| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jani
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:53 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
 |
|
"ujb" <ujb@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:g8cr18$87q$1@aioe.org...
| Quote: | Kelly> wrote:
On Aug 18, 2:12 pm, ujb <u...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
poor poor stupid is like a schipperke chasing it's tail!
Not at all - Schipperke's are nice, cute, loyal and smart...
but like poor poor stupid, no tail!
|
Schipperkes do so have tails! Tail-less ones have been docked.
Jani |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:59 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
Jani wrote:
| Quote: |
"ujb" <ujb@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:g8cr18$87q$1@aioe.org...
Kelly> wrote:
On Aug 18, 2:12 pm, ujb <u...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
poor poor stupid is like a schipperke chasing it's tail!
Not at all - Schipperke's are nice, cute, loyal and smart...
but like poor poor stupid, no tail!
Schipperkes do so have tails! Tail-less ones have been docked.
Jani
|
ok, i stand corrected about Schipper, but i'm stickin with no tail for
poor poor stupid!
--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this post... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jani
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:15 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
"ujb" <ujb@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:g8cutl$ri3$1@aioe.org...
| Quote: | Jani wrote:
"ujb" <ujb@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:g8cr18$87q$1@aioe.org...
Kelly> wrote:
On Aug 18, 2:12 pm, ujb <u...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
poor poor stupid is like a schipperke chasing it's tail!
Not at all - Schipperke's are nice, cute, loyal and smart...
but like poor poor stupid, no tail!
Schipperkes do so have tails! Tail-less ones have been docked.
Jani
ok, i stand corrected about Schipper, but i'm stickin with no tail for
poor poor stupid!
|
LOL. Fair enough 
Jani |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:35 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:31:11 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:07:10 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:55:13 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the
author.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:13:50 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com
wrote:
I have been working in the computer industry for over 25 years
now.
Sure you have.
Who signed your last check?
For the last few years, I've been paid in $$$ (cash)
Gosh, I wonder why?
^ ^ ^ ^^ ???? Why would you "wonder" at all? I mean, I'd really
like an explanation of how that would be ANY of your business.
???
But naturally you and your employer takes care of all the legal
requirements for such an activity.
??? I am self-employed. "Legal requirements?" Such as ?
Declaring your income.
Paying taxes.
Informing SSI of your income.
Making sure your employer file a 1099 and gives you a copy.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdf
smirk.
Or is it under the table?
The list of things you don't know diddly about grows longer by the
day!
I can assure you, I know my rights and my responsibilities.
Then why ask about laws?
I was making a point, STUPID.
You don't know diddly about my situation, but you feel like BMOC
when you PRETEND.
You must be a TYRANT At home!
Yes, it is my business
Nope! That's a bold-faced LIE!
and teh business of SSI and the IRS.
Nope!
Did you know, you stupid little f*, that there is actually a
MINIMUM yearly income, BENEATH which, you don't report?
I am betting you didn't know that!
And I think if you actually knew how LITTLE "extra income" I earn a
year, fixing and building computers, you'd feel truly ridiculous (if
that's possible)
My mistake, I thought you were talking about real work and charging
real money.
Well, my GOD! Mark the calendars! Mike the Moron has admitted he
made a M I S T A K E !
Put it this way, genius:
If my monthly income was $500 (it's none of your business how
much), and if I can build 2 computers a month (I don't) and I can get
$75 per computer ( two computers a month ) that $150 helps a LOT, but
I'm still UNDER the minimum poverty level.
|
And, like Al Capone, if you don't declare the income, you can go to jail.
If you build thenm for teh same person or company that 1099 I mentioned
comes into play.
| Quote: |
You strut around like King Mikey, but you ACTUALLY don't know shit.
AGAIN, dufus, TONS of books could be written about what you DON'T
KNOW!
So you go ahead and "report me to SSI" or "report me to SSDI", and
they're gonna say, "John Weatherly" WHO?"
Anybody have John's address?
????
You planning on paying me a visit?
I suggest you don't. |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:42:29 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:05:48 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:59:29 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
I am self-employed. "Legal requirements?"
Most drug dealers are self-employed.
I'm not a drug dealer,
|
You're a drug dealers best friend aka client. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
CB
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:43:44 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:04:28 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:30:25 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:55:13 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:13:50 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have been working in the computer industry for over 25 years now.
Sure you have.
Who signed your last check?
