TOS
Guest
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:36 am Post subject: Sin |
 |
|
Blackwood's Theory on Sin...
Excerpt from the New World Satanic Bible
To investigate the very origin of sin, one must simply look into the
historical paths of the Sumerian's and Assyrian's who in the School of
Nippur which taught several subjects that are even taught today,
theology and religious theology.
The researcher Langdon in his book Babylonian Wisdom (London 1923), p.
19 brought this out in his research of sin.
According to Assyrian and Babylonian legends and teachings, the
theology of sin is created from the theology that sin is made from
suffering and is controlled by man not the god's or goddesses.
Moreover it is evident that the terminology is defined in this society
and not in the Hebrew tribes who served as "slaves" to the
Babylonian's.
The Levitical prescriptions defined by Hebrew and Christian prophet's
fail to mention the historical and analytical theory of sin as
prescribed by these societies which openly practiced theology; however
this theology of sin may have had deep roots to defilement and links
to practitioners of demonology, it as terminology is created in an
attempt to heal slavery wounds.
And so the relationship of Sin and Defilement is born, are they
perhaps close in reference.
Moreover just as the ideas of defilement have deep roots in the
Babylonian society, to describe this as the idea of being impure
lack's relevance other than to scare man or woman later in the
Hebrew's creation of the Old Testament into a pattern of thought that
they will pay for "Acts of Defilement" by not going to heaven and
later in the New Testament hell.
Defilement is largely different than sin, and separation is clear, I
believe this title has been hung around the necks of all those who
worked in disagreement of the Hebrew text's.
The idea of sin dominates the entire idea of the God and "to sin or
not to sin" is not a question for those who seemingly are brainwashed
to the theory that if one sin's they will not go to the "Pearly
Gates."
The Babylonian's simply described the act of sin as defilement,
however much is still cloudy regarding the ancient text's since much
lies undiscovered and unexplained from the early cuneiform tablets.
Sin perhaps is "theistic" perspective and has little or no relevance
to living life as a Satanist, defilement is appropriate for a Satanist
as long as he or she takes from the situation and gains.
This is not advocating performing illegal acts but is as Christianity
embraces the thought of sin the Satanist embraces defilement and
through this he or she can control the very realm they seek to
control.
The term sin should be very foreign to those who agree with the
principles of defilement as described before the Hebrew's designed a
formula to empower a fictional entity they can neither speak to nor
see.
Worry about doing something that is a sin something that should be
deemed as "paranoia" and should be reserved for those who think the
"Myth of God" is real.
Let's further examine sin as it appears in history, perhaps providing
a insight into the inane concept of sin.
The prophet doesn't "reflect" on sin he "advocates" and "prophesies"
against it, using the tool called the Bible.
An example appears when the prophet Amos and after him Hosea and
Isaiah explains the destruction of the people by Yahweh.
It is under total and ludicrous explanation by these individual
"crack-pots" that if one does not bend a knee to Yahweh he or she will
be destroyed for being a "sinner."
We can hardly imagine the "mental stress" created by this set of
teachings that Yahweh will utterly destroy them, all this from a
loving God a God who threatens man, the very thing he created in his
own image.
Let's reflect God wishes to destroy man because he sins, and yet God
is good!
But onward this subject will be dealt with in chapters ahead.
I have come to think the sin idea separates the law of morals over the
law of the ritualistic laws of the surrounding pagans all to separate
the systems of government present in the region at this time in
history.
After being enslaved by several societies, the Hebrew tribes have now
been shown a weakness, a lack of hierarchy so thus they began to
create a yarn, they heard while being enslaved by the Babylonians,
this tale would not make man the strong position but make man serve a
odorless and colorless and loving deity named Yahweh, a "King of
King's" a man of pureness and a man who could deal out torrential
storms and plagues of locust all against those who refused to fall for
the Hebrew myth.
