed attitude this perspective too could become quite a
fundamentalism (it already has in some circles unfortunately). I
consider it my duty to assist with the earths immune response.
Help the Goddess out and she makes life real easy... It's better than
working with asinine demons thats for Dame sure.
Are you a Wicken?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
no, not at all. i'm a second-guessing luciferian is what i am/trying
not to be, and probably a homonculus to boot. I'm working through the
issues that creates.
i would prefer to be a zeal-crazed love priest of YHWH if i could ever
figure out just who he actually is.
If you ever do, it's not likely to happen before you're dead.
I find the pagan god/desses to be
attractive, but somewhat mentally disturbed, and that rubs off on me
it should be mentioned. I need a goat.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
something like a manifestation of my personal perception of my eternal
Overself. that's good enough for me, shit it involves a heck of alot,
any more and i'd be superswamped. |
|