For the last few years, I've been paid in $$$ (cash)
Standing on the corner with a sign that says "will work for food"?
Or maybe you're a drug dealer?
I'm gonna take a WILD stab at, you think that's funny, right?
|
Hilarious!!! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:53 am Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You deci |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 18, 2:53 pm, ujb <u...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
poor poor stupid is like a schipperke chasing it's tail!
Not at all - Schipperke's are nice, cute, loyal and smart...
but like poor poor stupid, no tail!
Ah, yes. Still, the Schipperke has positive characteristics that are
so *unlike* JW, that I still don't think the comparison works. For
instance, the Schipperke:
Is one of the most dynamic, intense, and curious of all breeds
Is quick-moving and agile and thrives on athletic activites and
interactive games
Makes an extremely keen watchdog
Is hardy, healthy
Now here are some traits of the Schipperke that *do* fit JW:
Destructiveness when bored or left alone too much
Suspiciousness toward strangers
Aggression toward other animals -- strong chasing instincts
Escape attempts and running away
Strong-willed mind of his own, requiring a confident owner who can
take charge
Lots of barking
Shedding
Slowness to housebreak
(I swear, I didn't make any of that up ;-)
So, as you can see, it's kind of a toss-up. While JW doesn't posess
any of the positive characteristics of the breed, he does possess the
negative traits. Then again, he doesn't possess the positive traits
of a human either, but definitely possesses the negatvie traits of
humankind. So, the only conclusion one can make is...
...better off to have a non-housetrained, tail-less Schipperke in your
home than JW.
;-)
|
I must admit, this IS about the most inspiring sermon I've ever
read!
Way to go, Rev Kelly!
:-)
I keep waiting for you to -- in some way-- show us God's love, the
Holy Spirit in you; I'm still waiting.
What I keep seeing is anger, hate, rage. Not the Holy Spirit by any
means. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:57 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:27:23 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
"And I worked on DOS 6.01".
How's this, dumb ass? When I was working on certain projects way
back, the OS was DOS 6.01.
Every time a new upgrade of DOS came out, we got it. We were a DOD
subcontractor (I worked for several DOD subcontractors as a WRITER),
and we had to stay "current."
Is THAT better?
|
No, you claimed you worked on it not with it and if you had to stay current
you would have only used it for a *very* brief period as 6.21 was introduced
the same years as 6.0.
| Quote: |
And if you accuse me of "changing my story" asshole, you may as well
say we are done.
|
You are changing your story.
| Quote: |
I'm TRYING to make it clear enough that even an idiot like YOU can
figure it out.
|
You are failing miserably. If it was just me then others would let me know
about it.
| Quote: |
You don't seem to be able to remember all your claims.
I don't "make claims."
|
OK, lies.
| Quote: |
snip
I never said-- never SUGGESTED-- that I was ever involved with
DOCUMENTING DOS 6.01.
I said "I used it at work, and (as I explained above), I used it at
home."
If it makes ANY sense to you (and a lot of rational, reasonable
things DON'T), if a "new release" came out of any software/OS we
were WORKING WITH, we needed to keep our work machines "current."
YOu don't work with the leading edge I worked with (stuff I am not
even at liberty to discuss with an ex- Green Beret like yourself)
without using "state of the art" computers.
I was documenting defense systems, and I was documenting very early
attempts at building "Microsoft Windows" BEFORE it was owned by
Microsoft, or even by Apple.
So you were working on MICROSOFT WINDOWS before Apple or Microsoft
"owned" it.
^ ^ ^ That is correct.
If you knew ANYTHING, you'd know that Steve Jobs BOUGHT the earliest
version of Windows from XEROX Corp.
|
No, he did not. He visited PARC (thus the "park it John" below)
The Zerox Star was the first GUI with Lilith, apple, and then Windows coming
after.
All were done in a black box environment and nobody bought anything from
PARC
| Quote: |
Our company (the one I worked with AT THAT TIME), developed the
product (the pre-"Windows" Windows) and we SOLD it to Xerox.
Xerox SOLD it to Apple (Steve Jobs)
|
So now you claim to have worked for PARC.
| Quote: |
You know the rest.
Park it John, that's stupid even by the standards we use to judge
|
| Quote: | you.
Go suck a duck!
In all those "leading edge" apps (one was Boeing Aerospace; another
was Boeing/NASA's Space Station)
we used leading edge equipment, including DOS 6.01 when it was
released.
