| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vegie
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: Re: ARE YOU REALLY SAVED? |
 |
|
Those who accept Christ, and in their first confidence say, I am saved, are
in danger of trusting to themselves. They lose sight of their own weakness
and their constant need of divine strength. They are unprepared for Satan's
devices, and under temptation many, like Peter, fall into the very depths of
sin. We are admonished, "Let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest
he fall." 1 Cor. 10:12. Our only safety is in constant distrust of self, and
dependence on Christ. {COL 155.2} |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
vegie
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: ARE YOU REALLY SAVED? |
|
|
Those who accept Christ, and in their first confidence say, I am saved, are
in danger of trusting to themselves. They lose sight of their own weakness
and their constant need of divine strength. They are unprepared for Satan's
devices, and under temptation many, like Peter, fall into the very depths of
sin. We are admonished, "Let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest
he fall." 1 Cor. 10:12. Our only safety is in constant distrust of self, and
dependence on Christ. {COL 155.2} |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
vegie
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: ARE YOU REALLY SAVED? |
|
|
Those who accept Christ, and in their first confidence say, I am saved, are
in danger of trusting to themselves. They lose sight of their own weakness
and their constant need of divine strength. They are unprepared for Satan's
devices, and under temptation many, like Peter, fall into the very depths of
sin. We are admonished, "Let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest
he fall." 1 Cor. 10:12. Our only safety is in constant distrust of self, and
dependence on Christ. {COL 155.2} |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
vegie
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: Re: WHAT IS SAVING FAITH? |
|
|
Those who accept Christ, and in their first confidence say, I am saved, are
in danger of trusting to themselves. They lose sight of their own weakness
and their constant need of divine strength. They are unprepared for Satan's
devices, and under temptation many, like Peter, fall into the very depths of
sin. We are admonished, "Let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest
he fall." 1 Cor. 10:12. Our only safety is in constant distrust of self, and
dependence on Christ. {COL 155.2}
"Donna Kupp" <dkupp@charter.net> wrote in message
news:e638aaaf-b5b4-4974-bd00-1535ec17ff25@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Many churches are teaching that a person may continue
in sin and still have eternal life. This seductive lie of the
"Carnal Christian" is based on two new ideas that have
been allowed to creep into church doctrine. The
first "idea" is "Saved by Grace"
"For by grace you have been saved THROUGH FAITH"
Ephesians 2:8 NAS
We are not saved by grace, we are saved THROUGH
FAITH. God grants us the gift of faith and through faith we
are able to be saved.
We are allowed to escape from the death sentence we have
earned by sin, only by the grace (an unmerited favor) of a
merciful God. We deserve eternal death, yet God has
graciously granted us a way of salvation, THROUGH
FAITH. The Apostle Paul said:
"Do we then overthrow the law by this faith?
By NO means! On the contrary, we uphold the law."
Romans 3:31 RSV
Clearly, "faith" does not excuse us from obedience to
the law of God; rather, through a true saving faith we are
empowered by the Holy Spirit to obey God's Ten
Commandments.
WHAT IS FAITH?
In the Greek (from which the New Testament is translated)
the words rendered as "believe" and "faith" are closely
related. The word for "believe" (Pisteuo) is the verb form of
the word used for faith (Pistis).
Thus: TO BELIEVE means TO HAVE FAITH.
This brings us to the second "idea" that the church system
has adopted in order to please itching ears and teach the
mystery of LAWLESSNESS: "If a person 'believes', he has
eternal life."
"He who believes in the Son has eternal life;
BUT HE WHO DOES NOT OBEY THE SON
SHALL NOT SEE LIFE,
but the wrath of God abides on him." John 3:36 (NAS)
That statement from John's Gospel declares that only those
who obey truly believe. (i.e. only those who obey "have faith".)
THE PROOF
IF - The one who believes in the Son has eternal life:
AND - the one who does not obey the Son
shall not see life:
THEN - The one who does not obey the Son,
does not believe in the Son.
(For it is clear that the one who shall not see life, does not
have eternal life.)
