www.evangelicalview.com

Leading Religious,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Theory of God
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 207, 208, 209, 210  Next
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Gnostic Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Reagan Revision
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Calling for Apostles of the Daheshist Church (Dahesh: Th Reply with quote

"NickYoungh" <dejonghnico@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6fd35097-98d2-4603-ab77-77719efaf5f7@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On 3 jan, 06:16, Darrick <darrick_even...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dr. Dahesh (1909-1984) was the miracle-working Prophet of Lebanon. We
believe He was Jesus reincarnated. He performed thousands of
supernatural miracles, all witnessed by thousands, hundreds of whom
have written about what they
saw.http://www.angelfire.com/mo3/dahesh/Miracles.html

We are now in the process of organizing The Daheshist Church. We are
making a call for leaders to come forth to lead the new Church locally
and worldwide.

The Holy Ghost will inspired those of you who will respond to this
call.
Respond to:
darrick_even...@yahoo.com

Up to the next declaration of the next 22 points Darrick tells you not
to believe.
I think Darrick needs to drop the religion and get himself laid.


It's how I rode into the new year and comes highly recommended.
--
RR

"We are being told that a competent, trustworthy president is someone
who brandishes his religion like a neon sign, loads a gun and goes out
hunting for beautiful winged creatures, and tries to imitate a past
president who, by the way, never shot a bird or felt the need to imitate
anybody."

~~ Patti Davis Is Not Flattered by GOP Candidates' Pale Imitations of
Her Father



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Back to top
Just James
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:07 am    Post subject: Re: Calling for Apostles of the Daheshist Church (Dahesh: Th Reply with quote

Reagan Revision wrote:
Quote:
"NickYoungh" <dejonghnico@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6fd35097-98d2-4603-ab77-77719efaf5f7@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On 3 jan, 06:16, Darrick <darrick_even...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dr. Dahesh (1909-1984) was the miracle-working Prophet of Lebanon. We
believe He was Jesus reincarnated. He performed thousands of
supernatural miracles, all witnessed by thousands, hundreds of whom
have written about what they
saw.http://www.angelfire.com/mo3/dahesh/Miracles.html

We are now in the process of organizing The Daheshist Church. We are
making a call for leaders to come forth to lead the new Church locally
and worldwide.

The Holy Ghost will inspired those of you who will respond to this
call.
Respond to:
darrick_even...@yahoo.com
Up to the next declaration of the next 22 points Darrick tells you not
to believe.
I think Darrick needs to drop the religion and get himself laid.

It's how I rode into the new year and comes highly recommended.

MMMMM sex. my wife and I have reconnected since our separation from church.

--
Just James

"Hands that help are far better than lips that pray."
~ Robert J. Ingersoll
Back to top
Topaz
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:45 am    Post subject: Re: Re: Do you want to know about ISLAM Reply with quote

Why is Islam so feared and derided today?
Ian Buckley - Shamireaders June 19, 2005

Pound's biographer Professor Hugh Kenner - with whom I had the honour
of corresponding shortly before his death - considered that without
its poets the world would have already have long since succumbed to
total exhaustion.

More practically, perhaps, we can view religion as playing a similar
valuable role in preserving traditional societies, and maintaining
higher values than the almighty dollar. But not all faiths have 'what
it takes' to resist the trend towards a world turned into a counting
house on top of a rubbish dump.

Indeed, both Judaism and the Protestant variant of Christianity are
implicated, more or less, in the rise of capitalism. Additionally,
traditionalist Catholics believe that their Church is now a shadow of
its former state, having virtually self-destructed after Vatican II.
While Eastern Orthodoxy and even Japanese Shinto play their honourable
part in resisting the rush towards a porno-trash non-culture, it is
pre-eminently Islam that is the biggest stumbling block in the way of
the New World Order.

In the first place Islam is a profoundly and genuinely democratic
faith, as opposed to the 'democracy' of fakery and computerised
trickery that characterised the election of Bush and Bliar. Following
on from this, Muslims also hold true to economic democracy in the form
of the prohibition of usury. Though now abandoned, this was also once
a doctrine of the Christian Church. Such a fundamental point is, to
say the least, unappreciated by the false prophets of globalist
capitalism, always on the lookout for fresh lands to reduce to a bland
and hence profitable mass - or mess.