No, I have not documented any OSs that I recall. Well, there was
the PRIME I worked on. I programmed and wrote the online Menu
system for a PRIME computer.
Ah, now you are a programmer. Was it Wirth the effort?
zzzzzzzz
I don't call learning to use a "pig latin " version of UNIX
"programming." If you want to call that "programming" be my guest.
|
Johnnie puts his other foot in it. Prime OS was developd using FORTRAN and
Modula-2 (Tha's why I have been spelling "wirth" rather than "Worth" since
this was first posted.
Wirth wrote Pascal, then Modula-2 and also developed one of the first GUI
machines, named Lilith.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Computer gives the history of Prime and
UNIX is not mentioned.
There were no "pig Latin" versions of UNIX and anybody that knows anything
about it will know why.
| Quote: |
The ASSUMPTIONS you make, if stacked one on the other, would block
out the sun.
I can certainly figure out enough "C" or "C++" that I can patch some
of my games so I can unlock the "cheats."
So you violate copyright laws (a felony in the computer world), decomile and |
recompile software.
That I would like to see.
| Quote: | I don't call that "programming." If you call it programming, be my
guest.
If I had my "cheat file" (in "Far Cry" the "cheat file" is called
"DevMode" [ "developer mode"]
ERASED, I could in no way recreate it from scratch.
I also worked on/co-authored, edited, and "bug-fixed" a VAX computer
at Sundstrandt, which became GE DOD systems. (or some such)
I've never documented DOS.
But you said you did.
You are mistaken. You misunderstanding is not the same as me
saying something, you lowbrow jerk.
I've never said I did.
And I worked on DOS 6.01".
Bug release information is usually one line, written by the
person who fixed it and frequently obscure.
Not being a programmer, I have never worked on documenting or
finding bug fixes.
So you were a programmer above and you aren't one now.
You were an idiot 5 years ago, who took MAJOR LEAPS of logic;
you're still doing it.
AGAIN, dufus, learning a "pig latin" version of UNIX is NOT what I
call programming.
|
You did not use UNIX on a prime computer.
| Quote: |
Tinkering in C to unlock the cheat codes in GAMES is not what I call
"programming."
|
Tinkering in C to unlock cheat codes would require decompiling and
recompiling.
| Quote: |
I'm sure you would, but that's because you have a whole bunch of air
where your brain is supposed to be.
It WOULD help if you actually READ and ABSORBED and comprehended
what is said and you didn't ASSUME so damn much.
It's so hard when you say "I am" (I programmed and wrote )in one
line and "I'm not"( Not being a programmer) in another.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I don't see any copy n paste here. I see you trying to
recall (and forgetting)
And as usual, you would be wrong. Your words are still on line and |
naturally I've copied them. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:34 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:35:06 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:31:11 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:07:10 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:55:13 -0500, CB <country2000@hotmail.com
wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the
author.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:13:50 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com
wrote:
I have been working in the computer industry for over 25 years
now.
Sure you have.
Who signed your last check?
For the last few years, I've been paid in $$$ (cash)
Gosh, I wonder why?
^ ^ ^ ^^ ???? Why would you "wonder" at all? I mean, I'd really
like an explanation of how that would be ANY of your business.
???
But naturally you and your employer takes care of all the legal
requirements for such an activity.
??? I am self-employed. "Legal requirements?" Such as ?
Declaring your income.
Paying taxes.
Informing SSI of your income.
Making sure your employer file a 1099 and gives you a copy.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099msc.pdf
smirk.
Or is it under the table?
The list of things you don't know diddly about grows longer by the
day!
I can assure you, I know my rights and my responsibilities.
Then why ask about laws?
I was making a point, STUPID.
You don't know diddly about my situation, but you feel like BMOC
when you PRETEND.
You must be a TYRANT At home!
Yes, it is my business
Nope! That's a bold-faced LIE!
and teh business of SSI and the IRS.
Nope!
Did you know, you stupid little f*, that there is actually a
MINIMUM yearly income, BENEATH which, you don't report?
I am betting you didn't know that!
And I think if you actually knew how LITTLE "extra income" I earn a
year, fixing and building computers, you'd feel truly ridiculous (if
that's possible)
My mistake, I thought you were talking about real work and charging
real money.
Well, my GOD! Mark the calendars! Mike the Moron has admitted he
made a M I S T A K E !
