Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2003 5:19 am Post subject: Same Gender/Sex Marriage_01 |
 |
|
Page 1
The issue of the very ability of the people of Canada to of themselves
know, judge, and choose what values they will have Canada be and mean
is at the very Heart and center of the philosophy for government by the
people and for the people. Canada's consideration of the issue of same-gender
marriages is confronted and challenged fact-to-face by the Roman Catholic
followship and a significantly large portion of the protestant followship,
and it is vital that Candians have sufficient backgound understanding
toso best protect their own best welfare. This brief writing holds a
number of advanced insights and fair opinions to serve that purpose.
Canada is an obvious christian nation and one survey counts 9 million
protestants and 13 million catholics, albeit all are baptised without their
consent and some number will in adulthood refute christian membership.
Canada is recognized world around for it's greater compassion, and whether
you recognize this or not, the precise center and essence of the Heart
of Christ is compassion for others. The Canadian 'wind' blows decidedly for
the Heart of the 'underdog', and the Canadian social politic resonates with
concern for they whom suffer. Whether by parent or by nature or by
literature, Canadians hold compassion and assert it to be a vital quality
in our political leadership and institutes.
Philosophically and socially, the left-wing is the most compassionate
and the right-wing the least compassionate, each relative to the other.
Greater compassion will act with less harm against others and less
compassion with more harm. Lifes circumstance on earth is obvious and it
is the life of oneself and others and the choice to serve oneself or the
other(s) and to place first oneself or the other(s). Bonding this issue
together is also the fact that much of our own gain occurs only with and
by anothers loss and often there is both time and suffering involved in that
loss. Let is suffice that we recognize our circumstance is predatory and
harmful, and some surely understand the earth has always been most largerly
the same today as it was 1000 and more generations ago. They whom desire and
act for some and more of the benefits of this earthly life unanimously act
for more property and money, the controlling and dominating power over
others, status and superiority over others, and such, and by the very same
means as likely every generation before them; strength and force and harm,
confusing, deceptions and lies, devaluing, oppression, and enslavment,
fellowship, alliance, and conspiracy, stealing, exthortion, and
expropriation, adultery, sexual hedonism, and sexual enslaving, and also
other usual tactics and means.
(The new world order for a global economy and markets speaks in the face
of global over-population, critical resource depletion, severe human and
industrial pollutions, and a collapsing climate environment. Common sense
sees the immediate need for large-scale reduced consumerism and population,
and the very worst thing to do is to globalize-to-increase-profits-in-
consumer-markets! We cannot afford the govermental and corporate efforts for
economic growth for a steadily annual increase in our own wealths, and this
should deeply concern you. Our whole nature and need is to drive for more and
when that more becomes our own destruction, we are all in a most serious
dilemma. There are some whom will see the signs and do nothing, and there are
some whom see those signs and begin to make an 'Arc'.)
Common sense sees the choice to pursue some and more of the benefits of
earthly life is also one of the choice to have concern for the lives of
others, and that decision is centered in the Heart of the individual and
moved by their Hearts compassion. Greater compassion will act with less harm
against others and less compassion with more harm. For the christian there is
now the choice to desire and agree and join into the need for belief in
Christ and ones obedience and contribution to the Law of Christ each day or
only the need for belief in Christ. Martin Luther declared that only by
Page 2
faith can one be saved and not by ones acts of lawfulness, and so a new,
second means and way for ones salvation was begun and the Roman followship
divided, and that new choice continues to this day.
For the Roman priesthood to condemn and oppose and forcingly act against the
declared and surely true love of a man for another man and a woman for a
woman is in contradiction to the Law of their prophet, yet the New Testament
is composed-with and holds a multitude of contradictions and so the integrity
of concept, principle, and action is as an unwelcome stranger to them.
