| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
§§§ Raven §§§
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:34 am Post subject: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
 |
|
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: | Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
|
If your not married safe sex is abstinance. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Aaron
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:17 am Post subject: Re: Israel's salvation |
|
|
A person posing as a Christian keeps posting bizzare statment and
insulting Christians and alike Atheists without cause. He (I am
assuming here) Calls himself "Pastor Frank;" this despite the fact
that he is not a Pastor. He also calls anyone who disagrees with Him
an "Atheist" as if he thought that this was a vile thing. I say
"...as if..." because This "frank" person has denounced the existance
of God. He has also made wild accusations about other people being on
drugs, commiting immoral sexual acts, being in league with Satan, and
other things.
Frank's bizzare posts have the effect of pushing people away from
seeking God because Frank commits so many immoral actions in his posts
alone. He has supported Nazi propaganda in various News groups and
makes unfounded accusations against Israel. He has posted
anti-Semitic slurs as if they were Christian theology, as if blind
Hatred was something that the Messiah taught.
On the surface these may appear to be the actions of a fanatical,
uneducated, mentally impared person, or maybe a person with severe
psychological problems. However, from time to time Frank has let his
guard down and let his real beliefs slip out. Or maybe, it is all
part of his plan to make Christians look foolish? It appears That
Frank either does not believe in God or that he is a knowing devotee
of Satan. Why would I say that? Because Frank has denounced the
existance of God. Even the most ignorant of Christians would never
denounce God's existance!
Here are the quotes with references:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl416064742d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=7kf6ub%24ele%249%40nntp1.uunet.ca
| Quote: | Pastor Frank wrote:
"Satan is the personification or anthropomorphization of evil.
How is it you can't understand such a simple literary device?
Or do you really believe that evil does NOT exist?"
|
If Satan does not exist, what about God?
But even worse, if Frank can convince people that Satan does not exist
they will not be on their guard against the evil one. Hmm...
but more to the point:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl416064742d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=7kmcph%24kuu%244%40nntp2.uunet.ca
| Quote: | Pastor Frank wrote:
"The NT describes both God and Satan as a spirit, meaning
something like a particular attitude, a holy (wholesome,
healthy) and an un-holy attitude, which however both only
come into reality if that attitude is translated into
action by a person. Hence seeing both God and Satan as
persons.
If you look at the NT closely, you will find many
extraordinary treasures of great beauty and wisdom.
And forget about the "mythological creatures" already,
they don't exist."
|
So, Frank says that God is a "mytholigical creature."
No Christian could possibly say that!
..... and how about this exchange:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=god+literary+device+author:pastor+author:frank&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=7jcrmp%24oop%241%40goblin.uunet.ca&rnum=12
| Quote: | Pastor Frank wrote:
Tiglath wrote:
You can stretch the word god as a figure of speech,
but that is an occasional literary device
which does not change the primary definition of the
word, but it is used only to add power to a particular
sentence. But that is not what you are after; you want
to legitimize that god is "what we like to do best."
This is not word power, but a power outage.
Don't blame me bud, it's the NT and the expert on God
the Father, his Son Jesus Christ which describe the
word "God" to mean a spirit (not a ghost nor divine
sentient entity) (John 4:24), the spirit of love etc.
as describes as the "fruits of the spirit" above.
So, the "divine entity" of your imagination you don't
want to believe in is strictly a strawman.
|
So, Frank tries to win over an Atheist by claiming that
God does not exist? Is that a valid reason for an Atheist
to convert to Christianity? Or maybe Frank thinks that
tricking the Atheists into thinking that Christianity is
a form of Atheism is a valid way to save souls?
Got another Frank quote:
| Quote: | news:cbadfc8f.0209251516.7ba4babb@posting.google.com...
Are you having problems with ancient philosophical
symbolism and metaphor? Looks like you anthropomorphise
the word "god" into some invisible powerful space
creature / warrior a la Zeus or Odin, and Satan in that
funny looking guy in the red body stocking, sporting a
tail, two little horns and a pitch fork. LOL And no,
those do indeed not exist.
|
Here Frank claims that God does not exist at all.
Frank, you keep lying, denouncing what is actually in the Bible.
You lie about being a Pastor.
You lie and make false accusations against anyone who disagrees with
you.
You lie about being saved after commiting Blasphemy agaisnt the Holy
Spirit in this NG on several occasions.