When Muslims, like those 'extremist' Iranians, reject the societies
(perhaps non-societies might be a better term) of Britain and the US,
are they really wrong to do so? Or are they just being sensible in not
wanting a taste of the growing gap between rich and poor, the drug
addiction, the sleaze, the corruption, the social breakdown, the urban
gun crime and trash TV that more and more characterises these two
countries today?

Significantly, terms such as Ummah and Dar-al-Islam are more or less
untranslatable, indicating a degree of cohesion and comradely
brotherhood that those outside the Arabic and Muslim world can barely
understand.

Though few of us realise it, we in the West are spoon-fed a bogus view
of reality: the truth only comes out in peripheral areas. Times,
Telegraph and Observer dribble on and on about the wonderful EU
constitution, or how we must 'democratise' Iraq1. However in the
travel sections of such papers you can still read the occasional
comment on the wonderful hospitality to be found in Libya or Syria, in
spite of everything that happened in recent years.

Apparently, tourists there can find themselves being invited, after a
passing acquaintance with a citizen of those 'evil' countries, to stay
and eat in private homes. Just try doing that in New York or London!
As Gavin Maxwell wrote of his stay in pre-Saddam and pre-American
Apocalypse Iraq :

'Throughout our journey I was struck by the boorishness of Western
hospitality by contrast with that of the Arabs. If a stranger rings a
doorbell in Europe, he must produce some very good reason before he
can get into the house at all, much less eat there as a guest; yet in
the lands where there are neither doors nor doorbells the stranger is
not asked the reason for his presence, and to hesitate in setting food
before him would be
shameful.'...

As is clear from the Last Sermon of the Last Prophet, true Islam has a
civilised attitude towards woman...:

'O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your
women, but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have
taken them as your wives only under Allah's trust and with His
permission. If they abide by your right then to them belongs the right
to be fed and clothed in kindness. Do treat your women well and be
kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers. And it
is your right that they do not make friends with any one of whom you
do not approve, as well as never to be unchaste. '...

America today, in line with its stultifying decay, hardly produces any
new contributors to the world of thought. Though scarcely comparable
to Mencken or Brooks Adams, the present-day philosophic duo of Beavis
and Butthead have it right: 'People are STUPID'.

Yes, people are stupid, especially modern Britons or Americans. They
are pleased to accept assessments of one of the world's great
religions from various self-interested parties with an axe to grind -
from tame professors run by the intelligence agencies, to
fundamentalist 'Christian' Zionist nutcases who want to bring on
Armageddon...

As for Muslims and Arabs in general, they can take some small comfort
from the words of Beregond, the soldier of Gondor, in Tolkien's Lord
of the Rings: 'We have this honour: ever we bear the brunt of the
chief hatred of the Enemy.'


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Back to top
bob young
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:24 pm    Post subject: Re: God Reply with quote

Epi-Sode wrote:

Quote:
Why do people believe in the fiction of God?

Insecurity

Instinctual need to be member of a cohesive group

A sense of arrogance [the god is theirs so they can speak
on it's behalf]

An alternative to groveling to political leaders
[they will always be there and so will imaginary gods that
act as a sop to the alternative of groveling to poiticians]

Fear [fear of life and fear of death]

I hope this helps..

Bob
Back to top
Out_Of_The_Dark
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! (was: Thanks. (Scientologists don't read Reply with quote

On Jan 31, 2:51 pm, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
Quote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
"The difficulty with your facing things in terms of time and space is
that you only notice if something has landed in the space and time at
your disposal, which is very limited. Sorcerers (Operating Thetans),
on the other hand, have a vast field on which they can notice if
something extraneous has landed. Lots of entities from the universe at
large, entities that possess awareness but not an organism, land in
the field of awareness of our world, or the field of awareness of its
twin world, without an average human being ever noticing them."

This is consistent with Gnostic teachings. I've no further doubt that
LRH completely ripped off OTO.

--
the Tortured Spark - a Light in the Dark
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor eddieVroom
Northern Lights Motor Lodge
Knights of the Visible Wank-L

http://psyop13013.blogspot.com/

He only comes out when I drink my Djinn...

'Squirrel Alert!'. ROFLOL!!!!
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! (was: Thanks. (Scientologists don't read Reply with quote

On 31 Jan., 20:51, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
Quote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
"The difficulty with your facing things in terms of time and space is
that you only notice if something has landed in the space and time at
your disposal, which is very limited. Sorcerers (Operating Thetans),
on the other hand, have a vast field on which they can notice if
something extraneous has landed. Lots of entities from the universe at
large, entities that possess awareness but not an organism, land in
the field of awareness of our world, or the field of awareness of its
twin world, without an average human being ever noticing them."