By obvious meaning, if the Law is the daily meaningful acts with serve the
lives of others and one refuses the necessity of and duty to that law, they
do simultaneusly refute the very Heart of compassion which is the living
substance that Law begins from. It is that Heart only which endows the Law
with principle and equality and will, and they whom dispute in whole-refute
the need and duty to that Law reduce their own will and efforts of and with
and by and for compassion. Whether you see it or not, the very center and
whole essence of the Heart of the Christ is compassion and it's compass is
light and vision and witness and reason, loyally serving Truth.
Luther declared that only by faith can one be saved and not by ones acts of
lawfulness, and it this which divided the Roman followship and began a new
group, generically named as protestants, but more accurately named as
Lutherans. Lutherans freely choose to place the opinions, ideas, and
attitudes of Martin Luther first, before the testimonies of some of the most
early of christs disciples, and whose testimonies are the very only
substantial and documenting evidences of Jesus and His lessons and Acts on
earth altogether. (That earliest document is also judged to be a later
consolidating body of record, itself deriving from those surviving disciples
whom were themselves the very living witnesses and chosen disciples of
Jesus.)
Common sense and honesty will look at not merely what Martin Luther did
but why, and in that resulting understanding one can see both the only two
options Martin Luther had and why he was mistaken. Martin Luther confronted a
Roman priesthood whom freely chose to ruthlessly pervert the Law which Christ
taught soto massively exploit the peoples, in gain, exthorting every type and
manner and amount of earthly benefit by both lying to those peoples in
professing both lawfulness and powers they did never have and by tyrannizing
those peoples into obedience and contribution. Luther readily saw the
pritesthood claimed the authority and power and right for what they were
doing from both their faith in Christ and the Law of christ and their duty to
that Law. If Luther accused the priesthood by faith, then the whole issue of
christ and salvation is ended and there is nothing left to have and keep, but
if Luther accused the priesthood by the Law, then he attacked only the
foundation of their power, which was obviously what they were using to force
and enslave and exploit the followship, yet that protected the continuance of
the followship in faith of christ, soby continuing the very chance for
salvation. Luther did not see, however, that when attacking the duty to the
Law he was thereby subverting that Law and making it unnecessary and
meaningless and worthless.
The Law which Christ taught was also His own empowerment and appointment,
for by only by His loyal obedience and consistant daily contribution to that
Law was Christ then given the authority to forgive sins and speak on behalf
of God in Heaven, these being the original case and very and only purpose for
His departing from Heaven soto enter and join into earthly life, and by a
miraculous birth. Christ did begin that mission when accepting the challenges
and trials for continuing in that Law or forsaking that Law by moving into
the wilderness for 40 days, and it is obvious, to all healthy minded and
honest people, that if Christ had not upheld and served the Law then He would
Page 3
have chosen His own life and havings and such and not continued to labour for
the rescue of all humankind (and for they of greater compassion, all
livingkind) from harm.
(The choice is and has always been this, to keep the earth or regret it and
search for another place. If one keeps the earth, they take-up possessions
and marriage and parenthood and such, soby moving into the side with Moses
and the Hebrews, whether they're aware of or intend that or not. Otherwise,
they regret the earth and search for union with the person of God and of Gods
domain, soby moving into the side of the prophets Krishna, Christ and Buddha,
knowingly or not. The Hebrews declare that God has authorized this material
earthly life as good, yet the Hebrews did fall into recklessness and
lawlessness and were enslaved and suffered, but God thereafter gave
Moses to rescue them from that crying and despair and to so-too declare and
issue a Law for them to obey and contribute to by which they would not again
know and suffer enslavement. This Law and Moses are remembered at PassOver,
which occurs in early springtime, the time when all animal and plant kind
mate and pollinate and such for their continuance of life on earth, yet also
the time of the christs crucifiction, for He did regret and refuse the earth
and laboured for the rescue of livingkind from life with harm.
The Law of the Christ dictates one need sell and forsake all possessions and
deny themselves each day and devote themselves to serving the lives of all
others on earth and it is an absolute enslavment and a condemnation of all
whom keep possessions and marriage, and such, yet Moses is the authoritative
evidence for all Hebrews, indeed all humankind on earth, that God would have
none know and suffer enslavment yet keep and serve a Law, and it is this
that the Hebrews decide and re-affirm each and every year, whether they know
that or not. The Hebrews have been suffered for now 2000 years in persecution
when infact standing against the enslavement and condemnation of all
humankind on earth, and is the suffering of 2000 years in persecution a
lesser or greater love for humankind than the crucifiction?
