| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DOC
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:59 pm Post subject: What is this? |
 |
|
I came across this 'site' and jw is mentioned in the writeup.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=308079
Judging from the 'nature of the pictures', one cannot help but wonder
if this is the same papa porn...>>>?
It was posted:
John Weatherly , September 02, 2001; 04:30 A.M.
This is not Porn at all. Remember, only the offensive get offended.
Beautiful composition. Bravo!
Am I wrong? |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:59 pm Post subject: Re: What is this? |
|
|
On Aug 18, 11:59 am, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
| Quote: | I came across this 'site' and jw is mentioned in the writeup.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=308079
Judging from the 'nature of the pictures', one cannot help but wonder
if this is the same papa porn...>>>?
It was posted:
John Weatherly , September 02, 2001; 04:30 A.M.
This is not Porn at all. Remember, only the offensive get offended.
Beautiful composition. Bravo!
Am I wrong?
|
I think it is another John Weatherly, as the John Weatherly connected
to that comment lives in Southern California.
It would have been nice, however, that you warn us all ahead of time
that the picture we would be viewing was so graphic in nature, dontcha
think? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:59 am Post subject: Re: What is this? |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:26:26 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 18, 11:59 am, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
I came across this 'site' and jw is mentioned in the writeup.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=308079
Judging from the 'nature of the pictures', one cannot help but wonder
if this is the same papa porn...>>>?
It was posted:
John Weatherly , September 02, 2001; 04:30 A.M.
This is not Porn at all. Remember, only the offensive get offended.
Beautiful composition. Bravo!
Am I wrong?
I think it is another John Weatherly, as the John Weatherly connected
to that comment lives in Southern California.
It would have been nice, however, that you warn us all ahead of time
that the picture we would be viewing was so graphic in nature, dontcha
think?
|
Elaine has just proved once again that she doesn't think.
Several years ago, I posted a link to a page on which a "Christian "
who was posing nude" was being interviewed, critiqued, debated (??)
whatever. It never occurred to me that a few hundred ADULTS (in here)
would think anything negative about a naked female breast.
Elaine went through the ROOF about me "posting a link to a porn
site."
Now SHE posts this!!
It goes right back to my observation a couple of years ago.
Elaine makes all the declarations about "The Rules" she has invented
in her mind.
If YOU or I ______, Elaine is LIVID with anger and writes a long list
of ugly adjectives about you/me.
But then SHE posts this. Since it's Elaine, it's supposed to be
"ok."
It's not ok.. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:02 am Post subject: Re: What is this? |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:26:26 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 18, 11:59 am, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
I came across this 'site' and jw is mentioned in the writeup.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=308079
Judging from the 'nature of the pictures', one cannot help but wonder
if this is the same papa porn...>>>?
It was posted:
John Weatherly , September 02, 2001; 04:30 A.M.
This is not Porn at all. Remember, only the offensive get offended.
Beautiful composition. Bravo!
Am I wrong?
I think it is another John Weatherly, as the John Weatherly connected
to that comment lives in Southern California.
It would have been nice, however, that you warn us all ahead of time
that the picture we would be viewing was so graphic in nature, dontcha
think?
|
I DO wonder why Elaine feels compelled to
1 go looking for this sort of stuff
2 post such when she finds it.
Do I hear a "2nd" when I say "hypocrite!"
Elaine, you are pathological.
You give ZERO credit for the good I do; but anything you can TWEAK
into something BAD, "that's John!"
You even did a search on the web a few years ago for ANYONE with
the initials "JW." You assumed that-- whether in Germany or in New
Zealand, if the initials were "JW", it was me.
Any number of people told you, "Elaine, that's not rational." You
weren't listening.
Your hate is not a pretty thing.
And you're only hurting YOU. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: What is this? |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:26:26 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 18, 11:59 am, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
I came across this 'site' and jw is mentioned in the writeup.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=308079
Judging from the 'nature of the pictures', one cannot help but wonder
if this is the same papa porn...>>>?
It was posted:
John Weatherly , September 02, 2001; 04:30 A.M.
This is not Porn at all. Remember, only the offensive get offended.
Beautiful composition. Bravo!
Am I wrong?
I think it is another John Weatherly, as the John Weatherly connected
to that comment lives in Southern California.
It would have been nice, however, that you warn us all ahead of time
that the picture we would be viewing was so graphic in nature, dontcha
think?
|
I never thought of that. Sorry. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: What is this? |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:59:50 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Elaine makes all the declarations about "The Rules" she has invented
in her mind.
|
whatever you claim, short bus... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:08 am Post subject: Re: What is this? |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:54:58 -0400, DOC <NOSPAM@nospam> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:59:50 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
Elaine makes all the declarations about "The Rules" she has invented
in her mind.
whatever you claim, short bus...
|
Honey, I'm not the only one who objected to your link.
john w |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