This is consistent with Gnostic teachings. I've no further doubt that
LRH completely ripped off OTO.

The (Operating Thetans) was added by me. It's really a writing by
Carlos Castaneda.
Don't know where he ripped it from, but he writes that it's supposed
to be reality how a mexican curandero/shaman named Don Juan sees it.
Back to top
eddieVroom
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:51 am    Post subject: Squirrel Alert! (was: Thanks. (Scientologists don't read thi Reply with quote

t.nanacatl@googlemail.com wrote:

Quote:
"The difficulty with your facing things in terms of time and space is
that you only notice if something has landed in the space and time at
your disposal, which is very limited. Sorcerers (Operating Thetans),
on the other hand, have a vast field on which they can notice if
something extraneous has landed. Lots of entities from the universe at
large, entities that possess awareness but not an organism, land in
the field of awareness of our world, or the field of awareness of its
twin world, without an average human being ever noticing them."

This is consistent with Gnostic teachings. I've no further doubt that
LRH completely ripped off OTO.

--
the Tortured Spark - a Light in the Dark
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor eddieVroom
Northern Lights Motor Lodge
Knights of the Visible Wank-L

http://psyop13013.blogspot.com/

He only comes out when I drink my Djinn...
Back to top
C. Woolard
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:56 am    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! Reply with quote

On Jan 31, 4:06 pm, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
Quote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 31 Jan., 20:51, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
"The difficulty with your facing things in terms of time and space is
that you only notice if something has landed in the space and time at
your disposal, which is very limited. Sorcerers (Operating Thetans),
on the other hand, have a vast field on which they can notice if
something extraneous has landed. Lots of entities from the universe at
large, entities that possess awareness but not an organism, land in
the field of awareness of our world, or the field of awareness of its
twin world, without an average human being ever noticing them."
This is consistent with Gnostic teachings. I've no further doubt that
LRH completely ripped off OTO.

The (Operating Thetans) was added by me. It's really a writing by
Carlos Castaneda.
Don't know where he ripped it from, but he writes that it's supposed
to be reality how a mexican curandero/shaman named Don Juan sees it.

LOL -- well, there are certain symbols and concepts that have been
propagated throughout the succession of religions. It's not surprising
there would be similarities.

That said, I just watched the Fishman video floating at the top of
Google right now. It reinforces my conviction that LRH ripped off OTO.
Lock, stock and barrel -- with a malevolent rewrite.


You didn't think a hack like L.Ron could actually come up with
someting original, did you?

Be glad fucking Harlan didn't decide to start his own religion.

--
C.
Back to top
eddieVroom
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! Reply with quote

t.nanacatl@googlemail.com wrote:
Quote:
On 31 Jan., 20:51, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
"The difficulty with your facing things in terms of time and space is
that you only notice if something has landed in the space and time at
your disposal, which is very limited. Sorcerers (Operating Thetans),
on the other hand, have a vast field on which they can notice if
something extraneous has landed. Lots of entities from the universe at
large, entities that possess awareness but not an organism, land in
the field of awareness of our world, or the field of awareness of its
twin world, without an average human being ever noticing them."
This is consistent with Gnostic teachings. I've no further doubt that
LRH completely ripped off OTO.

The (Operating Thetans) was added by me. It's really a writing by
Carlos Castaneda.
Don't know where he ripped it from, but he writes that it's supposed
to be reality how a mexican curandero/shaman named Don Juan sees it.

LOL -- well, there are certain symbols and concepts that have been
propagated throughout the succession of religions. It's not surprising
there would be similarities.

That said, I just watched the Fishman video floating at the top of
Google right now. It reinforces my conviction that LRH ripped off OTO.
Lock, stock and barrel -- with a malevolent rewrite.

--
the Tortured Spark - a Light in the Dark
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor eddieVroom
Northern Lights Motor Lodge
Knights of the Visible Wank-L

http://psyop13013.blogspot.com/

He only comes out when I drink my Djinn...
Back to top
eddieVroom
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:36 am    Post subject: Re: Look what's #1 on Google Video Reply with quote

JAFAW wrote:

Quote:
About the Fishman depo.
One of things that many people notice is that although he says some batshit
crazy things (like anyone who has been in the cult for long enough), he
doesn't appear to be all that batshit crazy himself. He always seemed to me
to be a bit of a scienotech "anorak" more than anything else.