Put it this way, genius:
If my monthly income was $500 (it's none of your business how
much), and if I can build 2 computers a month (I don't) and I can get
$75 per computer ( two computers a month ) that $150 helps a LOT, but
I'm still UNDER the minimum poverty level.
And, like Al Capone, if you don't declare the income, you can go to jail.
|
?? ^^^ LOL!! You are now comparing me to Al Capone?
ANY brain, ANY sense I had given you before now,
Whoooooooooooooooosh! It'd gone.
-------------------------- ARCHIVED -----------------------
If you had a BRAIN (you don't), your next OBVIOUS question would
have been,
"How can you make any money if you are only getting $75 to build a
computer?"
Well, it's $75 I have that I wouldn't have if I hadn't built it.
" But, why would ANYBODY build a computer for $75 profit?"
It's fun, and it's something to do that keeps me out of here and
away from self-worshipping MORONS like you.
On top of all that, I get PAID to have fun!
:-)
And all you can think about is, "Did you report that $75 you made 6
months ago? "
If IRS isn't concerned (they aren't), you don't need to be concerned.
I'll take care of MY behind; you worry about your behind.
| Quote: | If you build thenm for teh same person or company that 1099 I mentioned
comes into play.
|
^ ^ ^ ^ WHAT? "thenm?"
And I don't "work for a company". As I've told you (and a dozen
others now), I work for ME. My "boss" is my client. "Mano a mano",
one on one.
| Quote: |
You strut around like King Mikey, but you ACTUALLY don't know shit.
AGAIN, dufus, TONS of books could be written about what you DON'T
KNOW!
So you go ahead and "report me to SSI" or "report me to SSDI", and
they're gonna say, "John Weatherly" WHO?"
Anybody have John's address?
????
You planning on paying me a visit?
I suggest you don't.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:41 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:48:25 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:38:30 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
DOC wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:07:07 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
You have seen me give accurate information about Insane Elaine
MANY times, but due to your TOTAL lack of character, you remained
silent. (that's the same as lying, slug slime.)
Name ONE time you ever 'gave accurate information about me',
liar-johnnie?
A few quotes of yours:
"You HAVE abused your patients" [lie, and libel]
"You're a knowb animal abuser" [lie, and libel]
"You are a criminal" [lie, and libel]
You are a thief" [lie, and libel]
Need any more reminders, short bus?
Gosh, Doc, you sure ask some dumb questions ;)
I just posted some text where johnnie said he was and was not
programmer within a few lines in the same post.
Four days later he denied saying it.
I can't help that you're too stupid to understand me.
" Well, there was the PRIME I worked on. I programmed and wrote the
online Menu system for a PRIME computer.
|
And, stupid person, as I said before, if you call using the "pig
latin" version of UNIX "programming," fine. I was a programmer.
I don't call the "pig latin" version of UNIX (it was called "PRIME"
back then) "programming."
If you want to call that language SUBSTITUTE (you probably know the
name of the "pig latin" version of PRIME, if you thought about it)
If that's what you want to call "programming," OK!
According to you, I was a programmer for several months.
Absolutely ABSURD.
| Quote: |
I also worked on/co-authored, edited, and "bug-fixed" a VAX computer
at Sundstrandt, which became GE DOD systems. (or some such)"
" Not being a programmer, I have never worked on documenting or
finding bug fixes."
(You really should wait until Google removes your posts before making claims
like this.)
|
You should remove your head and shoulders from your colon (get your
head out of your ass) before you attack people for saying things you
can't understand.
| Quote: |
I've quoted him, been called a liar for making things up and had to
post the link where he said it.
Johnnie was *adamant* about his Book of Mormon dates and when I
proved him wrong,
You haven't proved anything.
claimed he didn't remember the right date.
I guessed at a date. I didn't remember, because I didn't notice the
date at the time.
You should have said that when you gacve us specific dates for your imagined
changes.
|
I didn't give you "specific dates", liar. I GUESSED, and said so.
I keep wondering why you pick fights with people over the internet.
You could be beating your wife up!
???
| Quote: | You could have admitted it at any point.
Instead you made the claim *after* I showed that the dates you insisted on
were wrong.
|
I have told you at least a dozen times, dumbass; I don't read your
every word.
I know you think we all should read your every syllable. I don't.
| Quote: |
You have yet to post a new date.
|
When I have one, when I have acquired the correct version, I shall
post it.