It matters less that Moses was firstly only individually and circumstantially
serving the ancient Hewbrews in their enslavement, but by the life of Jesus
their choice to keep the earth is made global and Universal; all livingkind
in every place within the material cosmos is held by the choice to keep and
endure their material living or regret and refuse it, both by how they suffer
themselves and how much compassion they feel and sustain for the lives of
others. Christ's Law and Cross completes the issue of life on earth,
for all will at some time, and indeed many times in this life, judge and
choose this life as good or bad, and caste their mystical vote unto the
awareness of God in so doing.
The Hebrews peoples also have a wailing wall and it is the living boundry
between earth and God and it is a living voice and communion with God.
The Hebrews cry and plea unto God from their suffering at that wall, and
their suffering is far more than only persecution, but also the whole of
suffering from this life on earth altogether. It reasons the resolution to
that wall and their tears is their rescue from suffering. The Hebrews also
keep the promise from God for a Messiah, and again I reason that Messiah can
only resolve those tears with their rescue from the material domain
altogether. The earth is a tyranny of harm, and all are mandated to harm
other lives and all are destined to suffer and die on the earth. It is this
which is their dilemma, for to embrace and join that Messiah needs them
regret and refuse the earth, but their appointment and commitment is to
the earth and they verily define and know themselves as Jews by that
commitment to the earth; 2000 years of accepted persecution in that devotion
and the Hebrew both defines and bonds among themselves in large amount by
that persecution. If Israel welcomes the messiah, the Jew ceases to be a Jew
and Israel ceases to exist.
Page 4
The issue of the Christ's law, which in all real meaning enslaves all whom
honestly join that Law, is founded upon the fact that all whom live on earth
are mandated to harm others lives whilst the obvious desire of the mysterious
cause of our lives is that we have life and continue to live. If we
incriminate ourself by that harm and are sothen destined to punishment,
yet the earth is also a hopeless experiences of our suffering and death,
absolutely, and the punishment against us would in effect mean suffering
and or death, then to regret and refuse the posesssions and benefits of
the earth whilst devoting ourself to the daily contribution to the good of
all others on earth, clearly serves the being and continuance of livngkind,
for as we are surely not willing to have more life when that more means
more and more suffering. We act against suffering and suffering opposes
our continuance in life.
The meaning of life is simply the moment to moment and day to day experiencs
of living in a rich society of others lives, but when all that is perceivable
leads us to reason the material universe did not always exist and had a
beginning and is itself a limited construct and will end, absolutely, on day,
then all we have laboured and suffered and all our achivements and honor and
all our treasures and remembrances and histories are utterly destroyed and
ended and lost and all has been in vain. So what is the purpose of this
life, for that purpose must lead us into something more soto justify our
original entry into life altogether and all we have suffered. To me, it seems
fair to suppose the purpose of our lives continues to be what is obvious, our
being and continuance in life and with the whole rich society of livingkind.
As we are made and determined to act for our continuance, such continuance
does reasonably need a place apart from the material domain, and if by harm
against others ( soto keep and partake the benefits and such of the earth)
we defeat ourself in that purpose, then when we refuse to harm other life
we best serve that purpose that the life and livingkind continue.
Although it appears the Christ's Law has condemned all in this life whom live
their own life by possessions, marriage, and such, we are all already
condemned by the earth to suffer and die and end in utter purposelessness and
all for no gain nor meaning whatsoever. When our obvious being in life is
proof of the will we have life and continue in life, then they whom take-up
the the devotion for the continuance of life and livingkind serve to fulfill
that will. Having said all this, moral good and right exists to serve the
continuance of life and MUST serve that life in continuance no matter where
such lifes resides nor how it 'got there'. To do that life MUST have the
protected right to the means for that continuance and on earth that means
self-serving and property and such.