Therefore, only those those who obey the Son are true
believers with a faith that saves. We may be disobedient or
we may be a believer, but not both. If we do not obey the
Son, we shall not see life. The Son said:
"If you would enter life, keep the commandments."
Matthew 19:16 RSV
If you do not obey God and set your will to keep all His
Commandments (including the Sabbath), you have
not yet made Jesus "Lord", you shall not see life, and the
wrath of God remains on YOU.
Donna Kupp
"And the dragon was wroth with the woman,
and went to make war with the remnant of her seed,
WHICH KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD,
AND HAVE THE TESTIMONY OF JESUS CHRIST."
Rev 12:17 (KJV)
The Seven Deadly Deceptions Of Counterfeit Christianity
www.freetruth.info
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ted McMillan
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:44:44 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
<sligojoe_Spamno@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Susan Williams wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying000@hotmail.com
wrote:
...
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Are you suggesting that Jack Chick is an impartial source?
It should be apparent to most people that Jack is grinding his own ax
and tends to express his opinions as fact.
|
Millions and millions of Bible Believing Christians died during your
reigns of terror!
Did your fathers seek for impartiality then in their secret courts,
detention places and dungeons? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ted McMillan
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:21:42 -0500, Mike I
<hope2basaint@nospamjustice.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:29:50 -0500, Susan Williams
salethiel77@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying000@hotmail.com
wrote:
Susan Williams wrote:
On 7 Jul 2005 16:46:59 -0700, "Anonymous" <trying000@hotmail.com
wrote:
Endomion wrote:
Don wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 08:17:19 -0700, NancyLuft@hotmail.com wrote:
I do NOT get in the same room as ministers, by the way, because
Christianity is a HOAX!
What are you afraid of? Do you think Billy Baptist is gonna hurt you?
How do you check out each individual before you interact with them?
Do you run a background check or what?
He yells "Science!" in a crowded creation seminar.
There you go. This one was dead since 21 June.
Can I concoct an Oath of hate in my backyard, and claim it was
official documents from Rome, and you figments of Jack Chick's very
vivid imagination cannot condemn it?
Jack Chick as your source is ridiculous.
No proof in all your statements is Rome-ulous!
Because Protestant wrote it?
Robert Ware wrote it. I can't wait to see Johnny Depp's new film
"The Libertine." It is suppose to be a period piece that reflects
the history of England at a time very close to the origination
of the Jesuit Oath forgery.
Maybe you'll learn something Mr. Macmillan.
Peace and Love,
Anon
But damned Jesuit. If Robert Ware wrote it, why can't you condemn it
for its hatred like you condemn everyone who exposes it?
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Thank you, I use this as my humor page for the day.
|
If you think the issues are funny, you are also another
super-terrorist.
Especially in this climate of terror, it is clearly treason to think
that billions of lives being threatened is a matter of joke.
Do you instead take verbal abuse very seriously? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ted McMillan
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:07 am Post subject: Re: !QUESTIONS FOR ANTICHRIST MAUDE ABOUT THE GLOBAL TREASON |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:58:25 GMT, Maud Gonne
<GonneMad@LesbianIreland.ie> wrote:
| Quote: |
"I. B. Wonderin" wrote:
"Maud Gonne" <GonneMad@LesbianIreland.ie> wrote in message
news:44D51DB7.64D0218@LesbianIreland.ie...
America is under attack,
By who?
Islamic extremists
|
That were always around during the ENTIRE HISTORY of the United
States?
You now tell us Bush is Catholic. We now see Inquisition principles
of security pushed against the will of the people in the Patriot Act.
YOU THEN TELL US WHAT EVEN OUR DYING SOLDIERS DON'T KNOW? THAT ROME
CONTROLS THE UNITED STATES WHILE BUSH MAINTAINS HE IS DEFENDING
"FREEDOM?"
Didn't America have the right to know about this new development in
"FREEDOM?"
| Quote: | or do you condone the
horriffic crimes commtted on 9-11 just as the Palestinians and
Iranians and
the North Koreans do? Are they your allies? Are you the enemies of
those
trying to keep America safe? People like you infuriate me, I have a
son, an
engineer with the Army, serving with distinction trying to keep
America safe
while people like you give aid and comfort to our enemies.
|
How can a person like you, who would only attack people on the
internet who witness and expose super-terrorists wanting all
non-Catholics dead, know about others who condone "HORRIFIC" crimes?