Don't expect me to send you a special love note reminder.
| Quote: |
**********************
At the same time you said YOU HAD THE BOOK and asked for a web site to be
built for you.
|
Nope. You AGAIN misunderstood. And you seem to love so much posting
your mis-understanding, I don't see any point in continuing to correct
your mish-mash of the facts.
| Quote: |
"Well, at least this should be an easy one for you to "prove". All you need
to do is get a copy of the BoM edition which has 'Bethelem'[sic] replacing
'Jerusalem', state which edition it is, and scan the relevant pages.
John replies,
" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Done, done, done, and done.
|
Meaning, stupid person, I am working on acquiring it.
My GOD! I don't know how you know to BREATHE, you're so damn STUPID!
| Quote: | " And since I don't know how to build a web page, I've uploaded the
images onto an e-mail account I set up for whoever wishes to look. "
***********************
On July 4th,THE SAME DAY you said you *didn't* have the book.
' I have had a copyu[sic] that was from the 1990s that said "Bethlehem."
I don't have it NOW. I lost my whole library some 7 years ago.
I have just ORDERED a new copy. "
' A few years later, in the 90s, I came across another copy (in our
laundry room, or wherever.
I took it to my apartment, and -- just casually-- checked Alma 7:10.
!!!!!!! The text had been CHANGED to "Bethlehem." '
snip> .
I'd say at least once a day he tells somebody he is not interested
in or done with them, then he forgets and responds to their next
post.
You obviously believe you know how I think and what I mean; you
don't.
Clearly few do and a good deal of the time that includes you.
I've told him to park it, but it hardly seems wirth while to remind
him of something as he forgets the reminders.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:35:06 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
.
And, like Al Capone, if you don't declare the income, you can go to
jail.
?? ^^^ LOL!! You are now comparing me to Al Capone?
|
Only in one respect as he was an intelligent man.
Thery sent him to jail for not declaring income.
| Quote: |
ANY brain, ANY sense I had given you before now,
Whoooooooooooooooosh! It'd gone.
-------------------------- ARCHIVED -----------------------
If you had a BRAIN (you don't), your next OBVIOUS question would
have been,
"How can you make any money if you are only getting $75 to build a
computer?"
Well, it's $75 I have that I wouldn't have if I hadn't built it.
" But, why would ANYBODY build a computer for $75 profit?"
It's fun, and it's something to do that keeps me out of here and
away from self-worshipping MORONS like you.
|
But clearly it does not as you are here.
| Quote: |
On top of all that, I get PAID to have fun!
:-)
And all you can think about is, "Did you report that $75 you made 6
months ago? "
If IRS isn't concerned (they aren't), you don't need to be concerned.
I'll take care of MY behind; you worry about your behind.
It's the law but again, thanks for playing. The next time a person |
interested in Christianity comes along we can point him to you.
He'll end up saying what my father always said. "I've seen to many
Christians."
| Quote: |
If you build thenm for teh same person or company that 1099 I
mentioned comes into play.
^ ^ ^ ^ WHAT? "thenm?"
And I don't "work for a company". As I've told you (and a dozen
others now), I work for ME. My "boss" is my client. "Mano a mano",
one on one.
|
If you worked for you , you would have to pay you.
You may be self employed but you work for other people.
If only they knew.
| Quote: |
You strut around like King Mikey, but you ACTUALLY don't know shit.
|
Mickey was a mouse, not a king.
Odd that should come up as coming back from town today I thought about being
called Mickey as a child and I realized that your blustering is about the
same as and as effective as Donald Duck's was. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:27 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:48:25 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:38:30 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
DOC wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:07:07 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com
wrote:
You have seen me give accurate information about Insane Elaine
MANY times, but due to your TOTAL lack of character, you remained
silent. (that's the same as lying, slug slime.)
Name ONE time you ever 'gave accurate information about me',
liar-johnnie?
A few quotes of yours:
"You HAVE abused your patients" [lie, and libel]
"You're a knowb animal abuser" [lie, and libel]
"You are a criminal" [lie, and libel]
You are a thief" [lie, and libel]
Need any more reminders, short bus?
Gosh, Doc, you sure ask some dumb questions ;)
I just posted some text where johnnie said he was and was not
programmer within a few lines in the same post.
Four days later he denied saying it.
I can't help that you're too stupid to understand me.
" Well, there was the PRIME I worked on. I programmed and wrote the
online Menu system for a PRIME computer.