I have laboured, rather obsessively, now 12 years to resolve the issue of the
suffering in life and this dilemma and to date have not discovered that last
answer to my question. God has given to me the witness of the sanctity of
Truth, both by the revelation of a radiant golden 'staff' whose top were a
number of 'T's' and giving Truth into all directions, and also by the sacred
band of white upon the head and radiant before the minds eye, soto enlighten
all shadow and darkeness and cloudiness, and it is by these and other causes
I take up the loyalty to the need for witness of what is as it is and it's
right naming, yet what is is often a paradox or in contradiction, but I am
left determined in that loyalty and so I work and wait for 'things' to make
sense. An angel told me I needed more lines and I see that to mean more time.
The Law verily begins with life without harm, for our original place of life
was in the company and domain of God and knowing only perfect goodness and
no evil, logically perfect, eternal life. Before our first trespass of the
law was also before our very knowledge/experience of evil altogether, and
without sin or evil there is only good and it is a perfect goodness and life
without death. Genesis is a tangled web of contradictions, and it is a lion
Page 5
of a lamb who will not tolerate, but confront and disentangle that confusion
soto surely see where the truth is. The 'Garden of Eden' was not earthly, but
'Gossamar', yet it needed hold the choice for us to know evil soto fulfill
the very being of free-will, free-will being the essence from which life
exists as life altogether and without which life and livingkind would not
exist whatsoever. Christ fulfills the real story of Genesis, for as were born
into life and God's company and domain by God's love and desire for us and
that God did desire we choose to not know evil, but remain with God and
continue in that good and everlasting life. Christ becomes the hand to lead
us back to our own true home and the Heart and with Law to undo the mistake
we so long-ago made.)
(As an opinion, death is also a fever and our adolescence is also a fever,
and the adolescent hetero male also knows fever by his desire and
comprehension of the body of the female. Hetero-males are naturally
'captivated' by the woman's body, both it's visual artistry and her obvious
enhanced sensuality. Somewhat subliminally, the male desires to know her body
as his own, by both his desire to experience the enhanced sensuality she
feels and to comprehend the opposite body nature has made; already knowing
his own body, to then know hers completes knowledge of the opposites; the all
that is and can be. Each know their own body as a good, and the knowledge of
the others body is opposite to that)
(In my adolescence, in 1966, October, and my 13th year, both of us being
fully clothed, I was kissing and petting the body of a favoured young beauty
in privacy soto know her body and satisfy that instinctual curiousity and
fascination and also complete that now generated and compelling energy when
I decided I wanted to know her vagina, and when I moved my hand over the
slacks she wore and upon that area, in an instant my hand transcended the
material boundary and was mystically inside her vagina, and in that very
instant my whole 'person' transcended into her entire material body and I
knew it as if it were my own, and I was shocked and intensely afraid for I
knew it was also the mystic and secret and it overwhelmed me. Her lipstick
tasted of fever and I to this day wonder what it was that had actually
happened.)
(The Christs disciple 'John' declared an angel with a robe of two colors and
upon that robe all the names of all harm upon the earth, yet everyone whom
lives this life on earth is destined to prey-upon and harm other lives, and
so I reason those colors mean also fever, for as sickness and accident and
harm and death against our life is also with fever, and I suppose the fruit
of that tree of the knowledge of evil was fever also.)
The Law is the very embodiment of the fundamental means for life to exist
whatsoever, for when one life is in absolute need and bond with another,
each must value and respect and reguard that other's life soto continue
in their own life. Logically, if ones harms another life soto sustain and
benefit their own life, they in whole effect equally harmed their own life.
How can it be that life needs free-will, but they whom assert their will
with dis-compassion and harm prove they will continue to do so in whatever
circumstance they may know, but by Luther we are set free from the
responsibility of our desires behaviours only by our desire to believe and
not by acts of Law? If the disciple Peter truely had been given the power to
forgive sins then Peter would have done miracles equal to christs and some
evidences of those miracles would be known, for Christs healing is a very
substantial increase in the good quality of ones life and those healed would
not hide that away. If Peter transfered that power to the priesthood there
would be an overflowing adundance of evidences and a daily and great joy on
earth in large numbers by what that healing does. The healing of Christ
happens only by ones communion with Christ and only by the union with His
Law, for ones regret and remorse is only by the Law and ones promise and new
Page 6
course is only by the Law, yet no-one on earth has nor ever has had propriety
of the Law. The Law is owned by all livingkind and livingkind is the Law and
the Law is all livingkind. None can barter, trade, give, or anywise convey
the rewards of the Law to another neither for themself, but only by honouring
and joining the Law are it's rewards found. All that is life begins with the
Law and the everlasting continuance of life happens only with the Law.
The lutheran (protestant) christian declares salvation only by belief
(and not by belief and acts of Law) and it is this which begins an
altered state of mind which renders those lutherans unable to admit
nor respect various facts and meanings of this life which do not agree
with their dogma, but conflict-with, contradict, or refute various
elements which compose their dogma. This altered 'psychotic' state is
created by the persitantly assertive and forcing opposition to all the
mind's valid deductive conclusions which do not agree with the elements
of their dogma, yet which themselves derive from actual facts/truths in
premise and which a healthy, balanced mind and honest Heart cannot deny,
but which the lutheran cannot tolerate and denies. This begins ones
attack against their own mind by and with their own mind and the mind
copes with that by 'snapping' into an altered surreal state, censoring
and blinding the mind to all cognitive meanings which endanger their dogma.
They subvert the minds vital logic process by sheer determined will,
forcing the mind to 're-configure' itself soto bipass the real meanings of
words and such, as well all meanings from all other sources and media, which
hold and convey meanings they will to not admit nor respect nor even
perceive. In all and every instance of this the root cause is fear, for they
are either lured or forced into this by either subtle and insidious
(deductive) threatening or direct and aggressive terrorizing from a lutheran
missionary, itself obsessively determined to convert all humankind to accept
and conform-to its psychosis and dogma.(and to cause one to self-install that
psychotic altered state soto perpetuate that.)
On the other hand, the Roman priesthood continue to claim their sacraments
are the divinely trasferred power of Christ and declare that by ones belief
in them (the priesthood) and ones obedience and contribution to their will
they will forgive your sins and grant you eternal life. They keep a trillion
dollar corporation, and continue to exthort and exproriate the labours and
moneys and such from the people, which in part maintain their vast holdings
of much of the worlds finest art, and corporate stocks and such. The senior
priesthood joins into conspiracy on mass to cover-up and lie against the
violent assaults, life-sickening and destroying shaming and threatening, and
gross sexual trespasses against the needy and helpless, which the priesthood
and nunery have done when they suppose what they do is unseen by others, yet
do not know their minds are naked. The Roman chief-priest seasonally,
publically pretends ask God for whole and everlastng peace on earth at the
date of Christs birth, when the material domain is a hopless perpetual
tyranny of harm and their very prophet had renounced it. The bishopry live
with gross properties, luxuries, and servantry, and frequent associations and
company with the wealthy, yet for that priesthood to then condemn and oppose
and forcingly act against the declared and surely true love of a man for
another man and a woman for another woman is a contradiction to the Law of
their prophet, but the New Testament is composed-with and holds a multitude
of contradictions and so the integrity of concept, principle, and action is
as an unwelcome stranger to them. They declare the Bible is the inspired word
of God and God must have been in communion with it's writters and perfectly
guarded them, hence the Bible must be absolutely, perfectly true and good.
When common-intelligence, common sense, and common honesty rightly see that
cannot be true, the followship and priesthood and nunery are dumbfounded and
incensed. Oh well.
By Gregory Paul  , 2003-08-22
I've written a 30 page essay named 'Creation, Human Society, and Suffering'
and all are welcome to visit my free web-site to read and/or save-to-disk
this at; www.mts.net/~chs2003 |
|