Oh, yeah, if he were just some other guy talking about computers, he'd
be right at home at DefCon. Otherwise, everything he's saying is
conceptually consistent with Gnostic teachings as I understand them.

I'll say it again: LRH ripped off OTO lock, stock and barrel. And
twisted it. It's like reading a copy of a copy.

And it is clearly malevolent, IMO.

--
the Tortured Spark - a Light in the Dark
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor eddieVroom
Northern Lights Motor Lodge
Knights of the Visible Wank-L

http://psyop13013.blogspot.com/

He only comes out when I drink my Djinn...
Back to top
Gerry Armstrong
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:55 am    Post subject: Re: Look what's #1 on Google Video Reply with quote

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:36:58 -0500, eddieVroom
<eddievroom@jamadots.com> wrote:

Quote:
JAFAW wrote:

About the Fishman depo.
One of things that many people notice is that although he says some batshit
crazy things (like anyone who has been in the cult for long enough), he
doesn't appear to be all that batshit crazy himself. He always seemed to me
to be a bit of a scienotech "anorak" more than anything else.

Oh, yeah, if he were just some other guy talking about computers, he'd
be right at home at DefCon. Otherwise, everything he's saying is
conceptually consistent with Gnostic teachings as I understand them.

I'll say it again: LRH ripped off OTO lock, stock and barrel. And
twisted it. It's like reading a copy of a copy.

And it is clearly malevolent, IMO.

See:
http://carolineletkeman.org/sp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1187&Itemid=240

Lecture: Some Notes On Black Dianetics
Socio-Political Subversion
Hubbard says there was only Black Dianetics in 1945.
http://carolineletkeman.org/sp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1183&Itemid=165

In 1945, Hubbard met Jack Parsons, an explosives expert and head of
the OTO in Pasadena, California. By early 1946, Hubbard had wormed
out of Parsons the highest secrets of the OTO, which include
instructions on how to turn elemental spirits into "familiars" or
slaves. See also: The Beast 666.
http://carolineletkeman.org/sp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=426&Itemid=111

In this lecture, Hubbard remarks on a relationship he had with such an
expert, although he doesn't mention Parsons by name. Parsons died
from a mysterious explosive incident.

Hubbard claims that with Dianetics, it is possible to give someone a
post-hypnotic suggestion and make them go insane with a trigger that
would activate days or months later.

With the OTO's magical formulae, Hubbard had the tools to turn people
into "friends" and adapted them to recruit members into Scientology.
Scientology still uses these techniques. See: Ad: Dissemination and
Help.
http://carolineletkeman.org/sp/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=791&Itemid=182

A person can drive himself mad with Dianetics without any trouble.
What you have concentrated on in your study of Dianetics has been the
process of making people well. That is your emphasis line. But don’t
think for a moment that that is any more than half of it. There is as
much data on how to make people insane, uncomfortable, sick or dead as
there is on how to make them well. We ordinarily do not handle that
side of the data; we ordinarily do not look at it. But once in a
while, in order to learn something, it is necessary to look at it.

Knowing the potentialities which are inherent in Dianetics, one is
rather aghast to look into the field and see the wild abandon with
which somebody will put out what he calls the “lollipop technique,”
which will wind a person up in a spinbin about as quick as scat!

This is something like the fellow who goes out and shoots oil wells.
There is a hole in the ground and something has happened down in this
hole that they don’t know anything about, so the way they fix up the
hole is by dropping some nitroglycerin in it. The nitroglycerin goes
down the hole and explodes down there, and after that maybe the hole
is all right and maybe it isn’t.

Now, the oil-well shooter will take a flask of nitroglycerin and put
it inhis pocket. He mixes up his nitroglycerin at home on his stove,
and- he doesn’t care about that. He will tell you, “Dynamite is safe;
you can light a cigar from dynamite.” As a matter of fact, I had one
of these fellows demonstrate to me one time that it was possible to
light a stick of dynamite and then light a cigarette from it. Nothing
to it!