And, stupid person, as I said before, if you call using the "pig
latin" version of UNIX "programming," fine. I was a programmer.
I don't call the "pig latin" version of UNIX (it was called "PRIME"
back then) "programming."
If you want to call that language SUBSTITUTE (you probably know the
name of the "pig latin" version of PRIME, if you thought about it)
If that's what you want to call "programming," OK!
According to you, I was a programmer for several months.
Absolutely ABSURD.
|
And as I have stated UNIX was not used on Prime computers.
| Quote: |
I also worked on/co-authored, edited, and "bug-fixed" a VAX computer
at Sundstrandt, which became GE DOD systems. (or some such)"
" Not being a programmer, I have never worked on documenting or
finding bug fixes."
(You really should wait until Google removes your posts before
making claims like this.)
You should remove your head and shoulders from your colon (get your
head out of your ass) before you attack people for saying things you
can't understand.
I've quoted him, been called a liar for making things up and had to
post the link where he said it.
Johnnie was *adamant* about his Book of Mormon dates and when I
proved him wrong,
You haven't proved anything.
claimed he didn't remember the right date.
I guessed at a date. I didn't remember, because I didn't notice the
date at the time.
You should have said that when you gacve us specific dates for your
imagined changes.
I didn't give you "specific dates", liar. I GUESSED, and said so.
|
IF you said so it was well after my showing you that the dates you stated
were wrong.
***************************************************
"Well, at least this should be an easy one for you to "prove". All you need
to do is get a copy of the BoM edition which has 'Bethelem'[sic] replacing
'Jerusalem', state which edition it is, and scan the relevant pages.
John replies,
" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Done, done, done, and done.
" And since I don't know how to build a web page, I've uploaded the
images onto an e-mail account I set up for whoever wishes to look. "
On July 4th,THE SAME DAY you said you *didn't* have the book.
' I have had a copyu[sic] that was from the 1990s that said "Bethlehem."
I don't have it NOW. I lost my whole library some 7 years ago.
I have just ORDERED a new copy. "
Which contradicts what you said above about not knowing the year and having
a copy to put on a web site.
Your claim that you do know the year makes thing simple for you. There is
only one copyright during that period so it must be that book.
Rather than ordering copies at random all you have to do is obtain that
copy.
You also made a bet,
'I'm betting you $1 (what I can afford) that anything after about
1993 is going to say "Bethlehem." '
so you owe somebody a dollar.
July 5th you claimed "Well, son, I have news for you. Somewhere in the
90s, they CHANGED
the BOM to say Jesus was born in Bethlehem. "
On the same date we come acros this little jewel.
' A few years later, in the 90s, I came across another copy (in our
laundry room, or wherever.
I took it to my apartment, and -- just casually-- checked Alma 7:10.
!!!!!!! The text had been CHANGED to "Bethlehem." '
**********************************
taken verbatim from http://tinyurl.com/6mufub
| Quote: |
I keep wondering why you pick fights with people over the internet.
You could be beating your wife up!
|
Always the violence.
| Quote: | ???
You could have admitted it at any point.
Instead you made the claim *after* I showed that the dates you
insisted on were wrong.
I have told you at least a dozen times, dumbass; I don't read your
every word.
I know you think we all should read your every syllable. I don't.
|
You don't seem to read *your* every word.
| Quote: |
You have yet to post a new date.
When I have one, when I have acquired the correct version, I shall
post it.
Don't expect me to send you a special love note reminder.
You have been making that claim since the first of July. If you want to |
"guess" as you put it at another date we can go through teh same thing over
again It will be easier this time as your positive statements before have
eliminated fro 1951 through the present.
| Quote: |
**********************
At the same time you said YOU HAD THE BOOK and asked for a web site
to be built for you.
Nope. You AGAIN misunderstood. And you seem to love so much posting
your mis-understanding, I don't see any point in continuing to correct
your mish-mash of the facts.
"Well, at least this should be an easy one for you to "prove". All
you need to do is get a copy of the BoM edition which has
'Bethelem'[sic] replacing 'Jerusalem', state which edition it is,
and scan the relevant pages.
John replies,
" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Done, done, done, and done.
Meaning, stupid person, I am working on acquiring it.
My GOD! I don't know how you know to BREATHE, you're so damn STUPID!
Becasue in the same post you claimed you had scanned teh pages. |
| Quote: |
" And since I don't know how to build a web page, I've uploaded the
images onto an e-mail account I set up for whoever wishes to look. "
***********************
On July 4th,THE SAME DAY you said you *didn't* have the book.