You are, in the words of Jesus, one of the "Bnai B'liya`al," children
of Satan (The name that Messiah used here denotes the personality of
Satan as rebellious, lawless and worthless.). It seems that you are
also "Ben HaSatan." since you are activly opposing God and thus His
enemy, and "Ben Armillus" (Son of the Anti-Christ) because you are
working so hard to prevent people from being saved. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ben Hopkins
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:30 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
§§§ Raven §§§ wrote:
| Quote: |
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
If your not married safe sex is abstinance.
|
Isn't 'safe sex' for people that have a fetish for bank vaults? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Dick Tater
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:47 pm Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
On 17 Apr 2006, Ben Hopkins wrote:
| Quote: | §§§ Raven §§§ wrote:
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
If your not married safe sex is abstinance.
Isn't 'safe sex' for people that have a fetish for bank vaults?
|
I tried to have safe sex once. But the hole was too small. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Elmer
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:40 pm Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
Michael wrote:
| Quote: | In article <hmY0g.7401$tT.2938@news01.roc.ny>, Elmer
§§§ Raven §§§ wrote:
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
If your not married safe sex is abstinance.
Arrghh. Pet peeve time. I don't have a not. Never owned one. Have you??
"Your" is a possessive pronoun. "You're" is the abbreviation for "you are".
And how does marriage insure safe sex??
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the relationship?
|
Marriage does not = safe sex. Monogomy = safe sex. Marriage ≠monogomy. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Michael
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:32 pm Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
In article <TB41g.6124$kg.2067@news02.roc.ny>, Elmer
<nylicens@frontiernet.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Michael wrote:
In article <hmY0g.7401$tT.2938@news01.roc.ny>, Elmer
§§§ Raven §§§ wrote:
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
If your not married safe sex is abstinance.
Arrghh. Pet peeve time. I don't have a not. Never owned one. Have you??
"Your" is a possessive pronoun. "You're" is the abbreviation for "you are".
And how does marriage insure safe sex??
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the relationship?
Marriage does not = safe sex. Monogomy = safe sex. Marriage ≠monogomy.
|
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the marriage relationship?
--
"-----------------"
May God Bless You
Michael |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
jesus.rapture.me@gmail.co
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
There is some great info directly related to this subject at
http://jesusraptureme.com/index.html
I found it very enlightening.
God Bless |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Pastor Frank
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:44 am Post subject: Re: Israel's salvation |
|
|
"Aaron" <anon@home.net> wrote in message
news:tjt842lt7kd5th5i0qv4na376gvqn2rfug@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
A person posing as a Christian keeps posting bizzare statment and
insulting Christians and alike Atheists without cause. He (I am
assuming here) Calls himself "Pastor Frank;" this despite the fact
that he is not a Pastor. He also calls anyone who disagrees with Him
an "Atheist" as if he thought that this was a vile thing.
Yep!! Aaron is an atheist alright. It's no use denying it any longer. An |
atheist trolling our pristine religious NGs is "a vile thing" indeed!!!!!!
see below
Pastor Frank
troll
troll (trol) verb
To post a message in a newsgroup or other online conference in the hopes
that somebody else will consider the original message so outrageous that it
demands a heated reply. A classic example of a troll is to post an article
in favor of torturing cats in a pet lovers' newsgroup.
The Original Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (Americanized
Version) is licensed from Longman Group UK Limited. Copyright © 1994 by
Longman Group UK Limited. All rights reserved.
Excerpted from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language,
Third Edition Copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic
version licensed from Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V., further
reproduction and distribution restricted in accordance with the Copyright
Law of the United States. All rights reserved. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
I had the impression that when you click onto the word "reply" printed
on the computer screen in blue letters that you were responding to that
particular post. But it doesn't seem so since my posts wind up all over
the thread. Does anybody understand how the google system works? Or
maybe I should take a computer course for morons. Unfortunately, I'm
serious. Or, maybe Google's system isn't perfect. I'd hate to think I'm
that dumb. I never read books for dummies after reading one and
learning that the author of the book was more of a dummy than me.
There is so much bullshit and censorship in America that people are no
longer aware of it.
Marshall Mcluhan authored the book: "The Medium is the Message." I
think he wrote it way back in the sixties. He was obviously quite
prescient about the affect of mass media.
And all that globalization crap we keep hearing about. David Duke might
not be all wrong. After all, we should live safely in our communities.
Instead some idiot screams bigot or racist or whatever as soon as you
say it like it is.
If you remember, in America, a few years ago, many television comedies
showed black and white mixed marriages etc. The white guy as I remember
was always out of it, and the black actor was always perfectly oriented
in his community. The white guy was routinely called "crazy".
In school, high school kids lived with the opposite reality. The blacks
were the ones having social problems, along with the hispanic gang
bangers. In reality, the whites we're oriented. Maybe showing the
opposite of urban reality is good. Maybe comedy can fuel reality. I
mean provoke society to change reality for the better.
Maybe it's good to show wealth in movies and glamour while there is a
depression. The films of the thirties glamourous lifestyles during the
Great Worldwide Depression.