What he was overlooking was that other people can’t do that. It isn’t
that familiarity breeds contempt but that he knows exactly how far he
can go; he knows what he can do with this stuff. He knows that you
don’t drop nitroglycerin on concrete. He also knows that when he picks
up a notebook, for instance, and puts it in his pocket, his chances of
dropping that notebook are very slight. So he picks up the
nitroglycerin and puts it in his pocket; he knows his chances of being
hit in the side are very slight. So he just says, “Those are the odds
against it,” and life is all very comfortable and he goes on.

Now, the funny part of it is, the oil-well shooter would say, “Well,
dynamite will burn! Ten percent dynamite will burn. You touch a match
to ten-percent dynamite and it will burn just like sawdust, and you
can light a cigarette with it.” Then you start to do it and the
dynamite blows up and they pick your head up someplace else.

Part of his technology is that you can always burn fresh dynamite. He
just left out one adjective. And the dynamite you picked up was a
couple of years old and all the nitroglycerin had settled in one end
of it. That was the end you lit.

There is a case of familiarity with a subject. These shooters very
seldom kill themselves, very seldom have accidents.

It is the same with a Dianetic auditor: He has looked at engrams, he
has looked at preclears, he has looked at screamers; he knows what he
is going after, what he can do with it and what he can’t do with it,
more or less. So he throws his preclears on the couch and runs them
into this and out of that and maybe sticks them up in something; then
he says, “Well, that’s all right, they don’t go nuts—not for
twenty-four hours. I’ll get that tomorrow.” In short, he shows a wild
abandon with the subject. But he is operating within known limits.
Even a fair knowledge of Dianetics lets you operate within those known
limits.

[...]

As long as you practice something remotely resembling Standard
Procedure, as long as you know there is a time track, as long as you
know you ought to keep chasing the preclear through the incident until
it finally desensitises, as long as you know enough never to lose your
nerve, you can’t do anybody very much damage—unless you go over onto
the side of complete Black Dianetics.

With Black Dianetics, you could tailor-make any kind of insanity you
wanted to. The person might not manifest this the next day, maybe not
the next week or maybe not for thirty days. Maybe three months later
he is walking down the street and feeling a little bit tired when
somebody honks an auto horn just right or something of the sort, and
all of a sudden he goes crazy, and there he is—insane! Or terribly
sick and uncomfortable.

So they take him off and put him in a spinbin and put electrodes on
him and then they push big levers and he goes into a convulsion and
breaks his spine, breaks his jaw, and so forth. In other words, one
can expect the maximum of cooperation from psychiatry in Black
Dianetics. They will bury what has already been planted, and they will
bury it deeply. This is rather brutal, isn’t it?

You could put a little book down in Czechoslovakia called “How to
Drive People Insane: PDH” filled with various kinds of insanity and
how to plant it to really make it good. You could drop this book into
the hands of a thousand people in Czechoslovakia and a thousand people
in Poland, and you could go in on the other side and make sure some
copies were in Chinese, and then hire a private jet pilot and have him
go over at seventy thousand feet and drop a few on
Moscow.

Sooner or later, some muzhik who has seen the little book is going to
watch Colonel Umphbumski come down the steps of the beer hall full of
vodka and very drunk. Maybe this little muzhik is the carriage driver,
and as he drives along he notices that the colonel is asleep. “Well,
what do you know. The colonel is asleep. This is too good to miss—Hap!
‘Stalin is against me . . .”’ and so on.

In other words, no high-ranking officer and no political entity is
safe in a world where a technique of this character exists. You
couldn’t wipe out the Foundation now and stop this technology from
existing and you couldn’t wipe me out and stop it from existing; it is
already out! You couldn’t go around and propagandise against it
because that would just popularize it. You can’t stop an idea with
sixteen-inch armor plate.

Unfortunately, Black Dianetics is inherent in Dianetics. In 1945, this
was all the Dianetics there was—how to drive people crazy, how to foul
up political systems, how to restimulate individuals just by talking
to them—without planting engrams—and in addition to this, how to
interrupt life force in an individual. We haven’t gone into that very
much. It is a wonderfully smooth way of committing murder.

I am mentioning this because somebody may ask you, “What could
possibly be dangerous about Dianetics?” I am telling you what could be
dangerous about it.

That was all it had risen to back in 1945. It became absolutely
necessary in 1948 and 1949, when these techniques were released to
psychiatry and to medicine, to release them much more widely.