Yahweh further solidifies this in his commentary to the prophet's in a
in dignifying an accusation filled commentary:
For three crimes of Damascus and for four…
For three crimes of Gaza and for four…
For three crimes of Tyre and for four…
The prophet's so trauma ridden by these comments predicted imminent
destruction to the people of the region.
The people so convinced by these jester's began to conceptualize the
idea of sin being against Yahweh and further taunting soon thereafter
rounded the theory out to its final rational.
Amos-the Shepard was first to design a theory of being righteous and
just (5:7; 5:21; 6:12) and rose above the cult and its rites.
Good, evil, life iniquity all were drawn from this tale.
The entire story unfolds the theory as Amos describes slavery, and
hating those less than oneself, and cruelty by leaders of area wars.
Perhaps Amos was describing the times that the Babylonian's served as
master's of the Hebrew's.
The idea was formed here that God hated those engaged in such
practices.
Hosea, introduces the theory of sin under the guise of conjugal
bonding, perhaps he lacked skills to pick up women or just felt like
someone would take his mate away, however the concept arose, it is
shown in the texts to be a statement of affection.
At this juncture adultery now becomes a sin to the Hebrew ramble.
God announces he shall be absent and this problem is quickly cut off
at the pass by teaching via prophecy that adultery will cause the loss
of Yahweh from one's life.
Isaiah is the probably the biggest salesman of the entire doctrines
when visiting a Temple (6:1-13), his vision is of another dimension of
Yahweh.
After God of justice was formed by Amos, and God of conjugal bond,
there is God of majesty and control over the land.
Sin at this point becomes now pride, arrogance, and false greatness,
all eliminating the slavery scars that the Babylonians so duly caused.
The Hebrew's conquered yet unyielding, have a mission to create, as
said before a "King of King's" someone to make the mental scars
disappear.
Isaiah thus creates the concept that begins to bind the religion, it
is faith and this faith is further described as God being only a
victor and empowering those who follow his teachings as described by
Isaiah.
Sin now begins its evolution and through-out the "Book of Fables" God
continues to speak to the prophets explaining sin in various ways, all
in a finite way to create a monarchy not of a King but a God a man in
man's likeness who is of all power and presence.
This becomes the turning point for Hebrews in history as they begin to
design all ways of life around the very thought they are not to sin,
or face destruction by Yahweh.
Josiah's reform and Moses' tale all take elements of sin to a new
level all solidifying the entire concept of God being a all powerful
entity who will not accept such acts as murder, adultery and slavery,
all the while codifying the entire faith he represents.
But the conceptualization of sin appears later in documents from
scholars such as Socrates and Plato, all the while under the guise of
theory and theism, the Christian began to further codify the theory in
the teachings of Jesus.
As Satanists we view the word sin as a Hebrew version of defilement
and enjoy participating in sins laid out by both the Christians and
Hebrews in the fable they created called the "Holy Bible".
There are numerous references to sin in the Bible so numerous it could
fill the pages of this book.
However while the Christians and Jews live by the theories of God
killing them or besieging them by plagues or not allowing them into
the "Pearly Gates", the Satanist continues to commit defilement and
not sin.
Perhaps the Babylonians created the monster of Christianity and
Judaism; well the Satanist certainly can always "Defeat the Goliath"
for as a New World Satanist, you will understand that "Sin" as
described is perfect.
Without any God to worry about:
Fuck your neighbor's wife if she let's you.
Run over the weaker person, for you are the "Ruler of Earth!"
Indulge with anyone without fear.
Slave any weak women or man, if they are mentally weak beat them with
not a whip but with the power you hold as "God of the Realm."
And by all means "Sin all you want!"
A New World Satanist is Yahweh, God, Allah, and a thousand other names
called by the uninformed and controls his or her own realm if they
choose to sin, or defile so be it.
The Next Theory discussed will be of Guilt as viewed by a Satanist and
it's relation to Sin.
Grand Magister Blackwood |
|