' I have had a copyu[sic] that was from the 1990s that said
"Bethlehem."
I don't have it NOW. I lost my whole library some 7 years ago.
I have just ORDERED a new copy. "
' A few years later, in the 90s, I came across another copy (in our
laundry room, or wherever.
I took it to my apartment, and -- just casually-- checked Alma 7:10.
!!!!!!! The text had been CHANGED to "Bethlehem." '
snip> .
I'd say at least once a day he tells somebody he is not interested
in or done with them, then he forgets and responds to their next
post.
You obviously believe you know how I think and what I mean; you
don't.
Clearly few do and a good deal of the time that includes you.
I've told him to park it, but it hardly seems wirth while to remind
him of something as he forgets the reminders. |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You decid |
|
|
On Aug 19, 12:11 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | I keep waiting for you to -- in some way-- show us God's love, the
Holy Spirit in you; I'm still waiting.
What I keep seeing is anger, hate, rage. Not the Holy Spirit by any
means.
Tried that with you many times over, John.
?????? ^ ^ ^ ^^ A list of us have never noticed! ^ ^ ^ ^ ???
|
Oh, you mean like you and Vera and Chuck and Rodney - your partners in
mental instability? Yeah, that's quite a list.
Truth is, John - when someone tries to be kind to you, one usually
comes back with a bloody stump where a hand used to be.
| Quote: | Like you LYING and going into a RAGE about the Metropolitan Baptist
church;
|
A "RAGE"? Hardly. I didn't even break a sweat.
| Quote: | then you found out you were WRONG, and not a WHISPER of an
APOLOGY.
|
Been there, done that John. You were wrong, I was wrong. You were
right, I was right. Did you miss that the first time?
| Quote: | Like your going on like it was the most important thing since Nuclear
War about where and when I was stationed!
Monumentous stuff! To be sure!
God is EXTREMELY concerned that everyone know where I was stationed,
when, and what sorts of birds I worked on!! Earth-shaking stuff!
|
You were the one who started the conversation, John. If you don't
want to talk about such things, don't bring them up. What's more, if
you didn't lie so much, no one would feel the need to verify what you
say.
| Quote: | What YOU need, what you foam at the mouth over, are
1 attention
and
2 being right about EVERYTHING
(if you're not right, you'll DIE, you know!)
|
I'm still living, John.
| Quote: | Honey, I have never claimed to be "tall.' I am of average height.
So what?
|
"Average"? Compared to you, Vern Troyer is average.
| Quote: | I MANY years ago stopped worrying about how tall I'd get;
|
When it was apparent at age 55 that you weren't going to be over 5
feet tall?
| Quote: | I also
YEARS ago stopped worrying about the size of my penis.
|
So you admit that you need to find it with tweezers - too much info,
John. But thanks for again verifying that your mind lives between
your legs.
"It does the
We're all so "relieved" that you are able to urinate without a
catheter in place, John. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Aug 19, 12:58 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | As usual, you get hung in the minute DETAIL when I'm trying to get to
a point.
I'll say, "aren't those roses beautiful." You'll say, "those aren't
roses."
I'll say, "ok. But they're still pretty, aren't they?"
You'll say, "they aren't roses."
I'll say, "FINE! But aren't they pretty?"
You'll say, "they aren't roses! But if you think THEY're pretty you
should see..."
|
The problem being that before you said "aren't those roses beautiful"
you said "I used to be a horticulturist working for Jackson Perkins".
If you don't know the difference between roses and dahlias, how could
you have possibly been a horticulturist working for the West Coast's
most famous rose grower?
See the problem? See why we all think you're a liar?
| Quote: | Whatever the language was used on the PRIME, I was using a
"short-cut" version, but I was able to "program" the menu on the
computer.
I worked with the system programmer, he would give me a hint or two
as I worked, and I "programmed" the menu.
|
That's a different story than the one you tried to sell previously.
| Quote: | Why they would hire me (a WRITER) to program the menu, I have no
idea.
|
Us either. That's why we're all pretty sure you're lying, John. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You decid |
|
|
On Aug 19, 3:56 pm, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
| Quote: | I'll take the Schipperke, thanks. Put weatherless in the pound!
|
His rabies, bordatella and distemper are likely not up to date. No
pound would take him.  |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