Are you the same as was truthfully described in historic Protestant
literature and who Jack Chick gave accurate information about?
| Quote: | You pathetic little jesuit fruitcake!
I am not a Jesuit.
I do belong to an oder, but I am not a Jesuit.
It is capitalized, by the way
|
The term JESUIT is a generic term used by most who warn the world
about the Antichrist. All those who are in different orders of the
Papacy, act the same. Like you, they can't see people telling us all
non-Catholics must die, and feel a desire to oppose such people. They
can see Ted Bundy though! or Charles Manson!
| Quote: | The enemy is taking over from within!
What enemy?
The enemy destroyed the World Trade Center ( where my favourite restaurant
was located, and where I dined the night before the attack)
|
You ask a question. The remedy first is to gain human status and not
be in favor of mass-exterminations of people who are not Catholic!
What enemy?...
EVEN THOSE TERRORISTS DIDN'T TELL US IN SOME CLANDESTINE PLACE THAT
THEY CONTROL THE UNITED STATES WELL AFTER THEY PUT HER PROTECTION IN A
FALSE WAR TO PURGE OUT THEIR LIVES BY DEATH!
| Quote: | People like you infuriate me as well. You have a son in the army? I have
a relative and loved one there as well!
I have a son; it is a lot different. Don't even attempt to compare.
EVEN MORE you should be
CONCERNED ABOUT THE TROOPS, and asking Bush and his administration some
hard questions.Beginning with how was Iraq, all but decimated and under
sanctions a threat to the United States? And when did Iraq attack the
U.S.? We were supposed to have been attacked by Al-quaida and Bin Laden
remember? What is this weird link between 9-11 and Iraq? Why keep making
that case when there is absolutely nothing to support it? Nothing ,
Nada, zero, zilch! Is a agenda layed out before 9/11being followed?
Certainly, you can read all about it in the Wolfowitz doctrine
Whatever the opriginal cause, the fact of the matter si that the Islamic
extremists are out of control, dangerous and a serious threat to America,
exceprt perhaps to their allies like you, awash with the blood of our
soldiers.
|
Can a demon person who favors the mass exterminations of BILLIONS, and
then, naturally, telling us that Rome controls America without it
being widely known even by our soldiers who are dying, know what is a
serious security threat to America??
They became out of control when the only president who has ties both
to them and the Saudis came and stole the presidency twice? The one
Maude tells us is a servant of her Pope?
| Quote: | We were attacked by Al Quaida? Korea has weapons of mass destruction,
Iraq has weapons of mass destruction? China? Why did the U.S. ignore
real weapons of mass destruction to go after invisible and non-existant
weapons of mass destruction? Why are we in a war in Iraq!?!?
Ask Bush. The point is that we are there, and that is now the frontline fo
the war on terrorism.
|
Ask why people would oppose others like you telling us Rome controls
the United States after Rome's servant put us in a false war to kill
off our LOYAL soldiers cos he was frightened a defeated dictator
playing with his rubber-ducky in no-fly-zones might destroy us!
| Quote: | Fortunately, in a free country such as ours, traitors covered in the
blood
of our servicemen like you have the right to be heard. I just do not
have to
listen.
|
[As you can see, all super-terrorists have to label us in their own
mirrors]...
| Quote: |
Good bye, Taliban-aventist--
Maud Gonne
One of the Lesbian Immortals
We Never Die
"They may batter us to pieces but they will never extinguish our hope."
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ted McMillan
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:42 am Post subject: Re: Adventism, Andrew, Agent 007, & Stephen |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:55:13 -0500, "Ian Zech" <Dickens_000@news.net>
wrote:
| Quote: |
"Susan Williams" <SWilliams07171964II@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:je3bn1134acue223u5npq0e94dm7cpejis@4ax.com...