— L. Ron Hubbard
Lecture 17 September 1951: Some Notes On Black Dianetics
The Darker Side of the Picture

© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
Back to top
eddieVroom
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:02 am    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! Reply with quote

C. Woolard wrote:
Quote:
On Jan 31, 4:06 pm, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 31 Jan., 20:51, eddieVroom <eddievr...@jamadots.com> wrote:
t.nanac...@googlemail.com wrote:
"The difficulty with your facing things in terms of time and space is
that you only notice if something has landed in the space and time at
your disposal, which is very limited. Sorcerers (Operating Thetans),
on the other hand, have a vast field on which they can notice if
something extraneous has landed. Lots of entities from the universe at
large, entities that possess awareness but not an organism, land in
the field of awareness of our world, or the field of awareness of its
twin world, without an average human being ever noticing them."
This is consistent with Gnostic teachings. I've no further doubt that
LRH completely ripped off OTO.
The (Operating Thetans) was added by me. It's really a writing by
Carlos Castaneda.
Don't know where he ripped it from, but he writes that it's supposed
to be reality how a mexican curandero/shaman named Don Juan sees it.
LOL -- well, there are certain symbols and concepts that have been
propagated throughout the succession of religions. It's not surprising
there would be similarities.

That said, I just watched the Fishman video floating at the top of
Google right now. It reinforces my conviction that LRH ripped off OTO.
Lock, stock and barrel -- with a malevolent rewrite.


You didn't think a hack like L.Ron could actually come up with
someting original, did you?

Be glad fucking Harlan didn't decide to start his own religion.

--
C.

Philip K Dick might get there yet. :)

--
the Tortured Spark - a Light in the Dark
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor eddieVroom
Northern Lights Motor Lodge
Knights of the Visible Wank-L

http://psyop13013.blogspot.com/

He only comes out when I drink my Djinn...
Back to top
Gnostic
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:34 am    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! Reply with quote

Quote:
Google right now. It reinforces my conviction that LRH ripped off OTO.
Lock, stock and barrel -- with a malevolent rewrite.


L. Ron Hubbard on Crowley,
"the late Aleister Crowley, my very good friend"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6fwzOYoAfY&feature=related


Hubbard : "Now, he could simply say, "I have action." A magician - the magic
cults of the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth centuries in the Middle
East were fascinating. The only modern work that has anything to do with
them is a trifle wild in spots, but it's fascinating work in itself, and
that's work written by Aleister Crowley, the late Aleister Crowley, my very
good friend. And he did himself a splendid piece of aesthetics built around
those magic cults. It's very interesting reading to get hold of a copy of a
book, quite rare, but it can be obtained. the Master Therion, T-h-e-r-i-o-n,
The Master Therion by Aleister Crowley. He signs himself "The Beast"; "The
Mark of the Beast, 666." Very, very something or other."
Back to top
Cyrenius SODDI
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:37 am    Post subject: Re: Squirrel Alert! Reply with quote

"Gnostic" <bardic26657@mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:13qugt1qaqmks42@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:

Google right now. It reinforces my conviction that LRH ripped off OTO.
Lock, stock and barrel -- with a malevolent rewrite.


L. Ron Hubbard on Crowley,
"the late Aleister Crowley, my very good friend"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6fwzOYoAfY&feature=related


Hubbard : "Now, he could simply say, "I have action." A magician - the
magic
cults of the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth centuries in the
Middle
East were fascinating. The only modern work that has anything to do with
them is a trifle wild in spots, but it's fascinating work in itself, and
that's work written by Aleister Crowley, the late Aleister Crowley, my
very
good friend. And he did himself a splendid piece of aesthetics built
around
those magic cults. It's very interesting reading to get hold of a copy of
a
book, quite rare, but it can be obtained. the Master Therion,
T-h-e-r-i-o-n,
The Master Therion by Aleister Crowley. He signs himself "The Beast"; "The
Mark of the Beast, 666." Very, very something or other."


I can get you a copy of that book signed "Jack T. Shit". S-h-i-t.
Back to top
bob young
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:32 am    Post subject: Re: God Reply with quote

Bob wrote:

Quote:
Stormin Mormon wrote:
Cause the reality of God is terrifying?

Why would that be the case?

as they say 'it is all in the mind'
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Evangelical Views - the Best of UseNet Religious Postings! Forum Index -> Gnostic Forum Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 207, 208, 209, 210  Next  
Page 208 of 210
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum