www.evangelicalview.com

Leading Religious,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Ásatrú Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Suevian
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:47 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

Peter J Ross wrote:
Quote:
In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> wrote:


Brian Mailman wrote:

Hermerico wrote:


On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...


That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about Truman.

B/

Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know The
Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort to
exterminate the "Jewish race".


I'd just like to congratulate the Bambies on newgrouping
soc.religion.asatru, so that valuable Usenet contributors like
Hermetico and Suevian can be protected from the evil trolls.

I have never once retreated to s.r.a to be free of scum such as you. I
grew up on wetlands, I understand that scum is just a part of the
process of nature which converts something useless and dead into
something valuable and living. I generally avoid it when I can, but in
some circumstances one is forced to scrape the scum off from time to time.
Back to top
Suevian
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:53 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:15:31 +0100, Peter J Ross fixed me with a beady
eye, and foamed wildly:

In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian
wrote:

Brian Mailman wrote:

Hermerico wrote:


On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...

That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about
Truman.

B/

Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know The
Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort to
exterminate the "Jewish race".

I'd just like to congratulate the Bambies on newgrouping
soc.religion.asatru, so that valuable Usenet contributors like Hermetico
and Suevian can be protected from the evil trolls.


Do you think his notion above is suitable for a Doogie nom, to run against
Aggie?


I really don't rate for you competition. Go talk to Ben Cramer.
Back to top
Aratzio
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:59 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:43:14 -0400, in news.groups, Suevian
<rising@flames.albion> bloviated:

Quote:
Peter J Ross wrote:
In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:11:19 -0700, Brian Mailman
bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote:


Hermerico wrote:


On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...

That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about Truman.


hermerico has nevertheless correctly guessd that I think Hitler was
worse than Truman.

It's nice that the Bambies appointed Dirk Bruere a moderator of the
neo-Nazi treehouse. It means that we can mention Hitler without being
Godwinned or even straying off-topic for news.groups.


I guess if issuing vague innuendos and inane insults is to your liking,
you can continue your juvenile conduct.

Please point out the parts you consider vague. I am sure one of us are
capable of restsating those parts in a manner you will find less vague
and more pointed.


Quote:
Nothing any of us can really do
to stop it. BTW, I had nothing to do with the choice of moderators on
s.r.a. I was opposed to the creation of the group, but affirmed their
Right to create it. Actually, you probably had more influence on my
supporting them than any appeal made by the creators of the group.

I am surprised it is not part of the jewish conspiracy to deny the
non-holocaust.
Back to top
Suevian
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:39 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

Aratzio wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:43:14 -0400, in news.groups, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> bloviated:


Peter J Ross wrote:

In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:11:19 -0700, Brian Mailman
bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote:



Hermerico wrote:



On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...

That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about
Truman.


hermerico has nevertheless correctly guessd that I think Hitler was
worse than Truman.

It's nice that the Bambies appointed Dirk Bruere a moderator of the
neo-Nazi treehouse. It means that we can mention Hitler without being
Godwinned or even straying off-topic for news.groups.


I guess if issuing vague innuendos and inane insults is to your liking,
you can continue your juvenile conduct.


Please point out the parts you consider vague. I am sure one of us are
capable of restsating those parts in a manner you will find less vague
and more pointed.

Well, for one, the claim that we are Neo-Nazis. I certainly am not
affiliated with any organization espousing Nazi doctrine.

Quote:

Nothing any of us can really do
to stop it. BTW, I had nothing to do with the choice of moderators on
s.r.a. I was opposed to the creation of the group, but affirmed their
Right to create it. Actually, you probably had more influence on my
supporting them than any appeal made by the creators of the group.


I am surprised it is not part of the jewish conspiracy to deny the
non-holocaust.

You'll have to consult Heinz on that.
Back to top
Peter J Ross
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:23 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

In news.groups on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:43:09 -0700, Aratzio
<a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:19:16 GMT, in alt.usenet.kooks, The Black Goat
With A Thousand Young <ancient_ones@shoggoths.rule> bloviated:

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:33:38 -0400, Suevian fixed me with a beady eye, and
foamed wildly:
The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian fixed me with a beady eye,
and foamed wildly:

Hitler said, "Vernichtung", in 1940, and he meant nothing less than
"annihilation".

There were no homicidal gas chambers in operation at the KZs. Jews were
not systematically exterminated in "factories of death".

Well, damn. And here I just used up my Doogie nom for the month on
Agamemnon! Never mind, Holocaust revisionists are old news. You'd make a
good opponent for Aggie, though. He has some real cutting-edge kookery,
and you might give him a run for his money.