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:47:37 -0500, "Ian Zech" <Dickens_000@news.net
wrote:
Are we hardened just because you figments of Jack Chick's very vivid
imagination teach us against paranoia and then you fib that Ellen
White is the antichrist?
Why are you demons afraid of a woman you claim was struck in the brain
with a rock? I'd rather talk about black helicopters. I think they
are more dangerous.
If you nazi psychiatrist would stop teaching people how mentally
unstable they are you would have realized your problems centuries ago.
Ya simmah down stupid.
There was one straight chain of truth without one heretical sentence in that
which I had posted.
My post was of God, or it was not, God does nothing in partnership with
Satan. My post bore the stamp of God or the stamp of the enemy. There is no
halfway work in the matter.
There might be a room for you at the Paradise Valley psychiatric ward. This
information was given me, not as a revelation from the Lord, but simply as a
human opinion.
Now piss off idiot.
|
Nazis and Communists always had the bad habit of mentally diagnosing
their enemies even in secret places after it was clear they cannot
beat them in discussion.
I was the one that posted the truth. That's why I leave evidence with
it. I, like most of the global population can see bold public death
threats against all non-Catholics that even neither Ted Bundy or
Jeffrey Dalmer would support.
The Lord didn't call Rome the Antichrist because it was as evil as Ted
Bundy or Charles Manson. He called it that because it was grossly
much more evil. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:59 am Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
On Aug 16, 2:00 pm, Ted McMillan <t-m...@juno.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:44:44 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
sligojoe_Spa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Susan Williams wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
...
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Are you suggesting that Jack Chick is an impartial source?
It should be apparent to most people that Jack is grinding his own ax
and tends to express his opinions as fact.
Millions and millions of Bible Believing Christians died during your
reigns of terror!
Did your fathers seek for impartiality then in their secret courts,
detention places and dungeons?
|
Ted,
I have not heard from you for a long time.
What rain of terror of mine are you speaking of?
What secret courts are you speaking of?
Please don't ask me to defend Bush's actions. I did not vote for
him nor do I support his policies (in general).
However Bush is not a Catholic, and apparently does not feel bound
to support the teachings of the Catholic Church. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
•R. L. Measures
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
In article
<18d83e4b-da60-4a0f-8ec2-71acbb45d588@v57g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
jmeehan@columbus.rr.com wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 2:00=A0pm, Ted McMillan <t-m...@juno.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:44:44 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
sligojoe_Spa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Susan Williams wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
...
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
=A0 =A0Are you suggesting that Jack Chick is an impartial source?
=A0 =A0It should be apparent to most people that Jack is grinding his o=
wn ax
and tends to express his opinions as fact.
Millions and millions of Bible Believing Christians died during your
reigns of terror!
Did your fathers seek for impartiality then in their secret courts,
detention places and dungeons?
Ted,
I have not heard from you for a long time.
What rain of terror of mine are you speaking of?
• - note - A "rain of terror" is a downpour that exceeds 5 inches per hour. |
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Peter Terry
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:17 pm Post subject: Re: Jesus WAS the Last Supper |
|
|
"Peter Terry" <mombassa@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gvGEj.987$n8.664@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
| Quote: | Was Jesus ritually sacrificed by a primitive cannibal cult and who after
having killed off his original movement, then went on to form Roman
Christianity from which today's churches are spiritual extensions off?
There is compelling evidence that the man who was thought to be Jesus did
not die on a cross but died like a lamb to slaughter in an horrific death
by human sacrifice at the hands of a fanatical religious fundamentalist
blood cult, who not only drank his blood and ate his vital body parts, but
went on to become the foundations of Christianity.
The foundations and dogma of Christianity was manufactured by this same
group led by the first anti-Christ, St. Paul. St. Paul played a dominant
hand in this abhorrent original act of ritual cannibalism, not only in
Jesus' betrayal and death, but in the violent genocide of the first groups
who had been loyal to Jesus and given him shelter. The teachings of Jesus
were plagiarised by this violent fanatical blood cult, who went on to
overlay their own primitive pagan religious traditions over his teachings,
out of which Christianity was eventually officially nationalised around
the period that the tyrant Roman Emperor Constantine officiated the
Council of Nicea 325AD.
The Romans accused the early gentile Christians of cannibalism, because
there were. And this abhorrent practice even continues today. Ritual
cannibalism is practiced symbolically in the "mass" and "holy communion"
of the Roman Catholic Church.
The gospels in today's bible only contain a fraction of what Jesus said,
as most of his beliefs are buried behind primitive religious pagan
mythology, these orchestrated by a myriad of copyists and scribes aligned
to the Roman Christian Catholic Church of the old Roman Empire. Church
dogma such as baptism, holy communion or subtranstantiation, virgin
births, resurrection, crucifiction, 12 apostles, miracles, blood as a
sacrament, human sacrifice, god-kings as creators, heaven and earth, royal
bloodlines, satan and the devil, claims of godhead, fixed wing angels,
atonement, the rapture, the trinity and purgatory, demon possession, adam
and eve, are all models that were plagiarised from a plethora of pagan
myths from cults which existed before the times of Jesus. The Gospels are
a collection of sayings by Jesus and others, who have been rewritten over
a period of time into classical pagan storylines using models of theology
or doctrine from many primitive saviour cults of antiquity such as
Mithras, most of which was never supported by Jesus anyway.
Through enacting certain spiritual knowledge one may remove the layers of
ritual misinformation in the gospels to unearth the truth behind the
original story of Christ and the reformed hippie styled Nazarene-Essene
movement that supported him.
Fortuitously, Jesus actually predicted all of the above.
These ideas are supported by: the Canonical Gospels and the account of the
crucifiction, New and Old Testament, biblical prophesy, the book of
revelations, Jewish- Roman and western history, by anthropology and
archaeology, by Christian doctrine- its pageantry and religious rituals,
from the blood soaked writings of the "early church fathers", by the
behavioural history of the ancient popes and saints, by the history of
primitive religions and prehistoric cultures, known symbols from the very
first Christians and by new theories on how "reincarnation and cosmic
memory" enable the tracking of the evolution of the soul .
"Father forgive them for they now not what they do"
WATCH THIS SPACE
Peter Terry
http://www.myspace.com/nambassa
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kikers
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:42 am Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
SW and TM still at it.
"Ted McMillan" <t-mac9@juno.com> wrote in message news:nb5ea4hp6q2iu1er4q85v7r14i6bci3akd@4ax.com...
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:44:44 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
<sligojoe_Spamno@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Susan Williams wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying000@hotmail.com
wrote:
...
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Are you suggesting that Jack Chick is an impartial source?
It should be apparent to most people that Jack is grinding his own ax
and tends to express his opinions as fact.
|
Millions and millions of Bible Believing Christians died during your
reigns of terror!
Did your fathers seek for impartiality then in their secret courts,
detention places and dungeons? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:49 pm Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
On Aug 16, 2:01 pm, Ted McMillan <t-m...@juno.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:21:42 -0500, Mike I
hope2basa...@nospamjustice.com> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:29:50 -0500, Susan Williams
salethie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Susan Williams wrote:
On 7 Jul 2005 16:46:59 -0700, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Endomion wrote:
Don wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 08:17:19 -0700, NancyL...@hotmail.com wrote:
I do NOT get in the same room as ministers, by the way, because
Christianity is a HOAX!
What are you afraid of? Do you think Billy Baptist is gonna hurt you?
How do you check out each individual before you interact with them?
Do you run a background check or what?
He yells "Science!" in a crowded creation seminar.
There you go. This one was dead since 21 June.
Can I concoct an Oath of hate in my backyard, and claim it was
official documents from Rome, and you figments of Jack Chick's very
vivid imagination cannot condemn it?
Jack Chick as your source is ridiculous.
No proof in all your statements is Rome-ulous!
Because Protestant wrote it?
Robert Ware wrote it. I can't wait to see Johnny Depp's new film
"The Libertine." It is suppose to be a period piece that reflects
the history of England at a time very close to the origination
of the Jesuit Oath forgery.
Maybe you'll learn something Mr. Macmillan.
Peace and Love,
Anon
But damned Jesuit. If Robert Ware wrote it, why can't you condemn it
for its hatred like you condemn everyone who exposes it?
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Thank you, I use this as my humor page for the day.
If you think the issues are funny, you are also another
super-terrorist.
Especially in this climate of terror, it is clearly treason to think
that billions of lives being threatened is a matter of joke.
Do you instead take verbal abuse very seriously?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Ted, get that tin foil hat back on. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ted McMillan
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:54 pm Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:49:16 -0700 (PDT), jmeehan@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 2:01 pm, Ted McMillan <t-m...@juno.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:21:42 -0500, Mike I
hope2basa...@nospamjustice.com> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:29:50 -0500, Susan Williams
salethie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Susan Williams wrote:
On 7 Jul 2005 16:46:59 -0700, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Endomion wrote:
Don wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 08:17:19 -0700, NancyL...@hotmail.com wrote:
I do NOT get in the same room as ministers, by the way, because
Christianity is a HOAX!
What are you afraid of? Do you think Billy Baptist is gonna hurt you?
How do you check out each individual before you interact with them?
Do you run a background check or what?
He yells "Science!" in a crowded creation seminar.
There you go. This one was dead since 21 June.
Can I concoct an Oath of hate in my backyard, and claim it was
official documents from Rome, and you figments of Jack Chick's very
vivid imagination cannot condemn it?
Jack Chick as your source is ridiculous.
No proof in all your statements is Rome-ulous!
Because Protestant wrote it?
Robert Ware wrote it. I can't wait to see Johnny Depp's new film
"The Libertine." It is suppose to be a period piece that reflects
the history of England at a time very close to the origination
of the Jesuit Oath forgery.
Maybe you'll learn something Mr. Macmillan.
Peace and Love,
Anon
But damned Jesuit. If Robert Ware wrote it, why can't you condemn it
for its hatred like you condemn everyone who exposes it?
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Thank you, I use this as my humor page for the day.
If you think the issues are funny, you are also another
super-terrorist.
Especially in this climate of terror, it is clearly treason to think
that billions of lives being threatened is a matter of joke.
Do you instead take verbal abuse very seriously?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Ted, get that tin foil hat back on.
|
The "warm" Christian Nazis are back! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ted McMillan
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:00 am Post subject: Re: The Jesuit Oath Is A Forgery 7 |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:59:44 -0700 (PDT), jmeehan@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 16, 2:00 pm, Ted McMillan <t-m...@juno.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:44:44 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
sligojoe_Spa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Susan Williams wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 19:40:39 -0800, "Anonymous" <trying...@hotmail.com
wrote:
...
Since you can't see the clearest questions like your fathers (giving
the reason why they ran the Inquisitions like Bush set up the Patriot
Act) why do you say Jack Chick has less credibility than the people he
tells the truth about?
Are you suggesting that Jack Chick is an impartial source?
It should be apparent to most people that Jack is grinding his own ax
and tends to express his opinions as fact.
Millions and millions of Bible Believing Christians died during your
reigns of terror!
Did your fathers seek for impartiality then in their secret courts,
detention places and dungeons?
Ted,
I have not heard from you for a long time.
What rain of terror of mine are you speaking of?
|
Why be on the internet if you even lived the last 8yrs and don't know?
If you don't know so much, how can you mentally diagnose someone or
know they need medications just for disagreeing with a member for the
Fourth Reich?
| Quote: | What secret courts are you speaking of?
|
What mental diagnoses for everyone who disagrees with you are you
speaking of?
| Quote: | Please don't ask me to defend Bush's actions. I did not vote for
him nor do I support his policies (in general).
|
Neither does the Democratic Congress that gave him everything he
wanted.
| Quote: | However Bush is not a Catholic, and apparently does not feel bound
to support the teachings of the Catholic Church.
|
But Bush is Catholic. Even another person with the same abilities as
you to lie and mentally diagnose, said so!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.
christian.adventist/msg/77214feff568d5d0
If he's not Catholic, can he see bold death threats against all
non-Catholics after installing powerful snooping devices to sniff even
posts on the internet that say so? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