How do you press the "reply and NOT oh the hell with it.
Do they have computer courses for beginners: "If all else fails read
the directions". |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Pastor Frank
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:44 am Post subject: Re: Israel's salvation |
|
|
"Aaron" <anon@home.net> wrote in message
news:58c642hlucpd0eblae33ueffmp9gi599iq@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
A person posing as a Christian keeps posting bizzare statment and
insulting Christians and alike Atheists without cause. He (I am
assuming here) Calls himself "Pastor Frank;" this despite the fact
that he is not a Pastor. He also calls anyone who disagrees with Him
an "Atheist" as if he thought that this was a vile thing.
At least you now admit to be an atheist and "a vile thing" trolling our |
pristine and hallowed Christian NGs.
*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com *** |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Elmer
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:00 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
Michael wrote:
| Quote: | In article <TB41g.6124$kg.2067@news02.roc.ny>, Elmer
nylicens@frontiernet.net> wrote:
Michael wrote:
In article <hmY0g.7401$tT.2938@news01.roc.ny>, Elmer
§§§ Raven §§§ wrote:
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
If your not married safe sex is abstinance.
Arrghh. Pet peeve time. I don't have a not. Never owned one. Have you??
"Your" is a possessive pronoun. "You're" is the abbreviation for "you are".
And how does marriage insure safe sex??
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the relationship?
Marriage does not = safe sex. Monogomy = safe sex. Marriage ≠monogomy.
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the marriage relationship?
|
Marriage is no guarantee of monogamy.
http://www.divorcepeers.com/stats31.htm |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:21 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: | I had the impression that when you click onto the word "reply" printed
on the computer screen in blue letters that you were responding to that
particular post. But it doesn't seem so since my posts wind up all over
the thread. Does anybody understand how the google system works? Or
maybe I should take a computer course for morons. Unfortunately, I'm
serious. Or, maybe Google's system isn't perfect. I'd hate to think I'm
that dumb. I never read books for dummies after reading one and
learning that the author of the book was more of a dummy than me.
There is so much bullshit and censorship in America that people are no
longer aware of it.
Marshall Mcluhan authored the book: "The Medium is the Message." I
think he wrote it way back in the sixties. He was obviously quite
prescient about the affect of mass media.
And all that globalization crap we keep hearing about. David Duke might
not be all wrong. After all, we should live safely in our communities.
Instead some idiot screams bigot or racist or whatever as soon as you
say it like it is.
If you remember, in America, a few years ago, many television comedies
showed black and white mixed marriages etc. The white guy as I remember
was always out of it, and the black actor was always perfectly oriented
in his community. The white guy was routinely called "crazy".
In school, high school kids lived with the opposite reality. The blacks
were the ones having social problems, along with the hispanic gang
bangers. In reality, the whites we're oriented. Maybe showing the
opposite of urban reality is good. Maybe comedy can fuel reality. I
mean provoke society to change reality for the better.
Maybe it's good to show wealth in movies and glamour while there is a
depression. The films of the thirties glamourous lifestyles during the
Great Worldwide Depression.
How do you press the "reply and NOT oh the hell with it.
Do they have computer courses for beginners: "If all else fails read
the directions".
|
Upper reply test |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:25 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
Lower reply doesn't seem to quote original message. Upper reply (under
show options) does. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Michael
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:55 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
In article <7Zf1g.7524$tT.6020@news01.roc.ny>, Elmer
<nylicens@frontiernet.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Michael wrote:
In article <TB41g.6124$kg.2067@news02.roc.ny>, Elmer
nylicens@frontiernet.net> wrote:
Michael wrote:
In article <hmY0g.7401$tT.2938@news01.roc.ny>, Elmer
§§§ Raven §§§ wrote:
DanielAlbertDesfosses@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you into safe sex? Should Roman Catholics practice safe sex?
If your not married safe sex is abstinance.
Arrghh. Pet peeve time. I don't have a not. Never owned one. Have you??
"Your" is a possessive pronoun. "You're" is the abbreviation for
"you are".
And how does marriage insure safe sex??
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the relationship?
Marriage does not = safe sex. Monogomy = safe sex. Marriage ≠monogomy.
How would one transmit STD's beyond the limits of the marriage relationship?
Marriage is no guarantee of monogamy.
|
It is if both follow the statutes of the commandments, which carry side
benefits as well.
--
"-----------------"
May God Bless You
Michael |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:58 am Post subject: Re: Monogamy with your spouse IS safe sex |
|
|
nylicence@yahoo.com wrote:
| Quote: | Lower reply doesn't seem to quote original message. Upper reply (under
show options) does.
nylicence, |
It worked! You're right, Thanks a million. I hope
other morons like me learn from this. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