Holocaust deniers are a dime a dozen and we could fill all the gas
chambers in all the death camps with them and still have 10s of
thousands left over.

They pretty much should be *denied* the opportunity to compete for the
Doogie.

Perhaps a collective nomination for all the neo-Nazis of
alt.revisionism and alt.asatru would work? Then none of them will ever
have to be nominated as individuals again.



--
PJR :-)

Newsgroup name validator (beta release, use with caution)
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator>
Back to top
mariposas rand mair fheal
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:57 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

In article <uNKdnebHapLswj3VnZ2dnUVZ_uCdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>,
Suevian <rising@flames.albion> wrote:

Quote:
Peter J Ross wrote:
In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> wrote:


Brian Mailman wrote:

Hermerico wrote:


On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...


That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about Truman.

B/

Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know The
Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort to
exterminate the "Jewish race".


I'd just like to congratulate the Bambies on newgrouping
soc.religion.asatru, so that valuable Usenet contributors like
Hermetico and Suevian can be protected from the evil trolls.

I have never once retreated to s.r.a to be free of scum such as you. I
grew up on wetlands, I understand that scum is just a part of the
process of nature which converts something useless and dead into
something valuable and living. I generally avoid it when I can, but in
some circumstances one is forced to scrape the scum off from time to time.

gosh thats almost like insult
i lost track of it halfway through the paragraph
but i think you came back to some kind of point by the end

arf meow arf - raggedy ann and andy for president and vice
limp and spineless lint for brains is better yet and nice
then rueing pair of shrub and dick the republican lice
call me desdenova seven seven seven seven seven seven
Back to top
Brian Mailman
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:48 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

Suevian wrote:
Quote:
Brian Mailman wrote:
Hermerico wrote:

On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than
Truman who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of
noncombatant civilians? ...


That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about
Truman.

Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know
The Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort to
exterminate the "Jewish race".

Interesting. Next you'll be telling us there's no gay people in Iran.

B/
Back to top
Brian Mailman
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:49 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

Peter J Ross wrote:
Quote:
In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> wrote:

Brian Mailman wrote:
Hermerico wrote:

On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than
Truman who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of
noncombatant civilians? ...


That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything
about Truman.

B/

Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know
The Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort
to exterminate the "Jewish race".

I'd just like to congratulate the Bambies on newgrouping
soc.religion.asatru, so that valuable Usenet contributors like
Hermetico and Suevian can be protected from the evil trolls.

You might want to forward that message on to jik....

B/
Back to top
Suevian
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:59 pm    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

Brian Mailman wrote:
Quote:
Suevian wrote:

Brian Mailman wrote:

Hermerico wrote:

On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than
Truman who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of
noncombatant civilians? ...



That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about
Truman.


Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know
The Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort to
exterminate the "Jewish race".


Interesting. Next you'll be telling us there's no gay people in Iran.

B/


Actually, I have very little interest in the topic of Persion
homosexuality.
Back to top
Aratzio
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:13 am    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:39:18 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, Suevian
<rising@flames.albion> bloviated:

Quote:
Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:43:14 -0400, in news.groups, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> bloviated:


Peter J Ross wrote:

In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:11:19 -0700, Brian Mailman
bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote:



Hermerico wrote:



On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...

That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about
Truman.


hermerico has nevertheless correctly guessd that I think Hitler was
worse than Truman.

It's nice that the Bambies appointed Dirk Bruere a moderator of the
neo-Nazi treehouse. It means that we can mention Hitler without being
Godwinned or even straying off-topic for news.groups.


I guess if issuing vague innuendos and inane insults is to your liking,
you can continue your juvenile conduct.


Please point out the parts you consider vague. I am sure one of us are
capable of restsating those parts in a manner you will find less vague
and more pointed.

Well, for one, the claim that we are Neo-Nazis. I certainly am not
affiliated with any organization espousing Nazi doctrine.

So was the claim vague? How bizaare, you seem to want to refute what
you claim is insubstantial.

Quote:


Nothing any of us can really do
to stop it. BTW, I had nothing to do with the choice of moderators on
s.r.a. I was opposed to the creation of the group, but affirmed their
Right to create it. Actually, you probably had more influence on my
supporting them than any appeal made by the creators of the group.


I am surprised it is not part of the jewish conspiracy to deny the
non-holocaust.

You'll have to consult Heinz on that.

Guil by association.
Back to top
Aratzio
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:14 am    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:23:11 +0100, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross
<pjr@example.invalid> bloviated:

Quote:
In news.groups on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:43:09 -0700, Aratzio
a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:19:16 GMT, in alt.usenet.kooks, The Black Goat
With A Thousand Young <ancient_ones@shoggoths.rule> bloviated:

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:33:38 -0400, Suevian fixed me with a beady eye, and
foamed wildly:
The Black Goat With A Thousand Young wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian fixed me with a beady eye,
and foamed wildly:

Hitler said, "Vernichtung", in 1940, and he meant nothing less than
"annihilation".

There were no homicidal gas chambers in operation at the KZs. Jews were
not systematically exterminated in "factories of death".

Well, damn. And here I just used up my Doogie nom for the month on
Agamemnon! Never mind, Holocaust revisionists are old news. You'd make a
good opponent for Aggie, though. He has some real cutting-edge kookery,
and you might give him a run for his money.

Holocaust deniers are a dime a dozen and we could fill all the gas
chambers in all the death camps with them and still have 10s of
thousands left over.

They pretty much should be *denied* the opportunity to compete for the
Doogie.

Perhaps a collective nomination for all the neo-Nazis of
alt.revisionism and alt.asatru would work? Then none of them will ever
have to be nominated as individuals again.

Haven't we given them opportunity enough?
Back to top
Peter J Ross
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:17 am    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

In news.groups on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:43:14 -0400, Suevian
<rising@flames.albion> wrote:

Quote:
Peter J Ross wrote:
In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:11:19 -0700, Brian Mailman
bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote:


Hermerico wrote:


On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...

That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about Truman.


hermerico has nevertheless correctly guessd that I think Hitler was
worse than Truman.

It's nice that the Bambies appointed Dirk Bruere a moderator of the
neo-Nazi treehouse. It means that we can mention Hitler without being
Godwinned or even straying off-topic for news.groups.


I guess if issuing vague innuendos and inane insults is to your liking,
you can continue your juvenile conduct. Nothing any of us can really do
to stop it. BTW, I had nothing to do with the choice of moderators on
s.r.a. I was opposed to the creation of the group, but affirmed their
> Right to create it. Actually, you probably had more influence on my
supporting them than any appeal made by the creators of the group.

"Why is Hitler any worse than Truman?"

The Bambies are not my friends, but I doubt if any of them would
prefer your opinion to mine on this issue. Even Kamens and Skirvin,
who have publicly slurped neo-Nazis, haven't gone so far as to to
*become* neo-Nazis.

Nevertheless, the Bambies newgrouped a newsgroup in which your
opinions are more welcome than mine, and it's not inconceivable that
the moderators hate me so much that they like you better.


Oh, I forgot to mention:

Fuck off and die, you nasty little trampler on six million unmarked
graves.

I have fun in news.groups; at least some of my opponents have fun in
news.groups; and my opponents and I will probably unite to make fun of
silly little impotent holocaust deniers like you.

Of course, I'm a Celt, not Germanic, so perhaps I deserve to be
gassed as soon as you've failed to win an argument with me.



--
PJR :-)

Newsgroup name validator (beta release, use with caution)
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator>
Back to top
Peter J Ross
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:24 am    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

In news.groups on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:39:18 -0400, Suevian
<rising@flames.albion> wrote:

Quote:
Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:43:14 -0400, in news.groups, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> bloviated:


Peter J Ross wrote:

In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:11:19 -0700, Brian Mailman
bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote:



Truman.


hermerico has nevertheless correctly guessd that I think Hitler was
worse than Truman.

It's nice that the Bambies appointed Dirk Bruere a moderator of the
neo-Nazi treehouse. It means that we can mention Hitler without being
Godwinned or even straying off-topic for news.groups.


I guess if issuing vague innuendos and inane insults is to your liking,
you can continue your juvenile conduct.


Please point out the parts you consider vague. I am sure one of us are
capable of restsating those parts in a manner you will find less vague
and more pointed.

Well, for one, the claim that we are Neo-Nazis. I certainly am not
affiliated with any organization espousing Nazi doctrine.

We decent people don't give a fuck about distinctions between
neo-Nazis and Holocaust-deniers.

You all look alike to us. We plan to gas everybody who has nothing
but empty space between the ears.

Quote:
Nothing any of us can really do
to stop it. BTW, I had nothing to do with the choice of moderators on
s.r.a. I was opposed to the creation of the group, but affirmed their
Right to create it. Actually, you probably had more influence on my
supporting them than any appeal made by the creators of the group.


I am surprised it is not part of the jewish conspiracy to deny the
non-holocaust.

You'll have to consult Heinz on that.

Does Heinz still offer 57 varieties of refuted neo-Nazi k'laims?

--
PJR :-)

Newsgroup name validator (beta release, use with caution)
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator>
Back to top
Peter J Ross
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:38 am    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

In news.groups on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:47:42 -0400, Suevian
<rising@flames.albion> wrote:

Quote:
Peter J Ross wrote:
In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:59:00 -0400, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> wrote:


Brian Mailman wrote:

Hermerico wrote:




That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about Truman.

B/

Let me restate it then. What was so bad about Hitler? We now know The
Holocaust(TM) is a fabrication, and there never was any effort to
exterminate the "Jewish race".


I'd just like to congratulate the Bambies on newgrouping
soc.religion.asatru, so that valuable Usenet contributors like
Hermetico and Suevian can be protected from the evil trolls.

I have never once retreated to s.r.a to be free of scum such as you. I
grew up on wetlands, I understand that scum is just a part of the
process of nature which converts something useless and dead into
something valuable and living. I generally avoid it when I can, but in
some circumstances one is forced to scrape the scum off from time to time.

Your post is literate. Congratulations on surpassing most of your
neo-Nazi friends.

Now fuck off, please. I'd hate to have to report you to the police,
when it's partly my fault that you were induced to rant in a
Holocaust-denying way the way you did. If you live in the UK or a few
other countries, you've already committed a crime. If you live in the
USA, the FBI will merely add you to a list.

Seriously, Bambies: Why the fuck did you newgroup a moderated asatru
newsgroup? You can see in this thread what asatru devotees are like
when they no longer have a reason to be polite to you.


--
PJR :-)

Newsgroup name validator (beta release, use with caution)
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator>
Back to top
Suevian
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:47 am    Post subject: Re: RFD - soc.religion.asatru.is-dead Reply with quote

Peter J Ross wrote:
Quote:
In news.groups on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:43:14 -0400, Suevian
rising@flames.albion> wrote:


Peter J Ross wrote:

In news.groups on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:11:19 -0700, Brian Mailman
bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote:



Hermerico wrote:



On the topic of Hitler, so what? Why is Hitler any worse than Truman
who gave the order to vaporize two cities full of noncombatant
civilians? ...

That's a false dichotomy, since Peter wasn't saying anything about Truman.


hermerico has nevertheless correctly guessd that I think Hitler was
worse than Truman.

It's nice that the Bambies appointed Dirk Bruere a moderator of the
neo-Nazi treehouse. It means that we can mention Hitler without being
Godwinned or even straying off-topic for news.groups.


I guess if issuing vague innuendos and inane insults is to your liking,
you can continue your juvenile conduct. Nothing any of us can really do
to stop it. BTW, I had nothing to do with the choice of moderators on
s.r.a. I was opposed to the creation of the group, but affirmed their

> Right to create it. Actually, you probably had more influence on my

supporting them than any appeal made by the creators of the group.


"Why is Hitler any worse than Truman?"

The Bambies are not my friends, but I doubt if any of them would
prefer your opinion to mine on this issue. Even Kamens and Skirvin,
who have publicly slurped neo-Nazis, haven't gone so far as to to
*become* neo-Nazis.

Nevertheless, the Bambies newgrouped a newsgroup in which your
opinions are more welcome than mine, and it's not inconceivable that
the moderators hate me so much that they like you better.

Since you have clearly demonstrated bigotry and hostility toward the
membership and mission of said newsgroup, it is reasonable that they
would exclude you.

Quote:

Oh, I forgot to mention:

Fuck off and die, you nasty little trampler on six million unmarked
graves.


Whatever. Strange how any forensic investigation into these alleged
unmarked graves is forbidden. You have to provide compelling evidence
in order for me to believe something which has been called into
question. The only compelling evidence I've seen indicates that the
Holocaustians have something to hide.

Quote:
I have fun in news.groups; at least some of my opponents have fun in
news.groups; and my opponents and I will probably unite to make fun of
silly little impotent holocaust deniers like you.


I'm well beyond all the name calling. Calling me a "Holocaust Denier"
is about like calling me a "Darwinist".

Quote:
Of course, I'm a Celt, not Germanic, so perhaps I deserve to be
gassed as soon as you've failed to win an argument with me.

Wrong religion. Our sacred lore does not advocate genocide.

http://phoenicia.org/exterminatecanaanites.html
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Ásatrú Forum Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 14, 15, 16  Next  
Page 3 of 16
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum